Reviews by 7nationarmy

7nationarmy

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Comfort, Overall sound performance, Build, Design, Price
Cons: Thin cable, Lacking accessories
I was browsing around for travel headphones, and I stumbled upon the M50. Not the Audio Technica one, but this one:

 

DSC01836.jpg

 

At first look I thought this is might be it. The M-Audio Studiophile Q40 was favoured for its sound quality and value, but the build was far from confidence-inspiring and the pleather pads were awful. The M50 on the other hand seems stylish, has ample paddings and not too bulky. Relatively affordable too, retailing at 75USD on Amazon. There's not much info about its sound quality, but I decided to make the plunge anyway. So here it is!

 

Packaging and Accessories

 

DSC01854.jpg

 

The box is nice and simple. There is nothing much to write home here.

 

Accessories provided are lacking. Inside the box there's the headphone and a 1/8" to 1/4" adapter. That is about it. I know that I should not expect too much from a budget headphone, but a carrying case or pouch would be nice.

 

Build and Comfort:
 
For a sub-$100 headphone the M50 is really well built. The soft-touch plastics and textured metal on the earcups make for a classy appearance. The earcup slider is metal and it clicks nicely as you adjust it. My only complaint on the build is the flat cable. It is rather thin and does not seem very durable. Fortunately, the cable is easily replaceable as it uses a standard 3.5mm connector which can be plugged in to either side of the cups.

 

Comfort is in my opinion the M50's strongest suit. It is the most comfortable 'affordable' headphones I have ever used. It is miles ahead of the old Q40 and also much better than the ATH-M50 and SRH440 in this regard. The pads are roughly 2.5cm thick and very plush. Although they are on the small side of the over ear category, they are still very comfortable. The earcups also slightly rotate around the slider on a ball joint, allowing for better fit to the head shape. The headband padding could be a little thicker, but since the M50 isn't heavy, this is just a very minor niggle.

 

The M50 is not foldable, so it may not be as portable as the ATH-M50. That being said, it is still compact enough to be snuggled in your daily backpacks.

 

Sound:

 

Songs used:

Signed, Sealed, Delivered – Stevie Wonder

My Immortal – Evanescence

Dream On – Aerosmith

Santeria – Sublime

Let It Go – James Bay

Hello – Adele

Here Tonight – Dash Berlin & Jay Cosmic ft. Collin Mcloughlin

 

M-Audio billed the M50 as a monitoring headphone, and I’d say that is a fitting description. The M50’s sound signature is rather neutral, perhaps slightly on the bright side.
 
The bass is adequate to say the least. It has decent, fast impact with good detail which is satisfying for soul, rock and pop music. It is not muddy or bloated at all. It feels accurate. In EDM songs like Here Tonight, the impact and reverberation is lacking for that club atmosphere/feeling, but then again this is supposedly a neutral headphone.
 
The mids is lush and clear. Guitars and vocals sounds crisp and articulate, free of bleeding from the low end frequencies. They also does not sound overly forward or laidback. It probably can be best described as listening from front row, instead of from onstage or back row.
 
The top end errs very slightly on the bright side. The hi-hats jump out as crisp and clear. This contributes to an overall excellent detail for a sub $100 headphone.
 
Imaging and soundstage is where I found the M50 to be performing way above its price range. For a closed headphone, the M50’s soundstage is surprisingly quite wide and deep. The instruments are well positioned and separated, making for a great 3 dimensional presentation.
 
Comparisons:
 
I have used the Q40, ATHM50 and SRH440 previously, but it was quite a long time ago. If I am to make a comparison now, it would be based on my memory which won’t be accurate. My brain is probably too overloaded with work to remember sound details. So, I will try to borrow/audition these 3 budget monitoring headphones for comparison when I get some free time and then I will update this section accordingly. If you have any suggestions for comparisons, please shoot away in the comments.
 
Conclusion:
 
DSC01859.jpg
 
The M50 is a very well built, stylish, comfortable headphone that is no slouch in terms of sound quality. Bass heads should look elsewhere, but those who seek a more neutral response will be satisfied with the M50’s signature and performance. Details are great and presentation is excellent. It also undercuts the popular budget monitoring headphones (ATHM50, SRH440) too in terms of price.
 
My gripes would be cable durability and the lack of carrying case. And perhaps they shouldn’t have given it the same name as that of one of the most recognisable headphone in this category.
 
