AFUL Performer 8

General Information

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
7.jpg
8.jpg
9.jpg
10.jpg
11.jpg
12.jpg
13.jpg
14.jpg
15.jpg
16.jpg
17.jpg
18.jpg

Specification:-​

>7BA+1DD High-Performance Hybrid Configuration.

>8mm Dynamic Driver With Biological Diaphragm.

>Customised High-Performance Balanced Armature Drivers.

>Enhanced 3D Printed Acoustic Tube Structure.

>Ultra-Long Low-Frequency Acoustic Tube

>RLC Network Frequency Division Correction Technology.

>High-Damping Air-Pressure Balance Technology.

>Balanced Sound Tuning With Tight Lower-End, Clear Midrange, and Extended Treble Response.

>Ideal for Most Genres of Music.

>Exquisite New Looks With Eye-Catchy Face Covers.

>Ergonomic & Lightweight Cavities.

>High-Purity Monocrystalline Copper Silver-Plated Cable.

>Standard 2-pin Connectors.

>Single-Ended 3.5mm Termination Plug.

Latest reviews

Duggu

New Head-Fier
Walking on the edge with tech
Aful Performer 8 (Chinese Edition) - Review

⚠️
First of all, I will give you a warning. I always review stuff according to my preference and my target is similar to "Tanchjhim Oxygen". Transparency is the key to my reviews and I always feel I should review something according to my taste. If I try to generalise stuff it will do more harm than good. Audio is subjective and everyone should give their subjective impressions while reviewing stuff, it's up to the viewer to filter out his preferred reviewers. Again I am very transparent about my opinion and I don't like to care about anything else. This review is very subjective and I am not paid or influenced to say anything about any product.


🌟
Having said that, I don't want to keep any suspense. I freaking love this IEM. For everyone, I will compare it with IE600, Blessings 2, Performer 5 and RSV as a reference point being the popularity these three IEMs achieved in the hobby.


🏆
Let's start with the things that impressed me the most.


🟢
This IEM is very clean sounding IEM and very very correct to my ears. What do I mean by correct? For me correct means I don't feel the need to change the sound to any extent using EQ and stuff. The totality of this IEM is extremely neutral to my ears and it is very very natural.

🟢
The drivability of this IEM is insane. It is easier to drive than 7hz Zero. Don't get me wrong of course you will benefit from better DAC for separation and spatial representation but this IEM is super easy to drive.

🟢
The pinna compensation of this IEM is very good for my ear gain and HRTF.

🟢
The plateau in the upper midrange gives the vocals a special treatment in which they sound phenomenal to me.

🗒️
Before Going to the cons I would like to discuss its tonality in detail.

👉
Bass -
There is no wow factor in this region. The sub-bass sounds clean and not exaggerated or elevated. Having said that, this is a problem with a few of my friends in the hobby. In their words "This feels like a BA Bass" & it is very low in quantity. For me, I don't think this is the case by any means. This IEM can't exaggerate the Subbass and Bass Region to give it a boost, but they do a good job if you give them a track with ample bass. You just can't expect it to give bass like Performer 5.

Now all the stuff like Attack and Decay is very moderate and will not satisfy a basshead by miles. The authority is very toned down too. To be exact the bass is the least exciting thing for me in this IEM but it didn't bother me. The textural information of the bass in this IEM is very light not in your face.

You won't get the huge air push in the sub-bass like IE600 but it is way more than the Blessings 2. The details in the Bass are also not as detailed as in IE600. The punch is more than RSV but decay is more natural in RSV.

👉
Mids -
Mids are sculpted as per my liking. There is a lot to talk about this certain range in this IEM.

Timber - The timber is not accurate but it is very close. For me, Timber is not a subjective thing and in the same way, it does not dictate how I enjoy the music. I can enjoy instruments even if I can't get accurate timber, but the reproduction has to be agile. This IEM provided me with that. I don't always want the guitar to sound real-life-like, I like guitars to have a smoothed metallic shrill and this IEM gave me that. So even if they can't reproduce the exact timbers of certain instruments, I enjoy them. Blessing 2 is better for me in Timber as well as RSV. It is miles better than Performer 5 and IE600.

