Recent content by backwardsname
  1. backwardsname

    HD650's bass is not hyped.

    I don't think Lunatique is simply saying that monitors are better than headphones. The impression I got is that he was saying, coming from the headphone world, which always has had trouble with accurate bass reproduction, many people will consider bass to be "bloated" that is actually much...
  2. backwardsname

    amp popularity check

    Total entries: 43 Entry Level: 21 ----------- Audio-gd C-2C (2) Audio-GD Compass (1) Audiotailor Jade (2) Aune DAC/amp (1) AV123 x-head (1) Darkvoice THA332 (1) Head Direct EF1 (2) Head Direct EF2 (1) Hotaudio RM-1 (1) Keces DA-152 (1) Little Dot I+ (2) Little Dot MK III (2)...
  3. backwardsname

    using an expensive headphone outside

    Quote: Originally Posted by sampson_smith Perhaps the boat analogy wasn't "water tight". But obviously what I was getting at was that wood isn't impervious to water - especially that used for headphones - and should be maintained as such. The more I hear about D2000's, emansdrawkcab...
  4. backwardsname

    using an expensive headphone outside

    I use my D2000s on my way to/from work a lot of the time. They sound pretty good straight out of an iPhone and they've been rained on a little bit with no ill effect. Never been in a downpour with them or anything -- I'd definitely try to cover them in that kind of situation.
  5. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by chinesekiwi However after more time with the DT880 / 600 paired up with different sources, I feel this is much more due to synergy reasons than the DT880 itself. I'll edit that first impression to reflect that. Also in another thread, I feel if a headphone...
  6. backwardsname

    which is better head room ultra micro dac+ultra micro amp or head room desktop amp/dac??

    The ultra micro amp and ultra micro dac will sound better than the standard desktop amp. The electronics are higher-end -- the only thing you lose is the single package and some connector options, but for most people the Ultra Micros should be just fine.
  7. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by hifidk I have had D2000/7000, SA5000, K701, DT880, HD600 and currently have HD650. With right equipment, all these shouldn't be grainy or sibilance with piercing highs. I think it's important to remember individual hearing with this. High-frequency...
  8. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by jagorev I honestly don't think the three headphones being considered by the OP are much of an upgrade to the D2000. If you're going to upgrade, save up for a big upgrade (wait till you can afford to buy something in D7000 or HD 800 territory) I'm not...
  9. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by Necrolic If I recall correctly, you've only had these headphones for a short while? I recommend you wait until they burn in more. It took at LEAST 300 hours for my D5000s to fully burn in, and I was amazed at the changes. Flabby bass was gone, no more...
  10. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by rpaul If you go with the K701/702, be aware that people claim that they are really picky in terms of source(s) used and that they require 300 or so hours of burn-in to reach their sonic potential. I'm definitely fine with the long burn-in time, and...
  11. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by pzm9pzm9 I am pretty sure you will find K701 bright. Especially hot cymbals. Well, yes, from what I hear that is the signature of the cans. I'm OK with bright. I think I made a bit of a mistake earlier in the thread with certain word choices -- I'm...
  12. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    After some consideration, I think the K701 is what I'm looking for. The only thing I can foresee being a problem is the anemic bass, but I'm not necessarily looking for neutrality. I'll probably buy from somewhere that offers a return policy in case I find them to be too bright, but everything...
  13. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by Cankin I've owned DT880, D2000 and K701. If you find D2000 sibilance, stay far away from DT880 which is the brightest and most sibilance headphone I've ever owned until now. Grado SR325i is considered warm in comparison. From your requirements, I'd...
  14. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by chinesekiwi Well the 600 ohm version of the DT880's is the best out of all the DT880's. It has more bass than the recessed bass of the 2003 DT880's and less harsh highs than DT880 '03 as well. Impressions from me and others (vs. other DT880's and other...
  15. backwardsname

    Where to go next? (From a D2k to HD650, DT 880, K701?)

    Quote: Originally Posted by Mink If you're sensitive for sibilance than definitely count the D5000's out. But I wouldn't call it grain, I find the highs to be very clean. I must be one of few, but I find the D5000's to be very refined, good recorded classical music sounds divine and...
Back
Top