Recent content by mhoopes
  1. mhoopes

    72 year old man needs hearing aids,anyone here using them with headphones?

    I know a few months have passed, so I can imagine that you've settled on a solution by now. For everyone else's edification, I can attest to my experience with the Widex Moment 440 sRIC. The Massdrop HD 6XX work pretty well for me with RIC hearing aids. They've never sounded better, even with...
  2. mhoopes

    TOPPING DX3 Pro

    Tip: I switched out the rubber feet on my DX3 Pro for nano tape (think as-seen-on-TV Alien Tape but purchased on Amazon). Four 1/4" squares, and not only does it not move when plugging in a 1/8" jack, I'll need something to pry it off of the mounting surface if I ever want to move it...
  3. mhoopes

    FA7, the first Quad drivers IEM from FiiO , all Knowles BAs and 3D printed technical , MMCX design

    Tried out the now-bargain TWS set AKG N400NC (as recommended by @crinacle, single 8.2 mm DD driver, stock EQ), with this track. Holds up well against the FA7/5K on the bass drum, and thus better than the aforementioned FH5/ES100, in that regard. Impressive at the <$100 cost.
  4. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    The default “tone volume” became very low in one of the firmware updates. You can configure it in VOLUME…OPTION:
  5. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    Yes, that is correct (matches the pinout in the user manual).
  6. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    I don’t know. I don’t have a good recent comparative data point in this price range. I also haven’t seen measurements on IMD or phase response, and any comparison with the same drivers and passive crossover networks. Anyone have cheaper earphones than the QX-over that sound better on the 5K?
  7. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    Agreed - I posited the lossless example as a testable non-compressed USB comparison point., if one was concerned with compression artifacts. I'd go aptX or LDAC if my DAP was on Android. Pretty safe to assume arar is on Apple hardware - and I'd recommend taking the path of least resistance there...
  8. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    I haven’t done that (Android LDAC), but I can say that I defy anyone to tell the difference between AAC 256 and lossless on a portable setup, much less AAC/LDAC over Bluetooth. Tuning/volume are likely large factors in any back-to-back listening test; other fidelity parameters will take a back...
  9. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    To follow up, I tried out a number of old earphones gathering dust in a drawer. All of them were *significantly* improved by their bespoke PEQ presets. Koss Porta Pro, FiiO F9, FiiO FH1, JAYS d-JAYS. My current FiiO FA7, and the old FH1, were notable for their egregiously poor factory tuning...
  10. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    By the way, I haven't seen any comment on the addition of the huge "AUTO EQ PRESET" PEQ database in the app. I think this is a very helpful bonus that at least gives us a good starting point for tweaking EQ, and/or evaluating the differences, while avoiding manual entry. It also gives some of...
  11. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    According to L/R balance on my iPhone, default is over-the-ear. L/R swap is disabled in the Qudelix app for these earphones. The cord exits could be angled a little more forward, but it’s ok. A chin slider would have helped a lot. Sounds good for the money paid, even with the $20 shipping. I...
  12. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    Longer, more complex, or higher-fidelity sounds consume valuable flash memory on the device. I’d rather spend the flash budget on other functions.
  13. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    audiosciencereview test is up. Link omitted for Head-Fi “bubble” moderation avoidance.
  14. mhoopes

    The Qudelix-5K thread

    Yes. My voice is clearer than with the ES100, but so is the background. Unusable in urban settings. Noise cancellation is a thing. Hopefully this improves.
Back
Top