You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Reviews by ahammedsojib
Filters
Show only:
Loading…
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Descent build quality ( that is made of polycarbonate and aluminum alloy)
~ Traditional bullet like shape shell design ( which is very light weight)
~ Comfortable to wear for a long time without any pain. ( For this it will be more suitable for many)
~ Good bass response & safe treble performance.
~ very lush midrange tonality.
~ Traditional bullet like shape shell design ( which is very light weight)
~ Comfortable to wear for a long time without any pain. ( For this it will be more suitable for many)
~ Good bass response & safe treble performance.
~ very lush midrange tonality.
Cons: ~ Average isolation.
~ Staging needed to be wider.
~ Not suitable for the instrument's heavy genre.
~ Separation & layering needed to be better.
~ Average technical performance.
~ Stock eartips aren't good ( eartips rolling must)
~ Many may consider this fixed cable as a problem. ( subjective )
~ Staging needed to be wider.
~ Not suitable for the instrument's heavy genre.
~ Separation & layering needed to be better.
~ Average technical performance.
~ Stock eartips aren't good ( eartips rolling must)
~ Many may consider this fixed cable as a problem. ( subjective )
★ Introduction :-
Tanchjim is a well-known name in the international earphone market. Like other brands, the reputation of Tanchjim's products is quite high. But the topic of today's review is the Tanchjim tanya dsp which is one of the low priced earphones in tanchjim's lineup, currently priced between $20 - $24 so I think it will be on the wish list of many.
★Build & Comfort :-
It can be said that the build quality of the
earphone was decent. The upper part of its shell is made of aluminum alloy and
the front part with the nozzle is made of
polycarbonate and the rear side of the IEM is semi open back type design and this bullet-like shape earphone
was very light weight and comfortable, so there is no possibility of ear heaviness or ear pain even if used for a long time and its 4N oxygen-free non-detachable copper cable isn't too bad. Kevlar shaft core and Litz structure type coating is provided due to which the cable is very soft, durable & tangle free. There is one button microphone with the cable which will give descent performance in case of phone call. But since this is a low-cost earphone, the accessories that came with it were also of very average quality. Especially the eartips that came with it were not very good. So it would be advisable to use Spinfit's cp100+ or cp145 with it. I used cp145 with it throughout my review which gave better results.
★ Box content at a glance :-
1. Tanya dsp earphone.
2. Two different sizes of gray color wide and narrow bored eartips.
3. Simple carrying pouch.
4. 10 pairs of extra backup filters.
5. Some extra documentation including warranty card.
★Specifications:-
# Driver: 7 mm micro dynamic driver
# Impedance: 16 ohms
# Frequency response: 20Hz - 42kHz
# Sensitivity: 112dB @ 1kHz
# Cable (non-detachable): Litz oxygen-free copper wire, USB type-C
Now Let's talk about the sound ……....
★ Bass :-
The bass section of the earphone is one
of its good points. It has a little boost of mid bass due to which the thump of mid
bass hits deep into the ear and at the same time the rumble of sub bass is also available. Drum's pedal's high hat, bass guitar's notes sound a bit serious. But the quantity was more than the quality of mid bass. Honestly, if the texture & depth of the bass could have been better, then the bass heavy genre would have been more enjoyable. But those who think bass is more important, it will not be too bad, they will enjoy it, can be said without any doubt.
★ Mids :-
The mids of this earphone will be its
strongest part. Its male vocal & female vocal are both more commendable but
the female vocal was superb. The mids section has a slight warmth & relaxing
feel which is ideal for long listening sessions. Hopefully those who are mids
lovers will have a lot of fun using it. For example, I enjoyed the mids of this
earphone a lot when I was listening to a
track of /Indie genre - "good company".
★ Treble :-
Treble was a bit on the brighter side, on
the other hand the presence of the treble region has a noticeable rise in the upper mids, which makes the sound quality of vocals and some engagement of instruments more engaging. However, although the treble is a bit bright, I did not find any distortion in the treble section. In the treble section, you can hear the response of all the instruments playing, and at the same time, the treble was sparkling and noticeable, but there is not much energy in the treble. I believe there will be no happiness.
★ Technicalities :-
Tanya dsp is a very low price set so one cannot expect good technical performance from it and this is no exception. Its sound stage was narrow staging & depth, height & weight was poor. Besides, its dynamic punch was very compressed and imaging was also not very good so gamers will not get a very good result from here during gaming. The main reason for such average technicalities is that the SNR or signal-to-noise ratio of cable with built-in DAC is very high. As a result, the dynamic range is greatly reduced and all
instruments seem to play at the same
volume.
★ Conclusion :-
Tanya dsp is a solid choice of normal users. Although it has some shortcomings as an affordable price category earphones, on the other hand it has several strengths. I believe that the slightly harman target sound will be liked by the low price. So for those who are looking for an earphone for regular usage and whose main priority is listening to music and making phone calls (the earphone has one button microphone with the cable), it can be a very good option at a low price. So those who are thinking about buying a type c earphone can keep this in mind. For the convenience of your purchase,
I have given the link below.......
https://www.linsoul.com/products/tanchjim-tanya?variant=43872256295129 (link is not affiliated)
Tanchjim is a well-known name in the international earphone market. Like other brands, the reputation of Tanchjim's products is quite high. But the topic of today's review is the Tanchjim tanya dsp which is one of the low priced earphones in tanchjim's lineup, currently priced between $20 - $24 so I think it will be on the wish list of many.



★Build & Comfort :-
It can be said that the build quality of the
earphone was decent. The upper part of its shell is made of aluminum alloy and
the front part with the nozzle is made of
polycarbonate and the rear side of the IEM is semi open back type design and this bullet-like shape earphone
was very light weight and comfortable, so there is no possibility of ear heaviness or ear pain even if used for a long time and its 4N oxygen-free non-detachable copper cable isn't too bad. Kevlar shaft core and Litz structure type coating is provided due to which the cable is very soft, durable & tangle free. There is one button microphone with the cable which will give descent performance in case of phone call. But since this is a low-cost earphone, the accessories that came with it were also of very average quality. Especially the eartips that came with it were not very good. So it would be advisable to use Spinfit's cp100+ or cp145 with it. I used cp145 with it throughout my review which gave better results.

★ Box content at a glance :-
1. Tanya dsp earphone.
2. Two different sizes of gray color wide and narrow bored eartips.
3. Simple carrying pouch.
4. 10 pairs of extra backup filters.
5. Some extra documentation including warranty card.

★Specifications:-
# Driver: 7 mm micro dynamic driver
# Impedance: 16 ohms
# Frequency response: 20Hz - 42kHz
# Sensitivity: 112dB @ 1kHz
# Cable (non-detachable): Litz oxygen-free copper wire, USB type-C

Now Let's talk about the sound ……....
★ Bass :-
The bass section of the earphone is one
of its good points. It has a little boost of mid bass due to which the thump of mid
bass hits deep into the ear and at the same time the rumble of sub bass is also available. Drum's pedal's high hat, bass guitar's notes sound a bit serious. But the quantity was more than the quality of mid bass. Honestly, if the texture & depth of the bass could have been better, then the bass heavy genre would have been more enjoyable. But those who think bass is more important, it will not be too bad, they will enjoy it, can be said without any doubt.
★ Mids :-
The mids of this earphone will be its
strongest part. Its male vocal & female vocal are both more commendable but
the female vocal was superb. The mids section has a slight warmth & relaxing
feel which is ideal for long listening sessions. Hopefully those who are mids
lovers will have a lot of fun using it. For example, I enjoyed the mids of this
earphone a lot when I was listening to a
track of /Indie genre - "good company".
★ Treble :-
Treble was a bit on the brighter side, on
the other hand the presence of the treble region has a noticeable rise in the upper mids, which makes the sound quality of vocals and some engagement of instruments more engaging. However, although the treble is a bit bright, I did not find any distortion in the treble section. In the treble section, you can hear the response of all the instruments playing, and at the same time, the treble was sparkling and noticeable, but there is not much energy in the treble. I believe there will be no happiness.

★ Technicalities :-
Tanya dsp is a very low price set so one cannot expect good technical performance from it and this is no exception. Its sound stage was narrow staging & depth, height & weight was poor. Besides, its dynamic punch was very compressed and imaging was also not very good so gamers will not get a very good result from here during gaming. The main reason for such average technicalities is that the SNR or signal-to-noise ratio of cable with built-in DAC is very high. As a result, the dynamic range is greatly reduced and all
instruments seem to play at the same
volume.

★ Conclusion :-
Tanya dsp is a solid choice of normal users. Although it has some shortcomings as an affordable price category earphones, on the other hand it has several strengths. I believe that the slightly harman target sound will be liked by the low price. So for those who are looking for an earphone for regular usage and whose main priority is listening to music and making phone calls (the earphone has one button microphone with the cable), it can be a very good option at a low price. So those who are thinking about buying a type c earphone can keep this in mind. For the convenience of your purchase,
I have given the link below.......

https://www.linsoul.com/products/tanchjim-tanya?variant=43872256295129 (link is not affiliated)
Attachments
Last edited:
View previous replies…

ahammedsojib
@RK Turan 

M
Md Ismail Hossain
I recommended this one to my friends. He doesn't have 3.5mm port. He was looking for type c alternative.

ahammedsojib
@Md Ismail Hossain it will be a good choice
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Light weight and comfortable shell.
~ Slightly warm and musical midrange tonality.
~ Fatigue free smooth treble performance.
~ Separation , and staging is fairly good in the price category.
~ It gives overall admirable sound performance considering the price point.
~ Slightly warm and musical midrange tonality.
~ Fatigue free smooth treble performance.
~ Separation , and staging is fairly good in the price category.
~ It gives overall admirable sound performance considering the price point.
Cons: ~ Somewhat thin midrange tonality. (common problem of harman target or "V" shape tuning)
~ not the best detail retrieval set.
~ lacks airy extension of treble.
~ Bass lacks deep impact and lacks texture.
~ average technical performance.
~ not the best detail retrieval set.
~ lacks airy extension of treble.
~ Bass lacks deep impact and lacks texture.
~ average technical performance.
★ Introduction :-
Simgot is a well-known name in the audio marketplace, although simgot is a Chinese brand, they have launched several products in the market, which has also increased their reputation to a large extent. Their recently launched EA500 IEM created a lot of hype and has been accepted as a true value for money device. However, the topic of today's review is Simgot EW100P, which is a very low budget category ($20) earphone.
★ Note :-
EW 100P being a very low price category's earphone, its stock eartips are not very convenient, so I have used final audio E-series black eartips in my full review, which gave better sound with this earphone. Also, if you want, you can use spinfit w1 eartips. So eartips rolling must for better result.
★ Build & comfort :-
The build quality of Simgot EW 100P is nothing extraordinary, its shell is made of fully polycarbonate and the gold plate area with the branding of Simgot at the back is made of aluminum alloy only. However, the whole shell has been given a glossy finish, which generally looks a bit attractive, but when you hold it in your hand, it gives a cheap feeling. However, the entire IEM shell is made of polycarbonate and is very light weight, so it keep in ear for long time . By doing this, there is no chance of any ear problem at all. On the other hand, to say something about the stock cable & eartips that come with it, I will say that the eartips that comes are average grade, but its stock cable is quite commendable because the cable is silver foil shielded detachable woven copper cable which is pretty good considering the price point.
Although the structure of the cable is a bit thin, but the cable does not create unwanted microphonics and I believe that the cable will last for a long time. Besides, the 0.78mm 2 pin connector of the cable is very strongly attached to the IEM, even if you hold the connector point of the cable and pull it lightly, it is not possible to open it easily from IEM and that is very good thing.
★ Box content at a glance :-
1. A pair of Ew100p IEM.
2. Silver foil cable.
3. 3 pairs of different size of white colour eartips.
4. A user manual.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver : 10mm high-performance dual-cavity dynamic driver ( LCP diaphragms)
~ Impedance: 32 ohm
~ Sensitivity: 122dB/Vrms (@1kHz)
~ Distortion ratio: THD<1%(@1kHz)
~ Frequency response: 5Hz-45kHz
~ Connector: 2-pin 0.78mm
★ Sound Impression :-
Ew 100p basically harman target 2016's sound signature and sound is produced with 2 Lcp dynamic drivers in the device, two drivers handle full frequency of sound together. However, despite harman target tuning, the bass section of the device was relatively weak, which will disappoint many bass head people. For your convenience, I have given the graph below, which I think will give you a better idea.
Credit : audio discourse
★ Now at first start the bass......
★ Bass :-
The bass section of the device is not so strong because the deep impact of the mid bass punch cannot be felt. However, the sub bass has a good weight & height due to which a decent rumble is obtained. At the same time, the notes of the high hat of drum pedal & bass guitar are not so precise, but their existence can be found. So I used final e-series black tips with this IEM which boosted up the mid bass of this set a bit and made the bass more enjoyable.
★ Mids :-
The IEM's midrange tonality was well balanced and neutral, though naturally a bit forward. The midrange has a nice body and a decent amount of texture, but the surprising thing was that the mids were quite clean, as a result of which the male & female vocals were able to show off their crafting quite nicely. Although its mids will not be the best or I will not say, but it has given quite satisfactory results compared to other competitors in the 20$ price category, on the other hand, the mids were slightly thin, which is a common problem of harman target tuning. All in all, I think the mids or vocal section will not make the listeners very unhappy.
★ Treble :-
Treble is nothing extraordinary but the delivery of treble can be said to be quite good. Its dual dd driver handles treble fairly well. Although the treble is not very detailed, there is no unwanted harshness or sharpness found here, but little amount of sparkle was there, so I got a modarate texture that naturally represents the quality of the treble. Although there is some jitter in the higher frequency which I would say is normal considering the price I think overall treble performance can be enjoyed fairly but treble head people will not be satisfied with it I am pretty sure.
★ Technicalities :-
Technical performance was similar to others of 20$ but it gives some better. On the one hand, the imaging was good. and the resolution and clarity were fairly accurate. It is convenient for gaming but not for competitive gaming. so it is not for those who are looking for earphones for playing competitive games, because the depth and height of the stage is ok, so the precise positioning of the opponent is not visible of action moment during gaming. Moreover, the separation & layering was also of mediocre level, so there is nothing special to say about the technicality of this set.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give it


Mids : 3.8/5
Bass : 3.2/5
Treble : 4/5
technicalities : 4/5
★ Conclusion :-
Simgot Ew 100p can be a good option considering the price for those who are looking for IEM under 20$ just for music listening. But the device has some lacks which I have already discussed, if someone likes its harman target sound signature and wants a daily use earphone with a budget around 20$ then this would be a solid recommendation from my side.
I have provided the purchase link below for your convenience.......
https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p (link isn’t affiliated)


Simgot is a well-known name in the audio marketplace, although simgot is a Chinese brand, they have launched several products in the market, which has also increased their reputation to a large extent. Their recently launched EA500 IEM created a lot of hype and has been accepted as a true value for money device. However, the topic of today's review is Simgot EW100P, which is a very low budget category ($20) earphone.
★ Note :-
EW 100P being a very low price category's earphone, its stock eartips are not very convenient, so I have used final audio E-series black eartips in my full review, which gave better sound with this earphone. Also, if you want, you can use spinfit w1 eartips. So eartips rolling must for better result.

★ Build & comfort :-
The build quality of Simgot EW 100P is nothing extraordinary, its shell is made of fully polycarbonate and the gold plate area with the branding of Simgot at the back is made of aluminum alloy only. However, the whole shell has been given a glossy finish, which generally looks a bit attractive, but when you hold it in your hand, it gives a cheap feeling. However, the entire IEM shell is made of polycarbonate and is very light weight, so it keep in ear for long time . By doing this, there is no chance of any ear problem at all. On the other hand, to say something about the stock cable & eartips that come with it, I will say that the eartips that comes are average grade, but its stock cable is quite commendable because the cable is silver foil shielded detachable woven copper cable which is pretty good considering the price point.
Although the structure of the cable is a bit thin, but the cable does not create unwanted microphonics and I believe that the cable will last for a long time. Besides, the 0.78mm 2 pin connector of the cable is very strongly attached to the IEM, even if you hold the connector point of the cable and pull it lightly, it is not possible to open it easily from IEM and that is very good thing.

★ Box content at a glance :-

1. A pair of Ew100p IEM.
2. Silver foil cable.
3. 3 pairs of different size of white colour eartips.
4. A user manual.

★ Specifications :-
~ Driver : 10mm high-performance dual-cavity dynamic driver ( LCP diaphragms)
~ Impedance: 32 ohm
~ Sensitivity: 122dB/Vrms (@1kHz)
~ Distortion ratio: THD<1%(@1kHz)
~ Frequency response: 5Hz-45kHz
~ Connector: 2-pin 0.78mm
★ Sound Impression :-
Ew 100p basically harman target 2016's sound signature and sound is produced with 2 Lcp dynamic drivers in the device, two drivers handle full frequency of sound together. However, despite harman target tuning, the bass section of the device was relatively weak, which will disappoint many bass head people. For your convenience, I have given the graph below, which I think will give you a better idea.

Credit : audio discourse
★ Now at first start the bass......
★ Bass :-
The bass section of the device is not so strong because the deep impact of the mid bass punch cannot be felt. However, the sub bass has a good weight & height due to which a decent rumble is obtained. At the same time, the notes of the high hat of drum pedal & bass guitar are not so precise, but their existence can be found. So I used final e-series black tips with this IEM which boosted up the mid bass of this set a bit and made the bass more enjoyable.

★ Mids :-
The IEM's midrange tonality was well balanced and neutral, though naturally a bit forward. The midrange has a nice body and a decent amount of texture, but the surprising thing was that the mids were quite clean, as a result of which the male & female vocals were able to show off their crafting quite nicely. Although its mids will not be the best or I will not say, but it has given quite satisfactory results compared to other competitors in the 20$ price category, on the other hand, the mids were slightly thin, which is a common problem of harman target tuning. All in all, I think the mids or vocal section will not make the listeners very unhappy.

★ Treble :-
Treble is nothing extraordinary but the delivery of treble can be said to be quite good. Its dual dd driver handles treble fairly well. Although the treble is not very detailed, there is no unwanted harshness or sharpness found here, but little amount of sparkle was there, so I got a modarate texture that naturally represents the quality of the treble. Although there is some jitter in the higher frequency which I would say is normal considering the price I think overall treble performance can be enjoyed fairly but treble head people will not be satisfied with it I am pretty sure.

★ Technicalities :-
Technical performance was similar to others of 20$ but it gives some better. On the one hand, the imaging was good. and the resolution and clarity were fairly accurate. It is convenient for gaming but not for competitive gaming. so it is not for those who are looking for earphones for playing competitive games, because the depth and height of the stage is ok, so the precise positioning of the opponent is not visible of action moment during gaming. Moreover, the separation & layering was also of mediocre level, so there is nothing special to say about the technicality of this set.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give it



Mids : 3.8/5
Bass : 3.2/5
Treble : 4/5
technicalities : 4/5
★ Conclusion :-
Simgot Ew 100p can be a good option considering the price for those who are looking for IEM under 20$ just for music listening. But the device has some lacks which I have already discussed, if someone likes its harman target sound signature and wants a daily use earphone with a budget around 20$ then this would be a solid recommendation from my side.
I have provided the purchase link below for your convenience.......

https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-ew100p (link isn’t affiliated)




Last edited:

ahammedsojib
@Nazimshawon You're right 

M
Md Ismail Hossain
I'll recommend it for my friends
Most of them prefer fun sound and affordable price
Most of them prefer fun sound and affordable price

RK Turan
I should've tried it out ig
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Comfortable & light weight polycarbonate shell
~ good sub bass rumble mid bass punch
~ warm & engaging "V" shape tuning
~ Non fatiguing & safe treble performance for the price
~ Satisfactory stock cable and accessories
~ An ideal dd set for beginners
~ good sub bass rumble mid bass punch
~ warm & engaging "V" shape tuning
~ Non fatiguing & safe treble performance for the price
~ Satisfactory stock cable and accessories
~ An ideal dd set for beginners
Cons: ~ Depth of the stage could have been better
~ Avarage technicalities
~ Treble extension could have been thicker rather than smooth
~ IEMs Shell feels a bit cheap (subjective)
~ Avarage technicalities
~ Treble extension could have been thicker rather than smooth
~ IEMs Shell feels a bit cheap (subjective)
★ Introduction : -
Hidizs is a well-known name in the chifi
world. They are quite popular in making
portable audio gear. They have some hit
products which have played a helpful
role in increasing their reputation.
Portable music players include Ap80,
Ap80 pro & pro X which have received
more acceptance among audiophile
persons, amplifiers like S9, S9 pro, S8,
XO are no exception, besides they have
some popular IEMs like - Mermaid MS1,
MS2, The recently discussed Planar IEM
MP145 along with MS3, MS4, MD4 has
gained a lot of reputation. But the topic
of today's review is Hidizs
MS1Galaxy which is a dual dd IEM of
Hidizs which is very affordable price
category.
# Disclaimer :- I have no financial agreement with "Hidizs" for this review, so my opinion is completely personal.
★ Looks & Design :-
The design of the IEM was also very nice looking , the device is available in 4 different color variants namely - black, red, blue & transparent color (Each color has L, R marking on the front of the earphone) . The single dynamic driver of 10.2mm inside can be seen from the front of each color variant and at the back all of them have the usual hidizs branding. My unit is of blue colour but personally I like the transparent color more.
★ Build & Comfort :-
Hidizs MS1 Galaxy is an entry level IEM so I don't expect anything extraordinary from its build quality. It also feels like all other IEMs in the sub 20$ price category. However, according to hidizs, they claim to have used High-Density German Makrolon Resin to make the shell of the earphone. Although the build doesn't seem very shaky to me, I believe it will support you for a long time if you use it with care. But the shell of this IEM is very light, if the ears are fit with the right size eartips, then it will not feel that there is any IEM in the ears. So I am sure about this matter that no one will face any problem with ear fit. Moreover, out of the box there are a few pairs of eartips of different sizes which I found quite usable. On the other hand, not to mention the stock cable, it was so nice that I couldn't even imagine that such a budget earphone would come with Silver-Plated Oxygen-Free 2 core braided copper cable.
★ Box content at a glance
:-
1. A pair of hidizs ms1 galaxy IEMs
2. Three pairs of eartips of different sizes
3. A decent 3.5mm silver-plated stock cable
4. Warranty card and some extra paperwork
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver : 10.2mm high-performance single dd- circuit magnetic dynamic driver (PU+PEEK composite diaphragm)
~ Impedance: 32 ohm
~ Sensitivity: 108dB
~ Distortion ratio: less than 0.05%
~ Frequency response: 20Hz-40kHz
~ Connector: 2-pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type: Oxygen-free, silver-plated copper cable with 3.5mm gold plated L shape jack
# All the audio gear items I used during the review are –
1. ASTELL & KERN SP1000M ( 3.5 & 2.5mm both)
2.Quloos Mc01 ( 3.5 & 4.4mm both)
3.@Tanchjm space lite
I also tested these by plugging them into the earphone port of my redmi note 12 smartphone.
# Ms1 galaxy is a set of 32ohm impedance whose sensitivity level is 108db so no powerful amplification is needed to run it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes a bit better sounding.
★ Sound impression :-
MS1 Galaxy is basically a set of "V" shape tuned set that is pocket friendly. The internal configuration of this set has single dynamic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency. The tuning of this IEM is fun & engaging, the tonality is warm and lush in a word. There is no extra emphasis on any frequency due to which there is no listening fatigue when listening for a long time which seems to be a very positive aspect according to this price. I have used stock eartips as well as aftermarket eartips during the sound testing period and it makes a good difference between fit, comfort and sound. I used Cp145 & Cp100+ eartips which gave me good experience. So if anyone has such eartips, then you can change the tips and hopefully you will be benefited. However, stock eartips do not give very bad performance, so listening can be done with them in the initial condition. Since this is a set of "V" shape tuning, you can understand that there is more bass and treble emphasis and the mids will be a little behind, so there is no exception here. Below is a sample image of frequency response for your understanding, hopefully you will get a good idea.
Credit :- cqtek
# Now I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the big strength Low end of this set, i.e. the bass......
★ The Bass :-
Bass section is a strong point of this IEM, the extension from sub bass to mid bass was very good so both sub bass rumble and mid bass punch can be heard very well. With the extreme punch of mid bass, it is able to create a fairly clear environment where the attack of the bass is strong but does not hamper any other sound frequency. Therefore, in the bass section, the instruments with the kick of the bass guitar, drum pedal, whose impact is very deep, but the notes were clear. However, in most of the tracks, I have seen the bass texture decrease, which is normal for such an earphone. But the warm frenzy that the bass offers will be more acceptable to many bass lovers.
★ The Mids :-
Mid range is not too bad for me although its position is a bit towards the back. However, the mids seem a little recessed to me, so the mid section is a bit thinner side, that is, the contrast of the singer's voice has deviated, as a result, the natural presentation of the vocal has been disturbed. However, it can be said that the throat tone, breath and movement of male & female vocal were fairly good, but the male vocal seemed to be a little better than the female vocal. On the other hand, the warm invitation of the entire mids combined with the sustain gives a smooth presentation that doesn't sound bad. So despite being a bit bass heavy, there is not much room for complaints about the mids.
★ The Treble :-
I am a bit unhappy with the treble performance because the treble is somewhat smooth. This smoothening thing hampers the full body of the treble a little so that the sparkle of the treble is not felt in the ear and at the same time the vibrant image of the string instruments of the guitar is not blown. However, this type of treble only bothers treble head people, but on the other hand, treble sensitive people will get more acceptance. By doing this, those who are used to listening more to instrument heavy genre like hard rock or heavy metal will get okay type performance from here.However, since there is not much boost in the treble section, I did not notice any unwanted harshness or shoutyness, the overall smooth treble delivery was as a result, I did not like the lack of engagement in the treble region.
★ Technicalities :-
The staging & imaging of the IEM was the same as the others in this price category, but could not offer anything special. The sound stage was a little bigger than the average, i mean out of the head type presentation. This made the notes playing in the stage come together and limit the feeling of expansion on the upper side. This made the stage's wideness & depth decrease a little, making the stage seem small. Separation & layering in instrument heavy genres was fairly standard. I got 2D effect in its staging , at the same time imaging can be called average, as a result gaming will not very good naturally. When I used it while playing a bullet force game I had difficulty understanding the positioning of the opponent At the same time, I cannot locate the direction of the gun shot precisely, so it will not be an ideal choice for gaming. So if gaming is priority, it is better to go to other options.
# Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give it

Bass : 4.2/5
Mids : 3.8/5
Treble : 3.5/5
Technicalities : 3/5
★ Comparison :-
~ Ms1 galaxy Vs Ew100p(20$) ~
The sound signature of the Simgot Ew100p is good to that of the ms1 galaxy in many ways. Although Ew100p is priced at 20$ but ms1 galaxy is priced between 16-17$ but it has some strengths which are better than Ew100p in some aspects despite the price being slightly lower. Now if I discuss the sound side by side with Ew100p then ms1 galaxy will advance in some aspects, the most advanced in the bass section because the big down side of ew100p was mid bass section on the other hand bass section is a strong part of ms1 galaxy, sub bass & mid bass both were better compared to Ew100. On the other hand, mids were slightly better than ms1 galaxy. However, it cannot be called the most fuller mids, the presentation is slightly recessed, but it will be a little ahead of the Ew100p. However, the mids presentation of ew100p was quite clean & crispy compared to ms1 galaxy . Now there is treble part where none of the two sets can deliver outstanding performance. If, i talk about the treble of Ew100p, then I will say that its treble was slightly dark type, besides, its treble may be considered a bit dry by many people, but it is foolish to think so. It seems to have somesparkle and accuracy than ms1 galaxy . On the other hand, it can be said that the treble part of Ms1 galaxy was a bit smooth where the treble is not very harmonious because this smooth effect presented the whole treble in a different form where there was no natural presentation at all at the same time of all the instruments that play in the treble section. There is a lack of quality which is mainly organized due to lack of airy extension. However, treble sensitive people will like Ms1 Galaxy more, while those who like treble will not find any of the two sets very ideal but Ew100p will be slightly ahead of ms1 galaxy in treble section . On the other hand, staging, imaging & separation were average of both. In this case, none of the two can give best performance, so there is not much discussion about them in my opinion.
~ Ms1 galaxy vs Tinhifi C0 Elf (detachable version) ~
Elf C0 is another offering in 20$ price category, it is also open back single dd IEM with "V"shape tuning. This set is eartips sensitive to a large extent, at the same time its treble is very bright, which creates fatigue in case of long time listening on the other hand mids are more recessed, moreover, it takes more power to drive compared to Ms1 galaxy and the lack of resolution is also high. On the other hand Ms1 galaxy is very easy to drive set. So in my opinion Ms1 galaxy is more suitable for daily usage.
★ Conclusion :-
Sub 20$ price category is very competitive, there are various chifi brands offering in this category. Since then, I have personally used several IEMs, so considering all aspects, the two sets seem to be quite good to me, so I presented the two sets in a side by side comparison review so that it is convenient for you to make a purchase decision. Now talking about who will buy this earphone? It can be an ideal choice for those who are new to join this hobby and whose budget is under 20$ and looking for fun "v" shape sounding IEM and treble sensitive at the same time. I would recommend buying it if you are not used to such a sound signature.
I have provided the purchase link below for your convenience
https://www.hidizs.net/products/hidizs-ms1-galaxy-dynamic-driver-in-ear-monitors ( link is not affiliated)
Hidizs is a well-known name in the chifi
world. They are quite popular in making
portable audio gear. They have some hit
products which have played a helpful
role in increasing their reputation.
Portable music players include Ap80,
Ap80 pro & pro X which have received
more acceptance among audiophile
persons, amplifiers like S9, S9 pro, S8,
XO are no exception, besides they have
some popular IEMs like - Mermaid MS1,
MS2, The recently discussed Planar IEM
MP145 along with MS3, MS4, MD4 has
gained a lot of reputation. But the topic
of today's review is Hidizs
MS1Galaxy which is a dual dd IEM of
Hidizs which is very affordable price
category.



# Disclaimer :- I have no financial agreement with "Hidizs" for this review, so my opinion is completely personal.
★ Looks & Design :-
The design of the IEM was also very nice looking , the device is available in 4 different color variants namely - black, red, blue & transparent color (Each color has L, R marking on the front of the earphone) . The single dynamic driver of 10.2mm inside can be seen from the front of each color variant and at the back all of them have the usual hidizs branding. My unit is of blue colour but personally I like the transparent color more.

★ Build & Comfort :-
Hidizs MS1 Galaxy is an entry level IEM so I don't expect anything extraordinary from its build quality. It also feels like all other IEMs in the sub 20$ price category. However, according to hidizs, they claim to have used High-Density German Makrolon Resin to make the shell of the earphone. Although the build doesn't seem very shaky to me, I believe it will support you for a long time if you use it with care. But the shell of this IEM is very light, if the ears are fit with the right size eartips, then it will not feel that there is any IEM in the ears. So I am sure about this matter that no one will face any problem with ear fit. Moreover, out of the box there are a few pairs of eartips of different sizes which I found quite usable. On the other hand, not to mention the stock cable, it was so nice that I couldn't even imagine that such a budget earphone would come with Silver-Plated Oxygen-Free 2 core braided copper cable.
★ Box content at a glance

1. A pair of hidizs ms1 galaxy IEMs
2. Three pairs of eartips of different sizes
3. A decent 3.5mm silver-plated stock cable
4. Warranty card and some extra paperwork

★ Specifications :-
~ Driver : 10.2mm high-performance single dd- circuit magnetic dynamic driver (PU+PEEK composite diaphragm)
~ Impedance: 32 ohm
~ Sensitivity: 108dB
~ Distortion ratio: less than 0.05%
~ Frequency response: 20Hz-40kHz
~ Connector: 2-pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type: Oxygen-free, silver-plated copper cable with 3.5mm gold plated L shape jack
# All the audio gear items I used during the review are –
1. ASTELL & KERN SP1000M ( 3.5 & 2.5mm both)
2.Quloos Mc01 ( 3.5 & 4.4mm both)
3.@Tanchjm space lite

I also tested these by plugging them into the earphone port of my redmi note 12 smartphone.
# Ms1 galaxy is a set of 32ohm impedance whose sensitivity level is 108db so no powerful amplification is needed to run it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes a bit better sounding.
★ Sound impression :-
MS1 Galaxy is basically a set of "V" shape tuned set that is pocket friendly. The internal configuration of this set has single dynamic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency. The tuning of this IEM is fun & engaging, the tonality is warm and lush in a word. There is no extra emphasis on any frequency due to which there is no listening fatigue when listening for a long time which seems to be a very positive aspect according to this price. I have used stock eartips as well as aftermarket eartips during the sound testing period and it makes a good difference between fit, comfort and sound. I used Cp145 & Cp100+ eartips which gave me good experience. So if anyone has such eartips, then you can change the tips and hopefully you will be benefited. However, stock eartips do not give very bad performance, so listening can be done with them in the initial condition. Since this is a set of "V" shape tuning, you can understand that there is more bass and treble emphasis and the mids will be a little behind, so there is no exception here. Below is a sample image of frequency response for your understanding, hopefully you will get a good idea.

Credit :- cqtek
# Now I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the big strength Low end of this set, i.e. the bass......
★ The Bass :-
Bass section is a strong point of this IEM, the extension from sub bass to mid bass was very good so both sub bass rumble and mid bass punch can be heard very well. With the extreme punch of mid bass, it is able to create a fairly clear environment where the attack of the bass is strong but does not hamper any other sound frequency. Therefore, in the bass section, the instruments with the kick of the bass guitar, drum pedal, whose impact is very deep, but the notes were clear. However, in most of the tracks, I have seen the bass texture decrease, which is normal for such an earphone. But the warm frenzy that the bass offers will be more acceptable to many bass lovers.
★ The Mids :-
Mid range is not too bad for me although its position is a bit towards the back. However, the mids seem a little recessed to me, so the mid section is a bit thinner side, that is, the contrast of the singer's voice has deviated, as a result, the natural presentation of the vocal has been disturbed. However, it can be said that the throat tone, breath and movement of male & female vocal were fairly good, but the male vocal seemed to be a little better than the female vocal. On the other hand, the warm invitation of the entire mids combined with the sustain gives a smooth presentation that doesn't sound bad. So despite being a bit bass heavy, there is not much room for complaints about the mids.

★ The Treble :-
I am a bit unhappy with the treble performance because the treble is somewhat smooth. This smoothening thing hampers the full body of the treble a little so that the sparkle of the treble is not felt in the ear and at the same time the vibrant image of the string instruments of the guitar is not blown. However, this type of treble only bothers treble head people, but on the other hand, treble sensitive people will get more acceptance. By doing this, those who are used to listening more to instrument heavy genre like hard rock or heavy metal will get okay type performance from here.However, since there is not much boost in the treble section, I did not notice any unwanted harshness or shoutyness, the overall smooth treble delivery was as a result, I did not like the lack of engagement in the treble region.
★ Technicalities :-
The staging & imaging of the IEM was the same as the others in this price category, but could not offer anything special. The sound stage was a little bigger than the average, i mean out of the head type presentation. This made the notes playing in the stage come together and limit the feeling of expansion on the upper side. This made the stage's wideness & depth decrease a little, making the stage seem small. Separation & layering in instrument heavy genres was fairly standard. I got 2D effect in its staging , at the same time imaging can be called average, as a result gaming will not very good naturally. When I used it while playing a bullet force game I had difficulty understanding the positioning of the opponent At the same time, I cannot locate the direction of the gun shot precisely, so it will not be an ideal choice for gaming. So if gaming is priority, it is better to go to other options.

# Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give it


Bass : 4.2/5
Mids : 3.8/5
Treble : 3.5/5
Technicalities : 3/5
★ Comparison :-
~ Ms1 galaxy Vs Ew100p(20$) ~
The sound signature of the Simgot Ew100p is good to that of the ms1 galaxy in many ways. Although Ew100p is priced at 20$ but ms1 galaxy is priced between 16-17$ but it has some strengths which are better than Ew100p in some aspects despite the price being slightly lower. Now if I discuss the sound side by side with Ew100p then ms1 galaxy will advance in some aspects, the most advanced in the bass section because the big down side of ew100p was mid bass section on the other hand bass section is a strong part of ms1 galaxy, sub bass & mid bass both were better compared to Ew100. On the other hand, mids were slightly better than ms1 galaxy. However, it cannot be called the most fuller mids, the presentation is slightly recessed, but it will be a little ahead of the Ew100p. However, the mids presentation of ew100p was quite clean & crispy compared to ms1 galaxy . Now there is treble part where none of the two sets can deliver outstanding performance. If, i talk about the treble of Ew100p, then I will say that its treble was slightly dark type, besides, its treble may be considered a bit dry by many people, but it is foolish to think so. It seems to have somesparkle and accuracy than ms1 galaxy . On the other hand, it can be said that the treble part of Ms1 galaxy was a bit smooth where the treble is not very harmonious because this smooth effect presented the whole treble in a different form where there was no natural presentation at all at the same time of all the instruments that play in the treble section. There is a lack of quality which is mainly organized due to lack of airy extension. However, treble sensitive people will like Ms1 Galaxy more, while those who like treble will not find any of the two sets very ideal but Ew100p will be slightly ahead of ms1 galaxy in treble section . On the other hand, staging, imaging & separation were average of both. In this case, none of the two can give best performance, so there is not much discussion about them in my opinion.

~ Ms1 galaxy vs Tinhifi C0 Elf (detachable version) ~
Elf C0 is another offering in 20$ price category, it is also open back single dd IEM with "V"shape tuning. This set is eartips sensitive to a large extent, at the same time its treble is very bright, which creates fatigue in case of long time listening on the other hand mids are more recessed, moreover, it takes more power to drive compared to Ms1 galaxy and the lack of resolution is also high. On the other hand Ms1 galaxy is very easy to drive set. So in my opinion Ms1 galaxy is more suitable for daily usage.

★ Conclusion :-
Sub 20$ price category is very competitive, there are various chifi brands offering in this category. Since then, I have personally used several IEMs, so considering all aspects, the two sets seem to be quite good to me, so I presented the two sets in a side by side comparison review so that it is convenient for you to make a purchase decision. Now talking about who will buy this earphone? It can be an ideal choice for those who are new to join this hobby and whose budget is under 20$ and looking for fun "v" shape sounding IEM and treble sensitive at the same time. I would recommend buying it if you are not used to such a sound signature.

I have provided the purchase link below for your convenience

https://www.hidizs.net/products/hidizs-ms1-galaxy-dynamic-driver-in-ear-monitors ( link is not affiliated)




RK Turan
Always excited to see new competitors on the market. Hope to see more from you brother.

ahammedsojib
@RK Turan sure bro

M
Md Ismail Hossain
Looks gorgeous for budget
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Durable build quality
~ Gives admirable power output in such a tiny form factor with minimal glare
~ almost clean, neutral and slightly colored sound
~ good resulation & transparency
~ very low background noise floor
~ no overheating issue in case of longer usage
~ good sound value for the price
~ Gives admirable power output in such a tiny form factor with minimal glare
~ almost clean, neutral and slightly colored sound
~ good resulation & transparency
~ very low background noise floor
~ no overheating issue in case of longer usage
~ good sound value for the price
Cons: ~ There is no physical volume control button and absence of specific led indicator
~ Technicalities could have been better
~ non detachable cable
~ no MQA certification
~ Only suitable for moderate power demanding IEMs
~ Technicalities could have been better
~ non detachable cable
~ no MQA certification
~ Only suitable for moderate power demanding IEMs
★Introduction :-
Tanchjim space lite is a dac dongle in very affordable price category ($45). Earlier tanchjim space dac dongle came in the market which showed good performance considering the price even though the device had 3.5 & 4.4 both output and also cost around 100$. But recently they have launched this space lite (3.5mm) in a very interesting price category ($45). I will try to highlight all aspects of the device in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how justified it is for the price.
# Disclaimer :-
I have no financial agreement with "Tanchjim Audio" for this review, so my opinion is completely personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
The packaging of the Dac amp was very minimalistic.
1. Tanchjim space dac amp
2 . Type c to Usb "A" adapter
3. Some extra paperworks
★ Specifications :-
Dac chip : High-Performance Cirrus logic CS43131
Port type : 3.5 Single-End
Input interface : USB - Type C
Frequency response : 6hz - 85 KHZ
Supports : PCM(32 Bit/768kHz) and Native DSD256
Noise Floor : 1uV
Dynamic - Range : 126 dB
Output Power : (105mw@16Ω & 98mw@32Ω)
Harmonic Distortion THD+N : 0.0003%
Power consumption : 0.5w
Output level : max 2Vrms
★ Design & Build Quality :-
Tanchjim space and space lite both have similar build material. TANCHJIM Space Lite dongle features a sleek and stylish design with a aluminum alloy frame that is durable and resistant to external interferences. Tanchjim's branding is engraved on the front of the device and space lite is written on the back which looks quite stylish. On the other hand copper silver plated wire core is used as the fixed cable material of the device through which the power supply is done inside the DAC circuit. This fixed cable did not disappoint because the durability was quite good and at the same time it was very small in size and seemed to be suitable for use anywhere. It is able to provide plug & play type performance in any situation.
★ Synergy & Power :-
The device is fully neutral sounding with slight coloration, but the interesting thing is that it is offering good power output from such a small form factor. It is capable of driving 105mw@16Ω as well as regular 98mw@32Ω from easy to drive IEMs to fairly demanding IEMs. Although this dac dongle is capable of driving many earphones, it cannot drive full size headphones because its power output is not that strong. However, some DD headphones will be suitable for headphones such as the Phillips Shp9500 type.However, its pairing is not very good with earphones below 16 ohm, so it is better not to use it. But many will consider using the Final E3000 with it, it will perform well there as well. I've tried several dd IEMs and a few planar IEMs with it and it drives pretty well. However, since it is a neutral sounding dac dongle, the best pairing is possible if it is used with warm, neutral type earphones. If the earphone is a little bright sounding, then I will not use it because the brightness of those earphones will become a little more enchance, then it will be difficult to listen. For example I can talk about letshouer s12 pro which is basically bright "V"set, if you can drive it, it makes the sound signature a bit brighter. But if one has a warm/neutral type sounding IEM in their arsenal then they will undoubtedly benefit the most from this. The sound of this dac dongle has a little coloration, that is, there is a touch of typical cirrus logic house sound. It brings a slight boost to the upper midrange section and at the same time adds warmth to the mids forward a bit, due to which the mids section sounds more pleasing while the clarity of the mids remains intact. It doesn't create any disturbance that degrades the natural presentation, it's fairly clear and the enjoyed with a little warm, On the other hand it has delivered decent treble performance
★ IEMS Used :-
~ kiwi ears Orchestra lite
~ softwares volume
~ Dunu kima classic
~ Letshouer X GIZAUDIO Galileo
~ Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
★ Sound Aspects :-
The device supports sample rate of 32 bit 768khz, so you can understand that starting from Pcm up to Dsd 256 support can be easily found here, which is a very good option for daily usage, at the same time stereo separation was also very good. On the other hand, its distortion ratio is also very low, I have run it at full volume so there is no distortion. I have used it on my phone and pc for a long time and have not had any problem with overheating. Moreover, it consumes very little power during use, the brand claims that its power consumption rate is 0.5w, which has been confirmed in my testing. Tanchjim has been able to handle heat management very well here so good job tanchjim.
Now I will discuss the sound in detail....
When you start listening to the sound by plugging the earphone into the device, the first thing you will notice is the sound stage and separation, it is able to create a good separation. The impact of the bass hits very deeply and there is a slight boost, but due to this, the notes of the bass are not damaged, the small and large notes can be heard clearly. Not that it portrays precisely, but it seems that it has been able to give as much as is available from such a form factor. On the other hand, the mids section has the goodness of cirrus logic because it boosts the upper mids a little bit and forwards the overall mids a little bit, which is also present here. Many people may think its treble is a little smooth, but this is not a big problem because this smooth effect is there to maximize the treble of the earphone. The treble section has a good amount of sparkle without harshness, so the enjoyment of the treble lasts for a long time. By default the extension of treble can hold very well and can create a good separation between small and large instruments. As the upper treble or airy extension was good, the lower treble and the full presentation were able to be represented very cleanly. However, if the treble section of one's IEMs is boosted more, then using it with it will bring harshness which can even create fatigue. At the same time dynamics and macro dynamics were of mediocre level and separation, layering and movement were nothing extraordinary or not bad considering this form factor and price category. Although not up to the mark in technical performance, it can be said that there was a descent. The staging was quite wide, so the earphones you are staging in will benefit more from here. However, I am not very happy with the imaging because it does not portray the instruments precisely and seems to be an average capability. But it would be foolish to expect more from such a price segment.
★ Conclusion :-
Currently there are many options in the market at sub 50$ although its price is 45$ now. This device will be more acceptable to those whose budget is below 50$ and even those whose regular needs will be met with such a single end output. But it is said that there are many more options in the market especially many chifi brands have "Ess" based dac dongle available which are offering better power output but their sound is harsh, sharp or aggressive in most cases space lite has a good position from that side. The device offers a full bodied sound presentation with descent power output. So in conclusion those who are thinking of buying it can definitely buy it and will have a buy recommendation from my side. Hope it will not disappoint you considering the price from any angle.
I have provided the purchase link below for your convenience
https://www.linsoul.com/products/tanchjim-space-lite(link is not affiliated)


Tanchjim space lite is a dac dongle in very affordable price category ($45). Earlier tanchjim space dac dongle came in the market which showed good performance considering the price even though the device had 3.5 & 4.4 both output and also cost around 100$. But recently they have launched this space lite (3.5mm) in a very interesting price category ($45). I will try to highlight all aspects of the device in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how justified it is for the price.

# Disclaimer :-
I have no financial agreement with "Tanchjim Audio" for this review, so my opinion is completely personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
The packaging of the Dac amp was very minimalistic.
1. Tanchjim space dac amp
2 . Type c to Usb "A" adapter
3. Some extra paperworks

★ Specifications :-
Dac chip : High-Performance Cirrus logic CS43131
Port type : 3.5 Single-End
Input interface : USB - Type C
Frequency response : 6hz - 85 KHZ
Supports : PCM(32 Bit/768kHz) and Native DSD256
Noise Floor : 1uV
Dynamic - Range : 126 dB
Output Power : (105mw@16Ω & 98mw@32Ω)
Harmonic Distortion THD+N : 0.0003%
Power consumption : 0.5w
Output level : max 2Vrms
★ Design & Build Quality :-
Tanchjim space and space lite both have similar build material. TANCHJIM Space Lite dongle features a sleek and stylish design with a aluminum alloy frame that is durable and resistant to external interferences. Tanchjim's branding is engraved on the front of the device and space lite is written on the back which looks quite stylish. On the other hand copper silver plated wire core is used as the fixed cable material of the device through which the power supply is done inside the DAC circuit. This fixed cable did not disappoint because the durability was quite good and at the same time it was very small in size and seemed to be suitable for use anywhere. It is able to provide plug & play type performance in any situation.


★ Synergy & Power :-
The device is fully neutral sounding with slight coloration, but the interesting thing is that it is offering good power output from such a small form factor. It is capable of driving 105mw@16Ω as well as regular 98mw@32Ω from easy to drive IEMs to fairly demanding IEMs. Although this dac dongle is capable of driving many earphones, it cannot drive full size headphones because its power output is not that strong. However, some DD headphones will be suitable for headphones such as the Phillips Shp9500 type.However, its pairing is not very good with earphones below 16 ohm, so it is better not to use it. But many will consider using the Final E3000 with it, it will perform well there as well. I've tried several dd IEMs and a few planar IEMs with it and it drives pretty well. However, since it is a neutral sounding dac dongle, the best pairing is possible if it is used with warm, neutral type earphones. If the earphone is a little bright sounding, then I will not use it because the brightness of those earphones will become a little more enchance, then it will be difficult to listen. For example I can talk about letshouer s12 pro which is basically bright "V"set, if you can drive it, it makes the sound signature a bit brighter. But if one has a warm/neutral type sounding IEM in their arsenal then they will undoubtedly benefit the most from this. The sound of this dac dongle has a little coloration, that is, there is a touch of typical cirrus logic house sound. It brings a slight boost to the upper midrange section and at the same time adds warmth to the mids forward a bit, due to which the mids section sounds more pleasing while the clarity of the mids remains intact. It doesn't create any disturbance that degrades the natural presentation, it's fairly clear and the enjoyed with a little warm, On the other hand it has delivered decent treble performance

★ IEMS Used :-
~ kiwi ears Orchestra lite
~ softwares volume
~ Dunu kima classic
~ Letshouer X GIZAUDIO Galileo
~ Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
★ Sound Aspects :-
The device supports sample rate of 32 bit 768khz, so you can understand that starting from Pcm up to Dsd 256 support can be easily found here, which is a very good option for daily usage, at the same time stereo separation was also very good. On the other hand, its distortion ratio is also very low, I have run it at full volume so there is no distortion. I have used it on my phone and pc for a long time and have not had any problem with overheating. Moreover, it consumes very little power during use, the brand claims that its power consumption rate is 0.5w, which has been confirmed in my testing. Tanchjim has been able to handle heat management very well here so good job tanchjim.
Now I will discuss the sound in detail....

When you start listening to the sound by plugging the earphone into the device, the first thing you will notice is the sound stage and separation, it is able to create a good separation. The impact of the bass hits very deeply and there is a slight boost, but due to this, the notes of the bass are not damaged, the small and large notes can be heard clearly. Not that it portrays precisely, but it seems that it has been able to give as much as is available from such a form factor. On the other hand, the mids section has the goodness of cirrus logic because it boosts the upper mids a little bit and forwards the overall mids a little bit, which is also present here. Many people may think its treble is a little smooth, but this is not a big problem because this smooth effect is there to maximize the treble of the earphone. The treble section has a good amount of sparkle without harshness, so the enjoyment of the treble lasts for a long time. By default the extension of treble can hold very well and can create a good separation between small and large instruments. As the upper treble or airy extension was good, the lower treble and the full presentation were able to be represented very cleanly. However, if the treble section of one's IEMs is boosted more, then using it with it will bring harshness which can even create fatigue. At the same time dynamics and macro dynamics were of mediocre level and separation, layering and movement were nothing extraordinary or not bad considering this form factor and price category. Although not up to the mark in technical performance, it can be said that there was a descent. The staging was quite wide, so the earphones you are staging in will benefit more from here. However, I am not very happy with the imaging because it does not portray the instruments precisely and seems to be an average capability. But it would be foolish to expect more from such a price segment.

★ Conclusion :-
Currently there are many options in the market at sub 50$ although its price is 45$ now. This device will be more acceptable to those whose budget is below 50$ and even those whose regular needs will be met with such a single end output. But it is said that there are many more options in the market especially many chifi brands have "Ess" based dac dongle available which are offering better power output but their sound is harsh, sharp or aggressive in most cases space lite has a good position from that side. The device offers a full bodied sound presentation with descent power output. So in conclusion those who are thinking of buying it can definitely buy it and will have a buy recommendation from my side. Hope it will not disappoint you considering the price from any angle.


I have provided the purchase link below for your convenience

https://www.linsoul.com/products/tanchjim-space-lite(link is not affiliated)
Last edited:
M
Md Ismail Hossain
Detachable cable would have been welcomed

RK Turan
Looks kinda premium despite having undetachable cable
Does it really drive sph9500 properly?
And are you still using it?
Does it really drive sph9500 properly?
And are you still using it?

ahammedsojib
@RK Turan Yes it is quite capable of driving
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Very durable and quite compact in size
~ warm & engaging Sounding device
~ Good power output from this form factor (70mw@32Ω)
~ Battery consumption rate was quite low
~ Good technicalities are offered for the price
~ Low background noise floor
~ warm & engaging Sounding device
~ Good power output from this form factor (70mw@32Ω)
~ Battery consumption rate was quite low
~ Good technicalities are offered for the price
~ Low background noise floor
Cons: ~ Absence of physical volume control button
~ Only suitable for IEMs (Not for hard to drive)
~ Airy extension of the treble is somewhat lacking
~ Dynamic punch was a bit thin
~ not very suitable for neutral lovers
~ design seems a bit cheap (subjective)
~ Only suitable for IEMs (Not for hard to drive)
~ Airy extension of the treble is somewhat lacking
~ Dynamic punch was a bit thin
~ not very suitable for neutral lovers
~ design seems a bit cheap (subjective)
★ Introduction :-
Hidizs has been launching their audio gear for a long time in the market. I believe that they've managed to maintain a fairly strong position in the affordable price category. They almost all dac amp and dap are basically Ess based . But some of these dac amps like S9 pro red copper and S9 pro plus Martha have a good reputation. Sd2 dongle is their new budget friendly offering with Ess dac chip is used in this device. I'll try to highlight all aspects of the device in my review.
# Disclaimer :-
At the beginning of the review I would like to thank Hidizs for sending me the Sd2 dongle. I've no financial agreement with Hidizs for this review, so my opinion is completely personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
The packaging of the Sd2 dongle was quite satisfactory because the necessary accessories are available out of the box so there is no need to buy anything extra.
1. Sd2 dongle DAC x1
2. Type-C to lightning cable x1
3. USB A to C adapter x1
4. User Manual x1 & Warranty card x1
★ Specifications :-
Dimensions : 34.5×20×10mm
Dac section : ES9270
Port type : 3.5mm Single-End
Input interface : USB - Type C
Frequency response : 20Hz-40kHz
Supports : PCM(32 Bit/384kHz) and
Native DSD 64/128
SNR : 118dB (SE)
Separation: PO (SE) 64dB
Output Power : 70mw@32Ω (SE)
Harmonic Distortion THD+N : (@32Ω)
Output level : SE - 2Vrms (max)
★ Design & Build Quality :-
The construction material of the Sd2 dongle is made of plastic composite , but this plastic build looks a bit cheap when held in the hand. But its side frame has been given a very nice finishing and hidizs branding on both sides along with a small led indicator which basically lights up in different colors based on the sample rate, but the interesting thing is that the device is very compact in size so it fits very well with the type c port of the phone and can be kept in the pocket when connected to the phone. It is advised to use it carefully while traveling or there is possibility of breaking the type c port of the phone.
★ IEMs Used :-
~ Simgot EA1000
~ Hidizs MP145
~ Dunu Kima Classic
~ Hidizs MS1 Galaxy
~ Qoa Gimlet
~ Simgot Ew100p
★ Sound Aspect :-
Sd2 is basically warm sounding dongle dac. Yes, exactly! The warm sound signature of the Sd2 dongle DAC can complement neutral or bright IEMs nicely, providing a balanced sound performance. However, it may not deliver optimal performance with headphones due to its limited driving capability. The IEMs that I've driven this dongle have shown good performance, even without having to worry about the power output, it has been able to drive all of them with full potential. The thing that was most noticeable after plugging the earphone into the device was the sound stage and separation. It was able to deliver each musical note with a fair amount of weight without any notes sitting on top of the others, But it doesn't overpower the instruments and doesn't feel dull. That's why sound quality seems to be intact.But its sound has a lot of fun factor, basically it provides bass boosted sound where texture is lacking i.e. increases the bass thump more. However, this was more noticeable in the case of bass heavy tracks, where there was a lot of excess but lack of quality.
The mids of Sd2 are usually quite clean & detailed and seem a bit forward, but here I noticed a tendency to make the body of the mids a little thin in the presentation of both male and female vocals. I believe they will be unhappy if given priority to mids.
Its treble section seems to strike a balance between cleanliness and aggression, but the absence of sparkle can be a drawback for those who prefer a more vibrant treble experience. It caters well to treble sensitive people but may not be to everyone's taste.
The biggest strength of the device would be its technicalities which make it quite admirable at this price. Its staging was wide and at the same time the depth was very good also imaging was excellent because it can accurately portray the motion nature of each instrument and even small micro and macro details without any problem. So those who are gamers, they'll be more benifited from here undoubtedly.Only the issue of dynamics seems to be a shortcoming. If it was a bit thicker, then a fuller bodied sound would have been obtained. In one word, the height and weight of the notes of the sound can be expressed very well.
★ Comparison :-
~ Tanchjim space lite (45$) vs Hidizs Sd2 (40$)~
The Space Lite offers a balanced and neutural sound signature with excellent clarity and detail retrieval. The bass is tight and well-controlled, providing a solid foundation without overpowering the mids and highs. The mids are smooth and articulate, rendering vocals and instruments with accuracy and realism. The highs are crisp and extended, adding sparkle and air to the overall sound With the ability to create an excellent sound stage. However, I noticed some weakness in the imaging capability and micro details seemed a bit weak. On the other hand, Sd2 provides a balanced blend of bass emphasis and good treble extension, However, Sd2's imaging was precise with the presence of descent micro details which would put it a step ahead of tanchjim space lite,Although power output is higher than sd2 (98mw@32Ω) but if someone prefers almost neutral tonality and gives more priority to mids, bass and treble are almost on point then space lite is for them. The Sd2 is an ideal choice for those who like fun and engaging, bass heavy sound signature.
★ Conclusion :-
The dongle dac market is currently very competitive. Most of the chifi brands that have popular off-the-shelf DAC chips are using their own philosophy to bring good dongles to the market. Hidizs is also on their list. Sd2 basically ess based dac, its sound is not sharp or aggressive like ess house sound, sound wise it has given warmish & musical tonality at the same time compact size has made its usability easier. Sd2 will be an excellent option for those who are looking for a good warm sounding dongle dac at an affordable price and those who give importance to portability more, It will satisfy them well.
I've provided the purchase link below for your convenience

Hidizs website (link is not affiliated)
Or

Amazon store (link is not affiliated)
Hidizs has been launching their audio gear for a long time in the market. I believe that they've managed to maintain a fairly strong position in the affordable price category. They almost all dac amp and dap are basically Ess based . But some of these dac amps like S9 pro red copper and S9 pro plus Martha have a good reputation. Sd2 dongle is their new budget friendly offering with Ess dac chip is used in this device. I'll try to highlight all aspects of the device in my review.


# Disclaimer :-
At the beginning of the review I would like to thank Hidizs for sending me the Sd2 dongle. I've no financial agreement with Hidizs for this review, so my opinion is completely personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
The packaging of the Sd2 dongle was quite satisfactory because the necessary accessories are available out of the box so there is no need to buy anything extra.

1. Sd2 dongle DAC x1
2. Type-C to lightning cable x1
3. USB A to C adapter x1
4. User Manual x1 & Warranty card x1
★ Specifications :-
Dimensions : 34.5×20×10mm
Dac section : ES9270
Port type : 3.5mm Single-End
Input interface : USB - Type C
Frequency response : 20Hz-40kHz
Supports : PCM(32 Bit/384kHz) and
Native DSD 64/128
SNR : 118dB (SE)
Separation: PO (SE) 64dB
Output Power : 70mw@32Ω (SE)
Harmonic Distortion THD+N : (@32Ω)
Output level : SE - 2Vrms (max)
★ Design & Build Quality :-
The construction material of the Sd2 dongle is made of plastic composite , but this plastic build looks a bit cheap when held in the hand. But its side frame has been given a very nice finishing and hidizs branding on both sides along with a small led indicator which basically lights up in different colors based on the sample rate, but the interesting thing is that the device is very compact in size so it fits very well with the type c port of the phone and can be kept in the pocket when connected to the phone. It is advised to use it carefully while traveling or there is possibility of breaking the type c port of the phone.


★ IEMs Used :-
~ Simgot EA1000
~ Hidizs MP145
~ Dunu Kima Classic
~ Hidizs MS1 Galaxy
~ Qoa Gimlet
~ Simgot Ew100p
★ Sound Aspect :-
Sd2 is basically warm sounding dongle dac. Yes, exactly! The warm sound signature of the Sd2 dongle DAC can complement neutral or bright IEMs nicely, providing a balanced sound performance. However, it may not deliver optimal performance with headphones due to its limited driving capability. The IEMs that I've driven this dongle have shown good performance, even without having to worry about the power output, it has been able to drive all of them with full potential. The thing that was most noticeable after plugging the earphone into the device was the sound stage and separation. It was able to deliver each musical note with a fair amount of weight without any notes sitting on top of the others, But it doesn't overpower the instruments and doesn't feel dull. That's why sound quality seems to be intact.But its sound has a lot of fun factor, basically it provides bass boosted sound where texture is lacking i.e. increases the bass thump more. However, this was more noticeable in the case of bass heavy tracks, where there was a lot of excess but lack of quality.
The mids of Sd2 are usually quite clean & detailed and seem a bit forward, but here I noticed a tendency to make the body of the mids a little thin in the presentation of both male and female vocals. I believe they will be unhappy if given priority to mids.
Its treble section seems to strike a balance between cleanliness and aggression, but the absence of sparkle can be a drawback for those who prefer a more vibrant treble experience. It caters well to treble sensitive people but may not be to everyone's taste.
The biggest strength of the device would be its technicalities which make it quite admirable at this price. Its staging was wide and at the same time the depth was very good also imaging was excellent because it can accurately portray the motion nature of each instrument and even small micro and macro details without any problem. So those who are gamers, they'll be more benifited from here undoubtedly.Only the issue of dynamics seems to be a shortcoming. If it was a bit thicker, then a fuller bodied sound would have been obtained. In one word, the height and weight of the notes of the sound can be expressed very well.


★ Comparison :-
~ Tanchjim space lite (45$) vs Hidizs Sd2 (40$)~
The Space Lite offers a balanced and neutural sound signature with excellent clarity and detail retrieval. The bass is tight and well-controlled, providing a solid foundation without overpowering the mids and highs. The mids are smooth and articulate, rendering vocals and instruments with accuracy and realism. The highs are crisp and extended, adding sparkle and air to the overall sound With the ability to create an excellent sound stage. However, I noticed some weakness in the imaging capability and micro details seemed a bit weak. On the other hand, Sd2 provides a balanced blend of bass emphasis and good treble extension, However, Sd2's imaging was precise with the presence of descent micro details which would put it a step ahead of tanchjim space lite,Although power output is higher than sd2 (98mw@32Ω) but if someone prefers almost neutral tonality and gives more priority to mids, bass and treble are almost on point then space lite is for them. The Sd2 is an ideal choice for those who like fun and engaging, bass heavy sound signature.


★ Conclusion :-
The dongle dac market is currently very competitive. Most of the chifi brands that have popular off-the-shelf DAC chips are using their own philosophy to bring good dongles to the market. Hidizs is also on their list. Sd2 basically ess based dac, its sound is not sharp or aggressive like ess house sound, sound wise it has given warmish & musical tonality at the same time compact size has made its usability easier. Sd2 will be an excellent option for those who are looking for a good warm sounding dongle dac at an affordable price and those who give importance to portability more, It will satisfy them well.




I've provided the purchase link below for your convenience


Hidizs website (link is not affiliated)
Or


Amazon store (link is not affiliated)
Attachments
M
Md Ismail Hossain
I'm itching to try this one
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Light-weight & Durable Build Quality.
~ Nice Led Display & Tactile Multi-Functional Button.
~ Neutral to Slightly Bright Sound Signature.
~ Decent Driving Power Output Available for IEMs and Some Moderate power Demanding Headphone (240mw@32Ω BAL).
~ Good Imaging ,Separation and Layering.
~ Almost Clean Background Noise Floor.
~ Good Resulation & Transparency.
~ Power Efficient, and No Overheating Issue In Case of Longer Usage.
~ Nice Led Display & Tactile Multi-Functional Button.
~ Neutral to Slightly Bright Sound Signature.
~ Decent Driving Power Output Available for IEMs and Some Moderate power Demanding Headphone (240mw@32Ω BAL).
~ Good Imaging ,Separation and Layering.
~ Almost Clean Background Noise Floor.
~ Good Resulation & Transparency.
~ Power Efficient, and No Overheating Issue In Case of Longer Usage.
Cons: ~ Not Very Suitable for Engaging & Thick Sound Lover.
~ Might be a little analytical for some people (Preference).
~ Type "C" to Type "A" Adapter Isn't Available Out of The Box.
~ No MQA Certification (Sad Thing for Tidal Fans).
~ DAC Filter Doesn't Make Much of Difference to The Sound.
~ Might be a little analytical for some people (Preference).
~ Type "C" to Type "A" Adapter Isn't Available Out of The Box.
~ No MQA Certification (Sad Thing for Tidal Fans).
~ DAC Filter Doesn't Make Much of Difference to The Sound.
★ Introduction :-
EPZ Audio is a new Chinese company specializing in audio equipment and accessories, known for their innovative designs and budget friendly high quality products.They offer a variety of items including earphones and audio cables. EPZ Audio has focused on providing exceptional sound performance and they also consider things like comfort, durability and stylish so they often incorporate the technologies and materials into their products to ensure an immersive audio experience for their customers. They committed to being at the forefront of audio innovation and meeting the evolving needs of customers in the audio industry. Although they have not been able to create a large space in the audio market yet, their budget offerings are increasingly attracting music lovers.
★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased EPZ TP50 dongle dac from Ali express store (EPZ) at discount price. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
1. TP50 dongle dac x1
2. Type-C to type c cable x1
3. User manual card x1
The unboxing experience of the device was similar to the other budget dongles. However, as necessary accessories, Type c to type c cable is available, cable quality not the best but what is given cannot be said to be bad in any way, but there is no type c to type A adapter, which can be called a downside, and no extra type c to lightning cable is available out of box, If you want to get the benefits of lightning cable, you have to purchase a separate lightning cable version.
★ Specifications :-
> Dac section : CS43198*2
> Amp section : RT6863*2
> Output type : 3.5mm Single-End & 4.4mm Bal
> Input interface : USB - Type C
> Frequency response : 20Hz-80kHz
> Supports : PCM(32 Bit/768kHz) and Native DSD256
> SNR : 125dB (SE) & 130dB (BAL)
> Dynamic-Range : 125dB (SE) & 130dB (BAL)
> Output Power : 121mw@32Ω (SE) & 240mw@32Ω (BAL)
> Output level : SE - 2Vrms & BAL- 4Vrms
> Harmonic Distortion THD+N : SE 0.0005% & BAL 0.0005%
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
The EPZ TP50 dongle DAC is constructed by using materials such as durable CNC metal and carbon fiber for its casing.These materials provide a balance between lightweight design and sturdy construction, making the device suitable for portable use while maintaining good durability.The side frame of the device is made of CNC metal and the front-back part is completely surrounded by carbon fiber panel. These materials provide a balance between lightweight design and sturdy construction, while maintaining good durability, making the device suitable for portable use.The use of carbon fiber as the construction material of such a budget DAC dongle is really commendable. It has a small led display on the front where you can find facilities like volume level, sound filter and gain option. Although the display is not so bright, As a result, some problems have to be faced to operate outdoors.
★ IEMS Used :-
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Simgot EA1000
~ Hidizs Mp145
~ KiwiEars Quintet
~ Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
★ Sound Aspects :-
TP50 is basically a dongle dac with neutral to slightly bright tonality. However, many may find it analytical as its sound filter is not that effective. Its two filters are the "Slow PC" and the Slow "LL" which create some variation in the sub-bass region, while the rest of the filters are not so handy but the "Non Os" filter tends to make the overall sound more analytical.The tonality then shifts towards colder and the notes of music seem very thin and lifeless as a result the musicality is lost. But the interesting part of it is its output power as it is capable of delivering (240mw@32Ω) power from its Bal port which is really remarkable from such a budget dongle dac.
I've been able to drive all the IEMs I've used with this dongle to full potential during my review, never feeling like the power output was lacking. I believe it can even drive moderately demanding headphones. Although there is no chance of getting full dynamics. However, it does not add much coloration to the sound, it is completely clean and neutral. Talking about its Bass, I can say that it can maintain very good control from sub bass to mid bass section at the same time Bass texture, speed & decay was fast enough.However, I expected a little better depth of bass region, which could have been enjoyed a little more. Although moving to "Slow PC" filter gives a slight boost to the sub bass region, then the appearance of the lower mids is slightly disturbed. On the other hand, the mids section was very clean & forward.The male and female artist's vocal can be represented very well but the vocal section is not very engaging because the presentation of the mids has lost its naturalness while ensuring more transparency there. Although the mids don't feel recessed, if the mids section adds a bit more warmth, then all genres seemed to sound more enjoyable.
After that the treble region was more resolving & well extended. Where there are detailed and well-texured high frequency offerings. This can improve the overall listening experience, especially for all genres that rely on complex treble detail, such as classical or jazz music. If all the instruments that are usually played in the treble section are thicker and rounded, the treble part would regain its fullness.
It has given solid performance in technical aspect . I got a lot of micro and macro details from here. The height of its sound stage was a little intimate but the depth was good and at the same time I was able to locate the placement & positioning of the instruments very well.Those who think about critical listening will definitely benefited from here.
★ Comparison :-
~ EPZ TP50 (109$) vs Fosi Audio DS2 - Cirrus Logic Edition (59$) ~
DS2's tonality was neutral to slightly warm with minimal coloration. The positive side of its sound is thick and rounded note weight and there was no roll-off in the bass & treble region. The sound stage seems to be a big strength of it. Because the height is quite big and the depth is good. At the same time, the imaging is also quite good. But its sound is not so resolving. Although Fosi audio claims that its Bal output is 510mw, but in my testing this does not seem fully justified. Because I got noticeable distortion from here when I turned up the volume level. If the sound could be refined a little more, this would be a killer deal for many undoubtedly, but I don't have any big complaints about the $60 dongle dac.
On the other hand, the TP50 is completely opposite in terms of sound signature, its sound is neutral-bright although it has some inbuilt sound filters which change the sound slightly, but it will be considered as flat neutral sounding. Where the musicality is less but the sound seems highly technical and somewhat thinner. There is no distortion, clean & clear back ground floor with descent power output, it has managed to hold a good position. Its main differences with DS2 are in these areas, because DS2's sound is not so resolving as it is. In terms of staging, DS2 has shown better performance compared to TP50 and imaging is not too far behind. I believe the DS2 will hold up well enough for its price. All in all, DS2 is a solid choice for those who prefer fun musical sound and have a low budget. Moreover, TP50 is an ideal choice for flat neutral lovers .
★ Conclusion :-
EPZ TP50 dongle dac will be far ahead due to its sound, build & compact size. It has managed to maintain a strong position in the 100$ price category. If someone likes highly technical & analytical sound in such a budget then I can easily recommend it for them. But those who are used to fun & colored sound signature will keep it away from their choice list.
I've provided link to buy at discount price for everyone's convenience

EPZ TP50 (33% off) purchase link
EPZ Audio is a new Chinese company specializing in audio equipment and accessories, known for their innovative designs and budget friendly high quality products.They offer a variety of items including earphones and audio cables. EPZ Audio has focused on providing exceptional sound performance and they also consider things like comfort, durability and stylish so they often incorporate the technologies and materials into their products to ensure an immersive audio experience for their customers. They committed to being at the forefront of audio innovation and meeting the evolving needs of customers in the audio industry. Although they have not been able to create a large space in the audio market yet, their budget offerings are increasingly attracting music lovers.
★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased EPZ TP50 dongle dac from Ali express store (EPZ) at discount price. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
1. TP50 dongle dac x1
2. Type-C to type c cable x1
3. User manual card x1
The unboxing experience of the device was similar to the other budget dongles. However, as necessary accessories, Type c to type c cable is available, cable quality not the best but what is given cannot be said to be bad in any way, but there is no type c to type A adapter, which can be called a downside, and no extra type c to lightning cable is available out of box, If you want to get the benefits of lightning cable, you have to purchase a separate lightning cable version.

