Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › crinacle's FR measurement database (188 IEMs measured)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

crinacle's FR measurement database (188 IEMs measured) - Page 14

post #196 of 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by crinacle View Post
 

 

 

The Forsteni and the IT03 are both cut from the same cloth. Similar style of bass, similar midrange... the striking difference would be in the upper mids/treble. The Forsteni is slightly more laid back and airy while the IT03 is a little more sparkly, though it's really only apparent when you A/B it extensively. The Forsteni has a slight (and it's really very slight) edge in clarity and detail.

 

Very interesting and not so surprising. what about the fit & isolation? I guess Oriolus has a better fit? I have a VERY good fit with Oriolus Oriolus, so I suppose fit with Forsteni will be the same

 

And what about Isine 10 vs Isine 20? What is your thoughts about these 2? frequency charts look similar and are very weird! Do you think sound leakage is very bad? and what about bass quantity? to which IEM would you compare them to?

Thank you!


Edited by cocolinho - 4/20/17 at 1:59am
post #197 of 199
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by totoyuen View Post
 

Nice work Crinnacle! From the many iems you've measured, Is there one that has a similar sound signature to Andromeda but with more sub and mid bass? Thanks!

 

More a suggestion than a statement, but the first thing that comes to mind would be the FitEar 334 335.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by cocolinho View Post
 

Very interesting and not so surprising. what about the fit & isolation? I guess Oriolus has a better fit? I have a VERY good fit with Oriolus Oriolus, so I suppose fit with Forsteni will be the same

 

And what about Isine 10 vs Isine 20? What is your thoughts about these 2? frequency charts look similar and are very weird! Do you think sound leakage is very bad? and what about bass quantity? to which IEM would you compare them to?

Thank you!

 

Personally the IT03 fit better. If the Oriolus2 fits you well I guess it's safe to assume that the Forsteni would as well.

 

I think I prefer the iSine 20 for its cleaner sound but it's been a long time since I last heard it. Most semi-open designs would definitely measure differently from the traditional isolating IEM designs (see also: FAD LAB II). Sound leakage is rather bad but it's really kind of the point; bass quantity is neutral and I think I'd liken the emphasis to something like the VSonic GR07.


Edited by crinacle - 4/20/17 at 6:25am
post #198 of 199
Curious, what does 0 dB FS mean for your measurements? Does the microphone blow up? XD
post #199 of 199
Thread Starter 

A talented individual known as @Suuup just created a program that is able to overlay any of my curves into a single comparative graph. Unfortunately the bot only exists within his Discord chatroom (link over here) but if you're too scared or lazy to pop by I'll be happy to manually generate some on request.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by noplsestar View Post

@crinacle thanks for the new measurements. Can you please show the Flamenco and Samba in one graph for comparison if it's not too much work? Thanks.

 

 

Green for Flamenco (with all switches up), yellow for Samba (custom).


Edited by crinacle - Today at 4:43 am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › crinacle's FR measurement database (188 IEMs measured)