Recent content by Minstrel59
  1. Minstrel59

    **Shure SE425 Review**

    To: ranjitotski and anyone whose heard the 215 and the 425 What's the difference in sound please?
  2. Minstrel59

    HPH MT220 vs DT150 vs DT250 250 ohm

    Thank you Arttt That's very helpful.
  3. Minstrel59

    SONY NWZ-A10 Series

    What are the pros and cons of iTunes v MediaMonkey?
  4. Minstrel59

    Closed back unamped for acoustic classical and folk?

    Hi claritas So they are described as closed back over ear but in reality they are a bit small? They sound the same but classic has better build?
  5. Minstrel59

    Closed back unamped for acoustic classical and folk?

    Thank you me x3 What is about those phones that make them suitable? Thanks again :blush:
  6. Minstrel59

    Closed back unamped for acoustic classical and folk?

    Thanks for those suggestions. I tried the 940's. Gave me earache. But I DO have sensitive ears (Hyperacusis).
  7. Minstrel59

    Sennheiser HD650 & Massdrop HD6XX Impressions Thread

    Have you tried swapping the HP's over with the electronics just to see if it's the electronics or the HP you prefer?
  8. Minstrel59

    Shure SRH1540 Review

    Hachiko Please may I ask what kind of sound level do you play them at? I only ask because apparently they sound unusually good at low volume. Would you agree?
  9. Minstrel59

    Closed back unamped for acoustic classical and folk?

    Up to 350GBP For: . Clarity . Precision . Natural, neutral sound . Good imaging and soundstaging . Low listener fatigue For listening to acoustic sound: . Piano . Cello . Human voice It's for very quiet low volume listening (but I guess I could EQ the bass if need be). To be used direct with...
  10. Minstrel59

    Rank the Headphones that You Own.

    Rick What did you like about the X2/27? P.S. I wonder if anyone has done the stats on these results (almost as mammoth a task as that kind chap who bought and reviewed that huge list of headphones)?
  11. Minstrel59

    HPH MT220 vs DT150 vs DT250 250 ohm

    I'd love to read everyone (whose heard these 3)'s opinions on how they compare? My preference is for an experience that is: . Without amping . For listening to (and appreciating) vocal talent and acoustic music . Sibilance free smooooooth treble . Honest and real (whatever that may be?)...
  12. Minstrel59

    SONY NWZ-A10 Series

    Have any A10 owners heard the iPod Nano 6th Gen? Love to read your opinion of differences in SQ. Thankyou
  13. Minstrel59

    Huge isolation, detailed but warm with a soft treble (less than £300)

    Which in ear monitors (less than £300) give: Massive isolation Transparency Good resolution A soft treble Minimum fatigue Warm sounding (not bright and sharp) Thank you
  14. Minstrel59

    Transparency, resolution, soft treble, minimum fatigue...

    Which closed back headphones (less than £300) give: Transparency Resolution Soft treble Minimum fatigue 'Warm and cuddly' sound as opposed to 'harsh and spiky'! Thank you
Back
Top