Campfire Audio Dorado

General Information

Dorado is a hybrid driver design; Our 8.5mm beryllium PVD dynamic driver is paired with Dual BA drivers + TAEC and captured in a unique liquid metal alloy housing.
– 8.5mm Beryllium PVD Dynamic Driver
– Dual High-Frequency Balanced Armature Drivers
– Tuned Acoustic Expansion Chamber™ (TAEC)
– World’s First Liquid Alloy Metal Earphone Housing
– Premium Litz Wire cable; Silver-plated-Copper conductors

Latest reviews

faceestrella

New Head-Fier
Pros: Engaging and lively W sound signature, solid build quality, Coherency in tuning
Cons: Long nozzle can be a fitting issue, May be too much bass for some, Paint finish not the most chip resistant


Introduction: Campfire Audio, a name in the industry that needs little to no introduction, recognizable in both name and design choices. With the Dorado, they’ve decided to create and put their own spin on an IEM configuration that has steadily increased in popularity in the last year or two; The 1 dynamic driver, 2 balanced armature hybrid. This configuration has had its share of hurdles and criticisms; usually these issues are all rooted in the lack of coherency, and this makes sense, dynamic drivers and balanced armatures tend to have different base “sounds” wherein if not properly executed lead to the final product sounding confused and with no real direction in tuning, just drivers doing their own things that happen to the same shell. And while constantly improving it is a setup that is often meant to give the best of both worlds can simply end up giving neither due to the nature of the difficult balancing act of tuning hybrids. With that we have the Dorado, utilizing the signature Campfire 8.5mm PVD Beryllium dynamic driver and 2 balanced armatures with T.E.A.C. wrapped in the (mostly) familiar liquid metal housing that has usually been utilized for their single dynamic models, a tantalizing combination of technology for sure. It does however come with a price tag to match at $999, only $100 less than the Vega and Andromeda, does it pull its weight in the Campfire Audio Family? Was it able to take full advantage of the technology within? Does it avoid the usual pitfalls of the configuration it utilizes? And most importantly does it fulfill the promise of Campfire Audio of “…delivers on the promise of hybrid designs; excellent detail with a visceral punchiness to the low end.”? For the most part, it does, and it does so much more.




Disclosure: The Dorado was provided to me by Campfire Audio in exchange for a comprehensive, and honest review.




Specifications:

5Hz–27 kHz Frequency Response

107 dB SPL/mW Sensitivity

15 Ohms @ 1kHz Impedance

Beryllium / Copper MMCX Connections

Liquid Metal Alloy Shell

8.5mm Beryllium PVD Diaphragm Dynamic Driver

Dual Balanced Armature High Frequency Drivers

Tuned Acoustic Expansion Chamber (T.A.E.C.)









Packaging and Accessories: (As the packaging and accessories are very similar parts of this section have been lifted from the Campfire Audio Polaris Review.) The Dorado comes in the standard Campfire Audio packaging, a relatively small box, colored red just like the Lyra II and Vega, decorated with the camping/night sky theme and Campfire Audio branding with the details and photo of the model on the outside. Opening the box reveals the Campfire Audio leather zipper case, and inside the 4 core SPC litz cable and the IEMs can be found inside with the IEMs coming in red miniature drawstring pouches sporting a red velvet like exterior with a simple fabric interior to protect the housings (more on that later). The Dorado comes preinstalled with Campfire’s marshmallow tips. Removing the case, you will find a false bottom revealing the rest of the included accessories. The included accessories are a standard set of black wide bore silicone eartips, a set of Spinfit tips of a host of sizes, the remaining marshmallow tips; And then we have a warranty card, a quick start guide, an attractive lacquer pin, and an IEM cleaning tool. The zipper case of the Dorado has a pebbled leather outer finish that sports their logo engraved, black zipper with a logo engraving as well, the interior is lined with an almost shearling like fabric to keep the housings free from scuffs or scratches from within; The case is high quality, and seems to be relatively durable, and while the leather outer material seems on the thin side, the case itself seems to have a backing that that keeps it stiff and sturdy. Overall the packaging is simple and not wasteful, and the accessories included are a quality and attractive case, a wide variety of tips to suit almost any need or use case, though a softer case material as well as a softer interior for the individual red pouches would ever so slightly increase the premium factor. Another thing of note is that the red pouch in some instances may stain the coating of the cable, so be mindful.













Build Quality: The Dorado (and those of its siblings) shell is a departure from the more recognizable shell design used for the balanced armature models of Campfire, with a smoother and more compact overall shape and utilizing what Campfire calls Liquid Metal Alloy shells. The shell is divided into 3 main parts the faceplate, the main body, and the nozzle. The faceplate is bare save for the engraved Campfire Audio logo and its share of the MMCX connection, with a bevel as it meets with the main body. The main body houses a lot of the bulk, with it housing the dynamic driver, the vent for the driver and the requisite engraved L/R marking. We finally transition to the nozzle area, to me the most intriguing part of the build as it is much longer and a bit thicker than what one would normally expect, this is, would hazard where both balanced armature drivers reside, the nozzle is capped off with a metal screen cover to protect the internal components from dust, or earwax from getting inside and clogging up the nozzle or drivers. The Dorado utilizes the tried and tested Beryllium MMCX connection for extra durability; and the main portion of the shell is finished in this gorgeous rose gold paint that just exudes class without being over the top, though I did find the finish to chip and scratch just a little too easy for my preference, but I have not experienced any major marring in the finish.

On to the cable, the Dorado comes with, what is by now standard fare for Campfire IEMs with their Litz cable, the 4-core double twist SPC cable that is of exceptional quality, though one would expect nothing less since this is coming from the same minds as ALO audio and they make fantastic cables. It feels supple, is light, and is flexible while looking attractive to boot, although as previously mentioned one might want to be careful since the soft coating might take on colors from dyes prone to running.









