Audiosense AQ0

General Information

1618892487206.png

Latest reviews

Captainbeefturd

100+ Head-Fier
Weight notes and phat beats
Pros: Oozingly sumptuous bass, on point
Near Harmon tuning
Nearly on point treble
Open sound
Pumping
Energising
Cons: At volume lacks resolution
I'm going to keep this short and sweet. The AQ0 truly is a hidden gem. It's been out nearly 2 years and still nobody's picked this up. Yes it doesn't have the resolution of some of the planars coming out. I've just received my Raptgo Hook-x and yes , it has superb resolution through the frequencies but does it have the note weight of the AQ0? No, does it f###, not much out there does. The AQ0 is a simple beast, just off neutral with a bass bias maintaining really clear mids and treble, it's dark with an unusual airlines giving just above average staging and vivid imaging, really nice timber. Their not perfect by all means thi AQ0 just beats anything I've owned or tried near this price point for shear enjoyment, energy or engagement. YOU WILL NOT BE DISAPPOINTED
  • Like
Reactions: Carpet

Zerstorer_GOhren

1000+ Head-Fier
Audiosense AQ0: A Noteworthy Decent Sounding One
Pros: - Quality Bass for Bassheads.

- A well-tuned warm sounding set

- Smooth and a relax tonality.

- Expected from Audiosense, they really included a high quality accessories inside of AQ0's packaging box.

- Well-textured note weight.

- Pretty damned good looking shell for an affordable set.
Cons: - MMCX connector (subjective)

- Wishing for more resolution and detail retrieval capability.

- Just an average technicalities aspect.
20211110_130949.jpg


Greetings and welcome to my another IEM review and I'm doing another product review from Audiosense...again.

No need further introduction about their company again as I keep introducing their products in every month.This written article will be my fifth one for Audiosense product (I admit that I'm turning into an Audiosense witness or a resolute believer), and now I have this particular item from them, The Audiosense AQ0.

20211110_131029_HDR.jpg


Audiosense AQ0 is the first product offering from their new AQ series line for their hybrid driver set-up range. It has a single dynamic driver set-up, This type of dynamic driver seems different compare to a common dynamic driver as Audiosense put some other materials like a graphene diaphragm for better nimble conductor to deliver more signal current, less distortion and improvements of its durability. Like all Audiosense products, it uses a high quality MMCX connector for flexibility purposes.

20211110_131607_HDR.jpg


Those shells encapsulates the graphene drivers are made of a 3D-printed resin which are more proven to have good structural design and more skin-friendly. The shell's structural design was very ergonomically design as they fit snugly into my ears without any stress or soreness. They do have an above average sealing into my lug holes as I barely hear some external noises from outside. Audiosense chooses a turquoise hue for its overall colour with a mother-of-pearl pattern-like on its face plate. Since it is a single DD driver set-up, it has vent that allow to release some build-up pressure and gives more "breathing" space on its driver.

20211110_131554_HDR.jpg
20211110_131600_HDR.jpg


Audiosense AQ0 included accesories on its packaging box are noticeably similar to its DT cousin, The DT100. As it has a two types of eartips in three different standard sizes, a moderately thick 19-core 6N single crystal copper golden brown cable in a L-shape 3.5mm termination with a velcro cable winder, a simple instruction manual and a stone gray colour canvas IEM case that is identical to Campfire Audio's stock IEM case. Audiosense also included a MMCX assist tool too.

20211110_131346_HDR.jpg
20211110_131405_HDR.jpg
20211110_131423.jpg


This set of IEMs needs only some ample power from its source as they are suprisingly undemanding to be driven but they scales well on better sources like DAPs, dedicated desktop DAC/amps and even my LG quad DACs can be able to give the best possible output and fuller dynamics too.


20211110_132212.jpg



This is the most important aspect of this IEM review and it is to determine its kind of tonality. The Audiosense AQ0 is more on a U-shape sound signature in my hearing perception, as it is obviously to have more prominent bass, more neutral mids and some emphasis and elevation on its treble region.