These are minor niggles though, and I would definitely recommend this headphones.
7nationarmy
7nationarmy
Isolation is great for what can be considered a portable headphone. I used it during a flight 2 days ago and it managed to block out the crying baby seated a row in front. I can still hear the cabin crew announcement though. My JH5 which I already sold still isolate better. but the M50 is still not bad at all.
mechavore884
mechavore884
+1 for isolation, after hearing the Q40s I really would like to try another set from this brand
LNuneek
LNuneek
Are these headphones truly over ear? From the pictures they look about the same size as the Beats Mixr. Can someone measure the ear pad opening?

7nationarmy

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Detailed and lush mids, Impactful yet detailed bass, Superb soundstage, Top notch build quality and isolation, Indestructible carrying case, Comfort
Cons: Need EQ to pick up treble, Size might be too big for some, Flimsy eartips

7nationarmy

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Very Decent SQ, PRICE OMG
Cons: Bad baad cable (tangle prone, don't seem durable), Not the most comfy, No accessories at all
The true budget IEM king!
 
First of all, there are no accessories and packaging. The IEM comes in a plastic wrap. That's that. Can't complain for $7 though.
 
The housing is a big, bulky shiny plastic. OK for the price. For me comfort is not bad at all, but for those who have smaller ears comfort will be an issue. Get another pair of eartips cos the stock ones are not so good. I use Meelec tips stuffed with Comply foam.
 
The worst part: cable. Super tangle prone, kinks, and no chin slider.
 
But... the sound! You can't get any better sq for even 5-10 times the price.
 
Bass: Has a decent impact and control, but lacking extension. Overall it is still enjoyable for most tracks.
 
Mids: Unexpectedly smooth and fairly detailed.
 
Highs: Fair amount of sparkle and detail, but again, lacks extension.
 
Soundstage: It is wide, but not really deep. 
 
Overall the 8320 is a very nicely balanced sounding IEM which worth much more than its price. Since it is very cheap, it is good to keep more than 1 for backup, practising recabling, try out stuff.

7nationarmy

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: SQ, Size, Flac, Rockbox, Clip, MicroSD expansion, Price
Cons: Fingerprint magnet, and nothing else
Really small, portable player with capabilities that worth a lot more than its price. Very good SQ for an entry level player, able to play FLAC, great UI and battery life with Rockbox. Clip is very useful for exercising/strapping an amp. The best thing: it is very cheap!

7nationarmy

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Price, SQ, comfort, accessories
Cons: No chin slider, average isolation
Affordable yet awesome? Look no further!
Vsonic has always been known for cheap earphones with high quality, and GR06 lives up to that name.
 
Build quality/design: well built and looks durable. I love the brownish-gold color of the cable. I also like the design: minimalist (not the flashy type) but very functional. The only downside I can find is the lack of chin slider.
 
Comfort: over-ear has always been my personal preference and I find the GR06 pretty comfy, although not as comfortable as the Phonak PFE. The housing is quite small and light, fits my ear better than the Shures, which are bigger. Microphonics is very minimal. I can wear these comfortably for many many hours.
 
Isolation: slightly above average. The foam tips isolate slightly better. Have not tried putting on the comply tips.
 
Accessories: for approx. 50$, Vsonic is very generous in terms of accessories. 15 pairs or eartips (including 1 pair of bi-flanges and 1 pair of foam tips), a pouch and a set of ear guides (very useful during exercises) are provided.
 
SQ: the GR06 is a mid-centric earphone. The mids are nicely textured, detailed and upfront. The bass is quite punchy and deep. Treble is the weakest of all three, being slightly less detailed. Soundstage is average.
 
Overall, the GR06 is a really great pair of earphones. They simply kick every other earpieces' ass at this price range. I bought this as a replacement for my broken UE400, which is priced 77USD. The GR06 is cheaper but better in almost every aspect. Highly recommended.
 
PS: a pair of earphones like this needs moar love! Why the hell it is low on head-fi rankings!? Moar reviews and bring it up the ladder!
7nationarmy
7nationarmy
At lendmeurears.com, a Singapore website. But you see in the website the price is 80SGD, but I purchased the pair in the website's counter at Toy Outpost (plaza singapura) for 65SGD or 50USD
bukujutsu
bukujutsu
In real life? Well, that throws out that option.
1
189906
Just got my pair, I love them. Alot better than the Visang R03 I had. More detail.
Back
Top