Fit: The fitting experience with the Dorado is somewhat of a peculiar one. The relatively more compact body and smooth edges mean that it is less likely to hit parts of outer ear and cause chafing, scratching or discomfort to the wearer, typical of this shell design like with the Vega and Lyra II, however the nozzle presents an interesting challenge, it is LONG and has a larger diameter than most, so this places individuals with narrow or shorter canals in a little bit of a bind, meaning that it will likely sit outside of the ear a touch, or it might prove difficult to wear altogether. Pairing with foams seem to be the best option as many silicone tips just don’t have the bore diameter or length to fit properly, bullet shaped foams however cover the length and diameter just fine for the most part and their nature tends to lend an easier and more secure wearing experience for most people. I personally found them to fit nearly perfectly with medium foam tips, sitting and cradling right in my ear and providing great sound isolation to boot.







Sound: To capture as comprehensive a picture of the sonic characteristics of the Dorado, I tested them using various source, including (but not limited to) Hiby R6 with and without an IEMatch, ifi Audio xDSD DAC/Amp, FiiO Q1 Mk II DAC/Amp, LG G6 with and without the HiFi DAC enabled, stock output from an Alienware 17 R3, volume matched to as close as my measuring gear would allow. The overall sound characteristics of the Dorado seem to be a warm W, and by that, I mean it has a boosted bass response that tapers towards the mids, with another peak in the midrange, finishing with energy in the treble.







Bass: Let’s get this out of the way immediately the bass on the Dorado is north of neutral. It has authoritative and visceral bass delivering on both slam and impact without sounding sloppy or uncontrolled, a common issue when bass is a focus of IEMs. The sub bass response is simply wonderful, especially for those who prefer their subbass to be powerful; in Lana Del Rey’s “Love” the bass drum hits seemingly fill the stage and resonate with wonderful and natural texture. The decay of the subbass is on the slower side, not being sluggish but rather almost thoughtful in the pacing of the decay, highlighting the timbre of the dynamic driver that. The midbass lightly tapers off at the transition to the mids lending to minimize “bloom” often associated with bass forward tunings that lead to interfering with midrange performance, particularly vocals, however it doesn’t really present itself as “thin” sounding at all in fact it still shares the same qualities with the subbass in texture, note fullness and decay, however it is just a tad more subdued, presented a touch behind the subbass, however with regards to the to rest of the frequencies it is still forward in fact when listening to “I Sold My Bed, But Not My Stereo” by Capital Cities the synth bass hits definitely get your head moving but there you can easily contrast it with the subbass that appears in the bridge of the song; and bass guitars in general are simply a joy to listen to on the Dorado. The bass delivery of the Dorado is fun, full, and can put a smile on your face. Those however looking for neutral, faster bass should definitely look elsewhere though.







Mids: The most prominent thing to notice with the midrange performance of the Dorado is the general forwardness and quality of the vocals, something not necessarily expected when the bass is as prominent as it is. Lower midrange is slightly behind, a result of the gradual rise from the taper in the midbass. This means that sound in that range, mostly instruments in my experience, like lower piano notes and the like sit a bit behind the vocals and suffer the most of any frequency in the tuning. Lower register vocals seem to be mostly free of any effect of the taper, “Perfectly Lonely” by John Mayer sound just about right, presenting the vocals with good thickness, with an ample amount of texture and definition that his singing doesn’t feel dry and it provides a listener with a pleasant amount of emotion with the texture. Moving up the scale to higher register vocals, I find them a hair bit ahead of the lower register, but only slightly, to me this manifests itself in more emotion coming through. “Valerie” by Amy Winehouse is a terrific example, the vocal delivery takes center stage, letting you focus on it and be complimented with the guitar riffs, and the consistent bass line and piano. Sam Smith’s “Baby You Make Crazy” is another great song on these, the chorus where he sings with a falsetto are smooth, delicate though not as well balanced as Valerie, so the bass is definitely a bit more in your face here. Instruments in the midrange as I touched on earlier take a step back from the vocals but the quality coming from pianos, guitars and the like are still very good, sounding articulate and never get muddled or lost even when there is a fair amount of distortion.







Treble: This is where the T.E.A.C. kicks in, and Campfire has managed to insert a surprising amount of air and sparkle into the Dorado. The treble is lightly energetic and has a good treble extension, as expected from this kind of configuration but the quality and the handling of the treble here is what sets it apart. The amount of details here is good, especially remembering the amount of bass these things pack. I did not find it sibilant and it is not harsh, the frequency response charts show that well enough, what they don’t show is that for that relatively mild graph, cymbals for one is reproduced relatively well, not something I initially expected, but the articulation of cymbals, from hi-hats to ride, and crash cymbals surprised me; listening to the typical “pop/punk” or metal jaunts the Dorado handles the fast cymbals really well, good definition and good “bite” on crashes without veering into the territory of discomfort thought still not the level of articulation found in high end multi BA configurations, but that is also expected. Moving onto other instruments the story remains much of the same “Feels So Good” by Chuck Mangione, the delivery in the instrumental is smooth, but not sounding rolled off, and violins and the high end of piano as in the cover of “Yellow” by Daniel Jung highlight an amount of “attack” I like in the violin while the piano notes in the treble region have this sparkle that really cap off the treble well. Overall there is good energy in the treble so that it isn’t “soft” that doesn’t overstep and articulates itself well.







Presentation: The overall presentation of the Dorado is not what I would call spacious, mostly because the forwardness of the vocals range tends to increase the intimacy of the listening experience, however the due to the recess in the transition point of the bass and mids coupled with the treble performance kind of balance or cancel each other out. The staging width is a little better than average, giving a good sense of left to right end to end, a fair bit beyond the ears. Depth on the other hand is quite good providing a good overall stage, and positioning is accurate as far as I can tell. Layering is pleasant all the way from the bass to the treble, while separation is likewise very good, with the individual presentation of instruments or notes good, even with more complex tracks and only in bass heavy tracks does the technical performance of the Dorado begin to suffer. One thing to note is that the Dorado is relatively forgiving of the source music, so even is tracks that aren’t the most technically proficient in mastering, it will not be as revealing of flaws as other IEMs, you can take that as either a pro or a con. Now back to something I touched on earlier, and one of the biggest draws of Dorado, cohesion. The way the tuning was handled is great, balancing the big bass response with the treble energy and the bump on the vocals that remove the usual “dips” in the sound that this configuration can suffer. The Dorado has a direction in the sound signature it’s trying to accomplish, and it succeeds.