The problem I faced with them was regarding the Drums, no matter how hard I tried to not care, Snare Drums are very artificial. They have the low end but need to catch up on the upper mids attack. Timberwise drums are the worst.

Vocals - Vocals are absolutely beautiful for me in this IEM. They are neither recessed nor elevated and sit right in the comfort zone of my target. I prefer B2 over P8 purely for vocals and I would say B2 Performs extremely well if the source is right. Textural information is average too.

👉
Treble
- The treble is wonderful to my ears, not too dark and or too bright. Crisp and detailed for the price bracket it acquires. The 10K - 15K dip is somewhat noticeable and it adds to the "In your face" feeling a lot. And sometimes it feels disconnected for sizzles in the songs, making it somewhat peaky for some people, also contributing to the missing trailing edges in the same instruments.
Overall, it is better than RSV and P5 by a huge margin (Obviously). I also prefer it over B2 but IE600 still takes the cake for the treble. I find IE600 treble to be ludicrous under the $500 bracket.

🔴
Now the cons


♦️
This IEM doesn't fit me well.

♦️
Eartips easily get dislocated.

♦️
The 2-pin Connector feels cheap.

🧪
Talking about the technicalities


🧫
The soundstage is somewhat round and not extremely yolk-like. It is slightly bigger than Blessings 2 and RSV. IE600 is a step above in spatial representation.

🧫
The detail retrieval is very good for the price but it still can't touch IE600 (Which is 2X the price). But it can hold its ground very very well in its price range.

🧫
Imaging is moderately good for the price.

🧫
Separation is excellent I would say. No matter how complex the mix is I could easily separate and focus on different instruments. Better than B2 and RSV and almost on par with IE600.


IMG_20240205_123827~2.jpg




Ratings

Sub Bass - 5/10
Bass - 5/10
Lower Mid - 5.5/10
Upper Mid - 6.5/10
Lower Treble - 7/10
Upper Treble - 6.5/10
Timber - 6.5/10
Resolution - 6.5/10
Imaging - 6/10
Soundstage - 5.5/10

Overall Rating - 6/10
Tonality = A-
Technicality = A-​
Last edited:
L
Leiker545
You're one of the only reviewers I know that use timber to characterize sound, thank you for that. For a hobby that is essentially made for listening to music, the lack of correct instrument/music theory jargon is mind boggling. People often say "neutral" or "lifelike presentation", which has some credit but leaves off a vague impression of intangible performance. Timbre is just timbre, it's what makes those things neutral and lifelike for crying out loud.

On the review itself, I'm surprised they didn't fit you well, the p5 and the p8 are imo marvels of technology because of the so many things fit inside them on a small form factor. I could use mine for hours on end without feeling a thing, whereas with the B3 the cartilage starts itching after 2 hours max.

Nevertheless, very nice review, I'll happily look forward to your others :)
  • Like
Reactions: Duggu
Duggu
Duggu
Thanks a lot ✨

Zerstorer_GOhren

500+ Head-Fier
AFUL PERFORMER 8: Drastic Improvement, Total Refinement
Pros: △ Certainly a big leap improvement over its predecessor.
△ Medical-grade high quality resin shell chassis.
△ Its UIEM-type shell chassis are one of the best on fitting and comfort just like the previous model.
△ High quality stock cable.
△ Premium faux leather IEM case for storage.
△ Easy to drive set.
△ A likeable sound profile for vocals and instrument lovers.
△ Well-done balanced tuning of this set
△ Precise, impacting and tidy bass response.
△ Clear, sufficiently textured and well-detailed midrange presentation.
△ Coherent, energetic and expressive female vocals
△ Crisp and bright sound on string instruments
△ Woodwinds instruments sounds pretty well on this set too
△ A noticeable improvement of its technical capabilities over the AFUL Performer 5.
Cons: ▽ Just an average to above average sound/speaker stage for a midrange set as my standard on technical performance is quite high especially on this price range segment. (simply my niggle moment)
▽ A fair few of sibilances on sibilant-laden tracks in some cases.
▽ Some occurrences of shrilly and jangling sound particularly on high register female vocals.
▽ Sorry uber-bassheads, this one isn't for you.
▽ Mediocre stock ear tips.
20231003_164529.jpg


"Without music, Life would be a mistake"

~~Friedrich Nietzsche, German philosopher, composer and a cultural critic.



