Anew U1

General Information

Specifications
  • Driver Configuration:10mm Dynamic
  • Sensitivity: 108db
  • Impedance: 32ohm
  • Frequency Response: 20-20khz

Latest reviews

CK Moustache

100+ Head-Fier
Link to my review and measurement index thread where one can also find a full review overview, more information about myself as well as my general-ish audio and review manifesto: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/956208/




I only give full stars. My ranking/scoring system does not necessarily follow the norm and is about as follows:

5 stars: The product is very good and received the "highly recommended" award from me.

4 stars: The product is very good and received the "recommended" award from me.

3 stars: The product is good/very good, but not outstanding/special enough to get any of my two awards. ["Thumbs Up"]

2 stars: The product is only about average or even somewhat below that and somewhat flawed/flawed in some areas. [neither "Thumbs Up" nor "Thumbs Down"]

1 star: The product is bad/severely flawed to outright bad. ["Thumbs Down"]





Anew U1


Source:

Review sample.


Miscellaneous:

The placement of the vent hole that most dynamic driver in-ears have (one counterexample are the Shure SE215 that have got closed, unvented shells) and that is used by in-ear manufacturers to control the bass levels (either the sub- or midbass, depending whether it is located if front of or behind the driver) is done very cleverly as it is not in the front but instead on the side of the shells wherefore the likelihood that the vent is covered after inserting the shells into one’s ears, which would either increase (front cavity vent) or decrease (rear cavity vent) the bass quantity, is reduced.

The ear tip selection is good, however quality control doesn’t seem to be Anew’s strongest point since some of the included tips arrived already damaged.

Quite surprising is that no storage solution is supplied – nothing at all, not even a basic pouch. This is clearly not appropriate for the price; for more than 100$ I definitely expect to find a storage case or pouch included with the in-ears.

As sort of a compensation, the cable that is included is of really high quality, doesn’t lack a chin-slider and is almost as attractive as the one used by iBasso on the IT01 (in fact the U1s’ 3.5 mm plug and y-splitter are even somewhat more attractive).

One dynamic driver per side.




Sound:

Largest included silicone ear tips.

Tonality:

W-shaped but not executed well.

The bass starts to rise around 500 Hz and reaches its climax way down in the sub-bass around 40 Hz with about 11 dB in quantity compared to an in-ear with a diffuse-field flat bass tuning (Etymotic ER-4S and ER4SR), therefore the tunings avoids any warm spillage into the midrange. Overpowering, strong upper bass punches are also avoided as a result and the lows are really rather sub-bass-centric.
When it comes to warmth, the Shure SE215m+SPE have got the most, followed by the iBasso IT01. Then come the U1 that have got the least amount of warmth

The midrange is a double-edged sword. It’s clearly emphasised, to a degree where the sound in the central frequency range is noticeably “in your face” and mid-centric. This can become exhausting after longer listening sessions, and this also leads to a quite unnatural presentation at times.
Sometimes that midrange emphasis with the present presence range works really well and highlights vocals, whereas sometimes it is totally out of place and makes voices sound nasal and way too present. Clearly this is not a natural nor universal tuning-

Unfortunately it doesn’t get all that much better above that.
While the 3 kHz dip is welcome as it makes the overly present midrange and what comes above that at least somewhat more acceptable and tolerable on tracks where the tuning doesn’t work well, the pronounced 5.3 kHz peak makes the highs sound plasticky and metallic when a note hits that frequency band, and there is another one at 10 kHz. The upper of the peaks is not as problematic though as it’s thankfully placed high enough and has a softer character to it (cymbals aren’t harsh but even tend to be on the softer side).
Super treble extension above 10 kHz is flawless.

About half of the time the tuning works and feels vibrant and lively, and highlights several aspects of a song positively. The other half of the time it is just way out of place and plasticky; anyway it’s clearly no natural or realistic tuning, and that midrange emphasis and especially 5 kHz peak are mainly responsible for that. Due to that, it is highly unlikely that the U1 will remain as someone’s everyday in-ears but rather end up as a soon forgotten flavour of the month when the initial excitement of the plasticky tuning has faded away – for in-ears with a fun-oriented but still realistic and natural enough tuning, there are just so many much better alternatives available.

