I've repeatedly tried to use in-ears over the years, as over-ears take too much space in my cabin luggage, but hated each and any model/make when walking or running because of the mechanical noise transmitted via the bone system. I've bought me a B&W C5 S2 after the shop staff at the airport surprisingly remarked the importance of a thorough listening test before any purchase, which is nothing new to me, though not quite what airport shops have been great at, ever.
I'm surprised by the fact that no one realized how these are possibly the only in-ears immune to body-induced low-end thump caused by canal occlusion, thanks to their semi-open design.
The less-than-obvious lack of side-effect was present also in the original C5, to tell the whole story, but I found it a tad too bass-heavy for what I listen to, and it never made into my options.
It's not that easy, I've been trained in double bass in my prime, and worked a concert sound engineering career for most of my life, whichmeans too much low-end is not a godsend, but quite the opposite.
Compared to the original version, I've found these C5 Series 2 much more correct, and (as with all in-ears) their low-end response can be further trimmed down with adjusting the insertion by a fraction of millimeter, and by an informed, trial-and-error choice in the size of the silicone tips.
I'm probably not alone in this, but I'm aware that my left and right ear canals have slightly different sizes. My audiologist says it happens to many others, as symetry in human body just doesn't exist per se.
After her advice, I realized that choosing tips of different sizes between left and right units can at the same time can and does adjust both the fit and the low-end response. Looser means lighter, in low-end department of the spectrum, and low-end hardly has any direction on reproduced sound if ambience is nilled (like with headphones), hence the possible trade-off.
It works smooth as candy, and i couldn't ask for more at any price, in all honesty: I don't miss my P7s or P5s impact and detail when I'm packing slim for flying any longer, and I'm free to choose whatever I feel like listening, from Renaissance to Deep House, from Chamber to Glitch, from Hard-Bop to Bluegrass, from Metal to Folk, without having to swallow the unrealistic boost of the previous version. Oh, and I can walk at any pace, without having to mimic the tempo in the recording in quarters, triplets, sixteenths or what!
I'm surprised by the fact that no one realized how these are possibly the only in-ears immune to body-induced low-end thump caused by canal occlusion, thanks to their semi-open design.
The less-than-obvious lack of side-effect was present also in the original C5, to tell the whole story, but I found it a tad too bass-heavy for what I listen to, and it never made into my options.
It's not that easy, I've been trained in double bass in my prime, and worked a concert sound engineering career for most of my life, whichmeans too much low-end is not a godsend, but quite the opposite.
Compared to the original version, I've found these C5 Series 2 much more correct, and (as with all in-ears) their low-end response can be further trimmed down with adjusting the insertion by a fraction of millimeter, and by an informed, trial-and-error choice in the size of the silicone tips.
I'm probably not alone in this, but I'm aware that my left and right ear canals have slightly different sizes. My audiologist says it happens to many others, as symetry in human body just doesn't exist per se.
After her advice, I realized that choosing tips of different sizes between left and right units can at the same time can and does adjust both the fit and the low-end response. Looser means lighter, in low-end department of the spectrum, and low-end hardly has any direction on reproduced sound if ambience is nilled (like with headphones), hence the possible trade-off.
It works smooth as candy, and i couldn't ask for more at any price, in all honesty: I don't miss my P7s or P5s impact and detail when I'm packing slim for flying any longer, and I'm free to choose whatever I feel like listening, from Renaissance to Deep House, from Chamber to Glitch, from Hard-Bop to Bluegrass, from Metal to Folk, without having to swallow the unrealistic boost of the previous version. Oh, and I can walk at any pace, without having to mimic the tempo in the recording in quarters, triplets, sixteenths or what!
I have a pair of these & think they're a bit underrated on Head-Fi. They have a real 'speaker-like', open sound to them not common with iem's & are obviously tuned to use with an iDevice when out-&-about where a slightly elevated bass is useful. I have other iems I use with a dedicated DAP, but these are my go-to for use on the move with my phone.
Know what you mean about the remote feeling a bit flimsy, but I actually like the shape - really helps with being able to operate it without having to look down.
Great to see them reviewed.