This is AFUL Performer 8, this is a follow-up model and an improvement of the highly popular, AFUL Performer 5. I did a review of the AFUL Performer 5 before and to be honest, I find it not that impressive given its popularity among audio enthusiasts out there.

20231003_164733.jpg


Like its predecessor model, AFUL Performer 8 is a hybrid driver IEM but the difference was the improvement of some of its patented technologies like High Dampening Air Pressure Balance System (HDAPBS) and RCL Network Frequency Division Correction Technology. The HDAPBS was supposedly lessen the air pressure build-up in the ear canal and improves a bit on bass tone, depth and texture while RCL Network Frequency Division will enhance the seamless transmission of sonic frequencies to even out some peaks due to some resonance effect and at the same time, it will deliver a smoother treble response.

20231003_165814.jpg
20231003_165201.jpg


As aforementioned regarding being an IEM earphone with a hybrid driver configuration, AFUL Performer 8 has an 8mm dynamic driver with bio-cellulose diaphragm which is also known as paper-cone diaphragm which gives a deeper, more responsive and tighter bass quality. The supporting drivers which consist of 7 balanced armature drivers will handle the rest of the frequencies, from mid-bass to ultra highs in which gives a textured yet detailed midrange presentation and then, a smooth and airy treble response.

20231003_170321.jpg
20231003_170309.jpg


The drivers were encased along with its patented technologies in 3D moulded resin shells in a UIEM-style shape, even its internal acoustic tubes which are also moulded. Its shell chassis underwent some processes like chemical treatment to ensure stability and durability of its structural integrity. The drivers were organised and connected into a 4-way acoustic tube layout with each specific diameter size for each frequency to lessen some potential resonance peaks. The design of its faceplate appears to take inspiration from an orange-red coloured semi precious stone with some glittery surface to give that premium feel. Like its predecessor, Performer 8 utilises a 2-pin connector as its interlocking mechanism which is a standard and a better choice for ease of cable replacement and stability.

20231003_164922.jpg
20231003_164927.jpg
20231003_164946.jpg


AFUL Performer 8 IEM comes along a premium cable, a 4-core high purity single crystal multi-wired silver-plated copper. The cable is quite malleable and supple to hold with enough thickness to have a balanced weight. It has a standard 3.5mm single ended as its termination plug and it was gold plated for better conductivity.

20231003_165034.jpg
20231003_165054.jpg


Regarding its wearability, like the AFUL Performer 5, Performer 8 has an excellent fitting due to its UIEM-style shell which is quite ergonomic as it rests well into my lugholes without discomfort or ear fatigue. It has remarkable isolation as it was able to block some external noises from the outside surroundings.

20231003_170150.jpg


As for product packaging, the product presentation of AFUL Performer 8 is quite similar to the almost midrange sets that I have encountered so far. It has a medium-size rectangular box with a product illustration at the front and some basic specification and contact information at the back.

20231003_165301.jpg


Here are the following contents inside of its box:

■ Pair of AFUL Performer 8 IEM

■ Stock cable

■ PU-leather round IEM storage case

■ 5 pairs of black-coloured balanced bore ear tips in different standard sizes.

■ 2 pairs of opaque wide bore ear tips in different standard sizes. (M & L only)

■ 4 pairs of black-coloured narrow bore ear tips in different standard sizes.

■ Paperwork like Q.C stub and instruction manual.

