Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Comments on iPod v.4
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Comments on iPod v.4

post #1 of 52
Thread Starter 
i never ended up with a Mini so this is my first experience with the click-wheel. I have to say that it's the most efficient control I've used to date. all functions can be accessed with one finger (thumb) and it never has to leave the wheel. wheel feels like it will last. Much better than the v.3 buttons, IMO, i really didn't like thier sensitivity though apple seems to have tweaked them a little better through subsequent firmware updates.

I appreciate the minimalist design. smart and simple.

there are still some points that really should be addressed.

1) track, album, artist names that don't fit on screen still do not scroll when they are selected. every other player I can think of has this "feature" by now.
2) EQ should be have be user-customizable with a 4 or 5 band freq selection. again, just about every other player has this.
3) user should be able to delete artist, album, or track from the player itself
4) Apple should provide software to manage music that does not require a full install on the PC. for PCs at work or school, it is often the case that you need admin priveledge to install an app like iTunes. Something like Ephpod, which i was able to run directly from the drive of the iPod v.2 making it unnecessary to install anything on the target PC. However, i tried to use Ephpod, and it is not (yet) compatable with v.4. It will trasfer tracks, but it cannot save the database file (some change in the format, it makes an error).. so they don't show up on the player's library.
and of course volume is not adjustable while in any menu since there is only one controller. not really any way around it with the current configuration, though it's not that much of an issue.
5) i would like to be able to view more detailed track information, like on the Rio Karma. including the iD3 tag comment field.
6) I would prefer that when adding items to the on-the-fly playlist, they would be "nested" .. like with Creative's OS. So that if you add an Artist or Album, the Artist or Album name is displayed in the playlist instead of simply dumping all the tracks in there.
7) the games are retarded. if they must, how about some classic arcade games that used a wheel-based controller, like the old Atari game Tempest.
8) I miss having a dedicated Main Menu button like other players, or a custom-assigned button like the karma
9) playback of sequential tracks is not gapless. there is a fraction of a second between tracks that is noticeable when playing something like a DJ mix.

perhaps holding back a few things for v.5? sigh...

also, i'm not too thrilled about the ultra-scratchable polished-steel backside of the iPod. yes, it's pretty at first site. not for long. an aluminum or magnesium based plate that's finished to resist scratching would be much more practical. Zens are good at staying new-looking as is the iHP and DJ.

some positive things:
1) the screen contrast is one of the best I've ever seen. soooo much better than v.2 iPod. backlight is bright.
2) smallest 40gb DAP. gotta like that. iHP-140 appears 30%+ bigger. iPod v.4 40gb is smaller than my 10gb v.2 even.
3) the center select button is once again mechanical. like that better.
4) price is more reasonable now, and in-line to within 10% of other brands of the same capacity. neither 20gb or 40gb model includes a case, which i think is unreasonable. especially considering how easily it scratches. a simple play-through case should not cost them more than $5-10 a piece in the quantity that Apple would require. For a "premium" player, a case should be included. However, I did receive a case and remote today due to the Monday morning mix-up on Apple's website. The case is just like the one for the v.3 iPods... badly designed and very much overpriced ($40?). The sides and top of the player are still exposed, there's no window for the screen or controls, the clip does not swivel, and generally it doesn't feel like it would protect the player much if it were to fall. i don't much use in-line remotes, but the one for the iPod is OK by me (I don't need the LCD screen and all). same design as previous generations.
5) sound quality is good as ever. no complaints.
6) i really like the wake-to-alarm feature. so i can go to sleep listening to it (with headphones) without fear of not being able to hear my regular alarm clock. I wish more players had this, AFAIK, only other one is the Zen NX/Xtra.
7) charging by USB is very, very handy. literally no need to carry around the wallwort anymore. all the PCs at home/work/friends have USB but firewire is still rare.
8) dock isn't changed from v.3 but it's my first time having it. nothing fancy but i like it. heavy and stays in place. iPod connects effortlessly. 3.5mm analog line-output is fine by me.
9) headphone output is still strong for US iPods, at least

also, iTunes could be better. I mainly use it by just dragging directories from Explorer to iTunes and it loads them. That's good, but removing items is not as easy. You can't tell it to select everything from one album or artist to delete. You have to manually select all those tracks and then delete them. there should be an option on right-click to remove all from that artist or album.

one thing of note, i had a problem getting the iPod to work on my PC after installing the software from the iPod's CDROM. I just went with all the default options during install, and when it was all done, and I connected the iPod, iTunes would say "iPod update complete" and disconnect it. I couldn't get past that to load tracks or anything. Tried many times. I uninstalled it all and tried again, and I noticed that at one of the last dialoge boxes, there was checked option for it to update the iPod if needed at iTunes startup. After unselecting that, and finishing the install, it worked fine. Has anyone else had a problem with this?

can't comment yet on battery life. havn't been keeping track. i've never used the included earbuds on this or my other pod so can't comment on them either. i don't care about WMA compatability so that's not an issue for me. all my tracks are EAC/LAME rips. i don't plan on using lossless either, though it's an appropriate feature to have.

overall, I'm pretty happy with it. The OS isn't much of a change over v.3, but lots of new stuff over my v.2 (which has been reassigned to my gf).
post #2 of 52
Thanks for the info, austonia.

