Recent content by mmx3
-
Reply to review by 'mmx3' on item 'Melokin DA9.1'
Any photos of internal PCB ?- mmx3
- Head Gear rating reply
-
The Fiio X5 Thread
Hi May be, anyone tested Х5 with fresh firmware, and with different volume levels ? I see strange results in article http://personalaudio.ru/detail/ibasso_dx_90/ (on russian, you can translate by Google) http://personalaudio.ru/upload/medialibrary/d8a/d8af18ad6a6b5c95b8140371f2256ad8.png...- mmx3
- Post #11,933
- Forum: Portable Source Gear
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
What caps ? I have mod version. opamp in I/U or in filter ? front pair of opamp (closer to pcm1792 chip) - I/U or filter ? Quote:- mmx3
- Post #102
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
Receive SMK-III mod. Good case, carefully assembled. Overally good ( but slightly... ragged), smooth sound with my Beyerdymamic 990. Articulated bass, good rock sound (without specififc treble problems as for some CirrusLogic dac's , for example). Not so good with Sennheiser px100...- mmx3
- Post #100
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
What is correct ? 8=-) " USB signal, received by tenor 7022, go to spdif chip 9001" or "directly to pcm1792" ? Can you send to me scheme of SMK-III ? (at Monday I 'll receive it. ) Quote:- mmx3
- Post #98
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
USB signal, received by tenor 7022, go to spdif chip 9001 or directly to pcm1792 ? Quote:- mmx3
- Post #95
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
Can I change mode of digital filter of pcm1792a in SMK-III mod (sharp <-> slow ) ?- mmx3
- Post #92
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
my opinion is - after any no-fold (eg, 44.1 - 96) re-discretization sound quality is down. These DAC's contain 8x (sync, fold) digital filter, that already multiply frequency at 8x. Yes, digital volume control - way to degrade the resolution on lowest and middle levels. ...- mmx3
- Post #91
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
I can't compare these DAC's on practice test, but "matrix mini i" has some disadvantages - re-discretization of input signals (upsampling), non-replacable OpAmps (op275 / opa2134), digital volume control in ad1955. Quote:- mmx3
- Post #89
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
I requested adapters on Ebay, 2dip --> 1dip (for opa627 in DIP cases), soic --> dip, 2 soic --> 1dip from http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=350414359241- mmx3
- Post #87
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
USB signal, received by tenor 7022, go directly to pcm1792 or to spdif chip 9001 ?- mmx3
- Post #86
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
I have some opa627, soic & dip, where I can buy these little PCB for it ?- mmx3
- Post #84
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
>> We tried OPA2132 / OPA2604 / OPA627(signal to double transform) , the sound is better than OP275, J But OPA627 - single OpAmp How I can use 627 ?- mmx3
- Post #82
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
someone try to install Opa2132 in SMK-III ? What you can say about sound with it ? ------------------ I 'll try opa2132, when I receive SMK-III . 8-)- mmx3
- Post #80
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components
-
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
File not found. Quote:- mmx3
- Post #79
- Forum: Dedicated Source Components