Conclusion: The Dorado follows in the philosophy of Campfire Audio, it doesn’t aim for outright technical proficiency, or pure reference tuning, it is fun, engaging. The Dorado is their attempt to fulfill the goal of getting the best of both worlds with a hybrid, timbre and fullness of dynamic drivers and articulation, details, and speed of balanced armatures, all the while packaging the sound neatly together avoiding it from sounding unnatural or off kilter. For the most part they have succeeded in providing an experience that is as close as to best of both worlds as one can get, and while it leans a little warmer than true balance, the level of cohesion they deliver here can almost be said as a “maturation” in the configuration and is hopefully something more hybrids will deliver in the future. All the while all of this is packaged in a housing that while might not be for all due to the nozzle, is for the most part comfortable, attractive and is generally of the high quality we have come to expect from Campfire Audio. This all delivered in the compact but accessory rich package. The Dorado is a wonderful IEM, easily lining up with my personal preferences, and one of my favorite earphones. And yes $999 is a steep price, I feel like for those hybrid fans like me looking for a “best of both worlds” experience that Dorado is one of the most well-rounded options that fit the bill, with a combination of build quality, and a sound signature that is not only unique but also refined, that price will be worth it, not a steal mind you, but definitely well worth it.





Originally posted at:https://faceaudioreviews.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-road-to-el-dorado-campfire-audio.html

daduy

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Build quality, sound quality, included cable and accessories
Cons: Can sound a bit too thick , long nozzle feels bit weird
Disclaimer

I got this unit as part of Australia/New Zealand tour arranged by @d marc0, thank you very much for including me in this tour :)

Introduction

I am just another music fans in this world, I love listening to music, and that made me stumble into head-fi around 11 years ago when looking for the best way to listen to my music. I am not in anyway an audiophile, heck not even close, so please forgive any lack of details in my review. Most importantly this is my personal impression on the unit, most likely i heard things differently than you, my ears, my preferences, my brain :)

I've listened to CA Dorado for about a month. I've used them mostly with LG G6. The source will be either my personal music or google play music.

Music preferences

My music preferences is mostly instrumental, whether it's Classical, Jazz, Celtic, New Age, etc. I also enjoy music with vocal on them, but my playlist is mostly instrumental. I would say around 80/20 mix.

Example of the music I listen (not limited to):
- Acoustic Alchemy
- Tony McManus, Soig Siberil
- Hawaiian Slack Key guitars
- Gontiti
- Fusion Jazz (Lee Ritenour, Dave Grusin, Fourplay, Special EFX, you get the idea)
- Akira Jimbo, Tetsuo Sakurai, Casiopea
- Incognito
- Europa Galante/Fabio Biondi, Musica Antiqua Koln, Rolf Lislevand
- Yoko Kanno
- Madonna

Sound signature preference


Hmm...not sure what my pref is, I used to enjoy Fostex TH-600 and Sony Z7 very much, but I don't own them anymore and now listen mostly to Stax SR-3.

My typical listening gear is Parasound Zdac -> Parasound Zamp v.3 -> Stax SRD-7 -> Stax SR-3

When travelling I usually use Sony MDR-1000x paired to the LG G6.

Build Quality and Design

As expected with Campfire Audio, build quality is excellent, the housing is made of liquid metal alloy with gold/bronze color finish. They look and feel exactly the same as Lyra II except for the color and the length of the nozzle.

For some reason, the Dorado nozzle is twice as long as any other CA IEM's nozzle that I have tried. I wouldn't expect that to be an issue, but surprisingly it took me a while to find the right tips. My usually fit medium size tips doesn't fit on my ears with the Dorado, I had to switch to smaller size tips.

After I find the right tips, then it's not a problem anymore, they are as good as other CA IEMs I've tried in the past.

I've reviewed a few of CA IEMs before, but this is the first time I tried their hybrid design. CA Dorado is a hybrid of 8.5mm beryllium PVD dynamic drive paired with two balanced armatures, so I am pretty curious to hear how they sounded.

Sound Quality


Ok the most important part for me, sound quality, so how do they sound? They have a smooth warm sound with a nice quantity of bass and nice sparkle in the treble region, I think they have a mild V-shaped sound signature.

Typical to CA house sound signature, I found the Dorado to be relaxing, rich and pleasant sounding, they didn't necessarily give me the "wow" effect when I listen to them the first time, but as I listen to them more and more, I like them more and more as well. It just sounded right to me. With the Dorado I think CA want us to enjoy the music, rather than analyzing every details in the instruments.

First of all let's talk about the bass, they are tune exactly to my preferences, they are more heavy on the sub-bass rather than mid-bass, which give them a nice kick when needed, but safe from having music sounding too warm. I will admit that sometimes the bass can feel a bit too much and music can sound a bit thick on the Dorado, but it only happens on music that was warm in the first place.

The mids are quite clear, although very slightly recessed. While there is good quantity of bass, I never felt them bleeding into the mids.

The treble is excellent, they are quite extended, detailed and crisp sounding. This must be the magic of the BA driver at work, because Lyra II try to achieve similar performance with single dynamic driver but can't really reach the same level of smoothness and ease as the Dorado did.

Comparison

Lyra II vs Dorado

This is quite easy for me, the Dorado is like my wishlist for the Lyra II sound signature.

The bass on Lyra II is more heavy on mid-bass rather than sub-bass, which makes music sounds a bit too warm for my taste.

The upper mids/low treble on the Lyra II can sound a bit harsh, while it's always controlled and smooth on the Dorado.

No brainer for me, the Dorado is definitely the better IEM than Lyra II.