20231003_165555.jpg
20231003_165615.jpg
20231003_165630.jpg
20231003_165609.jpg


With a resistance rating of 30 ohms and high sensitivity mark of 115dB, AFUL Performer 8 is quite efficient on power amplification that a typical source with normal gain output is enough to be able to drive properly. With just a medium setting of its amplitude level, this set will already sound very complete, well-dynamic and in full range scale.

20230831_144337.jpg


To determine its tonality, Performer 8 is more of a mild U-shaped sound profile but I also consider this set as a balanced-neutral sounding in my new classification on tonal profiles as there are mild U-shaped sounds which have different variances of texture and volume.

20231003_165909.jpg
received_3418466928414188.jpeg

(The graph was provided by @koyawmohabal , credits to him)


LOWS/BASS:

The bass quality of this set is quite evened on how it presents both of its sub bass and mid-bass frequency. It has an incisive, precise and clean bass response as it is quite well-separated from other frequency parts, so assuredly, bass bleeding is nigh on impossible.

Sub bass are clearly perceived as definitely hear some rumbling and reverberation coming from sub-bass focus instruments like octabasses, low tone bass guitars, synthesisers and drum machines. Mid-bass has a rather balanced texture as it has neither lean nor thick note weight as it gives an ample volume on instruments and vocals. Bass guitars have a sombre and resonant sound as I was able to hear clearly from the plucking of their strings either fretless or slapping. Bass kick drums have those rumbling and resonant sound on every stroke that fast double bass kicks from metal and rock tracks will be effortless to be played clearly. Bass-baritones are able to have an enough dense but I also noticed that it rather less dark tone and depth to give a more gravelly sound from them.

Tracks Tested:

Sub-bass

● New Order - Blue Monday
● The Camouflage - The Great Commandment
● Oktoplut - Le delta de l'Okavango

Mid-bass

● [Patricia Morrison - Bass guitar] Sister of Mercy - Lucretia My Reflection.
● [John Bonham - Bass kick drum] Led Zeppelin - When The Levee Breaks
● [Peter Steele - Bass-Baritone] Type O Negative - I Don't Wanna Be Me


MIDRANGE:

This is one of the highlights of this set or probably its major factor. It has good texture, forward in presentation, vivid and detail which will give a substantial body on most vocal types and instruments. It also sounds clean, transparent and well-extensive that female vocals and instruments types like strings and woodwinds will fare even better.

Male vocals have a rather decent texture, depth and volume while female vocals seems to have more emphasis as it has more energy, detail and range as it is able to project the highest register that a female singer could reach although there are some minor caveats in this one on which I expound it later. On male vocals, standard baritones have a velvety and smoothness on their voice quality but I also noticed that both verdi and kavalier baritones seems to have less fuller, less darker tone and too smooth that their distinctive characteristics lose those vivid, darker and metallic timbre. Tenors and countertenors sound better on this one as they sound more organic and able to gauge a better vocal dexterity on this set. Tenors have brassy and clear vocals with sufficient richness and strength as I was able to hear different vocal ranges of this particular voice type, from Heldentenor to the rarer Legerro tenor. Countertenors seem to have a similar tone, pitch and timbre with mezzo-sopranos in which I will explain later on the female vocal part. Contraltos appears to have rich and smokey albeit it has a less depth and a tad lighter tone in contrast that it should have a heavy one (kindly check out both Toni Braxton and Tracy Chapman's vocals). Mezzo-sopranos sound very euphonic and captivating as I was able to enjoy the tenderness, coppery and glowing vocal qualities while sopranos projects the best possible vocal quality on this set. Dramatic sopranos have rich and expressive sound from their vocals, spinto and lyric sopranos have creamy and mild sound quality, Soubrette sopranos has sweet and silky vocal timbre and coloratura sopranos have that vocal velocity that able to execute a shimmering and able to sustain upper register range but there are some snag that I should raise, it might be a tad shrilly and tinny sound to some listeners might be sensitive on this particular frequency.