★ Specifications :-
> Dac section : CS43198*2
> Amp section : RT6863*2
> Output type : 3.5mm Single-End & 4.4mm Bal
> Input interface : USB - Type C
> Frequency response : 20Hz-80kHz
> Supports : PCM(32 Bit/768kHz) and Native DSD256
> SNR : 125dB (SE) & 130dB (BAL)
> Dynamic-Range : 125dB (SE) & 130dB (BAL)
> Output Power : 121mw@32Ω (SE) & 240mw@32Ω (BAL)
> Output level : SE - 2Vrms & BAL- 4Vrms
> Harmonic Distortion THD+N : SE 0.0005% & BAL 0.0005%
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
The EPZ TP50 dongle DAC is constructed by using materials such as durable CNC metal and carbon fiber for its casing.These materials provide a balance between lightweight design and sturdy construction, making the device suitable for portable use while maintaining good durability.The side frame of the device is made of CNC metal and the front-back part is completely surrounded by carbon fiber panel. These materials provide a balance between lightweight design and sturdy construction, while maintaining good durability, making the device suitable for portable use.The use of carbon fiber as the construction material of such a budget DAC dongle is really commendable. It has a small led display on the front where you can find facilities like volume level, sound filter and gain option. Although the display is not so bright, As a result, some problems have to be faced to operate outdoors.


★ IEMS Used :-
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Simgot EA1000
~ Hidizs Mp145
~ KiwiEars Quintet
~ Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
★ Sound Aspects :-
TP50 is basically a dongle dac with neutral to slightly bright tonality. However, many may find it analytical as its sound filter is not that effective. Its two filters are the "Slow PC" and the Slow "LL" which create some variation in the sub-bass region, while the rest of the filters are not so handy but the "Non Os" filter tends to make the overall sound more analytical.The tonality then shifts towards colder and the notes of music seem very thin and lifeless as a result the musicality is lost. But the interesting part of it is its output power as it is capable of delivering (240mw@32Ω) power from its Bal port which is really remarkable from such a budget dongle dac.
I've been able to drive all the IEMs I've used with this dongle to full potential during my review, never feeling like the power output was lacking. I believe it can even drive moderately demanding headphones. Although there is no chance of getting full dynamics. However, it does not add much coloration to the sound, it is completely clean and neutral. Talking about its Bass, I can say that it can maintain very good control from sub bass to mid bass section at the same time Bass texture, speed & decay was fast enough.However, I expected a little better depth of bass region, which could have been enjoyed a little more. Although moving to "Slow PC" filter gives a slight boost to the sub bass region, then the appearance of the lower mids is slightly disturbed. On the other hand, the mids section was very clean & forward.The male and female artist's vocal can be represented very well but the vocal section is not very engaging because the presentation of the mids has lost its naturalness while ensuring more transparency there. Although the mids don't feel recessed, if the mids section adds a bit more warmth, then all genres seemed to sound more enjoyable.

After that the treble region was more resolving & well extended. Where there are detailed and well-texured high frequency offerings. This can improve the overall listening experience, especially for all genres that rely on complex treble detail, such as classical or jazz music. If all the instruments that are usually played in the treble section are thicker and rounded, the treble part would regain its fullness.
It has given solid performance in technical aspect . I got a lot of micro and macro details from here. The height of its sound stage was a little intimate but the depth was good and at the same time I was able to locate the placement & positioning of the instruments very well.Those who think about critical listening will definitely benefited from here.

★ Comparison :-
~ EPZ TP50 (109$) vs Fosi Audio DS2 - Cirrus Logic Edition (59$) ~
DS2's tonality was neutral to slightly warm with minimal coloration. The positive side of its sound is thick and rounded note weight and there was no roll-off in the bass & treble region. The sound stage seems to be a big strength of it. Because the height is quite big and the depth is good. At the same time, the imaging is also quite good. But its sound is not so resolving. Although Fosi audio claims that its Bal output is 510mw, but in my testing this does not seem fully justified. Because I got noticeable distortion from here when I turned up the volume level. If the sound could be refined a little more, this would be a killer deal for many undoubtedly, but I don't have any big complaints about the $60 dongle dac.

On the other hand, the TP50 is completely opposite in terms of sound signature, its sound is neutral-bright although it has some inbuilt sound filters which change the sound slightly, but it will be considered as flat neutral sounding. Where the musicality is less but the sound seems highly technical and somewhat thinner. There is no distortion, clean & clear back ground floor with descent power output, it has managed to hold a good position. Its main differences with DS2 are in these areas, because DS2's sound is not so resolving as it is. In terms of staging, DS2 has shown better performance compared to TP50 and imaging is not too far behind. I believe the DS2 will hold up well enough for its price. All in all, DS2 is a solid choice for those who prefer fun musical sound and have a low budget. Moreover, TP50 is an ideal choice for flat neutral lovers .

★ Conclusion :-
EPZ TP50 dongle dac will be far ahead due to its sound, build & compact size. It has managed to maintain a strong position in the 100$ price category. If someone likes highly technical & analytical sound in such a budget then I can easily recommend it for them. But those who are used to fun & colored sound signature will keep it away from their choice list.

I've provided link to buy at discount price for everyone's convenience


EPZ TP50 (33% off) purchase link
Last edited:

MD Rohit
Nice
M
Md Ismail Hossain
Hope they got colour variation
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Comfortable & light weight resin shell.
~ Nice design and construction.
~ Good sub bass extension.
~ Non fatiguing & safe treble performance.
~ Satisfactory stock cable and accessories.
~ Nice design and construction.
~ Good sub bass extension.
~ Non fatiguing & safe treble performance.
~ Satisfactory stock cable and accessories.
Cons: ~ Somewhat thin midrange tonality.
~ Lean dynamics presentation.
~ Lacks upper treble air.
~ A bit shouty upper mids.
~ Lack of mid bass deep impact and texture.
~ Below average isolation & technicalities.
~ Lean dynamics presentation.
~ Lacks upper treble air.
~ A bit shouty upper mids.
~ Lack of mid bass deep impact and texture.
~ Below average isolation & technicalities.
★ Introduction :-
EPZ is a fairly new Chinese brand that has been widely discussed for manufacturing excellent audio gear in the affordable price category. A few days ago I posted a review of their dongle dac. Today I'm back with a review of their entry level IEM Q1 pro. I bought this IEM from Ali Express just to see if its hype is justified. I will try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased EPZ Q1 Pro IEM from their Ali express store (EPZ). I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completly my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of Q1 pro was similar to the entry level IEM's. All kind of accessories were present out of the box. EPZ has no room to complain in this regard.
1. A pair of Q1 pro IEMs.
2. Three pairs of eartips of different sizes.
3. very simple carrying pouch.
4. Decent 3.5mm copper cable.
5. User manual guide.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- 10MM dual cavity dual magnetic circuit PU+LCP Liquid crystal molecular dome diaphragm.
~ Impedance :- 32Ω@1kHz
~ Sensitivity :- 110db(±1db)@Vrms
~ Distortion ratio :- <0.5%(@1khz,100db)
~ Frequency response :- 20Hz-20Khz
~ Connector :- 2-pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type :- 4-core LEONI single crystal copper cable with 3.5mm gold plated jack.
~ Cable Length :- 1.2m
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The Q1 Pro's shell is made entirely of EPZ's customized 3D printed resin. As it is very lightweight and fits very comfortably in the ear. So it will fit pretty well in everyone's ears, The resin build quality can't be called cheap in any way to me, Although fingerprints remain on the glossy shell it is not obvious. Even if it's an entry level IEM, it never looks like that. Starting from its packaging & the accessories that came with it were also worth appreciating.
Stock cable & 3 pairs of different size eartips were also quite good. The quality of the tips is not very premium, but it is quite soft and seems to be quite usable as stock eartips. Anyone can comfortably spend a lot of time on this IEM. It is undoubtedly ideal for traveling or outdoors. I listened to it continuously for about 3 hours and never felt disturb to the sense of ear balance. Among its most positive aspects, its comfort section will be at the forefront.That's why I enjoyed it for long time.
On the other hand the stock 3.5mm 4-core LEONI single crystal copper cable was durable, although it creates a bit microphonics sometimes, but this cable does not hampers sound quality. Due to the occasional twisting habit of this cable, EPZ has added a nice locking strap bracket to prevent it from tangling. The cable quality not the best but as a stock cable there is no chance to room complain.
★ Sound Aspect :-
Q1 pro is basically harman or "V" shape tuned set that is budget friendly. The internal configuration of this set has single dynamic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency. The tuning of this IEM is fun & engaging also tonality was neutral in a word. It is safe to say that I did not get any listening fatigue from its sound. I've used stock eartips as well as aftermarket eartips during the sound testing period and it makes a good difference between fit, comfort, isolation and sound. I used Spinfit Cp145 & Kbear 07 eartips which gave me good experience. However, stock eartips do not give bad performance, so listening can be done with them in the initial condition. Since this is a set of "V" shaped tunings, there is naturally more bass and treble emphasis and the mids are a little behind, There is no exception here.
★ Gears used :-
1. Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
2. Questyle M15 ( Se & Bal both)
3. Quloos Mc01 (Se & Bal both)
4. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
5. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
I also tested these by plugging them into the earphone port of my redmi note 12 smartphone.
Epz Q1 pro is a set of 32ohm impedance whose sensitivity level is 110db so no powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes a bit better sounding.
Now I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass.....
★ The Bass :-
The Q1 Pro is basically a bit sub bass focused but doesn't get enough rumble. On the other hand, the presence of mid bass was relatively less due to which mid bass punch & texture was not found well. Mid bass character seems to be crippled, at the same time, the delivery of the bass notes can be said to be on the slower side. The lack of bass speed, attack & decay has greatly reduced the enjoyment of the bass section, also the sub bass is slightly disturbing in some tracks. Can be said to have given somewhat disappointing bass performance. Overall, It cannot able to give complete satisfaction to anyone whether they are bass head or non bass head. So the bass performance will be considered as the down side without a doubt.
★ The Mids :-
The appearance of the mid section seems to be quite clean. Upper mids were more forward and even noticed a tendency to become a bit energetic at a times,Female vocals seem more shouty & male vocal somewhat thin . Which is basically more in stock cable but I didn't notice much this problem in upgradable cable. On the other hand, the lower mids were a bit thin which could be considered recessed, I noticed a slight sub bass bleed with the lower mids which aggrieved the quality of midrange tonality. But not too much bother without extreme mids lover, this thinner mids will not cause a big problem and can be enjoyed fairly well.
★ The Treble :-
Treble section was a bit bright but i didn’t get any aggressiveness , can be said that it was fairly smooth. Detail retrieval is also clean, but I found a little sibilance on some tracks. Although the lower treble is fine, but the upper treble does not seem to be extended enough, so the full energy and sparkle of the treble cannot be obtained from here. Hopefully this won't cause too much of problem except for very treble sensitive people.However, if it is used in a warm sounding source, there is no sibilance in the treble, then almost everyone can enjoy its treble.
★ Technicalities :-
The staging & imaging of this IEM was below average as the other competitors in this price category, could not offer anything special in technical aspect. Its sound stage was a little on the intimate side, i mean out of the head type presentation. I found the depth of the stage to be good. At the same time, imaging & stereo separation are fairly good. The placement, positioning and layering of instruments are slightly ahead of the average. The macro & micro details were quite lean which is normal to get from an IEM of this entry budget category, So there is no chance to make a big complaint.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4/5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4/5
★ Conclusion :-
Various chifi brands are launching their IEMs in the affordable price category which has created a very competitive market. Many people are interested in entry level IEMs who are looking for single dd IEMs for regular usage and think about comfort so that they can be used for a long time, I think Q1 pro will be more suitable. Considering its design, light weight build & overall sound performance, So it is not far behind its competitors. If someone is not very treble sensitive and does not give priority to gaming then I can easily recommend it to them.
I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience

1. EPZ official store (Ali express) link isn’t affiliated.
2. EPZ Q1 Pro ( Hifigo ) link isn’t affiliated.
EPZ is a fairly new Chinese brand that has been widely discussed for manufacturing excellent audio gear in the affordable price category. A few days ago I posted a review of their dongle dac. Today I'm back with a review of their entry level IEM Q1 pro. I bought this IEM from Ali Express just to see if its hype is justified. I will try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.


★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased EPZ Q1 Pro IEM from their Ali express store (EPZ). I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completly my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of Q1 pro was similar to the entry level IEM's. All kind of accessories were present out of the box. EPZ has no room to complain in this regard.

1. A pair of Q1 pro IEMs.
2. Three pairs of eartips of different sizes.
3. very simple carrying pouch.
4. Decent 3.5mm copper cable.
5. User manual guide.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- 10MM dual cavity dual magnetic circuit PU+LCP Liquid crystal molecular dome diaphragm.
~ Impedance :- 32Ω@1kHz
~ Sensitivity :- 110db(±1db)@Vrms
~ Distortion ratio :- <0.5%(@1khz,100db)
~ Frequency response :- 20Hz-20Khz
~ Connector :- 2-pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type :- 4-core LEONI single crystal copper cable with 3.5mm gold plated jack.
~ Cable Length :- 1.2m
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The Q1 Pro's shell is made entirely of EPZ's customized 3D printed resin. As it is very lightweight and fits very comfortably in the ear. So it will fit pretty well in everyone's ears, The resin build quality can't be called cheap in any way to me, Although fingerprints remain on the glossy shell it is not obvious. Even if it's an entry level IEM, it never looks like that. Starting from its packaging & the accessories that came with it were also worth appreciating.

Stock cable & 3 pairs of different size eartips were also quite good. The quality of the tips is not very premium, but it is quite soft and seems to be quite usable as stock eartips. Anyone can comfortably spend a lot of time on this IEM. It is undoubtedly ideal for traveling or outdoors. I listened to it continuously for about 3 hours and never felt disturb to the sense of ear balance. Among its most positive aspects, its comfort section will be at the forefront.That's why I enjoyed it for long time.

On the other hand the stock 3.5mm 4-core LEONI single crystal copper cable was durable, although it creates a bit microphonics sometimes, but this cable does not hampers sound quality. Due to the occasional twisting habit of this cable, EPZ has added a nice locking strap bracket to prevent it from tangling. The cable quality not the best but as a stock cable there is no chance to room complain.
★ Sound Aspect :-
Q1 pro is basically harman or "V" shape tuned set that is budget friendly. The internal configuration of this set has single dynamic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency. The tuning of this IEM is fun & engaging also tonality was neutral in a word. It is safe to say that I did not get any listening fatigue from its sound. I've used stock eartips as well as aftermarket eartips during the sound testing period and it makes a good difference between fit, comfort, isolation and sound. I used Spinfit Cp145 & Kbear 07 eartips which gave me good experience. However, stock eartips do not give bad performance, so listening can be done with them in the initial condition. Since this is a set of "V" shaped tunings, there is naturally more bass and treble emphasis and the mids are a little behind, There is no exception here.
★ Gears used :-
1. Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
2. Questyle M15 ( Se & Bal both)
3. Quloos Mc01 (Se & Bal both)
4. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
5. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
I also tested these by plugging them into the earphone port of my redmi note 12 smartphone.
Epz Q1 pro is a set of 32ohm impedance whose sensitivity level is 110db so no powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes a bit better sounding.
Now I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass.....
★ The Bass :-
The Q1 Pro is basically a bit sub bass focused but doesn't get enough rumble. On the other hand, the presence of mid bass was relatively less due to which mid bass punch & texture was not found well. Mid bass character seems to be crippled, at the same time, the delivery of the bass notes can be said to be on the slower side. The lack of bass speed, attack & decay has greatly reduced the enjoyment of the bass section, also the sub bass is slightly disturbing in some tracks. Can be said to have given somewhat disappointing bass performance. Overall, It cannot able to give complete satisfaction to anyone whether they are bass head or non bass head. So the bass performance will be considered as the down side without a doubt.

★ The Mids :-
The appearance of the mid section seems to be quite clean. Upper mids were more forward and even noticed a tendency to become a bit energetic at a times,Female vocals seem more shouty & male vocal somewhat thin . Which is basically more in stock cable but I didn't notice much this problem in upgradable cable. On the other hand, the lower mids were a bit thin which could be considered recessed, I noticed a slight sub bass bleed with the lower mids which aggrieved the quality of midrange tonality. But not too much bother without extreme mids lover, this thinner mids will not cause a big problem and can be enjoyed fairly well.
★ The Treble :-
Treble section was a bit bright but i didn’t get any aggressiveness , can be said that it was fairly smooth. Detail retrieval is also clean, but I found a little sibilance on some tracks. Although the lower treble is fine, but the upper treble does not seem to be extended enough, so the full energy and sparkle of the treble cannot be obtained from here. Hopefully this won't cause too much of problem except for very treble sensitive people.However, if it is used in a warm sounding source, there is no sibilance in the treble, then almost everyone can enjoy its treble.
★ Technicalities :-
The staging & imaging of this IEM was below average as the other competitors in this price category, could not offer anything special in technical aspect. Its sound stage was a little on the intimate side, i mean out of the head type presentation. I found the depth of the stage to be good. At the same time, imaging & stereo separation are fairly good. The placement, positioning and layering of instruments are slightly ahead of the average. The macro & micro details were quite lean which is normal to get from an IEM of this entry budget category, So there is no chance to make a big complaint.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4/5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4/5
★ Conclusion :-
Various chifi brands are launching their IEMs in the affordable price category which has created a very competitive market. Many people are interested in entry level IEMs who are looking for single dd IEMs for regular usage and think about comfort so that they can be used for a long time, I think Q1 pro will be more suitable. Considering its design, light weight build & overall sound performance, So it is not far behind its competitors. If someone is not very treble sensitive and does not give priority to gaming then I can easily recommend it to them.

I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience


1. EPZ official store (Ali express) link isn’t affiliated.
2. EPZ Q1 Pro ( Hifigo ) link isn’t affiliated.
Attachments
Last edited:

MD Rohit
Good review brother
M
Md Ismail Hossain
Really helpful

Nealz
Brilliant review, checked it out this morning! 

ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Good build construction & compact in size.
~ Tactile volume control button feedback.
~ Very powerful compared to this form factor . (510mw@32Ω Bal).
~ Descent technical performance.
~ Almost silent background noise floor.
~ Very power efficient and no overhearing issue.
~ Good sound value for the price.
~ Tactile volume control button feedback.
~ Very powerful compared to this form factor . (510mw@32Ω Bal).
~ Descent technical performance.
~ Almost silent background noise floor.
~ Very power efficient and no overhearing issue.
~ Good sound value for the price.
Cons: ~ Not very suitable for neutral lovers.
~ Can't deliver very clean output power.
~ missing gain switching option.
~ Bass note definition is slightly weaker by adding warmth effect.
~ Noticeable delay during volume control.
~ Can't deliver very clean output power.
~ missing gain switching option.
~ Bass note definition is slightly weaker by adding warmth effect.
~ Noticeable delay during volume control.
★ Introduction :-
Fosi Audio was founded in 2017, They quickly gained recognition in the audio equipment market for their commitment to providing high-quality amplifiers and DACs at competitive prices. Fosi Audio products are known for their impressive build quality and sound performance. Their product range includes stereo amplifiers, headphone amplifiers, Bluetooth amplifiers, and DACs, among others. Affordability is on of their key selling point. That's why they aim to provide customers with excellent sound performance and reliability in their audio gear. Today I'm mainly here with the review of their new popular dongle DS2 (2024). I'll try to highlight all aspects of this dongle dac in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased DS2 dongle dac from Ali express store (Fosi Audio) . So I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is totally my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of the device was similar to the other budget dongles. However, as necessary accessories, Type c to type c cable and type c to type A adapter is available, cable quality not the best but what is given cannot be said to be bad in any way, no extra type c to lightning cable is available out of box, If you want to get the benefits of lightning cable, you have to purchase a separate lightning cable.
1. DS2 dongle dac ×1
2. Type c to type c cable ×1
3. User manual guide ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
The Fosi Audio DS2 Dongle DAC features a solid build construction with a compact size and durable design. This DAC is constructed by using materials such as durable CNC metal machining and the entire housing is made shock proof. As a result, its finishing has been beautiful as well as hand feel & usability has been added to a different level. It has a small LED indicator on the front side which basically changes to different colors according to the audio sample rate.
This dongle has physical volume control buttons, the placement of which seems appropriate and the button pressing gives fairly tactile feedback. As a budget dongle, there are no issues with the durability of the placement of ports and buttons on it. As I said earlier that it is compact size dac so it will be very compatible with phone, laptop & music player and even can be used without any problem. So I can definitely say that it is truly versatile enough to use.
★ Specifications :-
> Dac section : CS43131*2
> Output type : 3.5mm Single-End & 4.4mm Bal
> Input interface : USB - Type C
> Impedance rate : 16~300Ω
> Frequency response : 20Hz-20kHz (±0.5dB)
> Supports : PCM(32 Bit/768kHz) and Native DSD256
> SNR : ≥130dB
> Noise floor : <1μV
> Dynamic-range : 125dB (SE) & 130dB (BAL)
> Output power : 130mw@32Ω (SE) & 510mw@32Ω (BAL)
> Output level : SE - 2Vrms & BAL- 4Vrms
> Harmonic distortion THD+N :
0.0006%(SE) @32Ω & 0.001% (BAL)@32Ω
★ Tasted With Gear :-
~ Sony IER M9
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Simgot EA1000
~ KiwiEars Quintet
~ Hidizs MP145
~ Tinhifi P1 Max ii
~ Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
★ Sound Aspects :-
The DS2's tonality ranged from neutral to slightly warm which added an analog-ish character to the overall sound.
The whole sound presentation was matured, as a budget dongle I did not see any bass or treble roll-off related issue. Even, it does not add much coloration to the sound. it was fairly clean, neutral to warmish type signature.
Also the interesting part of this dongle is the output power as it is capable of delivering (510mw@32Ω) power from its Bal port which is really remarkable from such a budget dongle dac. From regular DD to demanding Planar IEMs & Headphones, everything can be powered up fairly well.
I've used a number of IEMs in my reviews but haven't tested any headphones because I don't think this dongle suitable for demanding headphones drive . I got noticeable distortion whenever I tried to increase the volume level to use IEMs on it. But only in the case of IEMs, it will not cause such a big problem, but according to Fosi audio, the advertised high power output was not fully justified in my opinion.
Let's talk about its bass at the beginning, sub bass to mid bass section was nicely separated & well controlled without any tendency to bloat. However, there is a slight boost in the sub bass region, due to which the hi-hats of snare drum are given extra emphasis, which is not unpleasant to hear. On the other hand, the mid bass has been smoothed a little and warmth has been added, as a result, the definition of the bass notes has become a little weaker. So the heavy hitting sound of the kick drum has suffered a bit.
The mids section was very clean, there was no unwanted boost, so the tone of the artist's voice was very natural. The body of male & female vocal was very nicely represented , there is no problem of making it thin or recessed but the organic character of cirrus logic house sound which is usually observed, in the case of mids was also present here. Thither adds a slight warm to the mids and overall a bit forward to the presentation of mids region.
Treble section condition was quite improved. Electric, acoustic guitar & violin have been able to deliver the sound of string instruments as vibrant and well balanced. I have not noticed any lacks anywhere. Every instrument has been delivered in a very nice smooth manner without making it overly sharp, aggressive or dull. As usually found in Cirrus logic house sound, I found some similarities in the treble performance.
As opposed to, technical aspect was pretty good. Descent amount of detail, micro detail can be found very easily from here and at the same time there was fairly wider sound stage and depth. Imaging can accurately portray and the stereo presentation was solid. So I don't find any major flaw. As an entry level dongle dac, it has technically been able to give better results.
★ Synergy and Power :-
Most of the IEMs had better synergy with the dongle of neutral to warmish sound, moreover, there is no shortage in terms of power output and battery consumption rate is very low. I'm using it with the phone at 50-65% volume level (Bal port). Then its heat management and battery efficiency was very admirable .
Although, Single ended output was also good comparing others dongle, dynamics was somewhat lacking on single ended but nothing to room complain as long it was musical to my ears. However, using too bright sounding IEMs will not give the desired results. I paired my tested gear items with it and got pretty good results especially the IER M9.
Pairing was surprisingly good with m9. IER M9 itself is warmish neutral. Fosi audio ds2 doesn't exhibit any kind of hints of sibilance, that is a positive side of ds2. On the other side ds2 is also slight warmish on nature so the bass and mids on m9 section was slightly smooth with rounded yet exerting enough detail for it's asking price. Bass was little elevated maybe due to its amping design. Imaging and stage was a bit mediocre level. In short ds2 is on smoother side with well-rounded sound that is very suitable for enjoyable listening that many people seek.
★ Comparison :-
Moondrop Dawn Pro (50$)
Dawn pro basically neutral to slightly bright Sounding dongle dac. It has its own app support and 100 step volume level works very accurately. However, its bal port power output max 120mw but the output power is clean even at full volume and no distortion is found. Moreover, the build quality is low, the physical button pressing feedback is a bit loose and the stock type c to type cable is of very cheap quality.
Vs ~ Fosi Audio DS2 (60$)
DS2 Sound more analog-ish than Dawn pro. At the same time, DS2 is in a better position in Sound stage, Imaging, separation and layering. Moreover, build quality, accessories and button control feedback are slightly better and power output is far ahead compared to dawn pro. But the biggest difference is that the Ds2's sound isn't as more resolving and by no means suitable for heavy demanding gear use as Fosi Audio is advertising. Because when the volume level is increased, noticeable distortion is found in the sound. However, the notes of the sound were quite thick and rounded, so the sound of the full body was obtained, on the other hand, the sound of the Dawn pro was somewhat less musical and weight of the notes was less fuller , but the presentation was completely distortion free.
★ Conclusion :-
The current Dac dongle market is very competitive. Almost all chifi brands use popular off-the-shelf DAC chips and use their in-house R&D and try to attract the audience. Similarly, Fosi audio has launched several products in their affordable price category and DS2 in the 60$ price range will be a very good option for those who like thick and well-rounded sound with a hint of warmth & analogish character. And for those who prefer a bit bright-analytical and highly detailed sound and if the budget is 100$ then EPZ TP50 dongle dac can be an ideal choice for them, so from my side I would suggest buying both for people who are used to different sound signatures.
I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience

Fosi audio Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)
and Hifigo (link isn’t affiliated)
Fosi Audio was founded in 2017, They quickly gained recognition in the audio equipment market for their commitment to providing high-quality amplifiers and DACs at competitive prices. Fosi Audio products are known for their impressive build quality and sound performance. Their product range includes stereo amplifiers, headphone amplifiers, Bluetooth amplifiers, and DACs, among others. Affordability is on of their key selling point. That's why they aim to provide customers with excellent sound performance and reliability in their audio gear. Today I'm mainly here with the review of their new popular dongle DS2 (2024). I'll try to highlight all aspects of this dongle dac in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.

★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased DS2 dongle dac from Ali express store (Fosi Audio) . So I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is totally my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of the device was similar to the other budget dongles. However, as necessary accessories, Type c to type c cable and type c to type A adapter is available, cable quality not the best but what is given cannot be said to be bad in any way, no extra type c to lightning cable is available out of box, If you want to get the benefits of lightning cable, you have to purchase a separate lightning cable.

1. DS2 dongle dac ×1
2. Type c to type c cable ×1
3. User manual guide ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
The Fosi Audio DS2 Dongle DAC features a solid build construction with a compact size and durable design. This DAC is constructed by using materials such as durable CNC metal machining and the entire housing is made shock proof. As a result, its finishing has been beautiful as well as hand feel & usability has been added to a different level. It has a small LED indicator on the front side which basically changes to different colors according to the audio sample rate.
This dongle has physical volume control buttons, the placement of which seems appropriate and the button pressing gives fairly tactile feedback. As a budget dongle, there are no issues with the durability of the placement of ports and buttons on it. As I said earlier that it is compact size dac so it will be very compatible with phone, laptop & music player and even can be used without any problem. So I can definitely say that it is truly versatile enough to use.

★ Specifications :-
> Dac section : CS43131*2
> Output type : 3.5mm Single-End & 4.4mm Bal
> Input interface : USB - Type C
> Impedance rate : 16~300Ω
> Frequency response : 20Hz-20kHz (±0.5dB)
> Supports : PCM(32 Bit/768kHz) and Native DSD256
> SNR : ≥130dB
> Noise floor : <1μV
> Dynamic-range : 125dB (SE) & 130dB (BAL)
> Output power : 130mw@32Ω (SE) & 510mw@32Ω (BAL)
> Output level : SE - 2Vrms & BAL- 4Vrms
> Harmonic distortion THD+N :
0.0006%(SE) @32Ω & 0.001% (BAL)@32Ω
★ Tasted With Gear :-
~ Sony IER M9
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Simgot EA1000
~ KiwiEars Quintet
~ Hidizs MP145
~ Tinhifi P1 Max ii
~ Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
★ Sound Aspects :-
The DS2's tonality ranged from neutral to slightly warm which added an analog-ish character to the overall sound.
The whole sound presentation was matured, as a budget dongle I did not see any bass or treble roll-off related issue. Even, it does not add much coloration to the sound. it was fairly clean, neutral to warmish type signature.
Also the interesting part of this dongle is the output power as it is capable of delivering (510mw@32Ω) power from its Bal port which is really remarkable from such a budget dongle dac. From regular DD to demanding Planar IEMs & Headphones, everything can be powered up fairly well.

I've used a number of IEMs in my reviews but haven't tested any headphones because I don't think this dongle suitable for demanding headphones drive . I got noticeable distortion whenever I tried to increase the volume level to use IEMs on it. But only in the case of IEMs, it will not cause such a big problem, but according to Fosi audio, the advertised high power output was not fully justified in my opinion.
Let's talk about its bass at the beginning, sub bass to mid bass section was nicely separated & well controlled without any tendency to bloat. However, there is a slight boost in the sub bass region, due to which the hi-hats of snare drum are given extra emphasis, which is not unpleasant to hear. On the other hand, the mid bass has been smoothed a little and warmth has been added, as a result, the definition of the bass notes has become a little weaker. So the heavy hitting sound of the kick drum has suffered a bit.
The mids section was very clean, there was no unwanted boost, so the tone of the artist's voice was very natural. The body of male & female vocal was very nicely represented , there is no problem of making it thin or recessed but the organic character of cirrus logic house sound which is usually observed, in the case of mids was also present here. Thither adds a slight warm to the mids and overall a bit forward to the presentation of mids region.
Treble section condition was quite improved. Electric, acoustic guitar & violin have been able to deliver the sound of string instruments as vibrant and well balanced. I have not noticed any lacks anywhere. Every instrument has been delivered in a very nice smooth manner without making it overly sharp, aggressive or dull. As usually found in Cirrus logic house sound, I found some similarities in the treble performance.

★ Synergy and Power :-
Most of the IEMs had better synergy with the dongle of neutral to warmish sound, moreover, there is no shortage in terms of power output and battery consumption rate is very low. I'm using it with the phone at 50-65% volume level (Bal port). Then its heat management and battery efficiency was very admirable .
Although, Single ended output was also good comparing others dongle, dynamics was somewhat lacking on single ended but nothing to room complain as long it was musical to my ears. However, using too bright sounding IEMs will not give the desired results. I paired my tested gear items with it and got pretty good results especially the IER M9.

Pairing was surprisingly good with m9. IER M9 itself is warmish neutral. Fosi audio ds2 doesn't exhibit any kind of hints of sibilance, that is a positive side of ds2. On the other side ds2 is also slight warmish on nature so the bass and mids on m9 section was slightly smooth with rounded yet exerting enough detail for it's asking price. Bass was little elevated maybe due to its amping design. Imaging and stage was a bit mediocre level. In short ds2 is on smoother side with well-rounded sound that is very suitable for enjoyable listening that many people seek.
★ Comparison :-
Moondrop Dawn Pro (50$)
Dawn pro basically neutral to slightly bright Sounding dongle dac. It has its own app support and 100 step volume level works very accurately. However, its bal port power output max 120mw but the output power is clean even at full volume and no distortion is found. Moreover, the build quality is low, the physical button pressing feedback is a bit loose and the stock type c to type cable is of very cheap quality.
Vs ~ Fosi Audio DS2 (60$)
DS2 Sound more analog-ish than Dawn pro. At the same time, DS2 is in a better position in Sound stage, Imaging, separation and layering. Moreover, build quality, accessories and button control feedback are slightly better and power output is far ahead compared to dawn pro. But the biggest difference is that the Ds2's sound isn't as more resolving and by no means suitable for heavy demanding gear use as Fosi Audio is advertising. Because when the volume level is increased, noticeable distortion is found in the sound. However, the notes of the sound were quite thick and rounded, so the sound of the full body was obtained, on the other hand, the sound of the Dawn pro was somewhat less musical and weight of the notes was less fuller , but the presentation was completely distortion free.
★ Conclusion :-
The current Dac dongle market is very competitive. Almost all chifi brands use popular off-the-shelf DAC chips and use their in-house R&D and try to attract the audience. Similarly, Fosi audio has launched several products in their affordable price category and DS2 in the 60$ price range will be a very good option for those who like thick and well-rounded sound with a hint of warmth & analogish character. And for those who prefer a bit bright-analytical and highly detailed sound and if the budget is 100$ then EPZ TP50 dongle dac can be an ideal choice for them, so from my side I would suggest buying both for people who are used to different sound signatures.

I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience


Fosi audio Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)
and Hifigo (link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:
N
Nazimshawon
Decent product but not meant for everyone I guess. There are rooms for improvements too. But in this crowded segment it has a it's own value.