These are the sound characteristics from each segment of audio frequency spectrum based on my observation.

LOWS/BASS:

As I observed, the bass is somehow the most prominent on this one, it has good texture on both parts of bass frequency range. It has that punchiness, impactful and well-controlled as those are a good characteristics of well-tuned, high quality dynamic driver. Its transience are quite nimble as it decay fast as expected again from a high quality dynamic driver.

Sub-bass is quite a performer here as I feel that natural rumbling sound from it. Some synthpops and electonica genre (usually 80s to early 90s tracks) with more prominent sub-bass focus tracks will appear even more presented as it show how gruffy the very low end of audio spectrum on some mixes.

Midbass texture are well-bodied on how does it shows the quality of bass kicks and bass guitar as they sound sustaining, authoritative and weighty respectively. Male vocals in low registers such bass baritone such as sounds even deep and more guttural.

In my opinion, these kind of bass characteristics will be a sublime and terrific for a basshead who love a quality and a subtantial low end.

MIDS:

The mids are linear, clean and smooth. It has some added warmth into it too. Male vocals has an enough texture to show it show an adequate heaviness and deep-seated vocals on baritone and tenor singers. The female vocals are more prominent on this one as they sound appealing, prominent and even detail especially to high pitch ones as there are some instances that they are a little bit shrilly in a very few female vocal-centric tracks.

The timbre quality of instruments sound natural and renders the each tonal colour of every instrument very precisely and accurately detail. It is also pay my attention on a acoustic guitars and other instruments like Shamisen as they sounds crunchy and very lively as I feel that every plucking of its strings, the sharp and penetrating sound from a snare hits, a brilliant and lustrous sound of violin, a whistling and clear sound of a flute and last is a rich tone and ear-enveloping tune of piano.

Overall, the presentation of the mids is lush, thick and has a satisfying resolution on its own right.

HIGHS/TREBLE:

The layout of the treble region on I perceived it is more on a natural sounding as it is neither dark or too bright sounding. These type of treble is more on a "safer" as per se on being a balanced one.

The emphasis on upper mids in essence that I perceptible hear that elevation as its gives more energy to limits of some high range vocal, though I sense a very minimal amount of sibilance in a few sibilance-laden tracks but not to the point that I find them irritating and annoying into my ears.

It has an acceptable detail retrieval but if focuses on more macrodynamics rather than microdynamics, it has decent airy extension for a dynamic driver set. Crashing on cymbals strikes sounds more on natural that it has retain shimmer and clanging characteristic though there are some instances that its borderline on being splashy while hi/low hats has the shortened and muffled sound whenever I want hear that chicking sound.

SOUNDSTAGE, IMAGING AND OTHER TECHNICALITIES:

My estimation on its sound field dimensions regarding on its soundstage that it has an above average on wideness scale with decent perceived depth and average height. Imaging performs alright, not the best aspect for a DD in my opinion but I can still sense the placement of vocals and instruments of each location. Separation and layering performs competent enough to have a decent spacing and gaps of each row.

Coherency is not an issue here as its single DD driver performs very well with almost zero percent of having phasing and distortion issues.


To end my review and give a verdict about Audiosense AQ0, All I can say is that this fine piece of device indeed delivers a matured warm-sounding IEM that audio enthusiast leaning towards more coloured sound signature will probably like this kind of tuning. Even a neutralheads like me, I somehow enjoying this kind of tuning, a warmish and natural sounding that will be my alternate, all-rounder set (my mood influence and changes the type of music I'm listening...). And for a $100 dollar price range IEM with appealing aesthetics on its shell casing, this one in my opinion is one of the best lookers out there.

Audiosense DT100 currently cost about $99.00/£74.00 and it is still available to all e-commerce sites.

