Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sovkiller
I will explain that to you, as Rudi ask me to clear a few things:
The RP6 on ebay was a used demo, budget version (no DACT) this is why the price was so low BTW it was sold, but you will not find any other RP6 at this price. Rudi do not like and never sell any amp coming from any customers (returns) as new, this is why sometimes you will see a few demos going around on eBay (but not very often, as just a minimal numbers of customers returned his amps to him, or upgrade them for the next model) |
Having owned several mono block designed amps and dual mono preamps by Krell and a bemoth 200watt custom designed tube amp by Tim Parvicini, I can tell you that a dual/ mono version is always superior- tighter and extended bass, more open midrange, sweeter extended highs with air, better soundstaging with each instrument defined in its space- I could go on and on. I believe it's got something to do with the laws of Physics-you just get more current (clean power/energy) which enables it to drive the speakers/headphones better.
Look forward to hearing these favourable impressions from you guys at the Jan 30th meet.












I don't get it, if you do not consider the Rudistor amps to be in the same league of the Dr. Gilmore Dynahi (or at least the RP33) that as you stated is a old and inferior Nelson Pass topology, and that you could make, and sell for $300.00, and considering that you make, and sell, the Dynahi, for a way more than $300.00, why being so worried for other amps, and their synergy with all those headphones, if you already have the best one, or is that you are not so sure of what Gilmore desinged, and later you copy, and sell???? In other words are you satisfied with the Dynahi or not??? 



Ultimately things are going to look the same and when they start looking the same you can safely assume that the best solution has been found and everyone can adopt it.