Frequency Response:

ER-4S-Compensation

ProPhile 8-Compensation

Resolution:

Decent and capable but clearly held back by the tuning.

Fairly clean and tight bass for dynamic driver standards without any real softness or muddiness. About comparable to that of my Shure SE215m+SPE, which is a good and rare thing as they are pleasantly tight, fast and controlled for dynamic driver in-ears at this price point (the Shure have got a slight advantage when it comes to attack, but decay, speed and control are similarly good; as the Shure are tuned warmer though, the U1 don’t suffer from the SE215s’ slight masking effects wherefore the Anews’ bass and low midrange appear subjectively a smidgen more detailed).

Midrange and treble separation are where the Anew are a bit ahead of the Shure though, with slightly better separation with fast and more complex tracks. That advantage is however less than half of a class.

While the U1 are n-ears that are worth the money based on technical performance (but ultimately definitely no recommendation (at all!) due to the highly artificial tuning), they don’t fully reach the iBasso IT01s’ level of performance. Especially with more complex and faster music material, the IT01 show their superiority when it comes to tightness, separation and control. Overall I’d describe the IT01 as being one class above the Anew. The only area where both may be roughly comparable is midrange resolution.

Soundstage:

Not small, not large. Bigger than “average”. Not as wide as the Shures’. Spatial depth is present and there’s even a bit of layering. Overall still spherical.
Separation and placement are quite precise.




Conclusion:

Decent technical performance, build quality, cable and cleverly placed vents, but that’s about it – unfortunately the tuning, except for the nice bass, is so miserably artificial that it’s ultimately just “plain bad” and not “fun” at all.


Photos:



Palash

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Good build quality,
Lightweight,
Mature treble,
Clarity and details,
Good Cable.
Cons: Fat nozzle (Tricky tip selection),
No carry Case.
Introduction
It's always a very critical situation; when I have prepared myself to evaluate a product but instead listening to my playlists for hours without writing anything. Anew U1 is something like that and after almost three months of daily usage, I am doing this review. Anew as a brand is not that popular and very little information is out there.U1 is the only product available from this brand and I would like to thank Penon Audio for sending this U1 unit for review.

DSC_0032.jpg


Specifications
Brand - Anew,
Model - U1,
Color – Ivory / Black (Limited Edition),
Headphone sound principle - 10mm single carbon nanotube diaphragm Dynamic driver,
Shell material – Acrylic + Aluminum,
Nozzle diameter – 6 mm,
Sensitivity - 108dB/mW,
Frequency Response Range - 20-20KHz,
Impedance - 32Ω,
Distortion - < 0.2%,
Plug diameter - 3.5mm gold plated,
Connectors – MMCX,
Cable length - 1.2 M,
Cable type - High purity SPC Copper (Litz) 4 shares braided with ear hook,
Plug Type - straight plug.

DSC_0033.jpg


Buying Link - Here


What's in the Box?

U1 IEM Limited Edition Black,
Single crystal copper silver-plated Litz cable,
3 Pairs of white silicone ear tips (S, M, and L) wide bore,
3 Pairs of transparent silicone ear tips (S, M, and L) wide bore,
1 Pairs of double flange silicone ear tips (L).

DSC_0034.jpg


Presentation, Design & Build Quality
Anew U1 comes inside an 11 X 17 X 4.5 cm (W*H*D) white box, branding has been done on top of the box and specifications backside of the box. U1 IEM & cable placed inside using some foams and ear tips are beneath that foam layer. The overall presentation is simple and elegant.

DSC_0036.jpg


IEM – I have received the limited edition Black Anew U1 for review and no doubt it's very good looking. The entire shell is made out of acrylic and the surface is totally smooth. No visible scratch or bubble is present on U1’s unibody shell. The 6mm front nozzles have been made of aluminum. Perforated plates also have been applied in front of it to stop dust and dirt inside. Silver color branding on the faceplate is appropriate and stylish. Gold plated female MMCX port is embedded with the shell and seems very high in quality.