On instruments, I'll start with strings and woodwind instruments as Performer 8 will give a better edge on them. Strings like guitars and violins, the former have a crisp and lingering tone as I really enjoy guitar lines in a track whether it is an acoustic or electric ones and the latter ones in which I'm always enjoying to listen on classical, orchestra or symphonic metal have a vibrant, full and lively sound on every bowing movements on its strings. On woodwinds, concert flutes have rich and ethereal sound while piccolos have bright and intense sound and then on clarinets and saxophones, they have a penetrating, brilliant and reedy sound from them. As for brasses like trumpets, horns and trombones, a metallic, brilliant and penetrating sound on trumpets, a resounding and brilliant sound on horns, and then, a penetrating and tense sound on trombones. On percussives, a dry and sharp sound from every stroke on snare drums, a resonant and dry sound on both tom toms and field drum while there's an added rumbling sound on kettledrums. Pianos have a balanced to sufficiently bright tone from them while harpsichords have a soft yet resonant sound characteristic as I listen to Baroque period pieces particularly the works of Handel.

Tracks Tested:

Vocals

● [Kavalier baritone] Dmitri Hvorostovsky/Handel - Ombra Mai Fu
● [Baritone] Eddie Vedder/Pearl Jam - Daughter
● [Spinto Tenor] Luciano Pavarotti - Nessun Dorma
● [Tenor] Robert Plant/Led Zeppelin - The Rover
● [Countertenor] Andreas Scholl/Handel - Ombra Mai Fu
● [Countertenor] King Diamond/Mercyful Fate - The Dangerous Meeting
● [Contralto] Toni Braxton - Un-Break My Heart
● [Contralto] Tracy Chapman - Fast Cars
● [Mezzo-Soprano] Nadja Michael/Bizet - Carmen
● [Mezzo-Soprano] Sharon Den Adel/Within Temptation - The Cross
● [Coloratura soprano] Diana Damrau/Mozart - Die Zauberflöte: Der Hölle Rache
● [Dramatic soprano] Tarja Turunen/Nightwish - Sleeping Sun


Instruments

● [Guitars] Eagles - Hotel California
● [Violin] Felix Ayo/Vivaldi - Summer III. Presto: Tempo impetuoso d'Estate
● [Flute] Men At Work - Down Under
● [Trumpets] Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra/Wagner - Der Walküre
● [Trombone] Bad Manners - Just A Feeling
● [Drums] Hellhammer/Mayhem - Buried By Time And Dust
● [Piano] Yiruma - River Flows In You
● [Harpsichord] Barry Lyndon/Handel - Sarabande


HIGHS/TREBLE:

The treble response of AFUL Performer 8 is actually quite well-balanced as I noticed and observed the evenness on upper midrange to presence part where there is a fairly enough shimmer and crisp due to a slight elevation on the upper-mids just to give a well-articulated and good attack on instruments and a more coherent vocal projection. There's a hint of tad sibilance especially when I tested some of my test tracks which are known to be sibilant-laden but I consider it as well-controlled as it doesn't occur in most cases and good thing that I don't hear any strident sound on this one.

The cymbals have a good shimmer and glistening sound while hi-hats sound quite detailed on this one with their shortened buzzing sound. Celestas have a bright and glistening sound while glockenspiels have brilliant and penetrating sound. On the brilliance treble, it has a good amount of harmonics as it was able to give more sparkle and substantially moderate air.

Tracks Tested:

Instruments

● [Cymbals] Bobby Jarzombek/Riot - Fight Or Fall
● [Cymbals + Hi-hats] - Chad Smith/ Red Hot Chili Peppers - The Getaway
● [Glockenspiel] - Orchestre philharmonique de Radio France/Saint-Saëns - Danse Macabre, Op. 40
● [Celesta] - Cologne New Philharmonic Orchestra/Tchaikovsky - Dance Of The Sugar Plum


SOUNDSTAGE, IMAGING AND OTHER TECHNICALITIES:

As I'm quite critical on how the PERFORMER 5 sounds so intimate and congested within my head room in my previous review, AFUL PERFORMER 8 was able to fix some of its issues from sound field imaging up to the timbral incoherences. As it still doesn't have the widest sound/speaker stage set in the midrange category, but at least it has an above-average width span and good height ceiling and good depth as it gives me a moderately-sized head stage.