MD Rohit
Nice informative review bro
M
Md Ismail Hossain
I was planing to buy this one
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Comfortable & light weight resin shell.
~ Descent build construction.
~ Fast & deep mid bass punch (typical planar charecter).
~ Fun "V" shape tuning.
~ Good quality stock cable.
~ Descent build construction.
~ Fast & deep mid bass punch (typical planar charecter).
~ Fun "V" shape tuning.
~ Good quality stock cable.
Cons: ~ Recessed lower mids and the upper mids become a bit shouty.
~ No carrying pouch out of the box.
~ Average soundstage and depth.
~ No bal cable option for purchase.
~ A bit source sensitive.
~ Minimal planar timbre and slight bass bleed issue.
~ No carrying pouch out of the box.
~ Average soundstage and depth.
~ No bal cable option for purchase.
~ A bit source sensitive.
~ Minimal planar timbre and slight bass bleed issue.
★ Introduction :-
TinHiFi is a well-known Chifi brand in the audio industry, Their once big hit product was T2. This IEM caused quite a stir at an affordable price.The brand is particularly recognized for good quality in-ear monitors (IEMs). They gained popularity for offering better sound performance at an affordable price, and making audiophile-based equipment accessible to a wider audience.
Tinhifi products often receive positive recognition for their sound quality and value for money, But they still lagging though Relatively compared to other IEM manufacturers. But today I'm here with the review of Tinhifi p1 max ii planar IEM. Although this is the first set from the Tinhifi product line-up that I have reviewed. I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased Tinhifi p1 max ii IEM from Linsoul audio. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
The unboxing experience of P1 max ii was very ordinary. Which is a bit disappointing because this $100+ IEM doesn't come with a carrying pouch out of the box.There is an opportunity to complain about this to Tinhifi.
1. A pair of P1 max ii IEM.
2. Two pairs generic eartips of different sizes and a pair of foam tips.
3. Decent 3.5mm 4-core Oxygen-free silver-plated copper cable×1
4. User manual guide ×1
5. Warranty card ×1
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- Φ14.2mm Planar Magnetic driver.
~ Impedance :- 16Ω±15%
~ Rated power :- 5mW
~ Max power :- 10mW
~ Sensitivity :- 98+3dB@1kHz 0.126V
~ Distortion ratio :- 3%@1kHz 0.126V
~ Frequency response :- 10-20kHz
~ Connector :- 2-pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type :- 4-core silver-plated copper cable with 3.5mm gold plated jack.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The Tinhifi P1 Max II IEM showcases a sophisticated design and descent build quality. The 3D printed resin shell looks like it's made with precision and its sleek housing and durable materials ensure both aesthetic appeal and long-term durability. Attention to design details, such as ergonomics and cable quality, enhances user comfort and overall experience.
The stock 4-core silver plated copper cable has good build quality & The cable does not rub against the t-shirt while using the IEM and does not create any unwanted microphonics which is a big positive aspect of the cable. Although the cable is less prone to twisting, Tinhifi added a nice locking strap bracket to prevent it from twisting.
Therefore, it will be considered ideal for use in indoor or outdoor travelling. But the quality of the eartips was not good. Generic eartips seemed useless to me, but the interesting thing is that it comes with a pair of foam tips that can be used to continue the initial level of listening. These features combined make it an ideal choice for users. So it will be the top choice for those who prioritize comfort for long time listening.
★ Sound Aspect :-
P1 max ii basically "V" shape tuned set. Since this is a set of "V" shaped tunings, there is naturally more bass and treble emphasis and the mids are a little behind, There is no exception here. The internal configuration of this set has 14.2mm Planar magnetic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency.
The tuning of this IEM is fun & engaging also tonality was a bit bright-ish but it is safe to say that I did not get any major listening fatigue from its sound. However, those who are very treble sensitive may get somewhat fatigue from this. The foam tips that come with it are quite effective for the bright nature of the treble region, because these tips greatly reduce the brightness of the treble area. I've used stock eartips as well as aftermarket eartips during the sound testing period and it makes a good difference between fit, comfort, isolation and sound. I used which gave me good experience.
★ Gear used :-
1. Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
2. Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
3. Quloos Mc01 (Se & Bal both)
4. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
5. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
6. Tanchjim space lite (SE)
Tinhifi p1 max ii planar IEM which is a set of 16Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 98+3dB so a bit powerful amplification needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding, but a bit warmish or neutral sounding source will be more suitable with it.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
The P1 Max II offers well-controlled and tight bass response. A good amount of rumble is found in the sub-bass region. While not overwhelming, the bass is present and can handle complicated bass lines with clarity. As a planar, the fast attack & decay of bass was quite admirable but mid bass texture is noticeably lacking and some bleed with the lower mids which makes the bass note definition seems a bit weaker. Although it provides fairly clean low-end without any muddiness.
★ The Mids : -
The mids are clear and fairly detailed, offering good vocal clarity and instrument separation. However, there is some shoutyness in the upper mids section, It may become a little peaky source wise. Which has made the female vocal thin, on the other hand lower mids was recessed and the body of the male vocal has a tendency to be a bit lifeless. This IEM captures vocal and instrumental nuances less effectively. So the mids section will be considered as one of its downside.
★ The Treble :-
The treble region is typically described as bright and detailed, providing good resolution and extension, But the treble part is somewhat disturbed by planar timbre. At the same time, the body of the treble also tends to be thin As a result the guitar string instrument & cymbals sound bright-ish & unnatural. However, some listeners may find the treble to be slightly sharp or sibilant, depending on personal preference, track and source materials .
★ Technicalities :-
The P1 Max II offers a wide soundstage as 100$+ Planar in-ear monitor, with below average depth and height . Imaging is precise, allowing you to distinguish the positioning of various elements in a recording. On the other hand micro and macro details can portray fairly well most of the time. But tonality & timbre was not good, This is due to its planar glare. Overall, its planar magnetic drivers contribute to sound accuracy and speed, making it well suited for a wide range of genres.
★ Comparison :-
~ Hidizs MP145 (Regular varient 159$) ~
MP145 IEM is currently one of the best planar IEM under 200$. It is basically harman target 2019 v2 tuning which is considered mild U shape. The biggest strength of this IEM is bass or low end. It offers very clear, tight & controlled bass delivery where the physicality of the bass is blown out, even though the speed of the bass is less as a planar magnetic driver. But the midrange was clean and forward. Its vocal section is quite enjoying especially female vocal. So, the body of the male vocal is somewhat thinner side. On the other hand, the treble section was quite clean and well-extended, although due to the slightly planar timbre, the sound of some instruments seems more energetic, but technically it provided solid performance. Although the sound stage was fairly wide, the depth and height were surprisingly good and less amount of macro details. Overall its tonality & timbre was fairly accurate which is quite commendable as a 160$ planar IEM.
Vs ~ Tinhifi P1 Max ii~
The MP145 has several major differences with the P1 max ii. In mids section MP145 gave much better performance compared to P1 max ii. MP15 will be in a better position in terms of detail retrieval of treble section and better also impact & texture of bass, only P1 max ii will advance due to the speed of bass. Mp145 technically gave better performance but the amount of macro & micro details was more in P1 max ii. Even if it falls behind in sound performance, P1 max ii will be accepted by many people due to fit & comfort (3D printed resin shell) . On the other hand, the big and heavy metal shell like the giant tank of MP145 will not fit well in the ears of many people, as a result, it will disturb the fitting & long time usage experience.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 3/5
Mids : 3/5
Treble : 3.5/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Aesthetics : 3.8/5
★ Conclusion :-
The Tinhifi P1 Max II offers decent sound quality with its fairly well-tuned Planar driver . Its comfortable design and durable build make it a solid choice for those who prefer comfort & long-time usability. However, its high price tag may deter some buyers. Because it has given ok type overall performance for the price but there are better options in the current market. I can recommend it for those who are planning to buy planar IEMs for the first time and also value comfort. But if you give more priority to the sound quality, there are better options in the current market. So Tinhifi should launch more value for money IEMs in market in the coming days.
I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience


Linsoul Audio (Link isn’t affiliated)
Hifigo (Link isn’t affiliated)
Shenzhen Audio (Link isn’t affiliated)
TinHiFi is a well-known Chifi brand in the audio industry, Their once big hit product was T2. This IEM caused quite a stir at an affordable price.The brand is particularly recognized for good quality in-ear monitors (IEMs). They gained popularity for offering better sound performance at an affordable price, and making audiophile-based equipment accessible to a wider audience.
Tinhifi products often receive positive recognition for their sound quality and value for money, But they still lagging though Relatively compared to other IEM manufacturers. But today I'm here with the review of Tinhifi p1 max ii planar IEM. Although this is the first set from the Tinhifi product line-up that I have reviewed. I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.

★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased Tinhifi p1 max ii IEM from Linsoul audio. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
The unboxing experience of P1 max ii was very ordinary. Which is a bit disappointing because this $100+ IEM doesn't come with a carrying pouch out of the box.There is an opportunity to complain about this to Tinhifi.

1. A pair of P1 max ii IEM.
2. Two pairs generic eartips of different sizes and a pair of foam tips.
3. Decent 3.5mm 4-core Oxygen-free silver-plated copper cable×1
4. User manual guide ×1
5. Warranty card ×1
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- Φ14.2mm Planar Magnetic driver.
~ Impedance :- 16Ω±15%
~ Rated power :- 5mW
~ Max power :- 10mW
~ Sensitivity :- 98+3dB@1kHz 0.126V
~ Distortion ratio :- 3%@1kHz 0.126V
~ Frequency response :- 10-20kHz
~ Connector :- 2-pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type :- 4-core silver-plated copper cable with 3.5mm gold plated jack.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The Tinhifi P1 Max II IEM showcases a sophisticated design and descent build quality. The 3D printed resin shell looks like it's made with precision and its sleek housing and durable materials ensure both aesthetic appeal and long-term durability. Attention to design details, such as ergonomics and cable quality, enhances user comfort and overall experience.

The stock 4-core silver plated copper cable has good build quality & The cable does not rub against the t-shirt while using the IEM and does not create any unwanted microphonics which is a big positive aspect of the cable. Although the cable is less prone to twisting, Tinhifi added a nice locking strap bracket to prevent it from twisting.

Therefore, it will be considered ideal for use in indoor or outdoor travelling. But the quality of the eartips was not good. Generic eartips seemed useless to me, but the interesting thing is that it comes with a pair of foam tips that can be used to continue the initial level of listening. These features combined make it an ideal choice for users. So it will be the top choice for those who prioritize comfort for long time listening.
★ Sound Aspect :-
P1 max ii basically "V" shape tuned set. Since this is a set of "V" shaped tunings, there is naturally more bass and treble emphasis and the mids are a little behind, There is no exception here. The internal configuration of this set has 14.2mm Planar magnetic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency.
The tuning of this IEM is fun & engaging also tonality was a bit bright-ish but it is safe to say that I did not get any major listening fatigue from its sound. However, those who are very treble sensitive may get somewhat fatigue from this. The foam tips that come with it are quite effective for the bright nature of the treble region, because these tips greatly reduce the brightness of the treble area. I've used stock eartips as well as aftermarket eartips during the sound testing period and it makes a good difference between fit, comfort, isolation and sound. I used which gave me good experience.
★ Gear used :-
1. Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
2. Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
3. Quloos Mc01 (Se & Bal both)
4. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
5. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
6. Tanchjim space lite (SE)
Tinhifi p1 max ii planar IEM which is a set of 16Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 98+3dB so a bit powerful amplification needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding, but a bit warmish or neutral sounding source will be more suitable with it.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
The P1 Max II offers well-controlled and tight bass response. A good amount of rumble is found in the sub-bass region. While not overwhelming, the bass is present and can handle complicated bass lines with clarity. As a planar, the fast attack & decay of bass was quite admirable but mid bass texture is noticeably lacking and some bleed with the lower mids which makes the bass note definition seems a bit weaker. Although it provides fairly clean low-end without any muddiness.

★ The Mids : -
The mids are clear and fairly detailed, offering good vocal clarity and instrument separation. However, there is some shoutyness in the upper mids section, It may become a little peaky source wise. Which has made the female vocal thin, on the other hand lower mids was recessed and the body of the male vocal has a tendency to be a bit lifeless. This IEM captures vocal and instrumental nuances less effectively. So the mids section will be considered as one of its downside.
★ The Treble :-
The treble region is typically described as bright and detailed, providing good resolution and extension, But the treble part is somewhat disturbed by planar timbre. At the same time, the body of the treble also tends to be thin As a result the guitar string instrument & cymbals sound bright-ish & unnatural. However, some listeners may find the treble to be slightly sharp or sibilant, depending on personal preference, track and source materials .

★ Technicalities :-
The P1 Max II offers a wide soundstage as 100$+ Planar in-ear monitor, with below average depth and height . Imaging is precise, allowing you to distinguish the positioning of various elements in a recording. On the other hand micro and macro details can portray fairly well most of the time. But tonality & timbre was not good, This is due to its planar glare. Overall, its planar magnetic drivers contribute to sound accuracy and speed, making it well suited for a wide range of genres.
★ Comparison :-
~ Hidizs MP145 (Regular varient 159$) ~
MP145 IEM is currently one of the best planar IEM under 200$. It is basically harman target 2019 v2 tuning which is considered mild U shape. The biggest strength of this IEM is bass or low end. It offers very clear, tight & controlled bass delivery where the physicality of the bass is blown out, even though the speed of the bass is less as a planar magnetic driver. But the midrange was clean and forward. Its vocal section is quite enjoying especially female vocal. So, the body of the male vocal is somewhat thinner side. On the other hand, the treble section was quite clean and well-extended, although due to the slightly planar timbre, the sound of some instruments seems more energetic, but technically it provided solid performance. Although the sound stage was fairly wide, the depth and height were surprisingly good and less amount of macro details. Overall its tonality & timbre was fairly accurate which is quite commendable as a 160$ planar IEM.
Vs ~ Tinhifi P1 Max ii~
The MP145 has several major differences with the P1 max ii. In mids section MP145 gave much better performance compared to P1 max ii. MP15 will be in a better position in terms of detail retrieval of treble section and better also impact & texture of bass, only P1 max ii will advance due to the speed of bass. Mp145 technically gave better performance but the amount of macro & micro details was more in P1 max ii. Even if it falls behind in sound performance, P1 max ii will be accepted by many people due to fit & comfort (3D printed resin shell) . On the other hand, the big and heavy metal shell like the giant tank of MP145 will not fit well in the ears of many people, as a result, it will disturb the fitting & long time usage experience.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 3/5
Mids : 3/5
Treble : 3.5/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Aesthetics : 3.8/5
★ Conclusion :-
The Tinhifi P1 Max II offers decent sound quality with its fairly well-tuned Planar driver . Its comfortable design and durable build make it a solid choice for those who prefer comfort & long-time usability. However, its high price tag may deter some buyers. Because it has given ok type overall performance for the price but there are better options in the current market. I can recommend it for those who are planning to buy planar IEMs for the first time and also value comfort. But if you give more priority to the sound quality, there are better options in the current market. So Tinhifi should launch more value for money IEMs in market in the coming days.

I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience



Linsoul Audio (Link isn’t affiliated)
Hifigo (Link isn’t affiliated)
Shenzhen Audio (Link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:

RK Turan
You're presentations are a whole lot better then than before.Thanks for providing us with ideas.(I forgot my password so couldn't log in for a while.but still read them)
M
Md Ismail Hossain
Looks cool for the price
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ well-crafed & durable metal build IEM shell.
~ Very comfortable to wear in the ear.
~ Natural tonality & timbre as a single dd set.
~ Clean & forward midrange presentation.
~ Great staging, imaging & transparency.
~ Well-extended treble performance.
~ Very comfortable to wear in the ear.
~ Natural tonality & timbre as a single dd set.
~ Clean & forward midrange presentation.
~ Great staging, imaging & transparency.
~ Well-extended treble performance.
Cons: ~ Mirror finish shell fingerprint & scratch magnet.
~ Somewhat weaker sound isolation.
~ Useless stock nozzle filters.
~ Poor bass impact & depth (with Stock nozzles that came with it).
~ Average stock cable & accessories.
~ Slightly roll-off sub bass.
~ 3 - 5k region will be sibilance to many (Its nozzle filters are responsible for this issue).
~ Somewhat weaker sound isolation.
~ Useless stock nozzle filters.
~ Poor bass impact & depth (with Stock nozzles that came with it).
~ Average stock cable & accessories.
~ Slightly roll-off sub bass.
~ 3 - 5k region will be sibilance to many (Its nozzle filters are responsible for this issue).
★ Introduction :-
@TANCHJIM Official is a well-known Chinese audio company. They are well known for manufacturing quality audio gear. They ensure a combination of fine craftsmanship and aesthetic design along with advanced technology in product manufacturing and then release the product. Which attracts the attention of consumers along with the exceptional sound. Although they have released in the gear item market less than other chifi brands. Their most popular single dd IEM in their 200$ price category was the Tanchjim Oxygen. To maintain this continuity after a long time they have just launched Origin. I've been using this IEM as my daily driver for over four months. I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased Tanchjim origin IEM from Ali express (Grave Audio Store). I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completly my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of tanchjim origin was pretty good. All kind of accessories were present out of the box.Tanchjim has no room to complain in this regard
1. A pair of Tanchjim Origin IEMs.
2. Six pairs of different size eartips.
3. A large carrying pouch ×1.
4. Decent 3.5mm 6n Oxygen-free silver-plated copper cable ×1.
5. A user manual guide and some paper works.
The IEM comes in a rather large box with two types of cardboard with different sizes of eartips,(which quality is quite ok) stock cable & carrying pouch. On the other hand as a stock cable, high-purity 6N oxygen-free copper-plating silver wire, which according to tanchjim is effective as the Litz texture of the cable for softness and anti-oxidation. But in my opinion, the possibility of this cable oxidizing after several days of regular usage. But the good part of the cable is that does not create any unwanted microphonics while using it. I've always used an aftermarket bal cable with it though. Origin's white color stock carrying pouch is quite large and it is basically made of artificial leather. And the hand feel was good due to its finishing being like premium . Moreover, due to the good amount of space inside it, the IEM can be inserted very well.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- 10mm DMT 5th Generation Single Dynamic Driver
~ Impedance :- 16Ω±5%
~ Sensitivity :- 126dB/Vrms
~ Distortion ratio :- 0.056%@1kHz
~ Frequency response :- 20Hz-48kHz
~ Connector :- 0.78mm 2-pin
~ Cable type :- 6n Oxygen-free silver-plated copper cable with 3.5mm terminated jack.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
Origin IEM known for its meticulous design and robust build quality. This IEM features a sleek design with a focus on both form and function. Its metal construction build quality makes it very robust but due to the mirror finish the entire area around the IEM gets a lot of fingerprints and scratches very easily which looks quite annoying. Moreover, carved 3D logo of this IEM back side looks very nice, but the paint there wears off very easily after continuous use for a few months (without using pouch).
However, due to the metal build, it feels a bit heavy to hold in the hand, but this heaviness disappears when you put it in your ears, and it doesn't feel like you have an IEM in your ears.
That's why I've been able to listen to it for so long. I've not faced any problem of ear heaviness or discomfort. Due to its interchangeable nozzles being a little too thick and short, there was some trouble with the fit of the after market eartips. Because of this, many times in ear does not create proper seal. Overall, the Tanchjim Origin is for attention to detail in the design and highly commendable in the build and comfort department.
Sound Aspect :-
The Origin is another neutral and natural sounding IEM. Where harman-ish profile has some touch. But not treble or bass region boosted like other harman profile. It can be said that there is almost no coloration in its sound because the whole sound presentation is completely clean & transparent. This IEM comes with 3 pairs of interchangeable nozzle filters which are individually marked by "L, D, S" respectively.
"L" stands for~Light
"D" stands for~Dynamic
"S" stands for~Standard
But the saddest thing is that these tuning nozzles do not bring any change in the sound. And using after market eartips with them is a lot of trouble.
Moreover, its sound is not so good with stock nozzle filters, especially the bass region suffers more. Sub bass a bit roll-off and lack of mid bass presence is too much even 70-80$ range single dd IEM's mid bass seems better lol. On the other hand, 3-5k region will require sibilance for many people who are a little more sensitive in this area, they will face some listening fatigue.
Credit :- @TimmyVangtan
In my testing, to get the full potential of origin, it is necessary to use the DIY kit of Simgot EA500 (included tuning nozzle) . After using this tuning nozzle, Origin was able to show its maximum capability and the lacks of this IEM's sound were fulfilled. Noticeable improvement has come in the mid bass section and at the same time the sub bass rumble has also improved. Although the IEM is somewhat tips sensitive. I've used Kbear 07, Spinfit W1 & Trn T eartips with it but got the best results with T-eartips. Fit, comfort and isolation are also better with it.
Overall notes of sound have been thickened & warmth effect has been added which makes the overall sound signature much more engaging & enjoyable than the stock nozzle filters. So I judged the sound of origin using the tuning nozzle of Simgot EA500 and based on that I interpreted its total sound performance.
★ Gear used :-
1. @Questyle Audio Engineering CMA15
2. @Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3. Questyle M15 (Se & Bal both)
4. Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
Tanchjim Origin is a set of 16Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 126dB but it required firly powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding.
However, the best pairing I've found is with CMA Fifteen. Excellent staging, imaging even got lots of details & mico details. At the time I thought it was a 300$ range DD IEM.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
Origin features a good bass response that is often described as tight, controlled, & deep. Doesn't overwhelm the other frequencies but adds depth and impact to the whole sound signature. On the other hand, It has good extension into the sub-bass regions, but the sub bass is somewhat roll-off. providing good rumble which does not muddying the midrange or becoming boomy. Though mid bass struggles a bit to handle complex bass-lines that's a downside. It will not satisfy those who prefer boomy bass or bass head level performance.
So, here the focus is on quality rather than quantity of bass region. The bass, guitar and kick drum sound a little lacking in adequacy while ensuring good control levels while failing slightly to make the mid-bass self-sufficient. Because the control level is good, the entire bass frequencies are not overpowering by the midrange and high frequencies, so this balance manner ensures that all elements of the music are clearly heard and the listening experience is enjoyable. It can give fairly similar results in all genres.
★ The Mids :-
Origin's midrange performance is its biggest strength. It has ability to present vocals and instruments with smoothness, clarity, and a natural tonality indeed makes them stand out.Both male & female vocal's body was completely intact. Female vocal sounds a little more energetic in some tracks which can be a little annoying for some. The upper mids a little bit forward though that's why the artist's vocal section seems close to listeners. However, its lower mids region was also quite good , so it doesn't seem very thin or recessed at all. This characteristic is highly suited for mids lovers.Those who want adequate detail in the mid-range frequencies but without the problems of unwanted harshness or sibilance will get excellent performance from it, especially in genres such as jazz and acoustic music where there is an abundance of vocals and instruments. The Tanchjim Origin IEM can easily maintain enough clarity in the mids section so its characteristics will satisfy most mids lovers.
★ The Treble :-
The treble section is one of the biggest strengths of this set. Treble seemed lively and well-extended. Where there is no problem like harshness or sibilance. There is beautiful detailed which is not on your face type, smooth delivery along with micro details of descend amount as well as sparkle is available but not that much detail is missed or dull. Cymbals & Hi-hats sound natural without any unwanted boost which is why treble can be enjoyed for a long time without any listening fatigue. I can safely say that all but extremely treble sensitive folks will be satisfied with the Origin's highs.That is why it has been able to show descent performance in all genres.
★ Technicalities :-
As a single dd IEM, Origin technically showed better performance. Its soundstage is vey wide and at the same time the height and depth of the stage was more accurate. This wideness contributes to a more immersive listening experience, particularly noticeable in orchestral pieces or recordings with multiple layers.
Imaging was pretty good, pinpoint instruments placement & positioning which is really impressive. Origin undoubtedly gives better results in gaming.
On the other hand micro and macro details can portray fairly well. Tonality & timbre were also quite natural which is expected from a well-tuned single dd IEM. Overall, this IEM is providing solid performance in terms of technical aspect.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4.5/5
Treble : 4.2/5
Technicalities : 4.5/5
Dynamics/Speed : 4.2/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4/5
★ Conclusion :-
Tanchjim Origin IEM has been recently launched in the market as the successor of its previous model Oxygen. But the Origin's sound is quite disappointing with its stock nozzles which is not at all desirable from an IEM in the 260$ price category. However, if not used with the Simgot EA500 tuning kit (nozzle included) it will not be acceptable to many.
I would not call this IEM bad by any means but for those who are thinking of buying origin for them ea500 tuning kit is definitely mandatory, and I would suggest to purchase it. Hopefully my shared info will be able to satisfy the origin users and for those who are interested in buying this set.
I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience

Linsoul Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
HifiGo (link isn't affiliated)
Shenzhen Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
@TANCHJIM Official is a well-known Chinese audio company. They are well known for manufacturing quality audio gear. They ensure a combination of fine craftsmanship and aesthetic design along with advanced technology in product manufacturing and then release the product. Which attracts the attention of consumers along with the exceptional sound. Although they have released in the gear item market less than other chifi brands. Their most popular single dd IEM in their 200$ price category was the Tanchjim Oxygen. To maintain this continuity after a long time they have just launched Origin. I've been using this IEM as my daily driver for over four months. I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.

★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased Tanchjim origin IEM from Ali express (Grave Audio Store). I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completly my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of tanchjim origin was pretty good. All kind of accessories were present out of the box.Tanchjim has no room to complain in this regard



1. A pair of Tanchjim Origin IEMs.
2. Six pairs of different size eartips.
3. A large carrying pouch ×1.
4. Decent 3.5mm 6n Oxygen-free silver-plated copper cable ×1.
5. A user manual guide and some paper works.
The IEM comes in a rather large box with two types of cardboard with different sizes of eartips,(which quality is quite ok) stock cable & carrying pouch. On the other hand as a stock cable, high-purity 6N oxygen-free copper-plating silver wire, which according to tanchjim is effective as the Litz texture of the cable for softness and anti-oxidation. But in my opinion, the possibility of this cable oxidizing after several days of regular usage. But the good part of the cable is that does not create any unwanted microphonics while using it. I've always used an aftermarket bal cable with it though. Origin's white color stock carrying pouch is quite large and it is basically made of artificial leather. And the hand feel was good due to its finishing being like premium . Moreover, due to the good amount of space inside it, the IEM can be inserted very well.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- 10mm DMT 5th Generation Single Dynamic Driver
~ Impedance :- 16Ω±5%
~ Sensitivity :- 126dB/Vrms
~ Distortion ratio :- 0.056%@1kHz
~ Frequency response :- 20Hz-48kHz
~ Connector :- 0.78mm 2-pin
~ Cable type :- 6n Oxygen-free silver-plated copper cable with 3.5mm terminated jack.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
Origin IEM known for its meticulous design and robust build quality. This IEM features a sleek design with a focus on both form and function. Its metal construction build quality makes it very robust but due to the mirror finish the entire area around the IEM gets a lot of fingerprints and scratches very easily which looks quite annoying. Moreover, carved 3D logo of this IEM back side looks very nice, but the paint there wears off very easily after continuous use for a few months (without using pouch).

However, due to the metal build, it feels a bit heavy to hold in the hand, but this heaviness disappears when you put it in your ears, and it doesn't feel like you have an IEM in your ears.
That's why I've been able to listen to it for so long. I've not faced any problem of ear heaviness or discomfort. Due to its interchangeable nozzles being a little too thick and short, there was some trouble with the fit of the after market eartips. Because of this, many times in ear does not create proper seal. Overall, the Tanchjim Origin is for attention to detail in the design and highly commendable in the build and comfort department.
Sound Aspect :-
The Origin is another neutral and natural sounding IEM. Where harman-ish profile has some touch. But not treble or bass region boosted like other harman profile. It can be said that there is almost no coloration in its sound because the whole sound presentation is completely clean & transparent. This IEM comes with 3 pairs of interchangeable nozzle filters which are individually marked by "L, D, S" respectively.
"L" stands for~Light
"D" stands for~Dynamic
"S" stands for~Standard
But the saddest thing is that these tuning nozzles do not bring any change in the sound. And using after market eartips with them is a lot of trouble.
Moreover, its sound is not so good with stock nozzle filters, especially the bass region suffers more. Sub bass a bit roll-off and lack of mid bass presence is too much even 70-80$ range single dd IEM's mid bass seems better lol. On the other hand, 3-5k region will require sibilance for many people who are a little more sensitive in this area, they will face some listening fatigue.

Credit :- @TimmyVangtan
In my testing, to get the full potential of origin, it is necessary to use the DIY kit of Simgot EA500 (included tuning nozzle) . After using this tuning nozzle, Origin was able to show its maximum capability and the lacks of this IEM's sound were fulfilled. Noticeable improvement has come in the mid bass section and at the same time the sub bass rumble has also improved. Although the IEM is somewhat tips sensitive. I've used Kbear 07, Spinfit W1 & Trn T eartips with it but got the best results with T-eartips. Fit, comfort and isolation are also better with it.
Overall notes of sound have been thickened & warmth effect has been added which makes the overall sound signature much more engaging & enjoyable than the stock nozzle filters. So I judged the sound of origin using the tuning nozzle of Simgot EA500 and based on that I interpreted its total sound performance.
★ Gear used :-
1. @Questyle Audio Engineering CMA15
2. @Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3. Questyle M15 (Se & Bal both)
4. Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
Tanchjim Origin is a set of 16Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 126dB but it required firly powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding.

However, the best pairing I've found is with CMA Fifteen. Excellent staging, imaging even got lots of details & mico details. At the time I thought it was a 300$ range DD IEM.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
Origin features a good bass response that is often described as tight, controlled, & deep. Doesn't overwhelm the other frequencies but adds depth and impact to the whole sound signature. On the other hand, It has good extension into the sub-bass regions, but the sub bass is somewhat roll-off. providing good rumble which does not muddying the midrange or becoming boomy. Though mid bass struggles a bit to handle complex bass-lines that's a downside. It will not satisfy those who prefer boomy bass or bass head level performance.

So, here the focus is on quality rather than quantity of bass region. The bass, guitar and kick drum sound a little lacking in adequacy while ensuring good control levels while failing slightly to make the mid-bass self-sufficient. Because the control level is good, the entire bass frequencies are not overpowering by the midrange and high frequencies, so this balance manner ensures that all elements of the music are clearly heard and the listening experience is enjoyable. It can give fairly similar results in all genres.
★ The Mids :-
Origin's midrange performance is its biggest strength. It has ability to present vocals and instruments with smoothness, clarity, and a natural tonality indeed makes them stand out.Both male & female vocal's body was completely intact. Female vocal sounds a little more energetic in some tracks which can be a little annoying for some. The upper mids a little bit forward though that's why the artist's vocal section seems close to listeners. However, its lower mids region was also quite good , so it doesn't seem very thin or recessed at all. This characteristic is highly suited for mids lovers.Those who want adequate detail in the mid-range frequencies but without the problems of unwanted harshness or sibilance will get excellent performance from it, especially in genres such as jazz and acoustic music where there is an abundance of vocals and instruments. The Tanchjim Origin IEM can easily maintain enough clarity in the mids section so its characteristics will satisfy most mids lovers.
★ The Treble :-
The treble section is one of the biggest strengths of this set. Treble seemed lively and well-extended. Where there is no problem like harshness or sibilance. There is beautiful detailed which is not on your face type, smooth delivery along with micro details of descend amount as well as sparkle is available but not that much detail is missed or dull. Cymbals & Hi-hats sound natural without any unwanted boost which is why treble can be enjoyed for a long time without any listening fatigue. I can safely say that all but extremely treble sensitive folks will be satisfied with the Origin's highs.That is why it has been able to show descent performance in all genres.

★ Technicalities :-
As a single dd IEM, Origin technically showed better performance. Its soundstage is vey wide and at the same time the height and depth of the stage was more accurate. This wideness contributes to a more immersive listening experience, particularly noticeable in orchestral pieces or recordings with multiple layers.
Imaging was pretty good, pinpoint instruments placement & positioning which is really impressive. Origin undoubtedly gives better results in gaming.
On the other hand micro and macro details can portray fairly well. Tonality & timbre were also quite natural which is expected from a well-tuned single dd IEM. Overall, this IEM is providing solid performance in terms of technical aspect.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4.5/5
Treble : 4.2/5
Technicalities : 4.5/5
Dynamics/Speed : 4.2/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4/5
★ Conclusion :-
Tanchjim Origin IEM has been recently launched in the market as the successor of its previous model Oxygen. But the Origin's sound is quite disappointing with its stock nozzles which is not at all desirable from an IEM in the 260$ price category. However, if not used with the Simgot EA500 tuning kit (nozzle included) it will not be acceptable to many.
I would not call this IEM bad by any means but for those who are thinking of buying origin for them ea500 tuning kit is definitely mandatory, and I would suggest to purchase it. Hopefully my shared info will be able to satisfy the origin users and for those who are interested in buying this set.