DSC_0037.jpg


Another hole covered with a perforated plate on sides of the U1 drivers is there; red and blue color on them shows L and R driver. These holes are to minimize the pressure inside the IEM. Overall Anew U1 is not too small or too big. Medium size, smooth surface, lightweight and custom IEM like designed Anew U1 is a comfortable and good looking IEM without any doubt. 10mm single carbon nanotube diaphragm Dynamic driver has been used inside U1, which is unique but driver flex also there.

DSC_0038.jpg


Cable – The stock cable is one of the best cables that comes bundled with IEM under 200$ price range. The cable is totally handmade. 1.2 m silver-plated copper; Litz 4 core cable beautifully braided, not so soft or not so hard. High quality 3.5 mm gold plated plug, small Y splitter, lightweight chin slider, soft ear-hook and good MMCX connectors everything matches the total aesthetics of the cable. Even a white cable tie has been supplied to organize the cable.

DSC_0039.jpg


Tips – Tip selection is average. Both transparent and white tips are a wide bore. Only one large size double flange tip has been supplied which is strange. Narrow bore, foam and other double flange tips could be added but not present. Carry case or pouch also has been not supplied.

Fit & Comfort
From the aspect of fit and comfort, I can say it depends largely on the selection of tip. The nozzle size of Anew U1 is around 6mm so only a few aftermarket tips works. Wide bore tips really help to improve the lower frequency of U1 but that double flange tip was most comfortable for me.

Source
Anew U1 is easy to drive but. Sources I have used for this review are -
DAP – Hiby R3, Dethonray DTR1.
DAC AMP combo with PC – Audioquest Dragonfly Black, Fiio Q5, Schiit Modi 3+ Topping NX3s.
Phone – RealMe C2 + USB audio player pro.
More than 100 hours of burn-in has been done before this review.

DSC_0042.jpg


Tracks / Albums Listened
Adele – 25,
Amy Winehouse - Back To Black,
Michael McDonald - Wide Open,
Eagles - The Very Best Of The Eagles,
Eric Clapton - Riding With The King (Tidal MQA),
Eric Clapton - Unplugged (1992),
Etta James - At Last!,
Michael Jackson – Scream,
Sia - This Is Acting (Deluxe Version),
Kacey Musgraves - Golden Hour,
Legends- Elton John,
Daft Punk - Random Access Memories,
Fleetwood Mac – Rumours,
Sting - The Best of 25 Years,

Sound
At first contact; Anew U1 may sound like a conventional ' V ' tuned IEM. Extended lower and higher frequency part with recessed mids. Surprisingly after a long burn-in period, it has recovered the distance in mid-frequency quite a bit. The natural representation of mids sometimes feels recession but for my ears, Anew U1 is an almost balanced IEM.

DSC_0035.jpg


Bass – When comes to the lower frequency part, Anew U1 just mesmerizes with its outstanding performance. Both extension and depth are too good. With moderate speed and accuracy, the lower frequency part can reach deep easily. Both quality and quantity can be found in U1’s lower frequency part. Overall a full-bodied approach with the right amount of texture in mid-bass also can be noticed. Non-exaggerated sub-bass region is capable of a smooth rumble effect.

In Songs like ‘ I miss you ‘ by Adele, the opening drum hits sound full and well-controlled, in ‘ Instant Crush’ by Daft Punk the constant drum hits in backgrounds create a dance floor inside you. Bass lovers should try Anew U1 to experience a rich and resolving bass experience.

Mids – First things first, no bass bleed in mids noticed in Anew U1. Mid-range has presented itself almost a natural way and no such coloration present at all. Crisp, clear rendering with lots of details in mid-range. A little boost in lower mid-range results male vocals more crispier than female vocals. No harshness in upper mid-range but details are well preserved. The sense of naturalness and lots of details proves U1 is not a conventional ‘ V ‘ tuned IEM.