As for stereo imaging presentation, it projects a 3D-like spatiality as I was able to panned out certain placements of instrument and vocal with good spacing and gaps on each part of a well-organised tonal and frequency layers in a pitch black sonic canvas. Even the most complex tracks such as Jazz ensemble, Philharmonic orchestra and musical movie scores will be an easy-peasy for AFUL PERFORMER 8.

On its multi-drivers performance, it is noteworthy that all of its drivers able to deliver a very cohesive sound with a such a coherency of its dynamic driver to have faster transients response and a well-done gradual decay while the balanced armature drivers able to have a smooth and uninterrupted sonic performance.

AFUL Performer 8 has an excellent resolution capability in both macro-dynamics and micro-dynamics. As it has a rigid texture on its note weight while it also a sharp transient response as it is quite capable of extracting a substantial amount of nuances and details from an audio track.


PEER COMPARISONS:

AFUL Performer 5


● This is Performer 8's entry-level predecessor, it also has a hybrid driver configuration and it has resin shell chassis. The only difference between them physically was a shell chassis in which the Performer 5 has a tad smaller form factor and less number of balanced armature drivers that were implemented on.

● As for tuning, Performer 5 is more of a U-shaped sound profile. It has more focus on sub bass but its midbass is somewhat hollow and soft impact with recessed midrange midrange presentation in which it gives me some odd vocal and instruments timbre. Treble response of this one is quite strange as it has a noticeable peaks on its upper mids and presence treble to give that dissonant and jarring sound on brasses and sopranos and then a sudden slope down on presence to brilliance part of the treble region with a moderate amount of air and sparkle.

● On technical performance, Performer 5 is quite inferior in some aspect like sound/speaker stage size, less cohesive performance of its drivers and that tinny and metallic sound coming from its BA is very noticeable that I speculate that it might uses a cheap, run-of-the-mill balanced armature or improper implementation of dampeners.


YANYIN CANON II

● Performer 8's one of the major rivals in this price range. Like the Performer 8, it is also a hybrid driver and also has resin shell chassis though the Canon II's was a quite a tad more solid and it also has a larger size due to tuning switches. Both sets have similar asking prices.

● Due to its tuning switches, it gives a Canon II an edge over Performer 8 due to its 3-4 variants of U-shaped tuning. Overall, Even in all tuning variants that Canon II has, it is more warmer and a tad more coloured rounding. It has more dominant and tactual bass response, a warmer midrange to give more body on male vocals and brass instruments and a more smoother, less sheen on its treble response.

● Both sets have almost similar technical performance but Canon II has a bit more spacious sound/speaker stage and even more solid macro-dynamics. Although Performer 8 has a sharper definition on extracting micro-details.


THIEAUDIO HYPE 2

● Another new rival of Performer 8 and like the aforementioned set, it is also of a hybrid driver configuration and made of high quality resin shell as well. The difference was the number of drivers and implementation as HYPE 2 has dual dynamic drivers in a isobaric set-up and just two balanced armature drivers which are more premium as they are made by Sonion.

● Tonality-wise, HYPE 2 is somehow similar with the Performer 8 as they are both of a mild U-shaped sound signatures but the difference was that the HYPE 2 has more emphasis low frequencies which can be classified as a " bass boost neutral" or simply an L-shaped sound profile. It has more tactile and punchy bass response, a more linear, a tad warmer and less energetic midrange, and then, a more smoother and less shimmering treble response.

● When it comes to technical capabilities, HYPE 2 has an edge a bit over Performer 8 as it has a larger sound/speaker stage particularly in height and lateral sound field dimensions which makes it more roomy. Although the micro-detail definition of the Performer 8 is still sharper compared to HYPE 2. And the rest of their technical capabilities are quite similar on a case to case basis.