I've provided purchase link below for everyone's convenience


Linsoul Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
HifiGo (link isn't affiliated)
Shenzhen Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:

ahammedsojib
@syd67 Hello, friend hope you're well. Actually for me the lack of bass is covered by the simgot nozzle and the depth is also better.This is my personal experiment you can try if you are comfortable with nozzle switching.

ahammedsojib
@syd67 Only used the diy kit of ea500
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Comfortable & light weight polycarbonate shell.
~ Well-extended sub bass region.
~ Clean & forward midrange presentation.
~ Satisfactory stock cable & accessories.
~ Fairly safe treble performance.
~ Overall sound value.
~ Well-extended sub bass region.
~ Clean & forward midrange presentation.
~ Satisfactory stock cable & accessories.
~ Fairly safe treble performance.
~ Overall sound value.
Cons: ~ Somewhat recessed lower mids.
~ lack of mid bass impact & texure.
~ lack upper treble & air.
~ Poor shell construction & transparent faceplate gets scratched easily.
~ average technicalities & sound isolation.
~ lack of mid bass impact & texure.
~ lack upper treble & air.
~ Poor shell construction & transparent faceplate gets scratched easily.
~ average technicalities & sound isolation.
★ Introduction :-
Truthear is quite new but it is reputed Chifi audio brand. They specialize in producing quality audio gears for fairly budget friendly customers. Truthear's products are renowned for their descent sound quality, durability, and stylish design, catering to both music lovers and casual users alike. They have gained a strong position in the audio industry for their commitment to quality and customer satisfaction. But the most interesting thing is that this is my first review of a Truthear product
I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me from @shenzhenaudio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of Truthear Gate was descent enough . All kind of accessories were present out of the box. Truthear has no room to complain in this regard
1. A pair of Gate IEM ×1
2. Two types of different size eartips.
3. Carrying pouch ×1
4. multi-core oxygen free 2pin copper cable.
The IEM comes in a rather simple box. Out of the box comes the IEM, carrying pouch, stock cable and two types of several pairs of eartips. The unboxing experience I got from such an entry budget IEM is really commendable.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- 10mm Single Dynamic Driver.
~ Impedance :- 28Ω±15%@1kHz
~ Sensitivity :- 122dB/Vrms@1KHz
~ Distortion ratio :- 1%@1kHz (94dB)
~ Frequency response :- 10-45kHz
~ Connector :- 2pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type :- multi-core oxygen-free copper cable with L-shape single end jack.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
Truthear Gate IEM typically uses polycarbonate material for its shell design , similar to other IEMs in the $20 range. That's why it looks so cheap. On the other hand uses a transparent plastic as a faceplate on the back, Where there is Truthear branding on the left side faceplate and Gate branding on the right side. Which allows easy visibility of the driver unit inside. But fingerprints and scratches can easily get on this faceplate due to which it tends to blurry, Which will look very awkward. But the minimalistic carrying pouch that comes with it is very helpful to protect the IEM from scratches. Although the space inside it is relatively less due to its small size, but it is quite capable of protecting the IEM because its quality is not very bad as a stock pouch, so it can be called usable. But the build quality of this IEM isn't quite as shaky as it seems.
Moreover, the stock cable that comes with it is quite good and can be said to be durable. Its stock cable is multi-core oxygen-free 2pin copper cable Because the connector is very recessed, it sticks to the IEM very tightly, so there is almost no chance of it opening suddenly. The Rubber coating has been used as the build material of this cable due to which it is quite soft and fairly twisted free. But this cable will become unusable due to its rubber coating bursting after long usage. However, the shell of this IEM was very comfortable due to its light weight. Due to which it can be kept in the ear for a long time. Among the two types of eartips that come with it, the wide bored eartips seem to be usable with which initial listening can be done. But after market eartips would be better suited for the best fit, sound and isolation. I've tried several eartips on it so I noticed that using Cp100+ eartips or Trn T eartips with it gives better results.
★ Sound Aspect :-
Truthear gate basically safe harman tuned set. The internal configuration of this set has single dynamic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency. Where sub bass is more than mid bass but control and quality is pretty good. It typically provides a balanced U-shape sound profile with fairly good representation of lows, mids, and highs, ensuring fun & engaging listening experience.
Credit :- Super*Review
Where the presence of minimal coloration can be observed in the upper treble and mids region. This set is very easy to drive so it doesn't need powerful amplification. It can be played well from the earphone port of any smart phone, but it gets a little better sounding when using a dongle dac. But in that case it would be wise to use any neutral sounding source.
★ Gear used :-
1. Cayin Ru7
2. Questyle m15
3. Quloos Mc01
4. Epz Tp50
5. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024
6. Tanchjim space lite
7. Hidizs Sd2
• I also tested this set by plugging into the earphone port of my redmi note 12 smartphone.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
Gate is basically a sub bass focused set, which can create a deep & rumbly environment. This is why sub-bass notes resonate fairly clearly, which is able to create clear weather for some delicate bass-notes and drum hi-hats. On the other hand, the mid bass section is largely disappointing because there is a noticeable lack of impact and a lot of texture is missing. So the sound of the kick drum seems too dull. However, it is able to give good performance in genres like pop, edm, dance, hip-hop.
★ The mids :-
The Vocals section is a strength where these sets shine. It deliver clear, detailed & forward upper mids, with a good sense of warmth and presence. At the same time the lower mids were slightly recessed. As a result, the male vocal sounds a bit fuller compared to the female vocal. Although there is a slight margin of boost in the 4-5khz region which gives the female vocal extra energy which results in some tracks sounding a bit shouty. However, the overall mids section does not seem too unnatural. So, better performance can be found in pop, edm & hip-hop than acoustic, classical & jazz type genres.
★ The Treble :-
The treble extension of this IEM is mediocre, reaching into the upper registers where there is some lack of air. But can keep the sound harsh or sibilance free. It maintains a smooth manner in the lower treble which avoids any kind of fatigue. Treble notes are fairly controlled, ensuring a pleasant listening experience even during long listening sessions. But there is a bit of boost towards 10khz which makes the high frequency notes a little more crispy. By doing this, the treble sparkle is somewhat presented , but the instruments character is somewhat disturbed. Then it becomes difficult to portray distinguish the subtle nuances of vocals, cymbals and instruments such as violin or guitar.
★ Technicalities :-
Technically this set is not able to perform as expected. The height of its sound stage is a little better than the average but the lack of depth was noticeable. Although the imaging was good, it was difficult to understand the presence of directional audio, that means the instrument placement was not exactly at the pin point position. So it won't be ideal for competitive gaming naturally. Even detail, macro detail was also of average quality. Moreover, tonality & timbre good but not very matured. If one does not give too much priority to the technical aspect then I think it will be suitable for many.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4/5
Treble : 4/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Astheatics : 3.8/5
★ Comparison :-
~Truthear Gate VS Epz Q1 Pro ~
Gate sub 20$ price range IEM but it has some strength due to which sound wise it comes close to Q1 pro, But both have some differences. Although the Q1 Pro is sub bass focused, but its sub bass rumble is quite prominent compared to the gate. In the mid bass section, neither of the two is strong, lack of impact & texture was noticeable. On the other side mids section of both the upper mids boosted but some touch of warmth can be noticed in case of gate due to which the vocal sounds seems a bit pleasing but Q1 pro feels a bit less musical due to lack of warmth.
Besides, the Q1 Pro performed better in the treble region. especially lower treble is pretty safe than upper treble. The gate will be slightly behind the position of the upper treble. Both showed average performance in technicalities. Although the sound stage is average, the depth is comparatively better than gate. But the imaging of the gate will go a little further. In terms of tonality & timbre, Q1 pro is a bit more matured, but both lack micro detail.
★ Conclusion :-
Sub 20$ price bracket is very competitive. Many chifi brands have released many of their offerings in this category, But now with the arrival of the gate, all the previous records are almost broken. It has actually managed to perform better than the price. So, I think it will undoubtedly be a good option for those who are planning to buy something in this price range and think that they will use it regularly and also do not give much priority to gaming. I would recommend it buying from my side. I hope my shared info will be helpful for many people to make a purchase decision.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

Truthear Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)
ShenzhenAudio (link isn’t affiliated)
Truthear is quite new but it is reputed Chifi audio brand. They specialize in producing quality audio gears for fairly budget friendly customers. Truthear's products are renowned for their descent sound quality, durability, and stylish design, catering to both music lovers and casual users alike. They have gained a strong position in the audio industry for their commitment to quality and customer satisfaction. But the most interesting thing is that this is my first review of a Truthear product



★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me from @shenzhenaudio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product.The entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of Truthear Gate was descent enough . All kind of accessories were present out of the box. Truthear has no room to complain in this regard


1. A pair of Gate IEM ×1
2. Two types of different size eartips.
3. Carrying pouch ×1
4. multi-core oxygen free 2pin copper cable.
The IEM comes in a rather simple box. Out of the box comes the IEM, carrying pouch, stock cable and two types of several pairs of eartips. The unboxing experience I got from such an entry budget IEM is really commendable.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- 10mm Single Dynamic Driver.
~ Impedance :- 28Ω±15%@1kHz
~ Sensitivity :- 122dB/Vrms@1KHz
~ Distortion ratio :- 1%@1kHz (94dB)
~ Frequency response :- 10-45kHz
~ Connector :- 2pin 0.78mm
~ Cable type :- multi-core oxygen-free copper cable with L-shape single end jack.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
Truthear Gate IEM typically uses polycarbonate material for its shell design , similar to other IEMs in the $20 range. That's why it looks so cheap. On the other hand uses a transparent plastic as a faceplate on the back, Where there is Truthear branding on the left side faceplate and Gate branding on the right side. Which allows easy visibility of the driver unit inside. But fingerprints and scratches can easily get on this faceplate due to which it tends to blurry, Which will look very awkward. But the minimalistic carrying pouch that comes with it is very helpful to protect the IEM from scratches. Although the space inside it is relatively less due to its small size, but it is quite capable of protecting the IEM because its quality is not very bad as a stock pouch, so it can be called usable. But the build quality of this IEM isn't quite as shaky as it seems.

Moreover, the stock cable that comes with it is quite good and can be said to be durable. Its stock cable is multi-core oxygen-free 2pin copper cable Because the connector is very recessed, it sticks to the IEM very tightly, so there is almost no chance of it opening suddenly. The Rubber coating has been used as the build material of this cable due to which it is quite soft and fairly twisted free. But this cable will become unusable due to its rubber coating bursting after long usage. However, the shell of this IEM was very comfortable due to its light weight. Due to which it can be kept in the ear for a long time. Among the two types of eartips that come with it, the wide bored eartips seem to be usable with which initial listening can be done. But after market eartips would be better suited for the best fit, sound and isolation. I've tried several eartips on it so I noticed that using Cp100+ eartips or Trn T eartips with it gives better results.
★ Sound Aspect :-
Truthear gate basically safe harman tuned set. The internal configuration of this set has single dynamic drivers which handle the entire sound frequency. Where sub bass is more than mid bass but control and quality is pretty good. It typically provides a balanced U-shape sound profile with fairly good representation of lows, mids, and highs, ensuring fun & engaging listening experience.

Credit :- Super*Review
Where the presence of minimal coloration can be observed in the upper treble and mids region. This set is very easy to drive so it doesn't need powerful amplification. It can be played well from the earphone port of any smart phone, but it gets a little better sounding when using a dongle dac. But in that case it would be wise to use any neutral sounding source.
★ Gear used :-
1. Cayin Ru7
2. Questyle m15
3. Quloos Mc01
4. Epz Tp50
5. Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024
6. Tanchjim space lite
7. Hidizs Sd2
• I also tested this set by plugging into the earphone port of my redmi note 12 smartphone.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
Gate is basically a sub bass focused set, which can create a deep & rumbly environment. This is why sub-bass notes resonate fairly clearly, which is able to create clear weather for some delicate bass-notes and drum hi-hats. On the other hand, the mid bass section is largely disappointing because there is a noticeable lack of impact and a lot of texture is missing. So the sound of the kick drum seems too dull. However, it is able to give good performance in genres like pop, edm, dance, hip-hop.

★ The mids :-
The Vocals section is a strength where these sets shine. It deliver clear, detailed & forward upper mids, with a good sense of warmth and presence. At the same time the lower mids were slightly recessed. As a result, the male vocal sounds a bit fuller compared to the female vocal. Although there is a slight margin of boost in the 4-5khz region which gives the female vocal extra energy which results in some tracks sounding a bit shouty. However, the overall mids section does not seem too unnatural. So, better performance can be found in pop, edm & hip-hop than acoustic, classical & jazz type genres.
★ The Treble :-
The treble extension of this IEM is mediocre, reaching into the upper registers where there is some lack of air. But can keep the sound harsh or sibilance free. It maintains a smooth manner in the lower treble which avoids any kind of fatigue. Treble notes are fairly controlled, ensuring a pleasant listening experience even during long listening sessions. But there is a bit of boost towards 10khz which makes the high frequency notes a little more crispy. By doing this, the treble sparkle is somewhat presented , but the instruments character is somewhat disturbed. Then it becomes difficult to portray distinguish the subtle nuances of vocals, cymbals and instruments such as violin or guitar.

★ Technicalities :-
Technically this set is not able to perform as expected. The height of its sound stage is a little better than the average but the lack of depth was noticeable. Although the imaging was good, it was difficult to understand the presence of directional audio, that means the instrument placement was not exactly at the pin point position. So it won't be ideal for competitive gaming naturally. Even detail, macro detail was also of average quality. Moreover, tonality & timbre good but not very matured. If one does not give too much priority to the technical aspect then I think it will be suitable for many.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4/5
Treble : 4/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Astheatics : 3.8/5
★ Comparison :-
~Truthear Gate VS Epz Q1 Pro ~
Gate sub 20$ price range IEM but it has some strength due to which sound wise it comes close to Q1 pro, But both have some differences. Although the Q1 Pro is sub bass focused, but its sub bass rumble is quite prominent compared to the gate. In the mid bass section, neither of the two is strong, lack of impact & texture was noticeable. On the other side mids section of both the upper mids boosted but some touch of warmth can be noticed in case of gate due to which the vocal sounds seems a bit pleasing but Q1 pro feels a bit less musical due to lack of warmth.

Besides, the Q1 Pro performed better in the treble region. especially lower treble is pretty safe than upper treble. The gate will be slightly behind the position of the upper treble. Both showed average performance in technicalities. Although the sound stage is average, the depth is comparatively better than gate. But the imaging of the gate will go a little further. In terms of tonality & timbre, Q1 pro is a bit more matured, but both lack micro detail.
★ Conclusion :-
Sub 20$ price bracket is very competitive. Many chifi brands have released many of their offerings in this category, But now with the arrival of the gate, all the previous records are almost broken. It has actually managed to perform better than the price. So, I think it will undoubtedly be a good option for those who are planning to buy something in this price range and think that they will use it regularly and also do not give much priority to gaming. I would recommend it buying from my side. I hope my shared info will be helpful for many people to make a purchase decision.

I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience


Truthear Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)
ShenzhenAudio (link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:

Rsifur9
nice review, keep going 




RK Turan
Nice review on gate, I really liked them. I'll have try the Q1 pro next.
M
Md Ismail Hossain
Design doesn't look good
I hope it sounds better than the other iem in this price range
I hope it sounds better than the other iem in this price range
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Durable metal shell construction
~ Comfortable to wear
~ Good quality modular stock cable & accessories
~ Warm & engaging midrange
~ Deep & rumbly sub bass response
~ Non fatiguing & very smooth treble delivery
~ Overall good sound value
~ Comfortable to wear
~ Good quality modular stock cable & accessories
~ Warm & engaging midrange
~ Deep & rumbly sub bass response
~ Non fatiguing & very smooth treble delivery
~ Overall good sound value
Cons: ~ Slightly recessed lower mids (common problem of harman or v shape tuning)
~ Not very comfortable for longer usage
~ Average technicalities & sound stage width
~ Treble section may seem a little too dull or dark for many
~ Somewhat thin bass note & minimal bass bleed issue (doesn't seem bothering though)
~ Not very comfortable for longer usage
~ Average technicalities & sound stage width
~ Treble section may seem a little too dull or dark for many
~ Somewhat thin bass note & minimal bass bleed issue (doesn't seem bothering though)
★ Introduction :-
Letshouer Audio is a company specialized in audio equipment. Especially their previous S12 pro & S15 series which basically extended their planar IEM journey as it generated a lot of hype around the Chifi world. Their pricing goal is to maintain with price to performance ratio, So that customers can easily be satisfied with their budget offering. They have been able to maintain this consistency for a long time and recently they unveiled their new planar 'S' series called the S08. The most interesting thing this time is the number "08" as they've entered the 8th anniversary of their journey and on that occasion they have recently released the S08 in the market. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few week Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me from @LetShuoer Audio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of S08 was surprisingly good. All necessary accessories can be found out of the box, which have not made any compromise in terms of quality. Letshouer has no room to complain in this regard
1. A pair of S08 IEM.
2.Two types of different sizes eartips.
3.4-core silver plated copper cable with included modular jack system.(3.5mm & 4.4mm both)
4.A Premium hardshell carrying case.
5.Some extra paperworks.
The accessories that Letshouer have provided with this 100$ IEM are really impressive. They have provided a very nice braided silver plated copper cable as stock cable which has the facility of modular jack system i.e. both single end and bal termination facilities are available. Its hard carrying case can also be called very practical. Which has enough space inside so that the IEM can be stored easily and as a result the IEM will be protected. Moreover, it comes with two types of eartips such as balanced and vocal tips which seem quite usable. But the most interesting factor is its vocal tips as they look and feel like a copy of the cp500 in terms of comfort lol.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- Fourth generation 13mm planar magnetic driver
~ Impedance :- 26Ω
~ Sensitivity :- 105dB
~ Frequency response :- 20Hz ~ 40kHz
~ Connector :- 2pin 0.78 mm
~ Cable type :- 4 core silver plated copper with modular jack system.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The S08 IEM does not feature the sleek and ergonomic design of previous generation planars. A slight difference can be noticed in the upper part of its shell as the branding of Letshouer is engraved on the left side and a wide ditch-like pattern is given just below it. Similarly, a similar pattern can be seen along with a logo on the right side. This set does not look premium in any way despite the use of aluminum alloy as its shell construction. But its build construction is rock solid without any doubt. So there is no chance to raise any question about durability. On the other hand, even after the metal build, this set was fairly light weight, so it can be worn in the ears for a long time, at the same time fit and isolation are fairly good. But it cannot be called super comfortable. Because if used for a long time it will cause pain in the ear but this problem will be more for those who have an average ear canal. Moreover, I have noticed that using aftermarket eartips in this IEM makes the fit, isolation & overall sound a little improved . I want to talk about Spinfit W1 here. I got the best result from this set using w1 eartips. So if someone wants to experiment with different eartips, then i recommended to use w1.
★ Sound Aspect :-
S08 basically warm v shape sounding IEM. Where the bass emphasis is more than the treble. Because treble is very smooth but not bothering. Besides, the mids section is positioned a bit towards the back, so it seems to be a laid-back sounding. Where the excess of musicality is more noticeable than technicalities.This is where the S08 differs from its predecessor planar sets. Immersive staging and precise imaging are not very impressive like the previous generations, but one of the good aspects of this S08 is that there is no planar glare. As a budget planar, letshouer has managed to keep the tonality & timbre fairly accurate.
Credit :- @ToneDeafMonk
In the case of previous s12, s12 pro, the biggest headache of many was overly sharp or aggressive treble response and at the same time the presence of significant amount of planar timbre due to which the tonality was full of adulteration. But this time they have been able to show a different scenery by releasing their S08 even though the technicalities have to be sacrificed for that reason. However, the warmish sound signature of this set is able to increase the excitement of listening to many people if one is not highly of any treble head.
★ Gear Used :-
1. @Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2. Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3. Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4. Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6.Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
Letshouer S08 is a set of 26Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 105dB. This set cannot be called easy to drive by any means. It cannot be driven without a good amount of powerful sources . But in that case, pairing with a neutral to bright sounding source will be quite wise. So a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, Somewhat improved imaging even got descent details & slight mico details even tonality & timbre was more improved.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
In the bass section, this set has shown solid performance, especially the sub bass region is its strongest place. The extension of the sub bass was very solid because it has the ability to hit very deeply which creates a rumbly environment and at the same time its control level was remarkably good. But the mid bass section is a bit disappointing. There was a lack of impact & texture. This means that bass notes can only be heard but not felt with a sense of texture and resolution, Moreover, the bass notes seem to be thinner. In many cases it becomes difficult for this set to render fast bass lines correctly. Hence, it is naturally difficult to maintain tightness and agility without any bleed issue. That's why the tendency to have a slight mixup with the mids can be noticed. Although it is at a minimal level but it does not overly make the listening experience bothering. This characteristic is not so very ideal for genres like rock and metal where bass guitar and drum demand precise articulation.
★ The Mids :-
Mids region has a lot of engagement & fun factor. Upper mids are clean, forward & smooth manner with a hint of warmish present. On the other hand, there is a slight bleed of bass with lower mids, due to which a warmth environment will be create there, but the lower mids was really recessed, But it will be less noticeable to many but there it is . That's why vocals and instruments are presented with a good timbre, which listeners to hear mediocre nuances and textures in recordings. As a result of which adds body to vocals and instruments, providing a lush & musical presence without sounding overly clinical or thin. That's why the body of male & female vocal seems to be a bit more fuller even vibrant. This IEM's midrange performance adapts to a variety of genres fairly well. It represents vocals and instruments with authenticity and musicality, which making them versatile.
★ The Treble :-
The treble part of this set was much more relaxed. However, details are lacking because they have rolled-off to reduce the energy of its upper treble. Treble extension was mediocre level, making it difficult to reach the upper registers. Because of this it fails to contribute to an airy and spacious soundstage, which is unable to enhance the overall sense of openness and realism in the whole sound frequencies. The lower treble is more smooth and the texture is comparatively less. But its treble is in a much safer position than their previous planar IEMs. Many may find its treble a little dull, especially those who are treble heads. So vocals, cymbals and subtle nuances of instruments like violin, piano or guitar are not conducive to hearing properly. As a result, maximum instruments are hindered from being clearly audible. Treble notes are fairly controlled & very smooth, which gives a pleasant listening experience even during long listening sessions. Each instrument and vocal line takes a bit of effort to clearly define which creates a cohesive yet moderate detailed music presentation.
★ Technicalities :-
S08 is technically not that strong. Which can be a bit disappointing as it is planar. Sound stage width was average on the other hand stage depth was better. Imaging was good but nothing impressive. I got mediocre results from there. I was hoping this set would provide holographic imaging like its predecessors unfortunately it didn't. However, letshouer has released this set as fun & engaging focused due to which the excess of staging, imaging even micro detail has been reduced, making it more suitable for those who want to enjoy the listening music more. The most interesting thing about this set was tonality & timbre because I didn't get any major problems related to timbre from a planar set of such a budget. Letshouer has done a good job in this regard, Which really surprised me.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 4/5
Mids : 4/5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4/5
★ Comparison :-
~Letshouer S08 Vs Tinhifi P1 Maxii~
P1 max ii basically a bit bright-ish tuned set. Where there is presence of sub bass & mid bass but the bass note definition is a bit distorted but the speed was good which contains the characteristic of typical planar.In the case of S08, the bass section is its strong point, especially the sub bass is very prominent compared to the mid bass, due to which deep & rumbly bass is available, but the impact of the mid bass section is comparatively less due to which there is less presence of texture. So overall the S08 will undoubtedly outperform the P1 max ii in terms of both sub-bass and mid-bass.
Regarding the mids, I can actually say that the upper mids of the P1 max ii are a little brighter and the lower mids are recessed, due to which the sound of male & female vocals is very unpleasant even track wise sibilant issue was found.
On the other hand, S08 will be in a better position in terms of midrange performance, because its warm & lush-ier character has given a special fullness to the total mids section due to which the body of male & female vocal seems fuller and the mids section can be enjoyed fairly well in all genres. So naturally S08 will be ahead in this aspect.
If l think from the part of treble, P1 max ii is quite strong but it is in upper treble, although lower treble feels more unnatural due to its planar timbre. Its upper treble is a bit bright but not much of sibilance issue, details were fairly good. Though it failed often portray instruments to their full potential.
Again, the S08 treble region is very smooth, somewhat dull manner was noticeable because upper treble air & sparkle is lacking to a large extent. Because it will seem more acceptable to treble sensitive folks
Considering the technicalities though, the P1 max ii lags far behind. Along with its narrow staging, the depth of the stage is slightly lacking, besides, the imaging was good, although the accuracy of tonality & timbre was not good, it seemed quite average.
The S08 is not very impressive set in terms of staging & imaging, so the position of both can be said to be almost similar from this point of view, also micro details condition are also similar. But there's no doubt that the S08 shines the most in tonality and timbre accuracy.
★ Conclusion :-
The S08 planar IEM offers better value in terms of sound performance. Instead of Planar's typical technicalities, this time letshouer has given more priority to fun & relax sound due to which this set has been able to give more engaging sound. I'm quite happy that it has good timbre presence despite being a budget planar set. So if someone doesn't like treble too much and doesn't give priority to competitive gaming then I think it will be an ideal choice. This set is able to satisfy only those who want to enjoy the music for a long time while also finding fun factor in the music. So those who are used to such a sound signature, I would definitely recommend to buying it.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
Linsoul Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
Letshouer Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)
Letshouer Audio is a company specialized in audio equipment. Especially their previous S12 pro & S15 series which basically extended their planar IEM journey as it generated a lot of hype around the Chifi world. Their pricing goal is to maintain with price to performance ratio, So that customers can easily be satisfied with their budget offering. They have been able to maintain this consistency for a long time and recently they unveiled their new planar 'S' series called the S08. The most interesting thing this time is the number "08" as they've entered the 8th anniversary of their journey and on that occasion they have recently released the S08 in the market. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few week Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.


★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me from @LetShuoer Audio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of S08 was surprisingly good. All necessary accessories can be found out of the box, which have not made any compromise in terms of quality. Letshouer has no room to complain in this regard


1. A pair of S08 IEM.
2.Two types of different sizes eartips.
3.4-core silver plated copper cable with included modular jack system.(3.5mm & 4.4mm both)
4.A Premium hardshell carrying case.
5.Some extra paperworks.


The accessories that Letshouer have provided with this 100$ IEM are really impressive. They have provided a very nice braided silver plated copper cable as stock cable which has the facility of modular jack system i.e. both single end and bal termination facilities are available. Its hard carrying case can also be called very practical. Which has enough space inside so that the IEM can be stored easily and as a result the IEM will be protected. Moreover, it comes with two types of eartips such as balanced and vocal tips which seem quite usable. But the most interesting factor is its vocal tips as they look and feel like a copy of the cp500 in terms of comfort lol.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- Fourth generation 13mm planar magnetic driver
~ Impedance :- 26Ω
~ Sensitivity :- 105dB
~ Frequency response :- 20Hz ~ 40kHz
~ Connector :- 2pin 0.78 mm
~ Cable type :- 4 core silver plated copper with modular jack system.
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The S08 IEM does not feature the sleek and ergonomic design of previous generation planars. A slight difference can be noticed in the upper part of its shell as the branding of Letshouer is engraved on the left side and a wide ditch-like pattern is given just below it. Similarly, a similar pattern can be seen along with a logo on the right side. This set does not look premium in any way despite the use of aluminum alloy as its shell construction. But its build construction is rock solid without any doubt. So there is no chance to raise any question about durability. On the other hand, even after the metal build, this set was fairly light weight, so it can be worn in the ears for a long time, at the same time fit and isolation are fairly good. But it cannot be called super comfortable. Because if used for a long time it will cause pain in the ear but this problem will be more for those who have an average ear canal. Moreover, I have noticed that using aftermarket eartips in this IEM makes the fit, isolation & overall sound a little improved . I want to talk about Spinfit W1 here. I got the best result from this set using w1 eartips. So if someone wants to experiment with different eartips, then i recommended to use w1.

★ Sound Aspect :-
S08 basically warm v shape sounding IEM. Where the bass emphasis is more than the treble. Because treble is very smooth but not bothering. Besides, the mids section is positioned a bit towards the back, so it seems to be a laid-back sounding. Where the excess of musicality is more noticeable than technicalities.This is where the S08 differs from its predecessor planar sets. Immersive staging and precise imaging are not very impressive like the previous generations, but one of the good aspects of this S08 is that there is no planar glare. As a budget planar, letshouer has managed to keep the tonality & timbre fairly accurate.

Credit :- @ToneDeafMonk
In the case of previous s12, s12 pro, the biggest headache of many was overly sharp or aggressive treble response and at the same time the presence of significant amount of planar timbre due to which the tonality was full of adulteration. But this time they have been able to show a different scenery by releasing their S08 even though the technicalities have to be sacrificed for that reason. However, the warmish sound signature of this set is able to increase the excitement of listening to many people if one is not highly of any treble head.
★ Gear Used :-
1. @Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2. Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3. Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4. Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5. Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6.Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
Letshouer S08 is a set of 26Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 105dB. This set cannot be called easy to drive by any means. It cannot be driven without a good amount of powerful sources . But in that case, pairing with a neutral to bright sounding source will be quite wise. So a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, Somewhat improved imaging even got descent details & slight mico details even tonality & timbre was more improved.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
In the bass section, this set has shown solid performance, especially the sub bass region is its strongest place. The extension of the sub bass was very solid because it has the ability to hit very deeply which creates a rumbly environment and at the same time its control level was remarkably good. But the mid bass section is a bit disappointing. There was a lack of impact & texture. This means that bass notes can only be heard but not felt with a sense of texture and resolution, Moreover, the bass notes seem to be thinner. In many cases it becomes difficult for this set to render fast bass lines correctly. Hence, it is naturally difficult to maintain tightness and agility without any bleed issue. That's why the tendency to have a slight mixup with the mids can be noticed. Although it is at a minimal level but it does not overly make the listening experience bothering. This characteristic is not so very ideal for genres like rock and metal where bass guitar and drum demand precise articulation.
★ The Mids :-
Mids region has a lot of engagement & fun factor. Upper mids are clean, forward & smooth manner with a hint of warmish present. On the other hand, there is a slight bleed of bass with lower mids, due to which a warmth environment will be create there, but the lower mids was really recessed, But it will be less noticeable to many but there it is . That's why vocals and instruments are presented with a good timbre, which listeners to hear mediocre nuances and textures in recordings. As a result of which adds body to vocals and instruments, providing a lush & musical presence without sounding overly clinical or thin. That's why the body of male & female vocal seems to be a bit more fuller even vibrant. This IEM's midrange performance adapts to a variety of genres fairly well. It represents vocals and instruments with authenticity and musicality, which making them versatile.
★ The Treble :-
The treble part of this set was much more relaxed. However, details are lacking because they have rolled-off to reduce the energy of its upper treble. Treble extension was mediocre level, making it difficult to reach the upper registers. Because of this it fails to contribute to an airy and spacious soundstage, which is unable to enhance the overall sense of openness and realism in the whole sound frequencies. The lower treble is more smooth and the texture is comparatively less. But its treble is in a much safer position than their previous planar IEMs. Many may find its treble a little dull, especially those who are treble heads. So vocals, cymbals and subtle nuances of instruments like violin, piano or guitar are not conducive to hearing properly. As a result, maximum instruments are hindered from being clearly audible. Treble notes are fairly controlled & very smooth, which gives a pleasant listening experience even during long listening sessions. Each instrument and vocal line takes a bit of effort to clearly define which creates a cohesive yet moderate detailed music presentation.

★ Technicalities :-
S08 is technically not that strong. Which can be a bit disappointing as it is planar. Sound stage width was average on the other hand stage depth was better. Imaging was good but nothing impressive. I got mediocre results from there. I was hoping this set would provide holographic imaging like its predecessors unfortunately it didn't. However, letshouer has released this set as fun & engaging focused due to which the excess of staging, imaging even micro detail has been reduced, making it more suitable for those who want to enjoy the listening music more. The most interesting thing about this set was tonality & timbre because I didn't get any major problems related to timbre from a planar set of such a budget. Letshouer has done a good job in this regard, Which really surprised me.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 4/5
Mids : 4/5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4/5
★ Comparison :-
~Letshouer S08 Vs Tinhifi P1 Maxii~
P1 max ii basically a bit bright-ish tuned set. Where there is presence of sub bass & mid bass but the bass note definition is a bit distorted but the speed was good which contains the characteristic of typical planar.In the case of S08, the bass section is its strong point, especially the sub bass is very prominent compared to the mid bass, due to which deep & rumbly bass is available, but the impact of the mid bass section is comparatively less due to which there is less presence of texture. So overall the S08 will undoubtedly outperform the P1 max ii in terms of both sub-bass and mid-bass.
Regarding the mids, I can actually say that the upper mids of the P1 max ii are a little brighter and the lower mids are recessed, due to which the sound of male & female vocals is very unpleasant even track wise sibilant issue was found.
On the other hand, S08 will be in a better position in terms of midrange performance, because its warm & lush-ier character has given a special fullness to the total mids section due to which the body of male & female vocal seems fuller and the mids section can be enjoyed fairly well in all genres. So naturally S08 will be ahead in this aspect.
If l think from the part of treble, P1 max ii is quite strong but it is in upper treble, although lower treble feels more unnatural due to its planar timbre. Its upper treble is a bit bright but not much of sibilance issue, details were fairly good. Though it failed often portray instruments to their full potential.
Again, the S08 treble region is very smooth, somewhat dull manner was noticeable because upper treble air & sparkle is lacking to a large extent. Because it will seem more acceptable to treble sensitive folks
Considering the technicalities though, the P1 max ii lags far behind. Along with its narrow staging, the depth of the stage is slightly lacking, besides, the imaging was good, although the accuracy of tonality & timbre was not good, it seemed quite average.
The S08 is not very impressive set in terms of staging & imaging, so the position of both can be said to be almost similar from this point of view, also micro details condition are also similar. But there's no doubt that the S08 shines the most in tonality and timbre accuracy.

★ Conclusion :-
The S08 planar IEM offers better value in terms of sound performance. Instead of Planar's typical technicalities, this time letshouer has given more priority to fun & relax sound due to which this set has been able to give more engaging sound. I'm quite happy that it has good timbre presence despite being a budget planar set. So if someone doesn't like treble too much and doesn't give priority to competitive gaming then I think it will be an ideal choice. This set is able to satisfy only those who want to enjoy the music for a long time while also finding fun factor in the music. So those who are used to such a sound signature, I would definitely recommend to buying it.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

Linsoul Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
Letshouer Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)
Attachments
Last edited:

thaslaya
Great review and pics!

ahammedsojib
@thaslaya Thanks for your compliment

ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ premium looking shell design & solid build construction
~ Good stock cable & accessories
~ Two pairs of effective tuning nozzle filter which can give different sound test
~ Very engaging, thick & safe harman target profile
~ Great tonality & timbre offered as a single dd IEM
~ Fast and well-controlled bass reproduction
~ Safe treble performance
~ Good stock cable & accessories
~ Two pairs of effective tuning nozzle filter which can give different sound test
~ Very engaging, thick & safe harman target profile
~ Great tonality & timbre offered as a single dd IEM
~ Fast and well-controlled bass reproduction
~ Safe treble performance
Cons: ~ IEM shell fingerprint & scratch magnet.
~ Somewhat intimate sound stage
~ slightly recessed lower mids (with blue nozzle)
~ Lack of upper treble air & sparkle
~ Not very suitable for neutral lovers
~ Sound isolation needed to be better
~ Somewhat intimate sound stage
~ slightly recessed lower mids (with blue nozzle)
~ Lack of upper treble air & sparkle
~ Not very suitable for neutral lovers
~ Sound isolation needed to be better
★ Introduction :-
Dunu is a reputed chifi brand that has become a premium brand as they care about the quality and innovation of their audio gear. They have built a strong reputation for being admired for their ergonomic design, premium materials and durability. Dunu's biggest contribution can be seen in their in-house R&D integrated driver technology capable of delivering a premium sound experience. I've had the pleasure of using some of Dunu's audio gear, most notably their flagship lineup, the Zen and Zen Pro. They've tried to highlight this continuity in their budget offering. They recently released falcon ultra as the next successor of their previous model Falcon pro. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few months . Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased Dunu Falcon Ultra IEM from Linsoul Audio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of dunu falcon ultra was surprisingly good. All kind of accessories were present out of the box. @DUNU-Topsound has no room to complain in this regard
1. A pair of Falcon Ultra IEM.
2. Four types of different size eartips.
3. Two pairs of tuning nozzle (interchangeable) filters.
4. DUW-02 pro cable with Q-lock lite included modular jack system.
5. 3.5mm to 6.35mm Adapter.
6. A Premium carrying case & a cleaner tool.
It comes with a very good braided modular stock cable also It has Q-lock LITE system. This silver plated copper cable with mmcx connectors that enrich the cable features & usability. The build material of the cable and functionality is really appreciated, On the other hand it comes with several different sizes of eartips, where dunu candy eartips and S&s tips must be mentioned. As stock eartips, these are pretty much everyone's top picks. The quality of the stock carrying case is also good and there is enough space inside it to keep the IEM very well. Two pairs of different tuning nozzle filter are gold & blue respectively. And they are able to bring a good change in the sound tonality. The accessories that Dunu has provided out of the box with their falcon ultra, it is quite rare to expect such an unboxing experience from the offerings of any chifi brands.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- Dunu's developed 10.7mm ECLIPSE (second generation) dynamic driver
~ Impedance :- 16Ω@1kHz
~ Sensitivity :- 108dB±1dB@1kHz
~ Distortion ratio :- 0.3%@1kHz
~ Frequency response :- 5Hz-40kHz
~ Connector :- Patented MMCX
~ Cable type :- 4-Core Silver-Plated Litz Copper with interchangeable termination jack
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The Falcon Ultra IEM is built with a smooth and mirror finish faceplate design. Which at the same time enhances its beauty and makes it more attractive. But this mirror finish faceplate gets a lot of fingerprints and scratches very easily which is annoying. The build quality of the Falcon Ultra IEMs is rock solid. These IEMs are generally made from metal alloy which ensures greater durability and sturdiness. Again its stock cable is durable and tangle resistant which gives this set good support during long time use. Moreover, dunu has attached a strap bracket to this cable so that it can be kept tangle-free very easily. This focus on build quality ensures that the Falcon Ultra IEM performs reliably over time. Comfort is the key features of the Falcon Ultra IEM. This thing is importance of increased wear while listening or moving. The IEM shell is not too heavy despite being of metal construction, the two shells weigh twenty grams respectively. But it doesn't feel any heavier in the ear than it feels in the hand. The fit of this IEM is excellent, as its shell is shaped like a round coin that can be worn effortlessly on the ear ensuring a good fit. As this set size is relatively small, it will fit almost everyone's ears equally. So it can be used safely for a long time without any discomfort. Besides, it has several types of eartips that have different sizes according to the ear canal. These stock eartips take the comfortable fit a step further.
★ Sound Aspect :-
Falcon Ultra is basically the safest harman tuned IEM. Although, its interchangeable gold nozzle filter provides somewhat laid-back sound. Where the brightness of the treble region is reduced to a great extent. The mid bass section is slightly boosted and at the same time reduces the texture and increases the punch. However, the presentation of sub bass & mid bass seems to be fairly well-controlled. Overall bass notes are thick & rounded resulting in a fun-engaging sound with less technicalities that can satisfy warm sound lovers. The sound with blue nozzle seems to have a slight V-shape where more sub bass rumble increases compared to the mid bass. On the other hand, the energy & sparkle of the treble region is better due to which the tonality becomes bright. This nozzle makes the lower mids a bit recessed while increasing the clarity of the upper mids, which is considered a common problem of harman or V-shape sound. But technicalities are benefited more in blue nozzle. Detail, micro detail is also better compared to gold nozzle.
★ Gear used :-
1. Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2.Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3.Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4.Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5.Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6.Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
7.Blon V1 (Se & Bal both)
Falcon Ultra is a set of 16Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 108dB so not very powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, imaging even got lots of details & mico details even tonality & timbre was almost accurate.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
The Falcon Ultra deliver deep and impactful bass response. Bass response is punchy, it has fast attack and decay that adds dynamism to the whole bass notes. Sub bass region is the strongest part of falcon ultra compared to the mid bass. It can provide deep & rumbly sub bass. That's why the sound of instruments like bass guitar, drums hi-hat seems to be weighty even full bodied. But there is some lack of mid bass punch. So kick drums sound isn’t punchy enough, with less impact and texture and at the same time this thing is able to fulfil with its gold nozzle. As a result to hear and feel the nuances in bass notes and impact fairly well. Overall bass was well-controlled and does not bleed into the midrange frequencies. However, the gold nozzle makes overall bass notes sound a bit thin, But the blue nozzle again boosts the sub bass region to a slight margin, then the sub bass rumble is much better than the mid bass punch. The gold nozzle ensures clarity and separation of different musicality and less detailed but gives laid back type sound presentation. Instruments and vocals i.e the midrange maintain their presence and detail, even portray during complex bass notes.
★ The Mids :-
This set provide in clarity within the midrange frequencies, vocals and instruments to be heard with good accuracy and details, Both are portrayed accurately without being harsh or overshadowed by the bass or treble frequencies, so Instruments maintain their natural timbre in the midrange. This thing is suitable for genres that emphasize acoustic instruments that rely on vocal strength.The gold nozzle provides warmth in the mids section due to which the artist's vocal sounds fuller, especially the body of the male vocal is made thicker. But in blue nozzle, the female vocal sounds more energetic and even the tendency to become slightly shouty can be noticed. On the other hand, due to the lower mids being recessed, the organic character of the midrange is afflicted more. Two tuning nozzles make this IEM almost versatile for various genres. The gold nozzle is suitable for pop, edm, hip-hop & electro genres, while the blue nozzle will give better result for rock, metal & acoustic genres.
★ The Treble :-
Treble region appeared to be simply crisp, clean and mediocre detailed. Where the presence of sparkle is also found it is limited so there is no presence of unwanted harshness or sibilance issue. Since the sparkle is natural, the whole sound frequency seems lively & vibrant. It has the capability to accurately portray instruments like cymbal, violin, and piano. Its upper & lower treble are fairly good extended, that's why this set can easily reach into the uppermost frequency without any roll-off issues. This characteristic is usually limited to blue nozzle, so it is possible to get better results in instrument heavy genres like classical, rock & metal. On the other hand, In gold nozzle creates a completely opposite situation was observed. Where the highs offer a smooth, less details & controlled presentation, so air & sparkle is lacking in more quantity which is considered more suitable for treble sensitive people. Even those who listen to pop, edm, hip-hop type genres they will benefit more from it.
★ Technicalities :-
Falcon Ultra IEM's soundstage is on the intimate side but stage depth was good, due to which I did not notice any issue in separation and layering. Its imaging was really good due to which the positioning of small instruments can be precisely located which is able to bring good advantage in gaming. But it's not like this set is offering a holographic presentation at all. The most interesting factor is its tonality, as a single dd it has been able to give coherent musical sound without any artificial separation and at the same time the timbre was also natural. This set of technicalities also retains enough descent performance.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 4.2/5
Mids : 4.2/5
Treble : 4 /5
Technicalities : 4/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4.5/5
★ Comparison :-
~Dunu Falcon Ultra vs Tanchjim origin~
In build quality, both sets are metal constructed to ensure better durability at the same time comfortability. But due to the glossy shell design, a lot of fingerprints get stuck on both sets very easily. Talking about the sound aspect, both sets are out of the box with interchangeable tuning nozzle. But the 3 pairs of tuning nozzles of origin are all gimmicky, that's why simgot EA500 kit is a better sound solution as an aftermarket tuning nozzle filter. Moreover, the stock accessories of this set were also of average quality. Falcon Ultra will be way ahead in this aspect. Both sets have a Harman-ish profile in the sound section. In terms of tonality, origin is almost neutral and falcon ultra is slightly warmer side. But origin's bass performance is not as strong as falcon ultra. Especially if you change the tuning nozzle, both sub bass & mid bass from this set give fairly good results. On the other hand, origin is somewhat sub bass focused, but the lack of mid bass is more noticeable even if it delivers descent sub bass, although it is somewhat covered by the use of its EA500 tuning nozzle.
In the mids section, Origin is the real winner because the lower mids of the falcon ultra are recessed, which is more noticeable in its blue nozzle. Again, in the treble section, the origin has managed to provide a solid performance where it has managed to maintain a smooth manner along with enough detail, so that there was no unwanted harshness or sibilance issue, but the Falcon Ultra is very safe here and many treble heads think it is more safe tuned for treble, but the blue nozzle of this set adds some brightness & detail to the treble region. However, origin can be said to perform better in treble. Technically both sets are better but Origin will be ahead for Immersive staging and holographic imaging. Moreover, The tonality & timbral accuracy of both sets is equally commendable.
★ Conclusion :-
The Dunu Falcon Ultra IEM's unboxing experience, build quality and overall sound performance are surprisingly good at the bottom of the sub-$250 price segment.This set musicality is given more priority than technicalities. So I think this set will be ideal for those who want to enjoy music for a long time and are more used to fun and relaxed tuning. If someone doesn't give priority to very neutral sound then I can easily recommend it to them and I'm pretty sure that this set will be more acceptable to maximum folks.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
LinsoulAudio (link isn't affiliated)
Shenzhen Audio (link isn't affiliated)
Dunu is a reputed chifi brand that has become a premium brand as they care about the quality and innovation of their audio gear. They have built a strong reputation for being admired for their ergonomic design, premium materials and durability. Dunu's biggest contribution can be seen in their in-house R&D integrated driver technology capable of delivering a premium sound experience. I've had the pleasure of using some of Dunu's audio gear, most notably their flagship lineup, the Zen and Zen Pro. They've tried to highlight this continuity in their budget offering. They recently released falcon ultra as the next successor of their previous model Falcon pro. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few months . Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.