Anew U1 renders songs like ‘Crocodile Rock’ by Elton John and ‘Back To Black’ by Amy Winehouse in a linear way and sound more neutral but the texture remains untouched.

Treble – Treble is the most, interesting part of Anew U1. Higher frequency part is well-extended with lots of details but nowhere near sibilance. Good to mention that even with bright sources Anew U1 remains calm. The whole treble part is airy and specious but lack of brilliance keep U1 in the dry side like a multi B.A crossover. For example in the song like ‘ Dream ‘ by Fleetwood Mac, the cymbals sound accurate but the sparkle is not there.

DSC_0041.jpg


Soundstage, Imaging & Instrument Separation
The soundstage of U1 is wide but not super wide, the soundstage is more and more natural. Imaging another hand very good. Each and every instrument can be clearly identified. Busy tracks handled properly and each and every note is well articulated.

Comparison

Ibasso it01 vs Anew U1 - Both it01 and U1 priced very similarly. Soundwise they are very close too. Ibasso it01 offers more bass than Anew U1 but in a less controlled manner. It01’s bass response is not as impactful as U1. Maybe the quantity is more but the quality is better in U1. U1 has more texture and can go deeper than It01. Mids a bit better in It01 though. In the treble part, U1 is a clear winner. U1 has a more clear and sharper treble area in comparison to It01. The soundstage on both this IEMs is almost the same.

Conclusion
Buying one IEM over another from Chi-fi market under the budget segment is now quite challenging. Undoubtedly many really good and budget-friendly IEMs are now available and Anew U1 one of them. Anew U1 presents a well-balanced and mature sound that an audiophile really likes to have.

cqtek

1000+ Head-Fier
Pros: Remarkable resolution, definition, separation, level of detail in all ranges.
- Level of construction and cable.
- Above-average comfort, fit and isolation.
Cons: Lack of accessories, no bag or transport box.
Purchase link:

https://penonaudio.com/anew-u1.html

Link to the Store:

https://penonaudio.com/

Anew U1 07_.jpg

Specifications:
  • Driver unit: 10 mm Dynamic Driver carbon nanotube diaphragm
  • Frequency response: 20Hz - 20kHz
  • Sensitivity: 108±1dB
  • Impedance: 32Ω
  • THD: < 0.2%.
  • Plug: 3.5mm gold-plated
  • Capsule connection type: MMCX
  • Cable length: 12cm symmetrical design
Packaging

Anew U1 01_.jpg Anew U1 02_.jpg Anew U1 03_.jpg Anew U1 06_.jpg


The IEMs are packed in clean white packaging, wrapped in transparent film and sealed. Only the brand logo is shown on the front. On the back there is a silver sticker with the specifications. No trace of the model name.

After separating the lid of the box, inside are found:
  • The IEMs with the MMCX cable connected, inside a foam mould, which protects them.
  • A transparent, sealed plastic bag containing the silicone tips.
  • 3 pairs of opaque white silicone tips, sizes S, M, L.
  • 3 pairs of white translucent silicone tips, sizes S, M, L.
  • 1 pair of dual flange tips, white translucent silicone, size L.
The tips are all silicone, 7 pairs total. The channel of all of them is quite wide.
I miss more types of tips and some bag or transport box.
Overall, the content is below the minimum required by the price level.

Anew U1 08_.jpg

Construction and design

The model received has black capsules (it seems that they are a limited edition), with the brand embedded in silver. The shape of the IEMs is custom type, quite rounded, but has a thickness above the centimeter. The material with which they have been built, looks like some kind of hard plastic or acrylic, is glossy, smooth and polished, lightweight, well-finished and sturdy appearance. The nozzles are approximately 5mm in diameter, metallic. They have a filter of the same material, micro perforated. The MMCX connections are embedded and gold plated. On the sides of the capsules, there are two 3-4mm holes, covered by micro-perforated metal filters. The edge of both holes is a different color, red for the right capsule, blue for the left.