In summary, AFUL Performer 8 is a follow-up model of the previous model, The Performer 5 and there are some drastic changes between them. AFUL did some serious work and further improvement on the Performer 8 from shortcomings of the previous model like congested soundstage, inconsistencies of its tonal colour, less cohesion of its drivers and a noticeable tinny sound from their BA drivers. And finally, AFUL did an excellent job on this one and it shows that they are up for continuous refining and well-polished on their products.

As I end my assessment on AFUL Performer 8, this is another moment that first impressions last is quite irrelevant to the current state of our enthusiasm on portable audio. AFUL Performer 8 will be an excellent choice on a midrange segment if you are looking for a well-tuned, balanced sounding and impressive resolution capability that makes it more appealing towards audio enthusiasts. There are still some deficiencies on set but for its asking price, we can simply outweigh it with its more positive aspect on its tonal performance.

20231003_164754.jpg


AFUL PERFORMER 8 is available exclusively on HIFIGO, You can check out the unaffiliated link down below.

★★AFUL PERFORMER 8 - HIFIGO★★

20231003_164856.jpg


SPECIFICATION:

MODEL: AFUL PERFORMER 8
IMPEDANCE: 30Ω
SENSITIVITY: 115dB
FREQUENCY RESPONSE: 20Hz – 40KHz
CABLE LENGTH: 1.2M
PIN TYPE: 2-PIN CONNECTOR (0.78MM)
PLUG TYPE: 3.5mm
DRIVER UNIT(S): (1) DYNAMIC DRIVER + (7) BALANCED ARMATURE DRIVER(S)



Some Tracks Tested: ( * = 16-bit FLAC, ** = 24-bit FLAC, *'* = MQA, '*' = DSD, *'= .WAV)


Alison Krauss -When You Say Nothing At All *
Jade Wiedlin - Blue Kiss**
Led Zeppelin - When The Levee Breaks **
Mountain - Mississippi Queen *
Queen - Killer Queen **
Guns N' Roses - Patience *'*
Eric Clapton - Tears in Heaven '*'
Sergio Mendes- Never Gonna Let You Go '*'
Pearl Jam - Daughter **
Roselia - Hidamari Rhodonite *
Assassin - Fight (To Stop The Tyranny)*
Celtic Frost- Visual Aggression *
New Order - Blue Monday *
The Corrs- What Can I do (unplugged version) *
Jimi Hendrix Experience - Voodoo Child *
The Madness- Buggy Trousers *
Metallica - Motorbreath **
Mariah Carey- Always Be My Baby *
Destiny's Child - Say My Name *
Malice Mizer- Au Revoir *
Mozart - Lacrimosa *
New York Philharmonic Orchestra - Dvorak- Symphony 9 " From the New World." *
Eva Cassidy - Fields of Gold (Sting cover)*
Michael Jackson - Give In To Me *
Exciter - Violence and Force *
Diana Krall - Stop This World **
Debbie Gibson - Foolish Beat *'*
The Sisters of Mercy – Lucretia My Reflection**
Suzanne Vega – Luka **
Lauren Christy – Steep *
Ottoman Mehter - Hucum Marsi *
Diana Damrau - Mozart: Die Zauberflöte*
Type O Negative - Black No.1 *
Felix Ayo - Vivaldi: Presto **
Three Tenors - Nessum Dorma *
Mercyful Fate - Witches' Dance *

P.S.

I am not affiliated to AFUL ACOUSTIC nor receive monetary incentives and financial gains as they provide me a review unit for an exchange of factual and sincere feedback from yours truly.

Once again, I would like to send my gratitude to LVY YAN of HIFIGO TEAM for providing this review unit. I truly appreciate their generosity and trust towards me and other reviewers.