Dorado vs Hifiman RE2000 (based on memory)

Please bear in mind that this brief comparison is based on memory, so take it with a grain of salt.

In general, RE2000 is the better IEM in sound quality, it has the "wow" effect the first time you hear them. The bass is definitely more detailed and textured than Dorado.

The impression that I have left of RE2000 is "energetic", while Dorado is "relaxed", so it's different sound signature.

Comfort wise, the Dorado does it better, so is packaging wise, as in, Dorado got better cable and accessories compare to RE2000.

Last, but not least in my opinion, is the price. RE2000 cost 2k, Dorado cost 1k. I can say for sure that RE2000 doesn't sound twice as good as the Dorado, in fact I would bet that someone will prefer the sound of Dorado compare to RE2000.

Summary

For me the Dorado is close to perfection, it reminds me of my experience with the CA Andromeda, which is a another IEM that is close to perfection as well for me.

It can sound bit thick sometimes, and the long nozzle is a bit weird, but it's very minor things compare to other fine qualities that they have.

It's very close to reaching the perfect score for me, but at the end of the day I think it would be the perfect IEM (personally for me) if Campfire Audio would just cut down on the bass a tiny bit. So today it will get a 4.5 star from me.

Thanks for reading.
Pros: Build quality, accessories, overall design, comfort, overall sound quality, imaging
Cons: Can tend to be a little warm and clarity can suffer, bass tends to dominate, pricey
9936736_l.jpg

Picture are default 1200 x 800 resolution - click (photos in tables) to view larger images.

INTRODUCTION

If I mentioned Campfire Audio, chances are that most Head-Fier's will know who they are, and be able to list 1 or more of their IEMs. And thats quite a feat considering they've only been on the scene or two years. I've been fortunate to be able to audition most of their range by participating in tours organised by Ken Ball and facilitated by our own d marc0, and the range is pretty impressive. Ken has a vision and its slowly being realised.

The tour sample today is the Dorado – a triple driver hybrid retailing at USD 999. So lets put it through its paces, and see where it sits in the line-up.


ABOUT CAMPFIRE AUDIO

Campfire Audio is a partner company or off-shoot from ALO Audio, and is run by ALO's CEO and founder Ken Ball, and a small team of like-minded enthusiasts and engineers. Ken of course is the CEO and founder of ALO Audio (2006) and ALO is very well known for creating high quality audio components – including cables, amplifiers and all manner of other audio equipment. Ken founded Campfire Audio in 2015 – with a vision of creating extremely high quality earphones with excellence in design, materials and of course sound quality.

I've been privileged to not only have the chance to review some of their range, but also conduct direct discussions with Ken himself, and this culminated in Ken assisting me to recalibrate my own measurement gear so that it could more accurately reflect an IEC711 standard of measurement. The thing I have been incredibly impressed with in my dealings with Ken and Campfire is their absolute passion for sound and commitment to quality and service.


DISCLAIMER

The Campfire Dorado earphone that I’m reviewing today was provided as a tour review sample – organised via Ken Ball and d marc0. They have asked me for my opinion and feedback, with no restrictions or caveats. I do not make any financial gain from this review – it is has been written simply as my way of providing feedback both to the Head-Fi community and also Campfire Audio. The Dorado will be returned at the completion of this review.

I have now had the Dorado for almost 5 weeks. The retail price at time of review is ~USD 999.

PREAMBLE - 'ABOUT ME'. (or a base-line for interpreting my thoughts and bias)

I'm a 50 year old music lover. I don't say audiophile – I just love my music. Over the last couple of years, I have slowly changed from cheaper listening set-ups to my current set-up. I vary my listening from portables (mostly now from the FiiO X5iii, X7ii and iPhone SE) to my desk-top's set-up (PC > USB > iFi iDSD). My main full sized headphones at the time of writing are the Sennheiser HD800S, Sennheiser HD600 & HD630VB, MS Pro and AKG K553. Most of my portable listening is done with IEMs, and it has mainly been with my own personally owned IEMs - the Jays q-Jays, Alclair Curve2 and LZ Big Dipper. A full list of the gear I have owned (past and present is listed in my Head-Fi profile).

I have very eclectic music tastes listening to a variety from classical/opera and jazz, to grunge and general rock. I listen to a lot of blues, jazz, folk music, classic rock, indie and alternative rock. I am particularly fond of female vocals. I generally tend toward cans that are relatively neutral/balanced, but I do have a fondness for clarity, and suspect I might have slight ‘treble-head’ preferences. I am not overly treble sensitive, and in the past have really enjoyed headphones like the K701, SR325i, and of course the T1 and DT880. I have a specific sensitivity to the 2-3 kHz frequency area (most humans do) but my sensitivity is particularly strong, and I tend to like a relatively flat mid-range with slight elevation in the upper-mids around this area.


I have extensively tested myself (ABX) and I find aac256 or higher to be completely transparent. I do use exclusively red-book 16/44.1 if space is not an issue. All of my music is legally purchased (mostly CD – the rest FLAC purchased on-line). I tend to be skeptical about audiophile ‘claims’, don’t generally believe in burn-in, have never heard a difference with different cables (unless it was volume or impedance related), and would rather test myself blind on perceived differences. I am not a ‘golden eared listener’. I suffer from mild tinnitus, and at 50, my hearing is less than perfect (it only extends to around 14 kHz nowadays). My usual listening level is around 65-75 dB.

For the purposes of this review - I used the Campfire Dorado from various sources at my disposal – both straight from the headphone-out socket of various devices, and also with further amplification. In the time I have spent with the Dorado, I have personally noticed no change to the overall sonic presentation (burn-in).

This is a purely subjective review - my gear, my ears, and my experience. Please take it all with a grain of salt - especially if it does not match your own experience.


THE REVIEW

PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES

The Dorado arrived in the distinctive Campfire 122 x 81 x 54 mm cardboard retail hinged lid box. Like the Lyra II, the box is a reddish/crimson colour and continues with the galaxy type theme. The top (lid) simply has the word Dorado and a short description, and the front face has a picture of the Dorado.