That boggles my mind that they don't include a case - that's just asking for people to talk trash about them penny pinching. And $40 to buy one? Well, that'll help spur the 3rd party case market...
post #3 of 52
Quote:
and of course volume is not adjustable while in any menu since there is only one controller. not really any way around it with the current configuration, though it's not that much of an issue.
Odd..you REALLY jumped on the IHP for this same thing, but now it's "not that much of an issue" ?

Quote:
gapless playback, or nearly.
Dude ? I think people will REALLY want to know whether or not it's true gapless playback. It either IS, or it is NOT. Close may be nice, but isn't the point. Gapless as YOU KNOW..means playing back an album seemlessly, no gaps, no pops or clicks whatsoever...But again..YOU KNOW that. Funny thing about that..not sure if it was here or on the Riovolutions forum, where someone said that it won't be until Apple gets gapless implamented, when the reviewers will actually recognize gapless playback in the DAP world as a significant technological step foward..when ironically enough, the Karma had it since day one ! Mob rule spose' ..sad really, but seems logical enough to stand true.
post #4 of 52
Man My ipod 4th gen sounds Sooo much better than my IHP120!!!
Crisp clean and more detail!! I love it!!
post #5 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Spot
Odd..you REALLY jumped on the IHP for this same thing, but now it's "not that much of an issue" ?
the difference being that it was harder to navigate back to the now playing screen with that crappy joystick that has nothing for your finger to grip. that problem was solved by adding a small piece of 1/8th inch foam to the top, and now the joystick is very easy to use. I've been warming up to the iHP lately. that small change made a huge difference for me. still, i can't be the only one who had an issue with that, iRiver should have stuck a small grippy thing on top IMO.

like the iHP, on iPod there's no way to jump directly back to the now playing screen, while browsing or in other menus than the main menu, to quickly adjust volume if needed. they both get dinged for that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Spot
Dude ? I think people will REALLY want to know whether or not it's true gapless playback. It either IS, or it is NOT. Close may be nice, but isn't the point. Gapless as YOU KNOW..means playing back an album seemlessly, no gaps, no pops or clicks whatsoever...But again..YOU KNOW that. Funny thing about that..not sure if it was here or on the Riovolutions forum, where someone said that it won't be until Apple gets gapless implamented, when the reviewers will actually recognize gapless playback in the DAP world as a significant technological step foward..when ironically enough, the Karma had it since day one ! Mob rule spose' ..sad really, but seems logical enough to stand true.
yes, true, that needs clarification. i hadn't thought about it even till i was writing that and I hadn't heard a gap in the last couple tracks.

soooo i just loaded a non-stop DJ mix to test this directly. playback is _not_ gapless. there is a fraction of a second between tracks, short, but it's there. i'll correct my post.
post #6 of 52
Thread Starter 
by the way, sweet spot, there's one company that's even more at fault with the volume control thing... XCLEF.

i mean, they bother to make dedicated volume control buttons.... and they only work in the Now Playing screen. soooo dumb

on BOTH the hd-500 and hd-800

anyway, they have other, more serious issues than that.. firmware upgrades are fatal in many instances (including my own hd-500..)
post #7 of 52
hey austonia. thanks for your first impressions. i got an ihp-100 and i'm not sure if i want to switch to the ihp-140 anymore. seems like the only thing holding me back now is the line-out and the slight cheaper price.

few questions:

1) i enjoyed ipod v3's sound quality a lot, but not as much my ihp's. i was wondering if it sounds a little better or just different different then v3? (i bet it's exactly the same cause i kinda see no point for them to change it.)

2) i really didn't like the v3's sensitivity issue with it's pad and much prefer my ihp's joystick. i know you sorta mentioned this, but does the v4's click-wheel overcome the sensitivity issue the v3 had? (i honestly have no idea what the click-wheel is all about.)