The MMCX cable consists of 4 braided cores, each in silver (high purity single crystal copper silver-plated, as described in the store). It has some stiffness, but is still malleable enough not to cause any problems with the memory effect. The 3.5mm jack plug is gold-plated. The silver cover is suitably long and straight, with a rough area for easy grip. The white mark is inscribed on it. Close to the connector there is a velcro band to collect the cable efficiently. The separator is composed of a black cylinder with both silver cones, one on each side, cut at their narrowest ends. The cable has, in the bifurcated zone, a transparent plastic pin for its adjustment under the chin. The MMCX connections are gold-plated and the connectors are plated, of good size, and have a coloured ring inscribed to distinguish the side (red for the right, blue for the left), as well as the letters R and L serigraphied in white, inside a circle. The cables coming out of the MMCX connectors are covered with transparent semi-rigid plastic, to make it easier to fit over the ear.

The cable in general is of remarkable quality and I do not find it necessary to replace it.

Adjustment and ergonomics

Anew U1 09_.jpg

The fit I get with these capsules is pretty good. It's true that they touch slightly against the crus of helix, but not enough to make them uncomfortable. Overall, the capsules are wide and deep, and their fit on my ears is fair enough. For smaller ears, the friction may be more noticeable.

The insertion is rather superficial, given the diameter of the mouthpieces. To improve the seal I use my L-size silicone tips, filled with foam, thus achieving quite good insulation and a high sound immersion.

Anew U1 11_.jpg Anew U1 12_.jpg

Sound

Profile

The Anew U1 are IEMs with a clear emphasis on the low end, not only on the bass, but also on the lower-mids. It’s true that the mids are more distant, but the highs have a good extension. Thus, it could be said that its profile is in moderate V, slightly warm.

Anew U1 12_.jpg

Bass

The lower zone is very complete, from the sub-bass to the lower-mids, the extension and depth is really good. The level of precision and speed is equally remarkable. The texture of the bass is clearly tangible, being very easy to follow all its lines, due to the almost excellent definition. In this sense, one of the characteristics that most caught my attention, has been how these Anew divides all the low frequencies, in all their amplitude, each tone is perceptible individually without interfering with each other. This gives an idea of the quality of the driver used.

At the level of presence, I find the whole area quite linear, without being able to distinguish greater emphasis on one part or the other.

The bass hit is not at bassheads level, but do not disappoint the lovers of this area at all, like me, the bass has a lot of quality not to enjoy them. As it has an extensive range, it has a lot of body and nothing is missing in the area.

Another great feature of the U1 is its ability to keep the bass out of the rest of the frequencies.

Anew U1 13_.jpg

Mids

The frequency response descends smoothly towards the mids, retaining some emphasis still on the lower-mids. This is easily perceived in male voices, which enjoy an extra presence, body and definition, as opposed to clearly V IEMs.

The virtuosity of the driver is still present in this range and offers, once again, a remarkable definition, as well as a great dose of naturalness, despite a slight distance/presence of veil, only perceptible when compared to other more mid-centric IEMs. In no way can I say that U1 is dark, but the mids are not as exuberant as the bass, speaking in terms of presence, not resolution, as it is still the protagonist. U1's remarkable ability to describe every frequency in this range is still present, and this is noticeable even in the most complex and congested passages, even there, the Anew offer very high precision, clarity and detail.

Another plus point is the fair measure of the upper-middle, the control in this range is remarkable. It is very nice to perceive how wheezing stops at the right level.

Anew U1 15_.jpg

Treble

Surprisingly, it's the first thing that comes to mind when I try to analyze this segment. Its extension, definition, level of detail, resolution, clarity and execution, it seems unbelievable that they come from a single driver, and less that it is dynamic. It can be understood that a good dynamic driver defends well in low and/or mid ranges, but to reach the highs and demonstrate the same capacity offered in the previous segments, is within reach of few IEMs, and less in this price segment.