9936710_l.jpg
9936711_l.jpg
9936712_l.jpg
Dorado outer boxIside the box and carry case.The full package contents
The total accessory package includes:
  • 1 pair Campfire Dorado IEMs
  • 3.5mm SPC Litz MMCX stereo cable
  • Leather zippered carry case
  • IEM cleaning tool
  • 3 sets of silicone ear tips (S M L)
  • 3 sets of Crystal foam tips (S M L)
  • 4 sets of Spinfit tips
  • Campfire Audio logo clothing button / pin
  • Campfire’s fold-out user manual
  • Campfire’s warranty card
  • 2 small red “individual IEM bags”
The Campfire Audio carry case is very sturdy, but more “jacket or bag pocketable” than trousers. It measures approx. 115 x 75 x 45 mm and is zipped on 3 sides. When opened it reveals a softer interior which will definitely protect and preserve your IEMs. The exterior is quite strong, and also pretty rigid. You also get two red “baggies” with drawstrings, and these are for housing each IEM to stop them knocking together (if you are really particular about your IEMs).

All in all it is a very well put together package, and I applaud Campfire for including the extra foam tips and the Spin-fits.


TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
ModelCampfire Audio Dorado
Approx price$999 USD
TypeTriple Hybrid Driver IEM
Dynamic Driver8.5mm Beryllium PVD diaphragm
Balanced Armature DriversDual High Freq
Freq Range5Hz – 27kHz
Impedance15Ω
Sensitivity107 dB/mW
Cable ConnectionStandard MMCX
Cable Type (SE)~1.25m, SPC Litz
Jack3.5mm gold plated single ended, right angled
Weight (Dorado + cable + tips)~26g
Casing materialLiquid alloy metal

FREQUENCY GRAPH

The graph below is generated using the Vibro Veritas coupler and ARTA software. Ken Ball (ALO/Campfire) graciously provided me with measurement data which I have used to recalibrate my Veritas so that it mimics an IEC 711 measurement standard (Ken uses two separate BK ear simulators, we measured the same set of IEMs, and I built my calibration curve from shared data). I do not claim that this data is 100% accurate, but it is very consistent, and is as close as I can get to the IEC 711 standard on my budget. It seems to be down at around 8-10 kHz in comparison to Ken's graphs, but seems reasonably accurate through the rest of the spectrum.

I do not claim that the measurements are in any way more accurate than anyone else's, but they have been proven to be consistent and I think they should be enough to give a reasonable idea of response - especially if you've followed any of my other reviews. When measuring I usually always use crystal foam tips (so medium bore opening) - and the reason I use them is for very consistent seal and placement depth in the coupler. I use the same amp (E11K) for all my measurements - and output is under 1 ohm.

Any graphs are provided merely as a point of discussion, and later in the review I've included comparisons to other IEMs for similar reference.


9936733_l.png

Frequency chart and channel matching
The Dorado is what I would call a bass dominant monitor (on the warm side of neutral), but retaining a somewhat forward mid-range and some genuine air in the lower treble. The bass has a lot of extension and both impact and slam. The lower mid-range has a little recession relative to both bass and upper mid-range, but doesn't sound overly diffuse. The thing I can't quite get over is how Ken has created a sense of space with this monitor but still keeps vocals sounding very present.

Upper mid-range has a slow rise to a natural peak at 2 kHz, and displays very good cohesion between lower and upper mid-range with no dissonance or tonality issues. Lower treble shows excellent extension, and has some genuine treble energy, but this is so nicely balanced with the bass that its not obtrusive in any way.

Overall I’d say that the Dorado has a warm and smooth frequency response, with a good sense of detail in the top end (particularly with cymbal fundamentals), and despite the warm overall lean, still exhibits good overall tonal balance. The bass on these is definitely north of neutral, but at the same time there is enough balance through the mid-range, and upper end to sound very coherent.

As you can see from the graphs the drivers are very well matched (and some of the differences shown in my measurements are likely to be minor differences in seating each ear piece). I find this is typical of Ken's driver matching – I don't think I've ever seen a Campfire IEM with mismatching drivers.


BUILD AND DESIGN

9936714_l.jpg
9936715_l.jpg
9936716_l.jpg
External faceFrom the rearInternal face and nozzles
The Dorado uses a ultra high density liquid alloy shell, and the reason for moving all Campfire IEMs to this type of shell is the combination of mechanical strength and acoustic stability. The shell is very similar in shape to that of the Lyra, but with a quite striking “copper/tan” colouring. The other major change is the longer nozzle. This allows the inclusion of the Tuned Acoustic Expansion Chamber (TAEC) which allows Ken to discard the more traditional tube and damper tuning systems. According to Campfire, the 3D printed TAEC chamber provides a means of applying acoustic tuning without the compression associated with more traditional methods, and this results in better extension on high frequencies and a more open sound.

9936717_l.jpg
9936718_l.jpg
9936713_l.jpg
Nozzle height and angleCable connectorsThe litz cable
The Dorado measures approximately 20mm in length, 14mm in height and has a depth of approx. 10mm (excluding the nozzle). The nozzle itself is angled slightly forward and slightly up when worn, extends approx. 12mm from the main body, and has an external diameter of 6mm. The shape is very ergonomic, and the Dorado is designed to be used with the cable over ear. The IEM shell is 3 pieces in total – nozzle, shell and back plate, but the seams are so smooth you can hardly see them. There are L/R markings on the inside of both ear pieces and the Campfire logo is also discretely engraved on the outer face. There is a small vent or port adjacent to the cable exit on each ear-piece. Internally the dynamic driver for the Dorado is a custom 8.5mm beryllium PVD diaphragm transducer, and it is coupled with a dual BA pair for the upper mids and treble.