★ Disclaimer :-
I purchased Dunu Falcon Ultra IEM from Linsoul Audio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of dunu falcon ultra was surprisingly good. All kind of accessories were present out of the box. @DUNU-Topsound has no room to complain in this regard


1. A pair of Falcon Ultra IEM.
2. Four types of different size eartips.
3. Two pairs of tuning nozzle (interchangeable) filters.
4. DUW-02 pro cable with Q-lock lite included modular jack system.
5. 3.5mm to 6.35mm Adapter.
6. A Premium carrying case & a cleaner tool.
It comes with a very good braided modular stock cable also It has Q-lock LITE system. This silver plated copper cable with mmcx connectors that enrich the cable features & usability. The build material of the cable and functionality is really appreciated, On the other hand it comes with several different sizes of eartips, where dunu candy eartips and S&s tips must be mentioned. As stock eartips, these are pretty much everyone's top picks. The quality of the stock carrying case is also good and there is enough space inside it to keep the IEM very well. Two pairs of different tuning nozzle filter are gold & blue respectively. And they are able to bring a good change in the sound tonality. The accessories that Dunu has provided out of the box with their falcon ultra, it is quite rare to expect such an unboxing experience from the offerings of any chifi brands.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver :- Dunu's developed 10.7mm ECLIPSE (second generation) dynamic driver
~ Impedance :- 16Ω@1kHz
~ Sensitivity :- 108dB±1dB@1kHz
~ Distortion ratio :- 0.3%@1kHz
~ Frequency response :- 5Hz-40kHz
~ Connector :- Patented MMCX
~ Cable type :- 4-Core Silver-Plated Litz Copper with interchangeable termination jack
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
The Falcon Ultra IEM is built with a smooth and mirror finish faceplate design. Which at the same time enhances its beauty and makes it more attractive. But this mirror finish faceplate gets a lot of fingerprints and scratches very easily which is annoying. The build quality of the Falcon Ultra IEMs is rock solid. These IEMs are generally made from metal alloy which ensures greater durability and sturdiness. Again its stock cable is durable and tangle resistant which gives this set good support during long time use. Moreover, dunu has attached a strap bracket to this cable so that it can be kept tangle-free very easily. This focus on build quality ensures that the Falcon Ultra IEM performs reliably over time. Comfort is the key features of the Falcon Ultra IEM. This thing is importance of increased wear while listening or moving. The IEM shell is not too heavy despite being of metal construction, the two shells weigh twenty grams respectively. But it doesn't feel any heavier in the ear than it feels in the hand. The fit of this IEM is excellent, as its shell is shaped like a round coin that can be worn effortlessly on the ear ensuring a good fit. As this set size is relatively small, it will fit almost everyone's ears equally. So it can be used safely for a long time without any discomfort. Besides, it has several types of eartips that have different sizes according to the ear canal. These stock eartips take the comfortable fit a step further.

★ Sound Aspect :-
Falcon Ultra is basically the safest harman tuned IEM. Although, its interchangeable gold nozzle filter provides somewhat laid-back sound. Where the brightness of the treble region is reduced to a great extent. The mid bass section is slightly boosted and at the same time reduces the texture and increases the punch. However, the presentation of sub bass & mid bass seems to be fairly well-controlled. Overall bass notes are thick & rounded resulting in a fun-engaging sound with less technicalities that can satisfy warm sound lovers. The sound with blue nozzle seems to have a slight V-shape where more sub bass rumble increases compared to the mid bass. On the other hand, the energy & sparkle of the treble region is better due to which the tonality becomes bright. This nozzle makes the lower mids a bit recessed while increasing the clarity of the upper mids, which is considered a common problem of harman or V-shape sound. But technicalities are benefited more in blue nozzle. Detail, micro detail is also better compared to gold nozzle.

★ Gear used :-
1. Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2.Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3.Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4.Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5.Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6.Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
7.Blon V1 (Se & Bal both)
Falcon Ultra is a set of 16Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 108dB so not very powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, imaging even got lots of details & mico details even tonality & timbre was almost accurate.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
The Falcon Ultra deliver deep and impactful bass response. Bass response is punchy, it has fast attack and decay that adds dynamism to the whole bass notes. Sub bass region is the strongest part of falcon ultra compared to the mid bass. It can provide deep & rumbly sub bass. That's why the sound of instruments like bass guitar, drums hi-hat seems to be weighty even full bodied. But there is some lack of mid bass punch. So kick drums sound isn’t punchy enough, with less impact and texture and at the same time this thing is able to fulfil with its gold nozzle. As a result to hear and feel the nuances in bass notes and impact fairly well. Overall bass was well-controlled and does not bleed into the midrange frequencies. However, the gold nozzle makes overall bass notes sound a bit thin, But the blue nozzle again boosts the sub bass region to a slight margin, then the sub bass rumble is much better than the mid bass punch. The gold nozzle ensures clarity and separation of different musicality and less detailed but gives laid back type sound presentation. Instruments and vocals i.e the midrange maintain their presence and detail, even portray during complex bass notes.

★ The Mids :-
This set provide in clarity within the midrange frequencies, vocals and instruments to be heard with good accuracy and details, Both are portrayed accurately without being harsh or overshadowed by the bass or treble frequencies, so Instruments maintain their natural timbre in the midrange. This thing is suitable for genres that emphasize acoustic instruments that rely on vocal strength.The gold nozzle provides warmth in the mids section due to which the artist's vocal sounds fuller, especially the body of the male vocal is made thicker. But in blue nozzle, the female vocal sounds more energetic and even the tendency to become slightly shouty can be noticed. On the other hand, due to the lower mids being recessed, the organic character of the midrange is afflicted more. Two tuning nozzles make this IEM almost versatile for various genres. The gold nozzle is suitable for pop, edm, hip-hop & electro genres, while the blue nozzle will give better result for rock, metal & acoustic genres.
★ The Treble :-
Treble region appeared to be simply crisp, clean and mediocre detailed. Where the presence of sparkle is also found it is limited so there is no presence of unwanted harshness or sibilance issue. Since the sparkle is natural, the whole sound frequency seems lively & vibrant. It has the capability to accurately portray instruments like cymbal, violin, and piano. Its upper & lower treble are fairly good extended, that's why this set can easily reach into the uppermost frequency without any roll-off issues. This characteristic is usually limited to blue nozzle, so it is possible to get better results in instrument heavy genres like classical, rock & metal. On the other hand, In gold nozzle creates a completely opposite situation was observed. Where the highs offer a smooth, less details & controlled presentation, so air & sparkle is lacking in more quantity which is considered more suitable for treble sensitive people. Even those who listen to pop, edm, hip-hop type genres they will benefit more from it.

★ Technicalities :-
Falcon Ultra IEM's soundstage is on the intimate side but stage depth was good, due to which I did not notice any issue in separation and layering. Its imaging was really good due to which the positioning of small instruments can be precisely located which is able to bring good advantage in gaming. But it's not like this set is offering a holographic presentation at all. The most interesting factor is its tonality, as a single dd it has been able to give coherent musical sound without any artificial separation and at the same time the timbre was also natural. This set of technicalities also retains enough descent performance.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 4.2/5
Mids : 4.2/5
Treble : 4 /5
Technicalities : 4/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4.5/5
★ Comparison :-
~Dunu Falcon Ultra vs Tanchjim origin~
In build quality, both sets are metal constructed to ensure better durability at the same time comfortability. But due to the glossy shell design, a lot of fingerprints get stuck on both sets very easily. Talking about the sound aspect, both sets are out of the box with interchangeable tuning nozzle. But the 3 pairs of tuning nozzles of origin are all gimmicky, that's why simgot EA500 kit is a better sound solution as an aftermarket tuning nozzle filter. Moreover, the stock accessories of this set were also of average quality. Falcon Ultra will be way ahead in this aspect. Both sets have a Harman-ish profile in the sound section. In terms of tonality, origin is almost neutral and falcon ultra is slightly warmer side. But origin's bass performance is not as strong as falcon ultra. Especially if you change the tuning nozzle, both sub bass & mid bass from this set give fairly good results. On the other hand, origin is somewhat sub bass focused, but the lack of mid bass is more noticeable even if it delivers descent sub bass, although it is somewhat covered by the use of its EA500 tuning nozzle.
In the mids section, Origin is the real winner because the lower mids of the falcon ultra are recessed, which is more noticeable in its blue nozzle. Again, in the treble section, the origin has managed to provide a solid performance where it has managed to maintain a smooth manner along with enough detail, so that there was no unwanted harshness or sibilance issue, but the Falcon Ultra is very safe here and many treble heads think it is more safe tuned for treble, but the blue nozzle of this set adds some brightness & detail to the treble region. However, origin can be said to perform better in treble. Technically both sets are better but Origin will be ahead for Immersive staging and holographic imaging. Moreover, The tonality & timbral accuracy of both sets is equally commendable.

★ Conclusion :-
The Dunu Falcon Ultra IEM's unboxing experience, build quality and overall sound performance are surprisingly good at the bottom of the sub-$250 price segment.This set musicality is given more priority than technicalities. So I think this set will be ideal for those who want to enjoy music for a long time and are more used to fun and relaxed tuning. If someone doesn't give priority to very neutral sound then I can easily recommend it to them and I'm pretty sure that this set will be more acceptable to maximum folks.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

LinsoulAudio (link isn't affiliated)
Shenzhen Audio (link isn't affiliated)


Last edited:
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Very Soft & Grippy properties
~ Offers Great Comfort & Seal
~ Due to regular bore, better advantage is available for maximum IEM's
~ Clean, crisp & slightly bright treble delivery
~ Price to performance ratio
~ Offers Great Comfort & Seal
~ Due to regular bore, better advantage is available for maximum IEM's
~ Clean, crisp & slightly bright treble delivery
~ Price to performance ratio
Cons: ~ Softer bass definition
~ Not very suitable for bright sounding IEM's
~ Offers an average sound isolation
~ Not the best tonal balance handling capability
~ Over the time these eartips will turn yellow-ish (nitpicking)
~ Not very suitable for bright sounding IEM's
~ Offers an average sound isolation
~ Not the best tonal balance handling capability
~ Over the time these eartips will turn yellow-ish (nitpicking)
★ Introduction :-
EPZ is a newly established chinese audio company. Compared to other Chifi brands their gear offering is limited but they have managed to occupy a fairly strong position in the market, made it possible for their better quality control. Epz mainly manufacture earphone, cable, portable dac amp and tws type items. I've used several of their budget offerings and found them to be pretty good for the price. They've recently released M100 model transparent silicon eartips in the market which are considered as their premium quality tips till now. I've been using this eartips regularly for a few week Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this tips in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
The samples of the M100 eartips were sent to me directly from Epz Audio. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely personal.
★ Fit,Comfort & Isolation :-
The EPZ M100 eartips offer a good fit due to its silicon materials. Which fits the ear canal well and also creates a good seal even which helps the IEM to stay in the ear for a long time. It is available in several different sizes according to ear shape which helps in descent sound performance. On the other hand it is soft & grippy which ensures good comfort, even if used for a long time, there is no discomfort in the ears, Because of that, these tips are able to provide good support to listeners even during long listening sessions. However, these eartips cannot bring a noticeable change in terms of sound isolation, i.e. it can be said that it does not enhance the isolation much. By doing this, the presence of external noise can be detected, although I didn’t expect passive isolation like the premium tips from here but it needed to be a little better than average. I thought it might give me results similar to the Spinfit W1 but the usage experience was different. Moreover, it did not disappoint me that much.
★ Sound Aspect :-
EPZ M100 creates a fairly tight seal in the ear, so the bass is enhanced to a good extent, but the bass note definition and delivery is a little too soft because these tips reduce the texture more and slightly degrade the depth. If the presence of the low end of an IEM is good by default, it will not sacrifice much. It can represent the midrange very nicely without any overly colored or shouty, It has managed to keep the mid section neutral, there is no tendency to be thin or recessed. So IEM tries to portray the character of mids as it is. for that the descent clarity & detail is intact,That's why vocals and instruments seem well-defined and natural at the same time. The treble section also shines well on these tips, I noticed that these eartips brighten the upper register by a slight margin.That's why there will be good synergy in warm or a bit dark type sets, on the other hand, there will be less chance of benefit in bright sounding sets because the brightness of upper treble will more increase. Though it can't handle tonality very accurately either. Slight emphasis on upper treble will naturally be an issue for bright IEM's.These tips are more helpful to handling good technicalities, The sound stage can be maintained properly and the imaging is precise with the presence of micro detail is also remarkably good.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4.5/5
Treble : 4 /5
Technicalities : 4/5
Fit & comfort : 4/5
Sound isolation : 3.8/5
★ Conclusion :-
The price at which the Epz M100 eartips have come to the market can be said to be almost justified. Because its soft, flexible material was very comfortable and at the same time to give good fit but the deficiency was only in the area of isolation and in the bass region, besides these tips have been able to provide all kinds of benefits. So I can generally recommend to buying it, however, personal experiences may vary from person to person but I don't think these eartips will make anyone feel regret.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
Epz Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)
EPZ is a newly established chinese audio company. Compared to other Chifi brands their gear offering is limited but they have managed to occupy a fairly strong position in the market, made it possible for their better quality control. Epz mainly manufacture earphone, cable, portable dac amp and tws type items. I've used several of their budget offerings and found them to be pretty good for the price. They've recently released M100 model transparent silicon eartips in the market which are considered as their premium quality tips till now. I've been using this eartips regularly for a few week Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this tips in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.

★ Disclaimer :-
The samples of the M100 eartips were sent to me directly from Epz Audio. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely personal.
★ Fit,Comfort & Isolation :-
The EPZ M100 eartips offer a good fit due to its silicon materials. Which fits the ear canal well and also creates a good seal even which helps the IEM to stay in the ear for a long time. It is available in several different sizes according to ear shape which helps in descent sound performance. On the other hand it is soft & grippy which ensures good comfort, even if used for a long time, there is no discomfort in the ears, Because of that, these tips are able to provide good support to listeners even during long listening sessions. However, these eartips cannot bring a noticeable change in terms of sound isolation, i.e. it can be said that it does not enhance the isolation much. By doing this, the presence of external noise can be detected, although I didn’t expect passive isolation like the premium tips from here but it needed to be a little better than average. I thought it might give me results similar to the Spinfit W1 but the usage experience was different. Moreover, it did not disappoint me that much.

★ Sound Aspect :-
EPZ M100 creates a fairly tight seal in the ear, so the bass is enhanced to a good extent, but the bass note definition and delivery is a little too soft because these tips reduce the texture more and slightly degrade the depth. If the presence of the low end of an IEM is good by default, it will not sacrifice much. It can represent the midrange very nicely without any overly colored or shouty, It has managed to keep the mid section neutral, there is no tendency to be thin or recessed. So IEM tries to portray the character of mids as it is. for that the descent clarity & detail is intact,That's why vocals and instruments seem well-defined and natural at the same time. The treble section also shines well on these tips, I noticed that these eartips brighten the upper register by a slight margin.That's why there will be good synergy in warm or a bit dark type sets, on the other hand, there will be less chance of benefit in bright sounding sets because the brightness of upper treble will more increase. Though it can't handle tonality very accurately either. Slight emphasis on upper treble will naturally be an issue for bright IEM's.These tips are more helpful to handling good technicalities, The sound stage can be maintained properly and the imaging is precise with the presence of micro detail is also remarkably good.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 3.8/5
Mids : 4.5/5
Treble : 4 /5
Technicalities : 4/5
Fit & comfort : 4/5
Sound isolation : 3.8/5
★ Conclusion :-
The price at which the Epz M100 eartips have come to the market can be said to be almost justified. Because its soft, flexible material was very comfortable and at the same time to give good fit but the deficiency was only in the area of isolation and in the bass region, besides these tips have been able to provide all kinds of benefits. So I can generally recommend to buying it, however, personal experiences may vary from person to person but I don't think these eartips will make anyone feel regret.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

Epz Ali express store (link isn’t affiliated)

Last edited:
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Descent build quality
~ Fun & engaging U shape signature
~ Deep and fairly controlled bass response
~ well-extended treble performance
~ Clean & a bit forward upper mids
~ wider sound staging capability
~ Fun & engaging U shape signature
~ Deep and fairly controlled bass response
~ well-extended treble performance
~ Clean & a bit forward upper mids
~ wider sound staging capability
Cons: ~ Thin lower mids region & poor imaging
~ Upper treble sometimes gets a little too energetic
~ not the best bass note definition & control
~ Average dynamics presentation
~ Timbre accuracy could've been better
~ Upper treble sometimes gets a little too energetic
~ not the best bass note definition & control
~ Average dynamics presentation
~ Timbre accuracy could've been better
★ Introduction :-
Artti is a relatively new Chinese audio brand, Although it is a sub brand of Letshouer. But their product numbers are limited. So far they have released quite a few IEMs that are priced almost within reach.Their T10 model planar set was pretty good under $100 bucks. Although their R1 set was the first item that I used. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few months. Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me from Artti Audio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The Artti R1 set comes in a fairly large box where the IEM comes with a braided copper cable and two different sized eartips. Also, a small carrying pouch is available out of the box, which is small in size and has less space inside, so carrying the IEM may be a bit of a hassle. However, considering the price ratio, the accessories that Artti Audio is providing are not average in any way, and I will not even say the best possible experience. So Artti audio has no room to complain in this regard.
1 . A pair of R1 IEM
2 .Two types of different sizes eartips
3 . Four core braided copper cable
4 . Small Carrying pouch
5 . User manual and some extra paper works
The accessories were decent enough, stock cable is four core braided copper cable. According to Artti, it is an Australian copper cable, but to me, its looks & purity are similar to ordinary cables, But I did not notice anything extra ordinary. Interestingly, the cable does not create any unwanted microphonics during usage, even Artti has added a strap bracket to this cable to keep it tangle free which is pretty good. Moreover, the stock eartips quality was softer side , especially the white tips, gave better support to the initial listening experience compared to the black color tips. Again, the carrying pouch seems to be practical, IEM can be kept but it would be convenient if the size is a little bigger and the space inside is a little more.
★ Specifications :-
~ Model :- ARTTI R1
~ Driver Unit :- Triple dynamic drivers/side
~ Impedance :- 20.4Ω±1% (@1kHz)
~ Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) :- ≤3% (@1kHz)
~ Sensitivity :- 102dB/mW (@1kHz)
~ Frequency Response :- 20Hz-20kHz
~ Cable Length :- 1.2M±0.1M
~ Plug :- 3.5mm/4.4mm-0.78PIN
~ Cable :- Four-strand 216-core * 0.05mm Australian high-purity copper wire
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
Although this set does not offer anything impressive in terms of design, it is rock solid in terms of build construction. Aluminum alloy with anodized finish along with precision engraving of CNC housing, makes this set light weight & durable. Due to the light weight shell, it fits very comfortably in the ear and can be used for a long time without any problems like ear heaviness or discomfort. On the other hand, it sound isolation was mediocre level, although it is slightly enhanced with after market eartips. I would not call this set isn’t super comfortable in any way because those with relatively small ear canal may have some problem with fit issues. But I'm hopeful that it will fit maximum folks ears.
★ Sound Aspect :-
The Artti R1 IEM features a mild U-Shape sound profile that emphasizes a balanced and neutral sound.Triple dynamic driver has been used as the internal configuration of this set which handles the full sound frequency. Harman-ish tuned this set has several strengths, the sound stage is one of them. It mainly deserves praise for wide soundstage and fairly accurate instrument separation, which makes it quite competitive in its price category.Because of which it will be acceptable to many.
Credit :- hobbytalk
★ Gear used :-
1. Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2 . Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3 . Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4 . Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5 . Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6 . Fosi Audio Ds1 (Se & Bal both)
7 . Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
8 . Blon V1 (Se & Bal both)
ARTTI R1 is a set of 20 Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 102dB so not very powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, slightly improved imaging even a bit better micro detailing capability. There was also a little change in tonality.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
The bass region of this set shines very well, especially the sub bass, there is huge sub bass rumble which is quite deep but the problem is that due to the presence of this sub bass, the lower mids section has suffered a bit and there is noticeable bass bleed. The mid bass seems a bit mellow, the punch there is quite soft, there is generally less tendency to be more vibrant and energetic, and the weight descent of bass notes but lacks texture, and the fast bass line handling is often bloated, while other frequencies emphasis on overpowering. If the boominess of the bass region was a little less, then the lower frequency would have been clearer and the definition would have been good. As a result bass heavy tracks could be made much more enjoyable.
★ The Mids :-
Mids section was very clean & detailed. Where there is a lot of "clarity" in the tone due to the forwardness of the upper mids. Represents the character of the male & female vocals well but not too lush or soothing as there is a good amount of boost in the 3-5k which makes the vocals a little too energetic at times which emphasizes the high-pitched vocals that are upper. Makes the mids a bit shouty. Because of this, the female vocal seems lifeless in some recordings, but this problem does not have to be faced in all tracks. On the other hand, the body of the lower mids was a bit thin with a hint of warmth touch which tried to give a sense of thickness and warmth to the overall tone which benefited the male vocal. Essentially harman-ish tuning features to sacrifice the lower midrange to maintain the balance between bass and treble, which usually results in vocal timbre at the expense of a more linear midrange.
★ The Treble :-
The treble on the ARTTI R1 is usually extended but there was less presence of natural sense of airiness. treble is generally bright even seems a bit harsh but this harshness was more noticeable in stock cable and when I used after market cable it was almost reduced. However, the harshness of the mid-treble is somewhat tiring as there is occasional sibilance. I got a bit of a jittery feeling from high-frequency sounds like cymbals, high hats. This was more noticeable in classical, rock, and even electronic genres. Although I prefer the cohesive and non metallic shrillness that one would expect from such a tribride setup. But I don't think the lack of natural sparkle will fully satisfy the treble head folk.
★ Technicalities :-
This IEM is technically not that strong. Although the soundstage was quite spacious with a good sense of depth and height, but the imaging was on the weaker side. Moreover, the amount of detail & micro detail was very average even I did not notice anything impressive in terms of dynamics and speed. The tonality & timbre were a bit of adulterated. Which is a bit disappointing to get from such a tribride set. But they seem to have prioritized the fun factor more than technicalities. For those who prefer moderately detailed presentation with bass heavy fun & engaging sound, I think this set can be a good option at this price range.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 4 /5
Mids : 4 /5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Dynamics & speed : 3.8/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4 /5
★ Conclusion :-
Artti R1 IEM has been able to give descent enough result from unboxing experience to overall sound performance. The sound didn't seem too colored and it didn't tend to dry out either. Although there are many options in its price range in the market, it is offering a complete package at its own price. So if one doesn't have much difficulty with bass boosted sound then this set will not feel that much bothering. I would recommend to buying it but must be sure how well it fits with the personal taste.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
Artti official Ali express store
(link isn’t affiliated)
Artti is a relatively new Chinese audio brand, Although it is a sub brand of Letshouer. But their product numbers are limited. So far they have released quite a few IEMs that are priced almost within reach.Their T10 model planar set was pretty good under $100 bucks. Although their R1 set was the first item that I used. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few months. Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.


★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me from Artti Audio . I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The Artti R1 set comes in a fairly large box where the IEM comes with a braided copper cable and two different sized eartips. Also, a small carrying pouch is available out of the box, which is small in size and has less space inside, so carrying the IEM may be a bit of a hassle. However, considering the price ratio, the accessories that Artti Audio is providing are not average in any way, and I will not even say the best possible experience. So Artti audio has no room to complain in this regard.

1 . A pair of R1 IEM
2 .Two types of different sizes eartips
3 . Four core braided copper cable
4 . Small Carrying pouch
5 . User manual and some extra paper works
The accessories were decent enough, stock cable is four core braided copper cable. According to Artti, it is an Australian copper cable, but to me, its looks & purity are similar to ordinary cables, But I did not notice anything extra ordinary. Interestingly, the cable does not create any unwanted microphonics during usage, even Artti has added a strap bracket to this cable to keep it tangle free which is pretty good. Moreover, the stock eartips quality was softer side , especially the white tips, gave better support to the initial listening experience compared to the black color tips. Again, the carrying pouch seems to be practical, IEM can be kept but it would be convenient if the size is a little bigger and the space inside is a little more.
★ Specifications :-
~ Model :- ARTTI R1
~ Driver Unit :- Triple dynamic drivers/side
~ Impedance :- 20.4Ω±1% (@1kHz)
~ Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) :- ≤3% (@1kHz)
~ Sensitivity :- 102dB/mW (@1kHz)
~ Frequency Response :- 20Hz-20kHz
~ Cable Length :- 1.2M±0.1M
~ Plug :- 3.5mm/4.4mm-0.78PIN
~ Cable :- Four-strand 216-core * 0.05mm Australian high-purity copper wire
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
Although this set does not offer anything impressive in terms of design, it is rock solid in terms of build construction. Aluminum alloy with anodized finish along with precision engraving of CNC housing, makes this set light weight & durable. Due to the light weight shell, it fits very comfortably in the ear and can be used for a long time without any problems like ear heaviness or discomfort. On the other hand, it sound isolation was mediocre level, although it is slightly enhanced with after market eartips. I would not call this set isn’t super comfortable in any way because those with relatively small ear canal may have some problem with fit issues. But I'm hopeful that it will fit maximum folks ears.

★ Sound Aspect :-
The Artti R1 IEM features a mild U-Shape sound profile that emphasizes a balanced and neutral sound.Triple dynamic driver has been used as the internal configuration of this set which handles the full sound frequency. Harman-ish tuned this set has several strengths, the sound stage is one of them. It mainly deserves praise for wide soundstage and fairly accurate instrument separation, which makes it quite competitive in its price category.Because of which it will be acceptable to many.

Credit :- hobbytalk
★ Gear used :-
1. Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2 . Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3 . Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4 . Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5 . Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6 . Fosi Audio Ds1 (Se & Bal both)
7 . Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
8 . Blon V1 (Se & Bal both)
ARTTI R1 is a set of 20 Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 102dB so not very powerful amplification is needed to drive it, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, slightly improved imaging even a bit better micro detailing capability. There was also a little change in tonality.

Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
The bass region of this set shines very well, especially the sub bass, there is huge sub bass rumble which is quite deep but the problem is that due to the presence of this sub bass, the lower mids section has suffered a bit and there is noticeable bass bleed. The mid bass seems a bit mellow, the punch there is quite soft, there is generally less tendency to be more vibrant and energetic, and the weight descent of bass notes but lacks texture, and the fast bass line handling is often bloated, while other frequencies emphasis on overpowering. If the boominess of the bass region was a little less, then the lower frequency would have been clearer and the definition would have been good. As a result bass heavy tracks could be made much more enjoyable.
★ The Mids :-
Mids section was very clean & detailed. Where there is a lot of "clarity" in the tone due to the forwardness of the upper mids. Represents the character of the male & female vocals well but not too lush or soothing as there is a good amount of boost in the 3-5k which makes the vocals a little too energetic at times which emphasizes the high-pitched vocals that are upper. Makes the mids a bit shouty. Because of this, the female vocal seems lifeless in some recordings, but this problem does not have to be faced in all tracks. On the other hand, the body of the lower mids was a bit thin with a hint of warmth touch which tried to give a sense of thickness and warmth to the overall tone which benefited the male vocal. Essentially harman-ish tuning features to sacrifice the lower midrange to maintain the balance between bass and treble, which usually results in vocal timbre at the expense of a more linear midrange.

★ The Treble :-
The treble on the ARTTI R1 is usually extended but there was less presence of natural sense of airiness. treble is generally bright even seems a bit harsh but this harshness was more noticeable in stock cable and when I used after market cable it was almost reduced. However, the harshness of the mid-treble is somewhat tiring as there is occasional sibilance. I got a bit of a jittery feeling from high-frequency sounds like cymbals, high hats. This was more noticeable in classical, rock, and even electronic genres. Although I prefer the cohesive and non metallic shrillness that one would expect from such a tribride setup. But I don't think the lack of natural sparkle will fully satisfy the treble head folk.
★ Technicalities :-
This IEM is technically not that strong. Although the soundstage was quite spacious with a good sense of depth and height, but the imaging was on the weaker side. Moreover, the amount of detail & micro detail was very average even I did not notice anything impressive in terms of dynamics and speed. The tonality & timbre were a bit of adulterated. Which is a bit disappointing to get from such a tribride set. But they seem to have prioritized the fun factor more than technicalities. For those who prefer moderately detailed presentation with bass heavy fun & engaging sound, I think this set can be a good option at this price range.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 4 /5
Mids : 4 /5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 3.5/5
Dynamics & speed : 3.8/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4 /5
★ Conclusion :-
Artti R1 IEM has been able to give descent enough result from unboxing experience to overall sound performance. The sound didn't seem too colored and it didn't tend to dry out either. Although there are many options in its price range in the market, it is offering a complete package at its own price. So if one doesn't have much difficulty with bass boosted sound then this set will not feel that much bothering. I would recommend to buying it but must be sure how well it fits with the personal taste.

