Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aeriyn
Gods I swear those perverts at Birmingham International just like patting me down!
|

Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by aeriyn
Gods I swear those perverts at Birmingham International just like patting me down!
|

|
Originally Posted by Talonz
They could always pop open the mint tin. An inspector with enough knowledge would see that it has 9v batteries, opamps, resistors, and capacitors. No wireless transmitters or capacitors capable of stunning anyone.
|
|
Originally Posted by chia-pet
What's kind of funny is, policemen actually have to take IQ tests in order to become officers. I saw this on an episode of The Aweful Truth (with Michael Moore). The thing is, the IQ test isn't to disqualify those who are too dumb, but rather to filter out the ones who are too smart! But then again, it is Michael Moore--you can never know what to believe with that guy.
|
|
Originally Posted by kiwirugby
I think this thread should be copied to the amp and portable sections. It's an important and pertinent warning to one and all.
I'm about to fly from LA to DC, and I don't think I'll be taking any portable gear with me. Bloody shame I now carry a couple of different-sized padded envelopes with me when I fly and a bunch of stamps. Twice now I forgot a penknife in my briefcase, and was able to mail them back to myself. Just a thought......and it was only a while a go that having a penknife was being prepared!!!! |

| Does anyone else enjoy the irony of the name "LAX Security". |

|
Originally Posted by TWIFOSP
I think I'm going to become a TSA "agent", just so I can confiscate tons of cool gear and sell it on e-bay. I'll make a fortune. "I'm sorry sir, your digital camera, PDA, portable cd player, and notebook all could be bombs. I'm going to have to take that." -- "Will I get it back" -- "Hahahahah!" -- "No seriously, that's my property, I want it back!" -- "Then I suggest you start bidding, sucker!".
|

Actually, not a single person on this thread has bothered to note that with the devices being provable to function as described not returning them is a (technical) violation of the 4th Amendment, for the seizure would be unreasonable due to the goods being of no true security risks (OK, why have most of my posts on this forum lately been about legal standings??)
|
Originally Posted by Snake
![]() Actually, not a single person on this thread has bothered to note that with the devices being provable to function as described not returning them is a (technical) violation of the 4th Amendment, for the seizure would be unreasonable due to the goods being of no true security risks (OK, why have most of my posts on this forum lately been about legal standings??) |