9936725_l.jpg
9936724_l.jpg
9936738_l.jpg
Y split and cinchRight angled JackAn exquisitely crafted IEM
At the top of the shell is a beryllium coated copper MMCX connector, and when used with the supplied SPC ALO Litz cable, the connection is made with a very reassuring click. The cables do rotate in their sockets, but the connection itself seems very robust.

The cable is ALO’s “SPC Litz” which is high purity sliver-plated copper wire encased in a very flexible medical grade PVC jacket. The male MMCX connector is again beryllium coated, fits very snugly, and has either a blue or red dot on the connector to indicate L/R. There is a 70mm length of memory wire for over-ear wear, and I’ve found this very malleable, but also holds its shape very well. The cable is approximately 1.25m long, and consists of two twisted pairs above the Y split which continue as a twisted quad right through to the jack. The Y split is small and light and houses an in-built cinch which works really well. The jack is 3.5mm, right angled, and has clear rubber housing. Strain relief is excellent. The jack will also fit my iPhone SE with case in place.

FIT / COMFORT / ISOLATION
Fit for me is fantastic – the shells are very ergonomic in shape, and this includes the angle of the nozzles and also the placement of the cable exits. The shells (when fitted) do not extend outside my outer ear, and I have no issues lying down with the Dorado intact. The memory wire is also really well implemented here so that snugging the wires properly is easy. The fit is usually shallow with ergonomic shells, but with the rounded internal edges and the extended nozzle length, I have no issues getting an amazing seal by simply pushing the earpieces in a little better. I love the extra length on the nozzle for my preferences. Isolation is well above average for a hybrid, and I'd use these for public transport.

Those who’ve read my reviews will know that I have one ear canal slightly different to the other one (my right is very slightly smaller) - so I tend to find that usually single silicon flanges don't fit overly well. With the extra length on the Dorado nozzles I found that personally I had a lot more tip choices available to me – even silicone worked pretty well, and that included Spin-Fits, Ostry’s blue and black tuning tips, and Spiral Dots. The lip on the Dorado nozzle was pretty good for every tip I tried and I credit the reason for a lot of the success with the tips I tried to the angle of the nozzle. It isn’t just good – it is perfect. In the end my personal preference was to simply use Comply, although before I send these back, I really want to try a set of stretched medium Shure Olives.

9936719_l.jpg
9936722_l.jpg
Almost every tip fitPerfect fit and great comfort

SOUND QUALITY

The following is what I hear from the Campfire Audio Dorado. YMMV – and probably will – as my tastes are likely different to yours (read the preamble I gave earlier for a baseline). Most of the testing at this point (unless otherwise stated) was done with my FiiO X7ii (AM3A module) and medium Comply T400 tips. For the record – on most tracks, the volume level on the X7ii with the AM3A single ended was 35-40/120 on low gain which was giving me an SPL range of around 65-75 dB.

Tracks used were across a variety of genres – and most can be viewed in this list http://www.head-fi.org/a/brookos-test-tracks.17556. There was no DSP or EQ engaged.


Relativities

  • Sub-bass – elevated compared to the rest of the spectrum, and has very good extension. At low listening levels the rumble is still clearly audible. The sub bass doesn't dominate with tracks like Lorde's Royals, but does give a lot of impact and slam while still allowing her vocals to come through clearly.
  • Mid-bass – quite linear (although elevated) and matches the level of sub-bass extension. Has excellent impact and slam with tracks like Amy Winehouse's “You know I'm no good” or Feist's “The bad in each other”, and while it is quite dominant, it again doesn't over do things. Bass lovers will really enjoy it, lovers of a cooler more linear bass line will likely find it too much. Definite on the warm side.
  • Lower mid-range – there is a recession compared to sub and mid-bass, but matches quite nicely with the upper mid-range (nice natural progression). Male vocals have excellent presence, tonality and timbre and nothing sounds distant.
  • Upper mid-range – slightly elevated compared to lower mid-range, and there is a gentle rise from 1 kHz to a first peak at around 2 kHz. There is a dip after this, but because of the overall bass warmth, there is no feeling of dissonance. The rise is enough to provide good cohesion and some euphony for female vocals.
  • Lower treble has very good extension, but never gets into the bright or spiky range. I think there may be a little more in the 7-10 kHz area than I'm measuring (it definitely sounds as though there is more energy there). There is a good sense of detail – although it may be a little shaded by the elevated bass with some tracks.
  • My measuring equipment tends to struggle with accuracy over 10 kHz, and its a hit or miss whether I can actually hear it. Upper treble doesn't show any sign of deficiencies to me.
Resolution / Detail / Clarity
  • Clarity is OK despite the warmth of the default frequency response. Cymbals are a little fuzzy and they don't stand out as clearly as many of my other monitors. While the decay is there, the bass does tend to mask it a little.
  • If there is too much bass present in the track, you can lose a bit of upper end detail.
  • Quite clean and clear in the presence area, with good detail around vocals and guitar (as long as there isn't too much bass guitar or drum).

Sound-stage and Imaging
  • Good directional cues, and depending on the recording can be just on or slightly outside the periphery of my head space – so reasonable feeling of width and also of depth. I would call it more intimate than expansive with binaural tracks like Tundra.
  • Separation of instruments and imaging is good without being razor sharp. Some of the focus is at times “soft” (masking from the bass).
  • The applause section of “Dante's Prayer” was nicely presented with a realistic flow around me. It was a little more left / right than in front or behind.
  • “Let it Rain” was excellent. The track is recorded a little hot and has quite a three-dimensional sense of spatial presentation – it is the way the track was miked. There is a nice sense of space – but again its intimate rather than expansive. I know sibilance exists in the recording, but the Dorado pretty much completely eliminates it so there is obviously some masking going on.
Sonic Strengths
  • Overall a warm and pleasing tonality with reasonable balance for a U/V shaped default signature.
  • Intimate sense of staging as long as the track isn't bass dominant.
  • Both male and female vocals are presented quite naturally.
Sonic Weaknesses
  • Can be bass dominant with heavier bass emphasised tracks (this will come down to preference)
  • There is a little auditory masking going on (because of the bass dominance), and overall detail can suffer a little.
AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

The Dorado is not a hard IEM to drive with its 15 ohm impedance and 107 dB sensitivity. It was easily driven with all the sources I tried, and this included my iPhone SE and players like FiiO's X1ii (neither are power houses). My iPhone SE only needed about 30-40% of its volume for a comfortable 65-75dB and going over 50% volume was simply to loud for me on most tracks (pushing into the 80-85dB range).

