Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pigmode
I havn't made direct comparisons but my experience with 89259 is they are not even in the same league as Grovers. Just go with Grovers--why take a chance?
|
Why take a chance? Well, piggie and Biggie, that's why I'm asking you guys, so I don't have to take that chance

Lots of IC's that get rave reviews are rebadged Belden or Canare cables. For example, some people mentioned the SignalCable Analog Two, which is a thinly disguised 89259, and the highly praised nitrogens are based on yet another cable TV coax. I wouldn't be surprised if one of those Belden coax based designs could take on one of the big guys and win.
For the price, an 89259 based Heartland cable / Bluejeans cable / SignalCable / Copycat cables / DIYaudio IC for $40-50 is an undeniable value compared to all that Monster and Audioquest crap. I'm trying to find out whether tripling the price (for the Grover SRII, for example) is worth the scratch. From both of your comments, it seems like it is. I was hoping that more people had tried the famous 89259 against some big name cables.
Just to give you an idea where I am coming from, I just spent $229 on a Zu Mobius cable, and while I admit that it has made a noticeable improvement to the sound, I really don't feel that it was worth $229... if only there was as much of a 89259/DIY type market for headphone cables! (I know, headphile offers something around $130, but there isn't much selection being the only "DIY cottage industry" offering, and I was looking for something under $100)