I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

Artti official Ali express store
(link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:
P
Pranto Dev
Nice one
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Durable metal build construction
~ Great fit & comfort
~ Two pairs of effective tuning nozzle
~ Clean and slightly forward mids
~ Fast attacking bass response
~ Good staging & imaging capability
~ Great fit & comfort
~ Two pairs of effective tuning nozzle
~ Clean and slightly forward mids
~ Fast attacking bass response
~ Good staging & imaging capability
Cons: ~ Silver nozzle sound is very aggressive & fatiguing
~ Driver flex issue
~ Tonality & timbre accuracy just average (silver nozzle)
~ Thin bass note impact & lack of texture
~ Poor stock cable quality
~ Very source depended sound
~ Driver flex issue
~ Tonality & timbre accuracy just average (silver nozzle)
~ Thin bass note impact & lack of texture
~ Poor stock cable quality
~ Very source depended sound
★ Introduction :-
NF Audio is a well-known chifi brand but they lag behind other chifi manufacturers. They mainly make in-ear monitors (IEM). I haven't used much of their offerings. Although I purchased their NM2 a few years ago for personal use and found it to be a pretty ideal set sound wise.Their target includes both single dd as well as multi-driver IEMs, with a reputation for descent build quality and sound performance even with the attention to detail they always have in the user experience. I recently got my hands on their music series RA15 model single dd IEM, Which is my second used item of NF Audio so far. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few week. Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me directly from NF Audio. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The RA15 set provides the necessary accessories along with beautiful packaging. It comes with a single end stock cable, and a black color card bord with four pairs of different size silicon eartips. At the same time, a thin leather pouch is provided to carry the earphone. Besides, also two pairs of tuning nozzles are provided. One of which is gold and the other one is silver.
1. A pair of RA15 IEM ×1
2 . Four pairs of different size ms42 silicon eartips
3 . Two pairs of interchangeable nozzle
4 . silver plated copper cable ×1
5 . Simple leather pouch ×1
6 . User manual guide ×1
The quality of the provided accessories was not very satisfactory. Especially not to mention the stock cable, very average quality of plasticky material braided sliver plated copper cable which will definitely become useless after a few days of regular use. The carrying pouch was also very simple, which protects the IEM from scratches, but it does not seem to be effective in practical life. It's a bit disappointing to get such average accessories from an IEM for around $80. At this price, others in the market offer a better unboxing experience.
★ Specifications :-
★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
This IEM shaped like a small candy, the shell of this IEM is fully metal constructed, so it feels solid in hand and ensures robustness. But here the design is not very attractive because Nf audio has focused more on the build quality than the design here. Despite the metal alloy build, but also it has been reduced in size due to which it fits perfectly in the ear and when worn in the ear, it can be said that it is super comfortable. It can be used comfortably for long periods of time even for those who are used to using IEMs while lying down. I was able to wear it in my ears for about three hours straight any kind of issues without earache or loss of balance. It can fully satisfy those who want to avoid problems like fit issues or ear heaviness in daily commuting.
★ Sound Aspect :-
RA15 is basically a set of bright U shape profile, where the emphasis of treble is very high. As its internal configuration, the full sound frequency has been handled with a 10mm dynamic driver and two interchangeable nozzles provide a test of different sound tonality. Although the sound of the gold nozzle is fairly safe tuned, the silver nozzle produces a more detailed & analytical sound. Where the upper mids lose their control and make the lower treble aggressive, this tuning nozzle will undoubtedly be considered unusable.
Credit : Super* review
★ Gear used :-
1. Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2 . Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3 . Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4 . Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5 . Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6 . Fosi Audio Ds1 (Se & Bal both)
7 . Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
8 . Blon V1 (Se & Bal both)
RA15 is a set of 32Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 108dB so not very powerful amplification is needed to drive it, I got enough loudness from the phone's 3.5mm port, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source(warmish-slight neutral)and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, dynamics, improved imaging even a bit better micro detailing capability.Tonal balancing is also a little bit better.
Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
In the context of the bass section, I will say that this set is generally mid bass focused. However, there was rumble of sub bass but it is relatively less.There wasn’t much deep or rumbly effect like typical harman tuned sets. Interestingly, they have limited the presence of sub bass to reduce bleed into the mids. Again, the mid bass punch is good but the bass notes lack proper weight and less depth. Some of these improvements can be observed in the silver nozzle.The attack & decay of the bass was fairly fast and at the same time the control level was good, but the physical authority that a well tuned dd bass usually has, which was noticeably lacking here. Additionally, the mid bass is limited to 200hz in order to maintain politeness in its control levels.
★ The Mids :-
This set has enough clarity in the upper mids and the presentation was also very forward. Generally, there was no tendency for too much shouty or overly dull, but there is some emphasis on high-pitched vocals. As a result of which the thickness of some female vocals body becomes lean even lifeless.This is most noticeable in the silver nozzle. On the other hand, the gold nozzle has a hint of warmth touch in the lower mids which gives some fullness to the male vocal but it does not ensure the authentic character of the vocal. Harman-ish or v shape tuning is always thinner i.e recessed to maintain sufficient clarity in lower mids otherwise the contrast between bass and treble region will not be maintained. So lush even melodic vocals cannot be expected from this type of tuning. As a mids lover I personally don't like harman target very much.
★ The Treble :-
The treble part of this set would be described as clean & moderately detailed. Upper treble extension was good but I noticed more treble harshness from the mid to lower treble which was quite tiring. At the apex of this area some unpleasant sibilance issues arise, like s,,,sh,,s,,h, which add harshness. This situation can be noticed more in the silver nozzle and even enhances the brightness of the treble and increases the details but it is not at a tolerable level. Moreover, the treble is not well-articulated, the actual character of other high frequency instruments like cymbals, hi-hats is slightly distorted.Then I notice that a kind of metallic shrillness appears in the treble region which makes the 8k area even more peaky which becomes unlistenable. Even though I'm fairly tolerant of treble energy, but its silver nozzle fatigued me by treble. Which was full of unnatural sparkle and dry timbre. That's why the less detailed sound was found on the gold nozzle, but it was quite safe & enjoyable. Unfortunately there was a touch of unrefined treble though.
★ Technicalities :-
The RA15 technically delivered a solid performance. But I would say silver nozzle's contribution deserves more prominence in this regard. The sound stage was wider with accurate depth & height. Imaging capability gave descent result in gold nozzle but got holographic imaging in silver. On the other hand, the presence of micro detail has also increased significantly. Along with this, the dynamics and micro dynamics punch was also on the good side so there is no room to complain much. but the tonality lacks enough authenticity even the silver nozzle will seems more dry. As a single dd set, the timbre was also surrounded by a metallic touch instead of being natural, which created a somewhat disappointing situation. Those who prioritize the natural tone & timbre of dd IEMs will surely be disappointed.
Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give
Bass : 4 /5
Mids : 3.8 /5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 4.5/5
Dynamics & speed : 4/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4 /5
★ Comparison :-
~ NF Audio RA15 vs Artti R1 ~
Considering the current market, the R1 triple dd set is offering decent sound quality. But it doesn't have the modular tuning versatility like the RA15. The sub bass region of Artti R1 is quite strong compared to RA15, for punchy mid bass, RA15 will be one step ahead. So overall bass note weight wise R1 is in a better position, but fast attack & decay RA15's strength. Although both IEMs are not very strong in the mids section, I personally prefer R1's midrange because it has enough detail in the upper mids which is not harsh sounding like RA15's silver nozzle. In its gold nozzle, although the vocal section is fairly safe, there is a tendency to make the female vocal shouty, which is comparatively less in the case of R1 and the lower mids are recessed in both cases . In the treble section, the RA15 is a bit on the thinner side, Instruments has capable to produce clearly with the resolution was good. On the other side, the separation and layering of the R1 is a bit unrefined. RA15 just real winner in technicalities, Wider sound stage combined with holographic imaging makes it very competitive in this price category. R1 is technically not very strong as it is a triple dd set. Its staging was good but the imaging was of average quality. But in terms of tonality and timbre accuracy, none of the two sets will be the best, although I will put R1 ahead here, besides, the RA15 set is just far better in terms of detail & micro detailing capability.
★ Conclusion :-
The 100$ price category has become very competitive these days. Chifi brands have many offerings in this price range. NF Audio has recently become a part of this competition by launching their RA15. This set is technically better than other competitors. Currently, there are better options than this in the 80$ market because the quality of its accessories is quite low and at the same time the drive flex issue will also be a problem for many. The interchangeable nozzles they used for sound tuning could not provide a very polished sound. Especially the sound of the silver nozzle will be quite tiring for many people. I would recommend it to those who are more used to the treble's energy with prioritize excellent fit & comfort.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
Hifigo official store (link isn’t affiliated)
NF Audio is a well-known chifi brand but they lag behind other chifi manufacturers. They mainly make in-ear monitors (IEM). I haven't used much of their offerings. Although I purchased their NM2 a few years ago for personal use and found it to be a pretty ideal set sound wise.Their target includes both single dd as well as multi-driver IEMs, with a reputation for descent build quality and sound performance even with the attention to detail they always have in the user experience. I recently got my hands on their music series RA15 model single dd IEM, Which is my second used item of NF Audio so far. I've been using this IEM regularly for a few week. Now, I'll try to highlight all aspects of this IEM in my review. So that it is convenient for you to understand how equitable it is for this price category.


★ Disclaimer :-
This review unit was sent to me directly from NF Audio. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. So, the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The RA15 set provides the necessary accessories along with beautiful packaging. It comes with a single end stock cable, and a black color card bord with four pairs of different size silicon eartips. At the same time, a thin leather pouch is provided to carry the earphone. Besides, also two pairs of tuning nozzles are provided. One of which is gold and the other one is silver.


1. A pair of RA15 IEM ×1
2 . Four pairs of different size ms42 silicon eartips
3 . Two pairs of interchangeable nozzle
4 . silver plated copper cable ×1
5 . Simple leather pouch ×1
6 . User manual guide ×1
The quality of the provided accessories was not very satisfactory. Especially not to mention the stock cable, very average quality of plasticky material braided sliver plated copper cable which will definitely become useless after a few days of regular use. The carrying pouch was also very simple, which protects the IEM from scratches, but it does not seem to be effective in practical life. It's a bit disappointing to get such average accessories from an IEM for around $80. At this price, others in the market offer a better unboxing experience.
★ Specifications :-

★ Design, Build & Comfort :-
This IEM shaped like a small candy, the shell of this IEM is fully metal constructed, so it feels solid in hand and ensures robustness. But here the design is not very attractive because Nf audio has focused more on the build quality than the design here. Despite the metal alloy build, but also it has been reduced in size due to which it fits perfectly in the ear and when worn in the ear, it can be said that it is super comfortable. It can be used comfortably for long periods of time even for those who are used to using IEMs while lying down. I was able to wear it in my ears for about three hours straight any kind of issues without earache or loss of balance. It can fully satisfy those who want to avoid problems like fit issues or ear heaviness in daily commuting.

★ Sound Aspect :-
RA15 is basically a set of bright U shape profile, where the emphasis of treble is very high. As its internal configuration, the full sound frequency has been handled with a 10mm dynamic driver and two interchangeable nozzles provide a test of different sound tonality. Although the sound of the gold nozzle is fairly safe tuned, the silver nozzle produces a more detailed & analytical sound. Where the upper mids lose their control and make the lower treble aggressive, this tuning nozzle will undoubtedly be considered unusable.

Credit : Super* review
★ Gear used :-
1. Questyle Audio Engineering CMA Fifteen
2 . Cayin Ru7 (Se & Bal both)
3 . Questyle m15 (Se & Bal both)
4 . Quloos Mc01 (SE & Bal both)
5 . Epz Tp50 (Se & Bal both)
6 . Fosi Audio Ds1 (Se & Bal both)
7 . Fosi Audio Ds2 ~ 2024 (Se & Bal both)
8 . Blon V1 (Se & Bal both)
RA15 is a set of 32Ω impedance whose sensitivity level is 108dB so not very powerful amplification is needed to drive it, I got enough loudness from the phone's 3.5mm port, but if a good quality dac amp or portable player is used, then it gets scaled up with the source(warmish-slight neutral)and becomes better sounding. However, the best pairing I've found with CMA Fifteen. Better stage depth, dynamics, improved imaging even a bit better micro detailing capability.Tonal balancing is also a little bit better.

Now, I will discuss the sound in detail, I will start with the Low end of this set, i.e. the bass....
★ The Bass :-
In the context of the bass section, I will say that this set is generally mid bass focused. However, there was rumble of sub bass but it is relatively less.There wasn’t much deep or rumbly effect like typical harman tuned sets. Interestingly, they have limited the presence of sub bass to reduce bleed into the mids. Again, the mid bass punch is good but the bass notes lack proper weight and less depth. Some of these improvements can be observed in the silver nozzle.The attack & decay of the bass was fairly fast and at the same time the control level was good, but the physical authority that a well tuned dd bass usually has, which was noticeably lacking here. Additionally, the mid bass is limited to 200hz in order to maintain politeness in its control levels.

★ The Mids :-
This set has enough clarity in the upper mids and the presentation was also very forward. Generally, there was no tendency for too much shouty or overly dull, but there is some emphasis on high-pitched vocals. As a result of which the thickness of some female vocals body becomes lean even lifeless.This is most noticeable in the silver nozzle. On the other hand, the gold nozzle has a hint of warmth touch in the lower mids which gives some fullness to the male vocal but it does not ensure the authentic character of the vocal. Harman-ish or v shape tuning is always thinner i.e recessed to maintain sufficient clarity in lower mids otherwise the contrast between bass and treble region will not be maintained. So lush even melodic vocals cannot be expected from this type of tuning. As a mids lover I personally don't like harman target very much.
★ The Treble :-
The treble part of this set would be described as clean & moderately detailed. Upper treble extension was good but I noticed more treble harshness from the mid to lower treble which was quite tiring. At the apex of this area some unpleasant sibilance issues arise, like s,,,sh,,s,,h, which add harshness. This situation can be noticed more in the silver nozzle and even enhances the brightness of the treble and increases the details but it is not at a tolerable level. Moreover, the treble is not well-articulated, the actual character of other high frequency instruments like cymbals, hi-hats is slightly distorted.Then I notice that a kind of metallic shrillness appears in the treble region which makes the 8k area even more peaky which becomes unlistenable. Even though I'm fairly tolerant of treble energy, but its silver nozzle fatigued me by treble. Which was full of unnatural sparkle and dry timbre. That's why the less detailed sound was found on the gold nozzle, but it was quite safe & enjoyable. Unfortunately there was a touch of unrefined treble though.

★ Technicalities :-
The RA15 technically delivered a solid performance. But I would say silver nozzle's contribution deserves more prominence in this regard. The sound stage was wider with accurate depth & height. Imaging capability gave descent result in gold nozzle but got holographic imaging in silver. On the other hand, the presence of micro detail has also increased significantly. Along with this, the dynamics and micro dynamics punch was also on the good side so there is no room to complain much. but the tonality lacks enough authenticity even the silver nozzle will seems more dry. As a single dd set, the timbre was also surrounded by a metallic touch instead of being natural, which created a somewhat disappointing situation. Those who prioritize the natural tone & timbre of dd IEMs will surely be disappointed.

Overall rating out of 5 is what I would give

Bass : 4 /5
Mids : 3.8 /5
Treble : 3.8/5
Technicalities : 4.5/5
Dynamics & speed : 4/5
Build & Aesthetics : 4 /5
★ Comparison :-
~ NF Audio RA15 vs Artti R1 ~
Considering the current market, the R1 triple dd set is offering decent sound quality. But it doesn't have the modular tuning versatility like the RA15. The sub bass region of Artti R1 is quite strong compared to RA15, for punchy mid bass, RA15 will be one step ahead. So overall bass note weight wise R1 is in a better position, but fast attack & decay RA15's strength. Although both IEMs are not very strong in the mids section, I personally prefer R1's midrange because it has enough detail in the upper mids which is not harsh sounding like RA15's silver nozzle. In its gold nozzle, although the vocal section is fairly safe, there is a tendency to make the female vocal shouty, which is comparatively less in the case of R1 and the lower mids are recessed in both cases . In the treble section, the RA15 is a bit on the thinner side, Instruments has capable to produce clearly with the resolution was good. On the other side, the separation and layering of the R1 is a bit unrefined. RA15 just real winner in technicalities, Wider sound stage combined with holographic imaging makes it very competitive in this price category. R1 is technically not very strong as it is a triple dd set. Its staging was good but the imaging was of average quality. But in terms of tonality and timbre accuracy, none of the two sets will be the best, although I will put R1 ahead here, besides, the RA15 set is just far better in terms of detail & micro detailing capability.

★ Conclusion :-
The 100$ price category has become very competitive these days. Chifi brands have many offerings in this price range. NF Audio has recently become a part of this competition by launching their RA15. This set is technically better than other competitors. Currently, there are better options than this in the 80$ market because the quality of its accessories is quite low and at the same time the drive flex issue will also be a problem for many. The interchangeable nozzles they used for sound tuning could not provide a very polished sound. Especially the sound of the silver nozzle will be quite tiring for many people. I would recommend it to those who are more used to the treble's energy with prioritize excellent fit & comfort.


I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

Hifigo official store (link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Premium looking & robust build construction
~ Physical control buttons
~ Neutral to slightly bright sound signature
~ Decent technical performance
~ Good output power for the price
~ Physical control buttons
~ Neutral to slightly bright sound signature
~ Decent technical performance
~ Good output power for the price
Cons: ~ Control button pressing feels edgy
~ No dedicated gain switching option
~ Not very strongest dynamics punch
~ Mising type A adapter
~ Pairing not good with bright sounding stuff
~ Not very thick and well-bodied sound
~ No dedicated gain switching option
~ Not very strongest dynamics punch
~ Mising type A adapter
~ Pairing not good with bright sounding stuff
~ Not very thick and well-bodied sound
★ Introduction :-
Blon is a popular chinese brand, they were founded in 2014. We all are more or less familiar with the Blon brand, they gained a good reputation for releasing market hit products at basically affordable prices. Blon's first market shaking item was the Bl03, which was widely discussed for its quality bass performance and as their next successor they brought out the Blon 05s which was capable of providing great technicalities along with descent sound clarity and at that time its competitor was very few. I was personally a user of their 05s, Which satisfied me quite well. Recently they've launched V1 model dongle dac in the market, interestingly this is the first dongle in their dac amp line up. I've been using this dongle regularly for more than two weeks, I'll try to give my personal opinion about it in this review. So that it is convenient for understand how equitable for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
This unit was sent to me directly from Linsoul Audio for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The Blon V1 comes with a small box and out of the box dongle, type c to type c cable and lighting cable variants are also available. My unit is lightning cable version Besides, there is no type A adapter in the box that should have been there. So if you want to use it on PC, you have to buy usb A adapter separately.
1. Blon V1 dongle dac ×1
2. Type c to lightning cable ×1
3. User manual guide ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
The Blon V1 is a very sleek and premium looking device that uses tempered glass on both the front and back.The Side frame are basically made with aluminum alloy chassis. It has three physical multifunctional buttons including two volume up & down buttons and another music "play-pause" button. Due to some edgy finish to the buttons, they are not much leniency to press but the control buttons are not wonky, besides its ports also seem to be very durable. So there is no room to complain about these. V1 features light weight as well as durable and this is definitely a solid pieced. This portable device can be an ideal option for regular usage, because it is very compact in size and at the same time it very easy to carry. So can be easily used anywhere for indoor or outdoor travel. On the other hand, its glass panel gets fingerprints and scratches very easily which looks quite annoying that is basically a bummer. However, the interesting thing that the device is compatible with everything, so you don't have to face any kind of usability issues. It performed well with everything on all platforms including android, iOS and windows. No need to take the hassle of extra driver installation to use on PC, just plug & play type performance will be available. Also I was able to stream apple music on iPhone with it very well. That's why I would like to thank Blon for such a nice compatibility of their V1 dac.
★ Specifications :-
~ Model: V1 DAC/Amp
~ DAC Chip: CS43131*2
~ Frequency Response: 5-82KHz (±1dB)
~ Headphone Interface: 3.5mm single-ended, 4.4mm balanced
~ SNR: 132dB (A-weighted)
~ Dynamic Range: 4.4mm: 132dB (A-weighted)
~ Output Level: 4.4mm: 4Vrms,
3.5mm: 2Vrms
~ Sampling Rate Indicator: PCM (Green), DSD (Red)
~ Dimensions: 57mm*27.25mm*11.43mm
~ Weight: 20g
~ Max output power: 160mw
★ Tested With :-
~ Sennheiser HD660S2
~ Sony IER M9
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Hidizs MP145
~ IO Audio Volare
~ NF Audio Ra15
~ Letshouer S08
~ Artti Audio R1
★ Sound Aspect :-
The tonality of the dongle is simply neutral with a hint of bright-ish nature but there was no extra coloration. Which will match from maximum IEM's to some moderate demanding headphones, if they're not too bright sounding stuff by default. There was no unwanted boost in the V1 dac bass region. It exhibits controlled bass response with good extension but less depth & texture. The speed of the bass notes is good, bass notes were not too thick but not so thin, considered to be in a middle position.
Midrange has a very clean and forward presentation. This dac emphasizes the upper mids a bit, the lower mids tend to be a little grainy but less so. Because it's a bit more forward, it unlikely to do well in sets where the mids are already forward. Treble has a good amount of detail which is enough to bring out the upper treble, the lower treble is a bit unrefined with the quantity & quality of micro detail not up to expectations and their extension is mediocre.Technically, this dongle is in a very strong position. Wider stage as well as good imaging capability will put V1 far ahead of its competitors. However, this dac will not deliver clean output with sensitive sets (lower than 16ohm). So it is not wise to use those sensitive sets. I used the IO Audio volare for testing and I didn't get the results that I expected, it seemed to bloat the bass notes and ruin the dynamic punch and at the same time noticeable hissing issue was there
★ Synergy and Power :-
Decent synergy comes with the dongle in regular sets. Although it is a entry level dongle but power output is quite good. The maximum output capability of the device comes from its bal port. On the other hand, I've noticed the lack of many dynamics in the single end port, which is normal. Paired hd660s2 with its bal port (160mw) where there was good amount of loudness but dynamic punch was lacking. The bass was not tight and well-controlled with lack of depth, mids were more forward but not engaging even well-bodied. Besides, I got average detail retrieval and technicalities from it. This is not likely to cause problematic, as many desktop setups are unable to drive the 660s2 properly. The main drawback of the dongle is that dynamics & micro dynamics region. Which is usually seen from this type of offerings. In addition to moderate output power, It has the ability to decode sound from PCM to DSd256. The color of their light indicator changes according to the sample rate.
★ Conclusion :-
As Blon's first dongle, the v1 was pretty good but lacking in several aspects. By doing this, it may not be able to create a strong position compared to others dongle in similar price range. I don't consider these as major flaws though. If they can make their next generation dongle sound more resolving and technically more stronger, then it will surely achieve the title of value for money tag.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
Linsoul Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
Blon is a popular chinese brand, they were founded in 2014. We all are more or less familiar with the Blon brand, they gained a good reputation for releasing market hit products at basically affordable prices. Blon's first market shaking item was the Bl03, which was widely discussed for its quality bass performance and as their next successor they brought out the Blon 05s which was capable of providing great technicalities along with descent sound clarity and at that time its competitor was very few. I was personally a user of their 05s, Which satisfied me quite well. Recently they've launched V1 model dongle dac in the market, interestingly this is the first dongle in their dac amp line up. I've been using this dongle regularly for more than two weeks, I'll try to give my personal opinion about it in this review. So that it is convenient for understand how equitable for this price category.


★ Disclaimer :-
This unit was sent to me directly from Linsoul Audio for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The Blon V1 comes with a small box and out of the box dongle, type c to type c cable and lighting cable variants are also available. My unit is lightning cable version Besides, there is no type A adapter in the box that should have been there. So if you want to use it on PC, you have to buy usb A adapter separately.


1. Blon V1 dongle dac ×1
2. Type c to lightning cable ×1
3. User manual guide ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
The Blon V1 is a very sleek and premium looking device that uses tempered glass on both the front and back.The Side frame are basically made with aluminum alloy chassis. It has three physical multifunctional buttons including two volume up & down buttons and another music "play-pause" button. Due to some edgy finish to the buttons, they are not much leniency to press but the control buttons are not wonky, besides its ports also seem to be very durable. So there is no room to complain about these. V1 features light weight as well as durable and this is definitely a solid pieced. This portable device can be an ideal option for regular usage, because it is very compact in size and at the same time it very easy to carry. So can be easily used anywhere for indoor or outdoor travel. On the other hand, its glass panel gets fingerprints and scratches very easily which looks quite annoying that is basically a bummer. However, the interesting thing that the device is compatible with everything, so you don't have to face any kind of usability issues. It performed well with everything on all platforms including android, iOS and windows. No need to take the hassle of extra driver installation to use on PC, just plug & play type performance will be available. Also I was able to stream apple music on iPhone with it very well. That's why I would like to thank Blon for such a nice compatibility of their V1 dac.


★ Specifications :-
~ Model: V1 DAC/Amp
~ DAC Chip: CS43131*2
~ Frequency Response: 5-82KHz (±1dB)
~ Headphone Interface: 3.5mm single-ended, 4.4mm balanced
~ SNR: 132dB (A-weighted)
~ Dynamic Range: 4.4mm: 132dB (A-weighted)
~ Output Level: 4.4mm: 4Vrms,
3.5mm: 2Vrms
~ Sampling Rate Indicator: PCM (Green), DSD (Red)
~ Dimensions: 57mm*27.25mm*11.43mm
~ Weight: 20g
~ Max output power: 160mw
★ Tested With :-
~ Sennheiser HD660S2
~ Sony IER M9
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Hidizs MP145
~ IO Audio Volare
~ NF Audio Ra15
~ Letshouer S08
~ Artti Audio R1
★ Sound Aspect :-
The tonality of the dongle is simply neutral with a hint of bright-ish nature but there was no extra coloration. Which will match from maximum IEM's to some moderate demanding headphones, if they're not too bright sounding stuff by default. There was no unwanted boost in the V1 dac bass region. It exhibits controlled bass response with good extension but less depth & texture. The speed of the bass notes is good, bass notes were not too thick but not so thin, considered to be in a middle position.
Midrange has a very clean and forward presentation. This dac emphasizes the upper mids a bit, the lower mids tend to be a little grainy but less so. Because it's a bit more forward, it unlikely to do well in sets where the mids are already forward. Treble has a good amount of detail which is enough to bring out the upper treble, the lower treble is a bit unrefined with the quantity & quality of micro detail not up to expectations and their extension is mediocre.Technically, this dongle is in a very strong position. Wider stage as well as good imaging capability will put V1 far ahead of its competitors. However, this dac will not deliver clean output with sensitive sets (lower than 16ohm). So it is not wise to use those sensitive sets. I used the IO Audio volare for testing and I didn't get the results that I expected, it seemed to bloat the bass notes and ruin the dynamic punch and at the same time noticeable hissing issue was there

★ Synergy and Power :-
Decent synergy comes with the dongle in regular sets. Although it is a entry level dongle but power output is quite good. The maximum output capability of the device comes from its bal port. On the other hand, I've noticed the lack of many dynamics in the single end port, which is normal. Paired hd660s2 with its bal port (160mw) where there was good amount of loudness but dynamic punch was lacking. The bass was not tight and well-controlled with lack of depth, mids were more forward but not engaging even well-bodied. Besides, I got average detail retrieval and technicalities from it. This is not likely to cause problematic, as many desktop setups are unable to drive the 660s2 properly. The main drawback of the dongle is that dynamics & micro dynamics region. Which is usually seen from this type of offerings. In addition to moderate output power, It has the ability to decode sound from PCM to DSd256. The color of their light indicator changes according to the sample rate.

★ Conclusion :-
As Blon's first dongle, the v1 was pretty good but lacking in several aspects. By doing this, it may not be able to create a strong position compared to others dongle in similar price range. I don't consider these as major flaws though. If they can make their next generation dongle sound more resolving and technically more stronger, then it will surely achieve the title of value for money tag.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

Linsoul Audio (link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:
P
Pranto Dev
Nice one vai
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Light weight build with good comfort
~ Touch control facility & proprietary app support
~ Great battery backup
~ Anc & Ldac support
~ Fun V shape signature with good sub bass response
~ Strong connectivity & compatibility
~ Touch control facility & proprietary app support
~ Great battery backup
~ Anc & Ldac support
~ Fun V shape signature with good sub bass response
~ Strong connectivity & compatibility
Cons: ~ No wireless charging support
~ Average microphone quality
~ Not very cleanest bass note definition
~ Detail retrieval not very prominent
~ Slight metallic shrillness presence
~ Soundstage & imaging should have been better
~ Average microphone quality
~ Not very cleanest bass note definition
~ Detail retrieval not very prominent
~ Slight metallic shrillness presence
~ Soundstage & imaging should have been better
★ Introduction :-
Rose technics is a reputed chinese audio brand, they were established in 2012. The company has been trying to improve their own research and development for many years.That continuity they are still trying to maintain. Their IEM, tws and other items are available in the market at very affordable prices.There are also some mid tier lineup items. I haven't used many of their gear items though but recently I got a chance to use one of their tws which was quite good. Rose Technics Ceramics X is the topic of today's review. I've been using this one for more than a month. I'll try to give my personal opinion about it in this review. So that is convenient to understand how it is justified for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
Ceramics X tws was sent to me directly from Rose technics for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of ceramics x was quite satisfactory. Out of the box Tws,Charging doc, usb A to cable, three pairs of different size black color eartips, user manual guide and a qc card. But despite all the essentials, I felt the lack of a protective case that would have made me more satisfied. However, I have no room to complain about Rose technics in this regard.
1. Ceramics x Tws ×1
2. Type A to C Charging cable ×1
3. Three pairs of different size eartips
4. User manual guide and qc card ×1
★ Design & Build Quality :-
The entire build construction of Ceramics x tws is made of polycarbonate, even the nozzle area is the same material and its charging doc is also made of plastic material. The bottom of the Doc has a type c charging port and a small reset button next to it. A type of glossy coating has been used on the entire body of the Doc.The good thing is that it looks glossy but fingerprints & minimal scratches are not visible. Although it is plastic build, considering the quality, it does not feel wonky or cheap at all and can be said to be durable enough. They have three color variants namely black, metallic gray and white. Although my unit is of black color, but the gray color is the most attractive among them.Talking about the design of Tws, I will say that it is very simple, Their looks like simply an oval shape, but nothing specialities can be noticed there. The back side of the two buds similarly has "Rose Technics" branding and "ceramic" writing with gold accents. Interestingly, this branding part is basically the touch control area.
★ Fit, Comfort & Isolation :-
This plastic build tws was very light weight, per bud weight is 4.2g, so it fits very well in the ear canal. The quality of the stock eartips that came with it was fairly good which can create a good seal while also providing good comfort. I wore these tws in my ears continuously for about three hours, in which case I did not face any kind of discomfort or etching problem and I was able to use them comfortably for a long time. Moreover, due to their good seal, sound isolation is also good, but it does not seem like passive isolation at all. Normally, when music is played through these two buds in your ears, the outside noise is reduced more , so there is no chance to big complain here.
★ Connectivity & Features :-
The Tws will be connected with the phone, laptop or music player with the latest bluetooth 5.3. While connected, the connection strength was stable, so there was no problem. Also tws has codecs like Ldac so you can enjoy lossy sound. Apart from this there is support for regular aac & sbc. However, having advanced codecs like Apt-x, Apt-x hd would have benefited more. As this Tws is IPX5 rated, it is resistant to sweat and splash of water, so it will provide excellent support in outdoor traveling including regular gym, cycling. If one thinks that it is fully water resistant and thinks of wearing it while swimming, then it will be completely foolish, so it is advised to be careful about this. Ceramics x tws charging doc supported fast charging system. According to the company's advertisement, it is possible to get ten hours of play back by charging it for ten minutes. Which was nearly accurate according to my testing. On the other hand, from this charging doc, it can be fully charged about five times, i.e. it is supposed to get a total of fifty hours of playback time, but I got about thirty seven hours of playback time on a single charge, which cannot be said to be bad in any way, basically battery backup varies from user to user. If one uses tws at 50-60% volume level then overall battery backup can increase. I personally used it at 80-90% volume all the time and showed a consistent total battery life. Rose technics provides proprietary app support to ease the usability of their ceramics x tws.Their RoseLink app is available on both Google play & App store platform.
Let's take a look at the features of Roselink app below
Decent sound isolation is available in normal mode, in which case the possibility of outside noise is somewhat reduced. Noise cancellation or shift to Anc reduces the loud noise of outside a lot and when listening to music at approximately 65-70% volume, all the noise seems to be dead silent. If you go to Transparency mode, you can maintain self-awareness about the condition of outside in addition to music playback. As a result, it becomes more comfortable to travel on the roads.
Touch control is available from the two buds as shown in the image above
There are three EQ profiles respectively pop, hifi & rock. Switching to Pop mode delivers soft bass with a slightly warm midrange presentation and smooth highs. Rock mode reduces the resolution and increases the metallic timbre with the effect of bloated bass. This unnatural timbre makes the treble sound more unrefined. Finally, hifi mode is left, moving to it gives the most well-balanced tuning and there is less unwanted metallic touch compared to rock mode. So the best listening experience is available from here.
★ Gaming & Call quality :-
The device has a dedicated gaming mode and if you switch to that mode, the latency will be reduced to 54ms. This latency doesn't give much advantage in fps gaming really because when I played the game there was noticeable delay and I couldn't understand the opponent's positioning & sound of gun shot due to its poor imaging capability. It can be used for gaming normally, but my advice would always go to wired earphones. Now let's talk about call quality. The 4 GoerTek Mics system used by Rose technics which according to them is used for network noise reduction, which to be honest I didn't find any improvement. Indoor call quality is ok type, but outdoors i.e. in crowded areas it becomes unusable. Although there are better options in the budget considering the calling feature.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver Unit Diameter :- 10mm
~ Impedance :- 32Ω
~ Frequency Response Range :- 20 - 20000Hz
~ Interface Type :- USB-C
~ Bluetooth Version :- 5.3
~ Audio Codec :- LDAC/ AAC/ mSBC/ SBC
~ Playtime :- 50Hr
~ Charging Time :- Appr. 40min
~ Noise Control :- Hybrid ANC / Transparent
★ Sound Aspect :-
This set is typically offered V shape sound profile where the bass and treble presence are more but the midrange position is towards the back. Here the bass section alone emphasizes the sub bass region more than the mid bass. Sub bass rumble has the ability to hit very deep and it was also extended, but due to the low impact of mid bass, the overall bass does not feel so enjoyable.The Midrange especially upper mids focused which is more forward with better clarity. Lower mids recessed Naturally, the sub bass is slightly boosted causing minimal bleed issues with the lower mids.The peak of its 5k region makes some female vocals more energetic and sometimes shouty which is a bummer. Treble section was not extended enough, noticeable upper treble roll-off also detail retrieval was mediocre. The bothering part there was the unwanted metallic shrillness which made the sound of the string instrument more unnatural and thus created the coherence issue. Technicalities were average, sound stage height narrow but depth fairly accurate with poor imaging. Even though the tonality was a little on the brighter side and timbre was not that good.
★ Conclusion :-
Ceramics x tws is a very good package with its battery backup, features and overall sound. There are some lacking which if fulfilled would have been more acceptable to more people. At the price it has come to the market there are more competitors in the current market. Some of them may be slightly ahead in mic better or sound, but ceramics x versatile. This set can be recommended for those who are looking for tws under 50$ and also prioritize Ldac and good battery life.
I don't think this tws will more disappoint anyone in any way.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
Rose technics official website (link isn’t affiliated)
Rose technics is a reputed chinese audio brand, they were established in 2012. The company has been trying to improve their own research and development for many years.That continuity they are still trying to maintain. Their IEM, tws and other items are available in the market at very affordable prices.There are also some mid tier lineup items. I haven't used many of their gear items though but recently I got a chance to use one of their tws which was quite good. Rose Technics Ceramics X is the topic of today's review. I've been using this one for more than a month. I'll try to give my personal opinion about it in this review. So that is convenient to understand how it is justified for this price category.

★ Disclaimer :-
Ceramics X tws was sent to me directly from Rose technics for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The unboxing experience of ceramics x was quite satisfactory. Out of the box Tws,Charging doc, usb A to cable, three pairs of different size black color eartips, user manual guide and a qc card. But despite all the essentials, I felt the lack of a protective case that would have made me more satisfied. However, I have no room to complain about Rose technics in this regard.

1. Ceramics x Tws ×1
2. Type A to C Charging cable ×1
3. Three pairs of different size eartips
4. User manual guide and qc card ×1
★ Design & Build Quality :-
The entire build construction of Ceramics x tws is made of polycarbonate, even the nozzle area is the same material and its charging doc is also made of plastic material. The bottom of the Doc has a type c charging port and a small reset button next to it. A type of glossy coating has been used on the entire body of the Doc.The good thing is that it looks glossy but fingerprints & minimal scratches are not visible. Although it is plastic build, considering the quality, it does not feel wonky or cheap at all and can be said to be durable enough. They have three color variants namely black, metallic gray and white. Although my unit is of black color, but the gray color is the most attractive among them.Talking about the design of Tws, I will say that it is very simple, Their looks like simply an oval shape, but nothing specialities can be noticed there. The back side of the two buds similarly has "Rose Technics" branding and "ceramic" writing with gold accents. Interestingly, this branding part is basically the touch control area.