20211110_130956.jpg
20211110_131004.jpg
20211110_131011.jpg



SPECIFICATION:

MODEL: Audiosense AQ0
IMPEDANCE: 32Ω
SENSITIVITY: 101dB
FREQUENCY RESPONSE: 10Hz - 40KHz
CABLE LENGTH: 1.25M
PIN TYPE: MMCX Connector
PLUG TYPE: 3.5mm
DRIVER UNITS: One (1) Dynamic Driver


Some Tracks Tested: ( * = 16-bit FLAC, ** = 24-bit FLAC, *'* = MQA, '*' = DSD, *'= .WAV)

Alison Krauss -When You Say Nothing At All *
Jade Wiedlin - Blue Kiss**
Led Zeppelin - When The Levee Breaks **
Mountain - Mississippi Queen *
Queen - Killer Queen **
Guns N' Roses - Patience *'*
Eric Clapton - Tears in Heaven '*'
Sergio Mendes- Never Gonna Let You Go '*'
Pearl Jam - Daughter **
Roselia - Hidamari Rhodonite *
Assassin - Fight (To Stop The Tyranny)*
Celtic Frost- Visual Aggression *
New Order - Blue Monday *
The Corrs- What Can I do (unplugged version) *
Jimi Hendrix Experience - Voodoo Child *
The Madness- Buggy Trousers *
Metallica - Motorbreath **
Mariah Carey- Always Be My Baby *
Destiny's Child - Say My Name *
Malice Mizer- Au Revoir *
Mozart - Lacrimosa *
New York Philharmonic Orchestra - Dvorak- Symphony 9 " From the New World." *
Eva Cassidy - Fields of Gold (Sting cover)*
Michael Jackson - Give In To Me *
Exciter - Violence and Force *
Diana Krall - Stop This World **
Debbie Gibson - Foolish Beat *'*



P.S.
I am not affliated to AUDIOSENSE nor receive monetary incentives and financial gains as they provide me a review unit for an exchange of factual and sincere feedback from yours truly.

Once again, I would like to thank Elaine Wong for this providing this review unit, I truly appreciate on her generosity towards me and other reviewers.

If you are interested this IEM product from Audiosense, Just check their FB Page and E-commerce sites links below:

FB:
https://mobile.facebook.com/AudiosenseIEMs/

Aliexpress:
AUDIOSENSE Official Store
https://m.aliexpress.com/store/v3/home.html

Shopee (ASEAN Market):
https://shopee.ph/audiosense.ph
Last edited:
L
LaughMoreDaily
I used to have a small magazine and there was a half dozen ways to thank someone that helped me, all of them private. That was when the internet started... So I have a hard time believing you can only do so in a review. Besides, why would you want your competition to know who to contact that sent you money or a review unit to get your support?
Zerstorer_GOhren
Zerstorer_GOhren
@LaughMoreDaily

You have your own approach and I have mine. I don't see this review thing as competition after all. It is just all personal enjoyment on my listening experience. I'm quite very transparent person and if anyone I see that has a potential to be a good reviewer, I'm willing to support and trying to help them out just like some people here helping me out too, An act of a good reciprocity should be return likewise :)

On my point of view, I don't have particular issues on being vocal to be grateful to somebody else.

Note this one as you mention sending me some money :):

"I am not affliated to AUDIOSENSE nor receive monetary incentives and financial gains as they provide me a review unit for an exchange of factual and sincere feedback from yours truly."

I forgot to mention that I paid these review units from my own pocket after all, they are not free.
captione
captione
Is there a reason why people keep thanking the person who sent them the review unit in the review itself? I find the idea of doing so rather bizarre and a waste of space. Imagine if people did that for reviews when in a YouTube video or on TV.

