Recent content by Psalmanazar
-
DC Area Meet - April 7th, 2018 hosted by Gramophone
If I attend, I'll bring the Dangerous Source.- Psalmanazar
- Post #15
- Forum: Local / Regional Head-Fi Meets, Parties, Get-Togethers
-
Dangerous Music Convert-2 DAC Impressions and Discussion Thread
Thank you for your impressions. To my understanding, that's politeness is all in the AKM "Velvet Sound" DAC chip. The Solaris has a custom filter too so it's not the filter. I'm using an AK4490 based Grace M900 as a headphone amp and portable dac/pre (monitor controller I guess) around the...- Psalmanazar
- Post #21
- Forum: High-end Audio Forum
-
Dangerous Music Convert-2 DAC Impressions and Discussion Thread
Has anyone compared the Convert 2 to the Source in terms of tone and timbre? The Source sounded fairly normal to me when I briefly heard it and in this thread someone mentioned that the Convert was warmer than the Yggy, which I already consider to be warm and have fat bass. The Gearslutz guys...- Psalmanazar
- Post #18
- Forum: High-end Audio Forum
-
DC Area Head-Fi Meet and End-of-Summer SchiitStorm! - August 12, 2017 - Gaithersburg, Maryland! - IMPRESSIONS
A little loud but nice location! I got to try all of the Schiit tube amps again but missed out on trying the IFI gear. None of the Schiits were really my thing with all of them being rather bassy and the Valhalla 2 displaying noticeable grain. -
Slow VS Fast roll off and Minimum VS Linear phase
Yes exactly, the minimum phase filters are usually done over DSP but some like the Schiit Fulla and Jotunheim DAC portions use analog filtering. These are cause the destruction of stereo width and imaging with minimum phase filters. Of course it is applied to both channels, I don't know why that...- Psalmanazar
- Post #46
- Forum: Sound Science
-
Slow VS Fast roll off and Minimum VS Linear phase
That is the downside of minimum phase filters; the change in arrival time of different frequencies is not uniform and greatly affects the perceived stereo image. Yes DACs with minimum phase filters will apply it to both channels and yes it collapses the stage almost always when compared to the...- Psalmanazar
- Post #42
- Forum: Sound Science
-
USB-C & DAC
USB-C and USB 3.0 won't matter as they won't decrease the latency. The USB 2.0 bit-rate is already high enough for multiple i/o channels of audio. More power won't really matter either as better thought out devices are mains powered from the wall or have the option of mains power like the...- Psalmanazar
- Post #8
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
Slow VS Fast roll off and Minimum VS Linear phase
You can hear minimum phase and slow roll off filters collapse the stage by paying attention to the locations of instruments when abing between filters and DACs. This is much easier to hear than the roll-off most of the time. It's not hard if you aren't deaf in one ear, focus on the location of...- Psalmanazar
- Post #36
- Forum: Sound Science
-
Slow VS Fast roll off and Minimum VS Linear phase
Believe what you want to believe about everything you just said yet they measure different, use different parts that sound different, and people with more experience than you can hear the difference. Just because you can't or choose not to, doesn't mean they can't.- Psalmanazar
- Post #34
- Forum: Sound Science
-
Slow VS Fast roll off and Minimum VS Linear phase
Minimum phase and NOS analog filters produce noticeable errors in stereo separation as they are uneven in the time domain, which is why they typically aren't used. Please don't derail the thread. Minimum phase filtering is measurably inferior in both the time and frequency domain and it is used...- Psalmanazar
- Post #29
- Forum: Sound Science
-
Slow VS Fast roll off and Minimum VS Linear phase
My experience is that linear phase, fast roll off filters on well-implemented DACs tend to be the most natural/neutral; the impulse ringing is masked by other noise and basically impossible to hear unless it is causing IMD in downstream gear which it probably isn't thus it is just the "best" as...- Psalmanazar
- Post #27
- Forum: Sound Science
-
Grace Design x Massdrop m9XX DAC/Amp Review: First Impressions
Also @fjrabon , I have come full circle after spending a little more time on F1 with the Grace. I bought an M900 myself and now think it sounds better than anything Schiit makes below a thousand dollars. It just sounds much more transparent (easier to pick out guitar amps and vocal effects) with...- Psalmanazar
- Post #2,047
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
Grace Design x Massdrop m9XX DAC/Amp Review: First Impressions
Sounds like a synching issue with the phone and the USB receiver chip in the Grace. Are you using the camera connector kit?- Psalmanazar
- Post #2,046
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
Grace Design x Massdrop m9XX DAC/Amp Review: First Impressions
It drove the Eikon and Sennheisers fine. Don't see why it couldn't drive the Atticus.- Psalmanazar
- Post #2,043
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
Grace Design x Massdrop m9XX DAC/Amp Review: First Impressions
Yeah I am still looking for one in the US myself. Word of warning, people reported a little bit of noise with super sensitive IEMs with the Grace.- Psalmanazar
- Post #2,041
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components