3) what are you taking a shot of in your avatar?
post #8 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanity8me
hey austonia. thanks for your first impressions. i got an ihp-100 and i'm not sure if i want to switch to the ihp-140 anymore. seems like the only thing holding me back now is the line-out and the slight cheaper price.

few questions:

1) i enjoyed ipod v3's sound quality a lot, but not as much my ihp's. i was wondering if it sounds a little better or just different different then v3? (i bet it's exactly the same cause i kinda see no point for them to change it.)

2) i really didn't like the v3's sensitivity issue with it's pad and much prefer my ihp's joystick. i know you sorta mentioned this, but does the v4's click-wheel overcome the sensitivity issue the v3 had? (i honestly have no idea what the click-wheel is all about.)

3) what are you taking a shot of in your avatar?
1) i don't have a v.3 but I've used it before, sounds about the same to me (good)

2) agree with you on the v.3 controls, I really disliked them. the v.4 "click-wheel" is just like the optical wheel on the v.2, except that you can can also press on it (click) to do the same things the buttons do on other versions. click at the top, Menu/Back, click at the bottom, Play/Pause etc.

3) I don't remember, so it must have been good, eh? lol
post #9 of 52
Thread Starter 
something odd - if you pull out your headphones, the iPod pauses, every time.

A/B with the iHP-140 with the latest BBoys album, they sound virtually identical.
post #10 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by austonia
something odd - if you pull out your headphones, the iPod pauses, every time.
Now that's nice! Does it also work if you just remove them from the remote? Do you (or someone else) have access to a SIK imp/din or PocketDock LineOut so you could test whether it also stops upon removing the adaptor? I somewhat doubt it, but even if it's just for the headphones jack it is a neat feature...
post #11 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by austonia
(...)
(1) i don't care about WMA compatability so that's not an issue for me. all my tracks are EAC/LAME rips.

(2) i don't plan on using lossless either, though it's an appropriate feature to have.
Hi austonia,

Thanks for the review. Seing someone who hates Apple as much as you do bying the new iPod is somewhat reconforting for a guy like me who was waiting for the new generation...

May I ask you two questions? (Before, just a little precision:I have never listen to the sound of any iPod but I plan to buy one and use it with my Etys)

First, I only have WMA audio files on my PC: is it going to be a problem with the new iPod?

Second, I was planning to wait for the 60GB since I want to store about 150/200 CDs using the lossless setting. If you dont plan to use it yourself, does it means that this setting is «overrated», at least not that useful, in any way? If you say yes I probably go for the 40GB right now.

Thanks in advance.
post #12 of 52
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by genetic
Hi austonia,

Thanks for the review. Seing someone who hates Apple as much as you do bying the new iPod is somewhat reconforting for a guy like me who was waiting for the new generation...

May I ask you two questions? (Before, just a little precision:I have never listen to the sound of any iPod but I plan to buy one and use it with my Etys)

First, I only have WMA audio files on my PC: is it going to be a problem with the new iPod?

Second, I was planning to wait for the 60GB since I want to store about 150/200 CDs using the lossless setting. If you dont plan to use it yourself, does it means that this setting is «overrated», at least not that useful, in any way? If you say yes I probably go for the 40GB right now.

Thanks in advance.
uhhhhh you realize that iPod _DOES NOT_ play windows media files, right? ipod supports MP3, WAV, AIFF, AAC, Audible, Apple Lossless

and yes i think lossless formats are complete overkill when we're talking about sound output from a portable audio player.. but others disagree
post #13 of 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by austonia
uhhhhh you realize that iPod _DOES NOT_ play windows media files, right? ipod supports MP3, WAV, AIFF, AAC, Audible, Apple Lossless

and yes i think lossless formats are complete overkill when we're talking about sound output from a portable audio player.. but others disagree
Hi austonia,

LOL...oups....OK.....I obvioulsy will have to do my homework on this...

Thanks for the answer. And I will follow your advice about the space hungry lossless.....

Amicalement

P.S. On a good note, I still have all my CDs collection, quite a bit higher than a few hundreds. Seems I will have to store them differently on my PC...
post #14 of 52
Apple said it does not have plans for a 60 gig player anytime in the near future
post #15 of 52
Austonia, congrats on the new toy!

I will offer a different perspective on the click wheel; I really dislike it, at least on the minipod. My issue is that I usually use the controls without looking at the unit. Since it is hidden under my shirt or in a pocket I sometimes control it through the fabric. I very much prefer having buttons permanently assigned for specific tasks. Hitting the pause on my mini always results in a volume change, and sometimes lands me in a completely different CD. I tolerate it for the small size of the mini, but I would not "touch" one of the latest poids just because of the controls. From my perspective it looks like cost cutting + gimmick factor. I wonder if apple had something to do with that awful idrive system that BMW is using.

Just my opinions based on my needs and habits.


gerG
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Source Gear
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Comments on iPod v.4