Uhm, that's a bit of a stretch. Is there anything wrong thanking the people who gave/borrow the units?? I guess gratitude isn't a reason then??

suicideup

New Head-Fier
Audiosense AQ0 Review!
Pros: -An all-rounder sounding IEM
-Above-average detail retrieval for its price point (100usd)
-Tuning on the lows well done
-Clear mids
-Fatigue free yet enjoyable highs
-Above-average fit and isolation (subjective)
-Very good set of accessories. It comes with 3 pairs of stock tips, 3 pairs of OEM EP-EX11 ear tips, A canvas IEM case with wool walling -inside, and an MMCX remover tool.
-Very good IEM stock cable. Tightly braided and does not tangle based on my experience. Comes with a built-in winder as well.
Cons: -None for its asking price (100usd), really.
IMG_20211113_021408601-01.jpg


Audiosense AQ0 Review!

Good day! After three days of observation and casual usage, here is my review for the Audiosense AQ0- The so-called “underrated” IEM by few. Let's see whether it's truly underestimated!
Disclaimer/s:
  • Because I paid for it with my own money, the following claims and observations will be as truthful and honest as possible, with as little bias as possible.
  • The following remarks and observations shall be made and owned only by me.
  • Audiosense is unaware that I will be conducting this evaluation, and no compensation for this review is/was involved.
  • Your mileage may (and always, will) vary.

Burn-in time: 5 hours per day, 3 days.

Source/s used:

  • Hidizs AP80
  • Not-By-VE Avani Realtek Dongle
  • Samsung Galaxy S3 (WM1811 DAC)
  • Non-HiFi smartphone (realme 5i)

Sound signature:
  • Balanced-warm. Depending on the source matched, it might sound u-shaped at times. Big, controlled bass, clear mids, and well-extended highs with no roll-off.

Lows:
  • Lows are elevated and deep, with big quantity. However, the AQ0 did a great job of presenting the lows. Subbass is the elevated portion, not the midbass. Exhibits decent sub-bass rumble when needed. Overall, the bass packs a punch with quick and well-controlled decay. Bassheads will enjoy this IEM on EDM and bass-heavy tracks.
Mids:
  • Mids are I’d say near neutral, but can suffer from slight recession depending on the source paired, particularly with a non-hifi smartphone. Lower mids have decent weight and clarity. Upper mids exhibit above-average clarity with sufficient sparkle. No instances of peaks or sibilance are present.
Highs:
  • Highs are also decently extended and do not lack any air. It isn’t rolled off or bright either. I would say it’s on the “sweet spot”. Detail retrieval is above average for this price point. Microdetails can be heard easily without being analytical.

Soundstage, Imaging, and separation:
  • The soundstage is average, wider than deep. Separation is also average, it can suffer a little bit of congestion, but far from being bad or unbearable on this specific track (Cö shu Nie – Asphyxia). Imaging is also near precise and can handle five or more instruments and vocals decently.

Pros:
  • An all-rounder sounding IEM
  • Above-average detail retrieval for its price point (100usd)
  • Tuning on the lows well done
  • Clear mids
  • Fatigue free yet enjoyable highs
  • Above-average fit and isolation (subjective)
  • Very good set of accessories. It comes with 3 pairs of stock tips, 3 pairs of OEM EP-EX11 ear tips, A canvas IEM case with wool walling inside, and an MMCX remover tool.
  • Very good IEM stock cable. Tightly braided and does not tangle based on my experience. Comes with a built-in winder as well.

Cons:
  • None for its asking price we're talking about an IEM that can sound well with most genres (100usd), really.

Verdict:

Based on my results and general experience, the Audiosense AQ0 has proven to be underestimated. From the package to the accessories to the quality, Audiosense does a good job with the AQ0. I did not even know that this IEM was already released since February (https://twitter.com/Res0rtL0ve/status/1363795684118335492...). If we're talking about the "best" IEMs in terms of accessories, packing, and sound quality that I've rented, owned, and auditioned, these join the TFZ King 2, Kinera Idun, FiiO FA1, and Sennheiser IE40 Pro on my list of recommendations under $100.

Thank you for reading!

Additional Photos:



IMG_20211113_021755991-01.jpg
IMG_20211113_021821130-01.jpg
IMG_20211113_022100759-01.jpg
IMG_20211113_022408675-01.jpg


IMG_20211114_092827187.jpg


Last edited:

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top