The trebles are quite clear, well executed, laminated, concise, controlled, without stridency or hard, unpleasant peaks. Without being a fan of this area, I must admit that its presence endows the sound with a wealth of nuances and details quite large, providing a great level of clarity, separation and general cleanliness.

In no case are these treble anemics or extremely smoothed, something to keep in mind for those who are sensitive to this area. There is a clear presence, neither elevated nor exaggerated. Different sources may accentuate the area to a greater or lesser degree.

Anew U1 16_.jpg

Scene, soundstage

The sound offered by the U1s enjoys an excellent spatiality. This aspect generates a scene with a similar height and width, more spherical than not excessively wide. The high resolution favors instrumental positioning as well as stereophonic and image recreation.

The separation is a strong point, in each segment I have been extolling the virtue that have the U1, to execute each frequency in a defined manner. In this way, the separation benefits from it. With these IEMs, one is able to detect the dark background offered by good players.

Comparisons

iBasso IT01

IT01s are far more sensitive than U1s.

Bass of the IT01 have some more emphasis on the sub bass, while the U1 provide a more linear range in this segment and offer some more body and presence in the low midrange. Globally, U1 offers more punchy response than IT01.

Male voices sound more advanced in IT01, warmer and somewhat more focused, but thinner. Something similar happens with female voices, although to a lesser degree. In general the IT01 sound a little warmer, but also a little darker and more veiled, compared to a greater clarity and definition of the U1. The higher mids are more present in the U1, providing more brightness in the mids, in general.

The resolution is higher in the U1, as well as their analytical capacity, the IT01 sound more fuzzy in comparison.
The highs extend more in the U1 and provide more detail, while the IT01 sometimes sound more out of control in this area, offering some more unpleasant situations.
The U1 have greater separation and offer a more accurate image.

NiceHCK M6

The U1 are somewhat more sensitive than the M6.

Bass in the U1 are more complete, the sub bass feels more. Although at punch level the differences are not very big, the U1 are somewhat above the M6.

In terms of mids, the M6 seems to have more of a presence in its lower zone, offering a warmer and somewhat more advanced sound in that zone. In the meantime, the U1s show mids with a higher brightness and a bit more definition. The voices sound closer in the M6.

Treble is more present in U1, while M6 tends to be softer. The same happens with their extension, the U1 reach higher.

M6's are softer in general and their sound is more relaxed and warm. The U1 are more energetic, more dynamic, somewhat faster as well and more direct, but their profile is more V, with the voices further away. The resolution also seems somewhat higher, which is why the U1 sounds a more defined point.

The M6 offers a wider scene, while in the U1, the scene is somewhat narrower, but higher. The separation is slightly better in U1.

By way of conclusion, there is no clear winner in this comparison, so the choice of one or the other is subject to its virtues.

Anew U1 17_.jpg

Conclusion

In my humble opinion, the dynamic driver of these Anew is excellent. Leaving aside the profile of these IEMs, I'm very surprised by the analytical capacity they provide and the clarity they offer, along with their level of resolution. But what makes it even better is that this capacity extends over the entire sound range. It's hard to get to the level of micro detail or the precision of good BA drivers, but it really makes it difficult.
However in coherence it is excellent, the music flows in a very natural way and the tone is very pleasant, it is never unreal or forced.

Other parameters to emphasize are the separation and the image, aspects that generate a very pleasant sonorous experience. This, together with their good comfort and a sound that is not strident at all, makes them very nice, even for long sessions.
On the other hand, the cable supplied is remarkable, at the height of the sound and level of construction of the whole.

On the negative side I put the lack of accessories, the tips supplied are quite common and does not bring any case to keep them.

Having analyzed these U1, in view of the good work, the Anew brand looks quite promising. You'll have to pay attention to it.

Sources used during the analysis
  • Burson Audio Playmate.
  • Sabaj DA3.
Ratings
  • Construction: 90
  • Comfort: 80
  • Accessories: 50
  • Sound: 90
  • Quality/price: 80

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top