20231003_164556.jpg
20231003_164551.jpg
20231003_164544.jpg
20231003_164709.jpg
Last edited:

mRaaghava

100+ Head-Fier
Clean & Open
Pros: Very Clean Sound
Natural Open Mids
Natural Timbre
Highly Coherent Signature
Excellent Tonality
Price to Performance Ratio
Cons: Little More Bass Would Be Wonderful
Thin/Harsh Upper Mids-Lower Treble Region
Only 3.5mm Cable Provided. 4.4mm Would Have Been Better
Disclaimer

I have been provided with Aful Audio Performer 8 IEM for review purposes. I am part of Hifigo’s review tour in India. All the impressions I provide in this review are subjective to my listening capabilities and source used. I’m in no way related to Hifigo/Aful. You can buy Aful Performer 8 IEM from the following links for $369.99/INR 32,990:

https://hifigo.com/products/aful-performer8


P8-1.jpg


Description

The Aful Performer 8 IEM is a hybrid in-ear monitor that features one dynamic driver and seven balanced armatures on each side in shells made using a high-precision 3D printed resin. The package includes a high-purity monocrystalline copper silver-plated cable in a 98 wire x 4-strand configuration. The package includes the IEMs themselves, cable, Cable, few sets of eartips, and a protective case. IEMs are well built for the price and they fit perfectly without any issues. Shells are light weight.

P8-2.jpg


P8-7.jpg


Source Used

My portable DACAMP, Shanling H7 was used for the review purposes.

P8-8.jpg


Sound Impressions

In a nutshell, Performer 8 sounds very good right out of the bat, with its clean, mid-focused sound standing out.

Bass

Bass performance is just above neutral. Nowhere near bass head levels. It’s sufficiently provided to make music enjoyable. Decay and attack are fast. Sub bass and mid bass are decent. For me this is its weaker area. Little more bass quantity would have done wonders and make this IEM an even better offering.

Mids

This is the star of the show here. Performer 8’s mids sound very very clean, and natural with very good spacing and details. Male vocals sound natural. Female vocals are natural, crisp with excellent extensions. But, upper mids sound little thin and harsh. Mids timbre and tonality is excellent. Aful has provided an excellent tuning here. Very enjoyable, easily set this apart from competition.

P8-6.jpg


Treble

Treble is nicely done with good extensions. As with upper mids, there’s slight thinness/harshness in lower treble. Apart from this, treble, overall, is done in a good way. Details are presented in good way.

Technicalities

Performer 8 continues to perform in a good way, sounds coherent, very very clean, with wide open stage. Stage is more wider than depth, where it lacks a little. But still it sounds open. Resolution, detail retrieval capabilities, and dynamics are very good. Imaging and layering is good, but could have been helped if stage depth was better.

In all, Performer 8 impressed me with its super clean, open sound and coherent signature for the price it demands.

Comparison

Vs FiiO FD5


FD5 is a single DD IEM offering from FiiO, more or less falling in and around Performer 8’s price tag. Though recently it is getting sold at lesser price than Performer 8, which is a hybrid 8-driver IEM. FD5 is of metal construction compared to the resin of Performer 8. Both are comfortable for long runs and are solidly built for the price. Both come with good quality cables to start with. Coming to sound quality, straight out of the box, you will find FD5 to have more bass quantity, more stage depth but less width and more lively, energetic treble over Performer 8. But, Performer 8 pulls back some by sounding more open, spacious and clean. It boils down to preferences here, though.

Verdict

Aful Performer 8 is an excellent performer with an excellent tuning, and keeping the price tag in mind, Aful really has a winner in their hands. I haven’t heard their previous Performer 5 IEM, but from what I heard with Performer 8 in these few days, they can truly produce high quality IEMs at a bargain that are no slouches and punch above their suggested price tags. Performer 8 impresses you with its clean, coherent and open mid centric sound signature. There are definitely two cons, it being bass light and slight thin/harsh upper mids-lower treble. Even with this, it’s a good recommendation for anyone looking for an IEM with excellent tuning chops. But, for me, if it didn’t have those two cons, I would have bought it in instant. I wish it had more bass quantity to make it even better for me. But, still, Performer 8 is totally worth it.

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top