9936728_l.jpg
9936720_l.jpg
Practically any source will drive the Dorado wellNo real need for additional amplifiers
I also went back and forth (volume matching with test tones and fixed volumes using a few different combos – iPhone SE & FiiO Q1ii, X7ii with A5 and E17K, and X7ii by itself, and did not notice any appreciable difference between amped and straight out of a DAP.

RESPONSE TO EQ

Those who know me will likely guess that the Dorado, while very pleasant tonally, is not my ideal signature. I normally gravitate toward a cooler, clearer signature. I just wanted to use a rough and ready EQ, so my first step was to connect the E17K to the X7ii, and drop the bass by about -4 to -6 dB. For me it was an improvement, and allowed both the mid-range and lower treble to shine a little more.

9936721_l.jpg
9936723_l.jpg
E17K with bass reduction perfect for meOr L&P L3 with Jazz lower-treble EQ boost
Bass lovers (and those who like a warmer signature) who buy the Dorado may well be happy with the default signature, but its nice to know that it responds really well to some subtle tweaks. My favourite DAP combo with the Dorado is the L&P L3 with Jazz EQ setting (which lowers the bass and ups the mid-range & treble a little). For my tastes, this really makes the Dorado sing.

COMPARISON WITH OTHER IEMS

Its always a hard one to try and pick earphones to compare with. Ideally I would have liked to compare with the HifiMan RE800 and RE2000, but unfortunately I don't have them at the moment (out with another reviewer). So I decided instead to compare to the Lyra II (similar signature), Dunu's DK3001 and Fidue's Sirius (higher end triple hybrids), and also the LZ Dipper and 64 Audio U10 (both very good multi-BAs). Finally I compared it with my Alclair Curve – simply because it is my default, and also because it is relatively similar to the Andromeda.

For the source, I wanted something very neutral, but with a good digital control, to make sure I could volume match. So I chose to use the FiiO X7ii. No DSP or EQ was used. Gain was low (I didn't need any more). I volume matched using a calibrated SPL meter and fixed 1kHz test tone first. My listening level was set to an average of 70dB.

Campfire Audio Dorado (~USD 999) vs Campfire Audio Lyra II (~USD 699)
9936732_l.jpg
9936740_l.png
Campfire Dorado and Lyra IIFrequency comparisons
I couldn't compare the two side-by-side (the Lyra II is back on tour), but I do have frequency plots and my time with the Lyra was very recent, so please forgive the fact that this is from memory.

Both have the usual brilliant quality Campfire build, and both are diminutive and extremely comfortable. Size is similar apart from the Dorado's longer nozzle (which I actually prefer).

Looking at the frequency response, it is very similar and I'm willing to bet the dynamic is tuned very similarly on both. The difference is in the lower treble where the heat from the Lyra II in the 7-10 kHz range is shelved on the Dorado. This does two things – both softening the upper end, and also making the bass appear more dominant.

The Dorado is perfect for someone who is sensitive to treble and prefers a warmer signature. The Lyra II will better suit someone who likes more energy and contrast – and in this case (for me) I prefer the Lyra II.


Campfire Audio Dorado (~USD 999) vs DUNU DK3001(~USD 469)
9936727_l.jpg
9936739_l.png
Campfire Dorado and Dunu DK-3001Frequency comparisons
Both are hybrid IEMs, with the DK-3001 being a 1 (DD) + 3 (BA) vs the Dorado's 1 + 2 set up. The DUNU is half the price, Both are built extremely well and include quality cables. The DK-3001 includes a balanced option. The DK-3001's big let-down is in its ergonomics – there is a hard ridge on the inside of each ear-piece, and this causes long term discomfort (and has done for most reviewers). You can alleviate this with careful tip selection – but you shouldn't have to. Anyway the Dorado is supremely comfortable in comparison.

Sonically both have a warmish bottom end, but are very different signatures. The DK-3001 has a boosted upper mid-range which extends through to the lower treble. It is on the brighter side of neutral, and whilst I enjoy the default signature, it may be too bright for some. For me personally, I love the combo of detail and lower end impact. The Dorado in comparison is a little bassier, but comes across as quite dark and warm in comparison due to the comparatively shelved upper end. The interesting contrast here is that both actually benefit from EQ. Take the Dorado's bass down a little, and similarly cut the DK-3001's upper mids and lower treble by about -4 dB, and you have two excellent hybrids.

My preference is for the DUNU – but this solely comes to preference.


Campfire Audio Dorado (~USD 999) vs Fidue Sirius (~USD 899)
9936729_l.jpg
9936741_l.png
Campfire Dorado and Fidue SiriusFrequency comparisons
Again both are hybrid IEMs, with the Sirius being a 1 + 4 vs the Dorado's 1 + 2 set up. This time the pricing is very close (899 vs 999). The build on both is stellar – real quality materials and overall design. Fidue's modular cable system is excellent and for me gets the slight no over the Dorado. But again like the DUNU before it, the Fidue is not 100% ergonomically wonderful, with some slightly hard edges for those of us with bigger ears. The Sirius also has a port on the inside which can vary the bass response, so depending on fit, the bass can be relatively neutral or enhanced, depending on how they fit. No such issues with the Dorado.

For me the Sirius bass is extended, with decent impact, but tends toward a cooler and leaner signature, with a lot of mid-range emphasis. The Dorado again is at the opposite end of the spectrum with the much darker and warmer signature. Again this will come down to preference – but both are extremely good IEMs.


