Sony Electrets?
Apr 24, 2006 at 5:09 AM Post #46 of 65
Any idea how long the charge will last? i have a pair of Stax SR-60 that are still going strong, but i was curious about membrane charge life.

Does anyone else think these Sonys look an awful lot like stax gear? Headband, earcup holders, and the 5 conductor flat cable on the 880 all look Stax like.
 
Apr 24, 2006 at 5:17 AM Post #47 of 65
Call me crazy, but the 500 reminds me distantly of a Grado HP1000.
 
May 1, 2006 at 6:38 AM Post #48 of 65
Quote:

Originally Posted by studeb
Any idea how long the charge will last?


At least a human lifetime, as long as you don't boil them.


Quote:

i have a pair of Stax SR-60..


Do you mean a 30, 40 or 80? Grado makes the 60.
 
May 1, 2006 at 7:44 AM Post #49 of 65
May 1, 2006 at 2:58 PM Post #51 of 65
Quote:

Originally Posted by E.B.M.Head
Stax also made a SR 60. Look here: http://www.fl-electronic.de/neuklang/staxsr84.html (scroll a bit down)
You can find them quite often on german eBay.



Interesting! They don't show up on the English page of the Stax Brand History list, but from looking at them, they're what was sold in the US as the SR 30.

There's a link to a thorough explanation of electret principles and manufacture there for German speakers.

Maybe Stax called it an SR 30 here in the US to avoid a conflict with Grado. Thanks for the info!
 
May 1, 2006 at 11:43 PM Post #52 of 65
Quote:

Originally Posted by wualta
Maybe Stax called it an SR 30 here in the US to avoid a conflict with Grado. Thanks for the info!


Then why release a SR-80?

I think it's just another case of Stax renaming things for no logical reason, a la Alpha/Gamma.
 
May 2, 2006 at 3:30 AM Post #53 of 65
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carl
Then why release a SR-80?


Dunno..[draws circle in dirt with toe of shoe].. maybe the Grado '80 hadn't been released yet. Dunno.

Seriously, since I don't know when Grado started making the 60 and 80 (although I should; I own one of each), I have no idea. But something of a weird legal/superstition-type nature must've happened, since Stax started with the SR-40 electret, then improved it and called it.... the 30. Which was released concurrent with the 80. Argh!

Quote:

I think it's just another case of Stax renaming things for no logical reason, a la Alpha/Gamma.


I think there's a sinister conspiracy afoot. But you're probably right.
 
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:56 AM Post #54 of 65
Sorry to have to do this to a comfortably dead thread, but I've found my old e-buddy Axel has added the ECR-800 to his amazing site, The Vintage Knob. Cutaway diagrams and everything, with Japanese captions.

Apparently Sony got the diaphragm thickness on the 800 down to 2 microns. Did they do a back-electret configuration (see post #57 below)? They also found that different color wire sounded different. Shades of Peter Belt. Sony provides an explanation that you'll find interesting. It's all here:

Sony ESPRIT #30: ECR-880 & ECA-80

Still have never seen an 800 in the US. More's the pity.


.
 
Jan 3, 2008 at 3:59 AM Post #55 of 65
Always good to see a thread bumped where Carl had commented (comparatively) recently.

I miss Carl.
 
Jan 3, 2008 at 4:08 AM Post #56 of 65
Quote:

Originally Posted by wualta /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Sorry to have to do this to a comfortably dead thread, but I've found my old e-buddy Axel has added the ECR-800 to his amazing site, The Vintage Knob. Cutaway diagrams and everything, with Japanese captions.

Apparently Sony got the diaphragm thickness on the 800 down to 2 microns. Did they do a back-electret configuration? They also found that different color wire sounded different. Shades of Peter Belt. Sony provides an explanation that you'll find interesting. It's all here:

Sony ESPRIT #30: ECR-880 & ECA-80

Still have never seen an 800 in the US. More's the pity.



The ECA-80 box looks very complicated, much more than any Stax transformer box that I have seen.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Jan 3, 2008 at 5:28 AM Post #57 of 65
Notice two things: there's a bias voltage (200v), which means this isn't an electret headset but a "real" (ie, external-bias) electrostatic, and what some have called an amp is really just a fancy transformer box.

This also means the ECR-600 was a "real" electrostat.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top