Comparing the two the cx200 certainly has more bass, but its of the thuddy mud type. the cx300 mk II does seem to be an improved cx300, voice clarity is very good now, so listening to music on it is pretty nice. the cx300 original model is somewhere between the two. build quality is good as...

I was wondering if this was an equivalent replacement? yes i'm happy they are replacing at all, but still i wonder if the cx200 is really the same level or if they probably should have sent the cx300 II? finding reviews of comparisons of these sets is hard

at 30 dollars they smell of fakes. but how bad are they for the money?? 10 dollar sound? or 30 dollar sound? all i know is there are different levels of fake in china. some are just companies that knock your product off as best as they can for looks only. others build a shadow...

well, new chip with less noise supposedly. i've found no reviews of the new one on the net, just the old one. radio shack only sells the old one sadly would be nice to have a cheap portable amp to tie me over until i can afford a nicer one. i'm thinking of getting a sennheiser 590, i wonder...