Campfire Audio Dorado (~USD 999) vs LZ Big Dipper 3/switch (~USD 860)
9936730_l.jpg
9936737_l.png
Campfire Dorado and LZ Big DipperFrequency comparisons
This comparison is very different, pitching the Dorado's hybrid configuration against the 7 BA set-up of the LZ Big Dipper. When I reviewed the Big Dipper, I was so impressed, I approached LZ about buying the review sample (I do this with any sample I want to use purely for personal pleasure) – so I now own it. The Dipper I have has 3 tuning switches so you can change bass, treble and mid-range. My preferred current combo is + bass, - mids, - treble.

Both are made from quality materials – the Dipper is custom made with resin molds (similar to custom ear phones). Both fit incredibly well and are very comfortable, but the Dipper I would class as a sliver better in the comfort stakes. The Dorado has the better cable overall (aesthetically). The Dipper of course has the ability to be tuned.

Sonically these two are quite different and you'll note that with the Dipper I chose match the bass on the frequency graph as it actually give a far better representation of each earphone's relative frequency plot. The Dipper does dip a lot in the lower mid-range, and has a subsequent much higher rise through the upper mid-range. So it is reasonably V shaped with robust (but very quick ) BA base, and then extremely detailed upper mids and lower treble. The end result is a cooler leaner signature, but with enough bass thump to keep things dynamic. Switching to the Dorado, and the first thing I noted was the much warmer signature, but also the better mid-range on the Dorado (especially with male vocals). The Dipper is just a little overdone (like the DK-3001), while for me the Dorado is a little too lower end emphasised.


Campfire Dorado (~USD 999) vs 64 Audio U10 (~USD 1000-1399)
9936731_l.jpg
9936742_l.png
Campfire Dorado and 64 Audio U10Frequency comparisons
Again a similarly priced hybrid vs multi-BA comparison. You can get B Stock U10's for around the $1000 mark, although full retail will put you into the $1400 range. Both are made from quality materials – the U10 is acrylic while the Dorado has the alloy shell. Both are very ergonomic and very comfortable. The U10's default cable is its weak point (I've replaced mine), while the Dorado has the excellent SPC Litz. The U10 has the ability to further tune the signature with either ADEL or APEX modules.

Sonically these two might look similar on the frequency graph, but the bass response is quite different. The Dorado is quite a bit warmer and also has more impact. The U10 is more balanced (in terms of overall warmth) and the bass response is a lot quicker. The APEX/ADEL modules also release some of the bass pressure, and although there is still some decent thump, there isn't the same amount of auditory masking going on, so the U10 actually sound a little leaner and clearer. This is probably the closest comparison so far though and the most similar in signature. If I swap the APEX modules for the G1 ADEL modules I can bump the early upper mids to be even closer in overall signature – but again, the major difference is in the presentation of the bass (expected when its BA vs dynamic).


Campfire Dorado (~USD 999) vs Alclair Curve (~USD 250)
9936734_l.jpg
9936735_l.png
Campfire Dorado and Alclair CurveFrequency comparisons
This will probably make the least sense in terms of price and driver set-up, but it is my go-to in terms of reference. The Alclair Curve is a twin BA with an extremely ergonomic shape, quality build, and despite all the IEMs I have access to, continues to be one of my most used IEMs. If you bump the bass on the Curve by around 4 dB, it also sounds almost eerily similar to an Andromeda, and I really do wish more people could experience it. For me the overall build quality is similar – although the Dorado has better materials. The Curve is more comfortable – although both are excellent in this area.


Sonically these two are opposites. The Curve default is a little on the lean side with fantastic detail without overdoing it. The Dorado is on the warm smooth side, but still has that nice smooth mid-range and treble.

For me personally I'd take the Curve and EQ to suit – but that is simply my preference at play. The Dorado has a warm smooth signature which will appeal to many – its simply a little too much on the dark side for me.


VALUE

So how do I see the overall value of the Dorado? $999 is in the upper echelons of price for an IEM, but the build quality is outstanding and if the signature suits your preferences it will be absolutely worth it. For a single dynamic though, and considering how many really good IEMs are existing in the $250-600 range though, the Dorado will never be regarded as a “bargain”. Fair pricing given the material and hand-made build (including the quality and care with driver matching). I do think that it is somewhat unique in the earphones I've reviewed. This combination of signature and quality is (like the Lyra II) not abundant in the market.

CAMPFIRE AUDIO DORADO – SUMMARY

The Dorado is an extremely well built and designed hybrid IEM with a very good ergonomic fit, and is easily one of the most comfortable of the Campfire IEMs I've personally tried. Some may find the longer nozzle problematic (if you have small canals) – but personally I love it. The SPC Litz cable is also brilliant, and a step-up from the Tinsel cable which was supplied with the earlier Campfire models.

Sonically the Dorado has a definite warm, smooth and slightly dark emphasis, and while the upper mids and lower treble are nicely extended, for my personal tastes they were just a touch too much on the smooth side and slightly masked by the lower end warmth.

At RRP of $999 the Dorado represents fair (OK) value for the quality you get, and I would recommend them to anyone who really likes this type of signature. For me personally they do not quite fit my overall signature preferences. I can see the appeal though and for anyone who like this type of signature they should definitely be considered. Once again for the scoring I put them through my new table system which you can see below.

Once again I’d like to thank Ken and Mark for making this opportunity available.


Scoring Chart
HeadphonesCampfire Dorado (out of 10)
My ScoreOut Of WeightingWeighted Score
Accessories8.5105.00%0.425
Build9.51010.00%0.95
Design9.5105.00%0.475
Fit/Comfort9.01015.00%1.350
Sound Quality
Bass Quality8.0108.00%0.64
Mid-range Quality8.0108.00%0.64
Treble Quality7108.00%0.56
Overall Tonality7.0108.00%0.56
Clarity6.0108.00%0.48
Stage/Imaging7.5108.00%0.60
Value61017.00%1.02
TOTALS86110100.00%7.70

9936726_l.jpg

Comments

There are no comments to display.
Back
Top