★ Fit, Comfort & Isolation :-
This plastic build tws was very light weight, per bud weight is 4.2g, so it fits very well in the ear canal. The quality of the stock eartips that came with it was fairly good which can create a good seal while also providing good comfort. I wore these tws in my ears continuously for about three hours, in which case I did not face any kind of discomfort or etching problem and I was able to use them comfortably for a long time. Moreover, due to their good seal, sound isolation is also good, but it does not seem like passive isolation at all. Normally, when music is played through these two buds in your ears, the outside noise is reduced more , so there is no chance to big complain here.

★ Connectivity & Features :-
The Tws will be connected with the phone, laptop or music player with the latest bluetooth 5.3. While connected, the connection strength was stable, so there was no problem. Also tws has codecs like Ldac so you can enjoy lossy sound. Apart from this there is support for regular aac & sbc. However, having advanced codecs like Apt-x, Apt-x hd would have benefited more. As this Tws is IPX5 rated, it is resistant to sweat and splash of water, so it will provide excellent support in outdoor traveling including regular gym, cycling. If one thinks that it is fully water resistant and thinks of wearing it while swimming, then it will be completely foolish, so it is advised to be careful about this. Ceramics x tws charging doc supported fast charging system. According to the company's advertisement, it is possible to get ten hours of play back by charging it for ten minutes. Which was nearly accurate according to my testing. On the other hand, from this charging doc, it can be fully charged about five times, i.e. it is supposed to get a total of fifty hours of playback time, but I got about thirty seven hours of playback time on a single charge, which cannot be said to be bad in any way, basically battery backup varies from user to user. If one uses tws at 50-60% volume level then overall battery backup can increase. I personally used it at 80-90% volume all the time and showed a consistent total battery life. Rose technics provides proprietary app support to ease the usability of their ceramics x tws.Their RoseLink app is available on both Google play & App store platform.


Let's take a look at the features of Roselink app below


Decent sound isolation is available in normal mode, in which case the possibility of outside noise is somewhat reduced. Noise cancellation or shift to Anc reduces the loud noise of outside a lot and when listening to music at approximately 65-70% volume, all the noise seems to be dead silent. If you go to Transparency mode, you can maintain self-awareness about the condition of outside in addition to music playback. As a result, it becomes more comfortable to travel on the roads.

Touch control is available from the two buds as shown in the image above

There are three EQ profiles respectively pop, hifi & rock. Switching to Pop mode delivers soft bass with a slightly warm midrange presentation and smooth highs. Rock mode reduces the resolution and increases the metallic timbre with the effect of bloated bass. This unnatural timbre makes the treble sound more unrefined. Finally, hifi mode is left, moving to it gives the most well-balanced tuning and there is less unwanted metallic touch compared to rock mode. So the best listening experience is available from here.
★ Gaming & Call quality :-
The device has a dedicated gaming mode and if you switch to that mode, the latency will be reduced to 54ms. This latency doesn't give much advantage in fps gaming really because when I played the game there was noticeable delay and I couldn't understand the opponent's positioning & sound of gun shot due to its poor imaging capability. It can be used for gaming normally, but my advice would always go to wired earphones. Now let's talk about call quality. The 4 GoerTek Mics system used by Rose technics which according to them is used for network noise reduction, which to be honest I didn't find any improvement. Indoor call quality is ok type, but outdoors i.e. in crowded areas it becomes unusable. Although there are better options in the budget considering the calling feature.
★ Specifications :-
~ Driver Unit Diameter :- 10mm
~ Impedance :- 32Ω
~ Frequency Response Range :- 20 - 20000Hz
~ Interface Type :- USB-C
~ Bluetooth Version :- 5.3
~ Audio Codec :- LDAC/ AAC/ mSBC/ SBC
~ Playtime :- 50Hr
~ Charging Time :- Appr. 40min
~ Noise Control :- Hybrid ANC / Transparent
★ Sound Aspect :-
This set is typically offered V shape sound profile where the bass and treble presence are more but the midrange position is towards the back. Here the bass section alone emphasizes the sub bass region more than the mid bass. Sub bass rumble has the ability to hit very deep and it was also extended, but due to the low impact of mid bass, the overall bass does not feel so enjoyable.The Midrange especially upper mids focused which is more forward with better clarity. Lower mids recessed Naturally, the sub bass is slightly boosted causing minimal bleed issues with the lower mids.The peak of its 5k region makes some female vocals more energetic and sometimes shouty which is a bummer. Treble section was not extended enough, noticeable upper treble roll-off also detail retrieval was mediocre. The bothering part there was the unwanted metallic shrillness which made the sound of the string instrument more unnatural and thus created the coherence issue. Technicalities were average, sound stage height narrow but depth fairly accurate with poor imaging. Even though the tonality was a little on the brighter side and timbre was not that good.


★ Conclusion :-
Ceramics x tws is a very good package with its battery backup, features and overall sound. There are some lacking which if fulfilled would have been more acceptable to more people. At the price it has come to the market there are more competitors in the current market. Some of them may be slightly ahead in mic better or sound, but ceramics x versatile. This set can be recommended for those who are looking for tws under 50$ and also prioritize Ldac and good battery life.
I don't think this tws will more disappoint anyone in any way.

I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

Rose technics official website (link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:
P
Pranto Dev
Good one bhai
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Small form factor with solid metal build construction
~ Neutral to slightly warm sound signature
~ Great technicalities
~ Powerfully enough from this form factor (max 220mw 4.4mm)
~ Hardware level volume control button
~ Neutral to slightly warm sound signature
~ Great technicalities
~ Powerfully enough from this form factor (max 220mw 4.4mm)
~ Hardware level volume control button
Cons: ~ Missing gain switching option and no app support
~ Not very suitable for sensitive stuff
~ Not the most resolving sounding dongle
~ Tends to heat up quickly during use
~ Slightly ess glare can be realized (nitpicking)
~ Not very suitable for sensitive stuff
~ Not the most resolving sounding dongle
~ Tends to heat up quickly during use
~ Slightly ess glare can be realized (nitpicking)
★ Introduction :-
Fosi Audio has made the budget dac amp segment much more competitive by releasing quality gear at affordable prices. I used their Ds2 dongle which was pretty good considering the price. Their most hit product was the sk02 dac amp which ranks among the standard sub100$ bucks.Today I'm mainly here with a review of their previous model dongle dac Ds1. I've been using it for more than a month. I'll try to give my personal opinion about it in this review. So that it is convenient for understand how equitable for this price category.
★ Disclaimer :-
This unit was sent to me directly from @Fosi Audio for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The packaging of DS1 was quite simple, a flat box of black color contains dongle dac, usb A adapter, user manual and a nice looking nylon braided type c to type c short cable. All useful accessories are available out of the box, so there is no need to buy anything extra. Fosi has no room to complain in this regard
1. Ds1 dongle dac ×1
2. Usb A adapter ×1
3. Type c to type c short cable ×1
4. User manual guide ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
In terms of design, this dongle does not offer anything impressive, but in the build section, it must be called rock solid. This dongle of fully metal constructed which is a little heavy in weight but feels very durable when held in hand. To me it felt like holding a small metal bar in my hand lol. Apart from the solid build, the compatibility of the device was also excellent. I have used it with windows, android, and ios without any issues. Interestingly it has support from pcm format to native Dsd 512 which was really commendable. The device has a small light indicator that changes color according to the audio sample rate. Moreover, the dongle has a hardware level volume control button whose positioning and pressing feedback were quite satisfactory and at the same time the ports were very strong. From this point of view, fosi audio undoubtedly deserves praise.
★ Specifications :-
~ Model :- DS1
~ Output Power :- 120mW(SE); 220mW(BAL)
~ Terminating Impedance :- 16-300Ω
~ Input Mode :- USB Type C
~ Output Mode :- 3.5MM + 4.4MM Headphone
~ Frequency Range :- 20Hz-20kHz (±0.5dB)
~ THD :- 0.0006%(32Ω SE); 0.001%(32Ω BAL)
~ SNR :- ≥120 dB
~ Sampling Rate :- 32bit/768kHz
~ DSD :- DSD64/128/256/512
~ DAC Chipset :- ES9038Q2M
~ Material :- aluminium Alloy
~ Device Weight :- 38g
★ Tested With :-
~ Sennheiser HD660S2
~ Sony IER M9
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Hidizs MP145
~ IO Audio Volare
~ NF Audio Ra15
~ Letshouer S08
~ Artti Audio R1
★ Sound Aspect :-
Ds1 basically neutral to slightly warmer sounding dongle. The dongle is able to deliver commendable sound performance from its compact form factor. The low noise floor of the device is relatively quiet, due to which there was no unwanted circuit noise in the background which can be called dead silent noise floor. Due to the lower noise floor, it is able to create a fairly clear invitation to lower frequency sounds naturally. Despite being a performer in the affordable price segment, there was no roll-off issue in its sound which is a big strength. Ds1 dongle has regular single ended port as well as bal port from where the device can show its max output capability. Maximum IEM's or some moderate demanding headphones can be powered up with this Bal port to get more juice out. The dongle has support from pcm to native dsd 512 also supports 32bit/768kHz sample rate. The Dsd playback is not as expected from budget dongles and this was no exception here. The dongle has a small light indicator that changes color based on the sound sampling rate but most of the time it creates a confusing situation that can seem a bit annoying. Talking about the sound, let's talk about the bass at the beginning. The bass section was very tight & impactful, there was good control from sub bass to mid bass area with the body was very pronounced. Bass notes seem to be well-separated where I didn't notice any unwanted bleed issue but the speed is on the good side even though there is a slight lack of texture. Definition was decent enough but definitely not like premium dongles. The Mids region it's completely clean with slight warmth effect which giving a welcoming factor there. It's able to represent the singer's vocal very beautifully without any harshness or dryness. Afterward maintaining the cleanliness of the upper mids, it has managed to ensure the transparency of the lower mids admirably which surprised me. Most of the dongles I have used around this price range have faced problems like mids section being more forward or recessed in many cases but Ds1 is in a far better position compared to them at least for its midrange performance.Treble is basically detailed with good amount of sparkle presence but not very resolving. There was minimal glare which made it somewhat fail to portray the actual character of the sound like cymbals & string instruments. Notwithstanding the extension of Treble was good, but the end to end extension was not that up to the mark. In terms of technicalities, the dongle has given simply excellent performance. Along with wide sound stage, good depth and precise imaging has given a good advantage in terms of fps gaming. Dynamics and macro dynamics punch are decent and there was no complaint about the resolution. So it can be said that under 100$ bucks it will be technically far ahead of its other competitors undoubtedly.
★ Synergy and Power :-
ESS's ES9038Q2M is used as a dac chip in the device, but its sound is not like the typical "ess" house sound. This neutral to warmish sounding dongle has good synergy with almost all types of IEMs.I did not find any decrease in the output power of the device, 120mw@32 ohms from single end and 220mw@32 ohms from Bal port. Despite having such impressive output capability, the dongle is very battery efficient. While using the phone I noticed a very low battery consumption rate which deserves a lot of praise. With this admirable power output, it is possible to power up some demanding headphones in addition to regular dd & planar sets. However, pairing with highly sensitive IEMs was not very well, hissing issue comes easily from here.Because of this, the chances of benefiting from using sensitive sets are very less. I have paired many IEMs with the dongle and even used the full size open back headphone HD660S2. The dongle was able to drive this open back headphone quite well, providing good control by keeping the impact fairly tight in the bass region with decent speed & tolerable staging even can present the mids with fine detail without being harsh. Moreover, treble has mediocre detailed presentation but lacks a lot of dynamics & resolution which is normal to get from such a budget dongle.
★ Conclusion :-
Barring a few minor issues, the ds1 offers everything in its sound performance. It's possible to get good synergy from it everywhere without a very bright sounding set. It can be an ideal option for those whose budget is around 100$. I'm hopeful that the device will be a complete package with solid build, sound quality & high output power that will satisfy most of the listeners. I would suggest to buy it for those who want good technicalities with fun relaxed sound. If someone is looking for something highly technical and analytical sounding dongle then would be advised to stay away from ds1.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
FosiAudio Ali express store (link isn't affiliated)
Fosi Audio has made the budget dac amp segment much more competitive by releasing quality gear at affordable prices. I used their Ds2 dongle which was pretty good considering the price. Their most hit product was the sk02 dac amp which ranks among the standard sub100$ bucks.Today I'm mainly here with a review of their previous model dongle dac Ds1. I've been using it for more than a month. I'll try to give my personal opinion about it in this review. So that it is convenient for understand how equitable for this price category.

★ Disclaimer :-
This unit was sent to me directly from @Fosi Audio for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box Content at a Glance :-
The packaging of DS1 was quite simple, a flat box of black color contains dongle dac, usb A adapter, user manual and a nice looking nylon braided type c to type c short cable. All useful accessories are available out of the box, so there is no need to buy anything extra. Fosi has no room to complain in this regard



1. Ds1 dongle dac ×1
2. Usb A adapter ×1
3. Type c to type c short cable ×1
4. User manual guide ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Functionality :-
In terms of design, this dongle does not offer anything impressive, but in the build section, it must be called rock solid. This dongle of fully metal constructed which is a little heavy in weight but feels very durable when held in hand. To me it felt like holding a small metal bar in my hand lol. Apart from the solid build, the compatibility of the device was also excellent. I have used it with windows, android, and ios without any issues. Interestingly it has support from pcm format to native Dsd 512 which was really commendable. The device has a small light indicator that changes color according to the audio sample rate. Moreover, the dongle has a hardware level volume control button whose positioning and pressing feedback were quite satisfactory and at the same time the ports were very strong. From this point of view, fosi audio undoubtedly deserves praise.




★ Specifications :-
~ Model :- DS1
~ Output Power :- 120mW(SE); 220mW(BAL)
~ Terminating Impedance :- 16-300Ω
~ Input Mode :- USB Type C
~ Output Mode :- 3.5MM + 4.4MM Headphone
~ Frequency Range :- 20Hz-20kHz (±0.5dB)
~ THD :- 0.0006%(32Ω SE); 0.001%(32Ω BAL)
~ SNR :- ≥120 dB
~ Sampling Rate :- 32bit/768kHz
~ DSD :- DSD64/128/256/512
~ DAC Chipset :- ES9038Q2M
~ Material :- aluminium Alloy
~ Device Weight :- 38g
★ Tested With :-
~ Sennheiser HD660S2
~ Sony IER M9
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ Hidizs MP145
~ IO Audio Volare
~ NF Audio Ra15
~ Letshouer S08
~ Artti Audio R1
★ Sound Aspect :-
Ds1 basically neutral to slightly warmer sounding dongle. The dongle is able to deliver commendable sound performance from its compact form factor. The low noise floor of the device is relatively quiet, due to which there was no unwanted circuit noise in the background which can be called dead silent noise floor. Due to the lower noise floor, it is able to create a fairly clear invitation to lower frequency sounds naturally. Despite being a performer in the affordable price segment, there was no roll-off issue in its sound which is a big strength. Ds1 dongle has regular single ended port as well as bal port from where the device can show its max output capability. Maximum IEM's or some moderate demanding headphones can be powered up with this Bal port to get more juice out. The dongle has support from pcm to native dsd 512 also supports 32bit/768kHz sample rate. The Dsd playback is not as expected from budget dongles and this was no exception here. The dongle has a small light indicator that changes color based on the sound sampling rate but most of the time it creates a confusing situation that can seem a bit annoying. Talking about the sound, let's talk about the bass at the beginning. The bass section was very tight & impactful, there was good control from sub bass to mid bass area with the body was very pronounced. Bass notes seem to be well-separated where I didn't notice any unwanted bleed issue but the speed is on the good side even though there is a slight lack of texture. Definition was decent enough but definitely not like premium dongles. The Mids region it's completely clean with slight warmth effect which giving a welcoming factor there. It's able to represent the singer's vocal very beautifully without any harshness or dryness. Afterward maintaining the cleanliness of the upper mids, it has managed to ensure the transparency of the lower mids admirably which surprised me. Most of the dongles I have used around this price range have faced problems like mids section being more forward or recessed in many cases but Ds1 is in a far better position compared to them at least for its midrange performance.Treble is basically detailed with good amount of sparkle presence but not very resolving. There was minimal glare which made it somewhat fail to portray the actual character of the sound like cymbals & string instruments. Notwithstanding the extension of Treble was good, but the end to end extension was not that up to the mark. In terms of technicalities, the dongle has given simply excellent performance. Along with wide sound stage, good depth and precise imaging has given a good advantage in terms of fps gaming. Dynamics and macro dynamics punch are decent and there was no complaint about the resolution. So it can be said that under 100$ bucks it will be technically far ahead of its other competitors undoubtedly.


★ Synergy and Power :-
ESS's ES9038Q2M is used as a dac chip in the device, but its sound is not like the typical "ess" house sound. This neutral to warmish sounding dongle has good synergy with almost all types of IEMs.I did not find any decrease in the output power of the device, 120mw@32 ohms from single end and 220mw@32 ohms from Bal port. Despite having such impressive output capability, the dongle is very battery efficient. While using the phone I noticed a very low battery consumption rate which deserves a lot of praise. With this admirable power output, it is possible to power up some demanding headphones in addition to regular dd & planar sets. However, pairing with highly sensitive IEMs was not very well, hissing issue comes easily from here.Because of this, the chances of benefiting from using sensitive sets are very less. I have paired many IEMs with the dongle and even used the full size open back headphone HD660S2. The dongle was able to drive this open back headphone quite well, providing good control by keeping the impact fairly tight in the bass region with decent speed & tolerable staging even can present the mids with fine detail without being harsh. Moreover, treble has mediocre detailed presentation but lacks a lot of dynamics & resolution which is normal to get from such a budget dongle.

★ Conclusion :-
Barring a few minor issues, the ds1 offers everything in its sound performance. It's possible to get good synergy from it everywhere without a very bright sounding set. It can be an ideal option for those whose budget is around 100$. I'm hopeful that the device will be a complete package with solid build, sound quality & high output power that will satisfy most of the listeners. I would suggest to buy it for those who want good technicalities with fun relaxed sound. If someone is looking for something highly technical and analytical sounding dongle then would be advised to stay away from ds1.

I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

FosiAudio Ali express store (link isn't affiliated)
Last edited:
ahammedsojib
100+ Head-Fier
Pros: ~ Surprisingly clean output power
~ Durable enough build construction
~ Perfect for regular use with smart phones
~ Decent resulation & transparency
~ Nice airy-extended treble performance
~ Good technical ability & excellent heat management
~ Offers almost neutral tonality with minimal coloured sound
~ Durable enough build construction
~ Perfect for regular use with smart phones
~ Decent resulation & transparency
~ Nice airy-extended treble performance
~ Good technical ability & excellent heat management
~ Offers almost neutral tonality with minimal coloured sound
Cons: ~ Low output power just 45mw@32ohm
~ Slight lack of bass depth (nitpicking)
~ Not so ideal with sensitive IEMs
~ Relatively pricey compared to the competitors
~ Fixed silver cable will gradually oxidize (that is known to all)
~ Slight lack of bass depth (nitpicking)
~ Not so ideal with sensitive IEMs
~ Relatively pricey compared to the competitors
~ Fixed silver cable will gradually oxidize (that is known to all)
★ Introduction :-
ddhifi has been regarded as a reputable Chinese audio equipment manufacturer.Who have been manufacturing audio gear and accessories for a long time.Their latest innovations and modern solutions cater to the needs of audiophiles and make everyday life more easier. ddHiFi generally started their journey with Guangzhou DD Electronic Technology Company established in July 2017. They are the manufacturer of earphone, cable, audio adapter, dac dongle and many other necessary accessories. In which they represent an emphasis on unique design as well as craftsmanship can be said to be meticulous. I recently got hold of their newly released tc35cm2 dongle dac and have been using it regularly, the whole experience of which will be shared in today's review.
★ Disclaimer :-
This unit was sent to me directly from @ddHiFi for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
Tc35cm2 dongle comes in a very small white color box. When you open it, you will see the dongle, a warranty card and qc passed card. Apart from that, there is nothing else what can be called a very simple unboxing experience. I expected there to be a generic fabric pouch to carry the dongle. Unfortunately it wasn't there, ddhifi does not include it in the box. In this case they can be said to have shown some stinginess lol.
1.TC35CM2 Dongle Dac ×1
2.warrenty card ×1
3.QC Passed card ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Compatibility :-
This miniature form factor's dongle is really eye catchy due to its smooth finishing.The construction of this device is simply top notch. Ddhifi has tried to make a single end dongle as durable as possible with their tc35cm2. CNC-machined aviation grade aluminum has been used as the construction material of the device. Both ends of it i.e. type c interface portion & earphone port portion are completely surrounded by metal cover where smooth finishing is also given, At the same time, ddhifi's branding has been highlighted nicely in the golden accent on the surface of type c port portion. Which enhances its premium-ness to a great extent. Moreover, the braided structure of high quality silver plated copper cable connects the two ends of the dongle in a very strong way, resulting in a very stiff feel when held in the hand. Along with the commendable build quality, its compatibility was also quite good. I have been able to use it with my android phone, ipad and pc without any issues and even when using it on pc its full potential has come out. Its small size is designed for ultra portability without sacrificing performance. Since there is no problem with carrying it, this device can be used in any situation with ease. As mentioned earlier, there is no problem with the phone. The dongle connects very strongly to the type c port of the phone which is a positive aspect but keeping it in a jeans pocket makes it a bit risky to stay connected to the phone while traveling as the phone's charging port remains prone to breakage. So I think it would be wise to maintain personal awareness then.
★ Specifications :-
~ Interface : USB-C
~ Socket : 3.5mm 4-pole
~ Cable : High-purity oxygen-free copper multi-core shielded
~ Supported headphone type : TIA standard inline controls
~ Frequency response : 20Hz- 20kHz
~ Headphone amp chip : ES9603Q (independent)
~ PCM decoding support : Up to 32bit/384kHz (dsd 64 max)
~ Output power : L+R>45mW+45mW (322/ THD+N<1%)
~ SNR : ≥112 dB (32Ω load/A-weighted)
~ Dynamic range : >120dB
~ THD : <0.008% (322 load)
~ Noise floor : <3μV (A-weighted)
~ Length (excluding plugs) : 9cm
~ Weight: Approx. 9.5g
★ Tested With :-
Android phone
, Ipad & PC 
~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ NF Audio Ra15
~ Artti Audio R1
~ Letshouer S08
~ Dunu Kima 2
~ NF acous Nm20
~ Celest Wyvern Qing
★ Sound Aspect :-
The Tc35cm2 dongle is basically a neutral sounding source where a hint of bright touch exists. Sound wise it gives fairly natural presentation in all cases. Although minimal coloration has been found, I would not say that make the sounds more clinical or digital. This dongle tries to deliver sound exactly as it should be to create the appearance of music. Other than that there haven't found any roll-off issues which is definitely a strength.This dongle supports audio format of upto 32 bit 384khz sampling rate, where the max Dsd 64 is supported. With It's 112db SNR, this small dongle is capable of delivering very clean sound. Talking about the sound, let's jump to the bass at the beginning.The bass wasn’t punchy enough, where depth is noticeably lacking.The speed & texture of the bass was on the good side. Due to this lack of depth, this will increase more the lack of bass region in IEMs. There is a slight warmth in the mids section which adds a welcoming factor to the overall midrange. Upper mids region is somewhat forward but clean, lower mids can retain clarity. In general the vocal sound does not seem very lifelike or realistic even more coloured that's considered as neutral presentation. As a result, the mids have been able to ensure adequate cleanliness.Treble region was quite good, able to offer moderately detailed presentation along with sufficient airiness. A very nice extension from upper treble to lower treble was maintained, on the other side the presence of lower treble is also good.There is a slight boost towards the upper register but it doesn't affect the treble too much and there is no harshness or peakiness. Also lower treble is pretty good. Where smooth manner has gained importance along with detail retrieval is intact. In terms of technicalities, it has given a decent result. The sound stage height was a little better than the average and the depth was accurate. Imaging capability was not bad, even if not more precise.The instruments can be located fairly good way. I didn't get any kind of stereo separation related issue, similarly micro dynamics is just good & macro dynamics presentation was below average.
★ Synergy and Power :-
The output power of the dongle is quite low (45mw@32ohm) so it can provide good synergy with driving most easy to drive IEMs to their full potential. I tried many IEMs with this dongle including regular dd as well as budget friendly planar set, but did not use any kind of full size headphone as its driveability was not that satisfactory level. It becomes a bit challenging for this dongle to drive a demanding planar set. I used my Letshuoer S08 planar, which was a bit hard to drive so the tc35cm2 couldn't open-up full dynamics with its lower amplification. Moreover, it has performed well in the case of regular dd sets, but if the sound of IEMs are a bit bright-ish, then the pairing with them will not be very promising. Outside of it, neutral or slightly warm sounding IEMs have shown good performance. I don't notice too many complaints with it considering the size.
★ Comparison :-
~Ddhifi tc35cm2 Vs Tanchjim space lite~
Both are dongles of similar form factor. Space lite a little bit more pricey than tc35cm2. In terms of sound, space lite will be in a better position even the output power is far ahead than tc35cm2. None of them have a gain switching option sadly, but the space lite is handy for using a bit more demanding gear for its higher power output (98mw@32Ω). It supports pcm to max Dsd 256 while ddhifi can decode up to highest dsd 64. Interestingly, none of them paired well with the sensitive sets. Different dac chip are used in the internal configuration of both of them, that's why there are some changes in the sound. Regarding tonality, space lite is neutral to slight warmth and ddhifi is neutral to hint of bright-ish. Even though ddhifi overall is better in technical aspect, space lite seems more wider in sound stage but its imaging capability is not very convenient but space lite is definitely the real winner in overall sound performance.
~ddHiFi tc35cm2 Vs Blon V1~
The price of blon's newly released dongle V1 is almost similar with this dongle of ddhifi. Price is consistent but blon V1 offers better value in terms of price to performance ratio. It is made up of glass panel and aluminum frame so the device looks quite premium and it has bal port which gives upto 160mw output power which is much more higher than tc35cm2. By doing this, v1 will bring additional benefits in driving moderate demanding headphones, which is the main lacking of ddhifi but does not come with such clean output with sensitive sets. It has hardware level volume control buttons with "play" & "pause" buttons as an extra benefit. Slight pop-ing sound is available only when plugging in and removing the earphone. That doesn't seem like any major problem. Technicalities are also much better than this dongle of ddhifi. So if you need more output power, I think v1 will definitely be a worthy purchase.
★ Conclusion :-
ddhifi has tried to cover pretty much everything from the build quality of their tc35cm2 dongle. If you look at its retail price, then it must seem a bit pricey because other offerings are better than this in the current market. Which are performing better in addition to the output power.Those who are looking for a simple dac dongle as an alternative to the earphone port of any smart phones (except Lg & some specific phones). which will have good build quality as well as fairly good sounding. At the same time, this tc35cm2 dongle can be an ideal option for those who do not need high power output but are thinking of regular use with phone. I can recommend those folks to buy it. Otherwise, those who already have a few sets in their arsenal will easily find a better option in the current market under 50$.
I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience
ddhifi has been regarded as a reputable Chinese audio equipment manufacturer.Who have been manufacturing audio gear and accessories for a long time.Their latest innovations and modern solutions cater to the needs of audiophiles and make everyday life more easier. ddHiFi generally started their journey with Guangzhou DD Electronic Technology Company established in July 2017. They are the manufacturer of earphone, cable, audio adapter, dac dongle and many other necessary accessories. In which they represent an emphasis on unique design as well as craftsmanship can be said to be meticulous. I recently got hold of their newly released tc35cm2 dongle dac and have been using it regularly, the whole experience of which will be shared in today's review.


★ Disclaimer :-
This unit was sent to me directly from @ddHiFi for review purpose. I had no financial agreement with them to promote their product. As always the entire opinion of this review is completely my personal.
★ Box content at a glance :-
Tc35cm2 dongle comes in a very small white color box. When you open it, you will see the dongle, a warranty card and qc passed card. Apart from that, there is nothing else what can be called a very simple unboxing experience. I expected there to be a generic fabric pouch to carry the dongle. Unfortunately it wasn't there, ddhifi does not include it in the box. In this case they can be said to have shown some stinginess lol.


1.TC35CM2 Dongle Dac ×1
2.warrenty card ×1
3.QC Passed card ×1
★ Design, Build Quality & Compatibility :-
This miniature form factor's dongle is really eye catchy due to its smooth finishing.The construction of this device is simply top notch. Ddhifi has tried to make a single end dongle as durable as possible with their tc35cm2. CNC-machined aviation grade aluminum has been used as the construction material of the device. Both ends of it i.e. type c interface portion & earphone port portion are completely surrounded by metal cover where smooth finishing is also given, At the same time, ddhifi's branding has been highlighted nicely in the golden accent on the surface of type c port portion. Which enhances its premium-ness to a great extent. Moreover, the braided structure of high quality silver plated copper cable connects the two ends of the dongle in a very strong way, resulting in a very stiff feel when held in the hand. Along with the commendable build quality, its compatibility was also quite good. I have been able to use it with my android phone, ipad and pc without any issues and even when using it on pc its full potential has come out. Its small size is designed for ultra portability without sacrificing performance. Since there is no problem with carrying it, this device can be used in any situation with ease. As mentioned earlier, there is no problem with the phone. The dongle connects very strongly to the type c port of the phone which is a positive aspect but keeping it in a jeans pocket makes it a bit risky to stay connected to the phone while traveling as the phone's charging port remains prone to breakage. So I think it would be wise to maintain personal awareness then.

★ Specifications :-
~ Interface : USB-C
~ Socket : 3.5mm 4-pole
~ Cable : High-purity oxygen-free copper multi-core shielded
~ Supported headphone type : TIA standard inline controls
~ Frequency response : 20Hz- 20kHz
~ Headphone amp chip : ES9603Q (independent)
~ PCM decoding support : Up to 32bit/384kHz (dsd 64 max)
~ Output power : L+R>45mW+45mW (322/ THD+N<1%)
~ SNR : ≥112 dB (32Ω load/A-weighted)
~ Dynamic range : >120dB
~ THD : <0.008% (322 load)
~ Noise floor : <3μV (A-weighted)
~ Length (excluding plugs) : 9cm
~ Weight: Approx. 9.5g
★ Tested With :-



~ Tanchjim Origin
~ Dunu Falcon Ultra
~ NF Audio Ra15
~ Artti Audio R1
~ Letshouer S08
~ Dunu Kima 2
~ NF acous Nm20
~ Celest Wyvern Qing
★ Sound Aspect :-
The Tc35cm2 dongle is basically a neutral sounding source where a hint of bright touch exists. Sound wise it gives fairly natural presentation in all cases. Although minimal coloration has been found, I would not say that make the sounds more clinical or digital. This dongle tries to deliver sound exactly as it should be to create the appearance of music. Other than that there haven't found any roll-off issues which is definitely a strength.This dongle supports audio format of upto 32 bit 384khz sampling rate, where the max Dsd 64 is supported. With It's 112db SNR, this small dongle is capable of delivering very clean sound. Talking about the sound, let's jump to the bass at the beginning.The bass wasn’t punchy enough, where depth is noticeably lacking.The speed & texture of the bass was on the good side. Due to this lack of depth, this will increase more the lack of bass region in IEMs. There is a slight warmth in the mids section which adds a welcoming factor to the overall midrange. Upper mids region is somewhat forward but clean, lower mids can retain clarity. In general the vocal sound does not seem very lifelike or realistic even more coloured that's considered as neutral presentation. As a result, the mids have been able to ensure adequate cleanliness.Treble region was quite good, able to offer moderately detailed presentation along with sufficient airiness. A very nice extension from upper treble to lower treble was maintained, on the other side the presence of lower treble is also good.There is a slight boost towards the upper register but it doesn't affect the treble too much and there is no harshness or peakiness. Also lower treble is pretty good. Where smooth manner has gained importance along with detail retrieval is intact. In terms of technicalities, it has given a decent result. The sound stage height was a little better than the average and the depth was accurate. Imaging capability was not bad, even if not more precise.The instruments can be located fairly good way. I didn't get any kind of stereo separation related issue, similarly micro dynamics is just good & macro dynamics presentation was below average.

★ Synergy and Power :-
The output power of the dongle is quite low (45mw@32ohm) so it can provide good synergy with driving most easy to drive IEMs to their full potential. I tried many IEMs with this dongle including regular dd as well as budget friendly planar set, but did not use any kind of full size headphone as its driveability was not that satisfactory level. It becomes a bit challenging for this dongle to drive a demanding planar set. I used my Letshuoer S08 planar, which was a bit hard to drive so the tc35cm2 couldn't open-up full dynamics with its lower amplification. Moreover, it has performed well in the case of regular dd sets, but if the sound of IEMs are a bit bright-ish, then the pairing with them will not be very promising. Outside of it, neutral or slightly warm sounding IEMs have shown good performance. I don't notice too many complaints with it considering the size.

★ Comparison :-
~Ddhifi tc35cm2 Vs Tanchjim space lite~
Both are dongles of similar form factor. Space lite a little bit more pricey than tc35cm2. In terms of sound, space lite will be in a better position even the output power is far ahead than tc35cm2. None of them have a gain switching option sadly, but the space lite is handy for using a bit more demanding gear for its higher power output (98mw@32Ω). It supports pcm to max Dsd 256 while ddhifi can decode up to highest dsd 64. Interestingly, none of them paired well with the sensitive sets. Different dac chip are used in the internal configuration of both of them, that's why there are some changes in the sound. Regarding tonality, space lite is neutral to slight warmth and ddhifi is neutral to hint of bright-ish. Even though ddhifi overall is better in technical aspect, space lite seems more wider in sound stage but its imaging capability is not very convenient but space lite is definitely the real winner in overall sound performance.

~ddHiFi tc35cm2 Vs Blon V1~
The price of blon's newly released dongle V1 is almost similar with this dongle of ddhifi. Price is consistent but blon V1 offers better value in terms of price to performance ratio. It is made up of glass panel and aluminum frame so the device looks quite premium and it has bal port which gives upto 160mw output power which is much more higher than tc35cm2. By doing this, v1 will bring additional benefits in driving moderate demanding headphones, which is the main lacking of ddhifi but does not come with such clean output with sensitive sets. It has hardware level volume control buttons with "play" & "pause" buttons as an extra benefit. Slight pop-ing sound is available only when plugging in and removing the earphone. That doesn't seem like any major problem. Technicalities are also much better than this dongle of ddhifi. So if you need more output power, I think v1 will definitely be a worthy purchase.

★ Conclusion :-
ddhifi has tried to cover pretty much everything from the build quality of their tc35cm2 dongle. If you look at its retail price, then it must seem a bit pricey because other offerings are better than this in the current market. Which are performing better in addition to the output power.Those who are looking for a simple dac dongle as an alternative to the earphone port of any smart phones (except Lg & some specific phones). which will have good build quality as well as fairly good sounding. At the same time, this tc35cm2 dongle can be an ideal option for those who do not need high power output but are thinking of regular use with phone. I can recommend those folks to buy it. Otherwise, those who already have a few sets in their arsenal will easily find a better option in the current market under 50$.

I've provided the purchase link below for everyone convenience

ddHiFi official Ali express Store (link isn’t affiliated)
Last edited:

Rsifur9
very good heads up 
