Hirsch and I spent a couple of hours today listening to these sources. These are my opinions.
The Meridian is worth the money. To me, it was a clear winner every time we switched to it in an a/b comparison. It had a unique combination of crystal clear clarity and blinding speed, which made the Wadia and Ack! seem wooly.
I thought that it was a substantial difference, and one worth the insane cost. It was the nicest source I have ever heard.
The Wadia was also a fine player, and if we had not listened to the Meridian, I would have given it a fantastic review. It is 95% of the Meridian, but really at this level of player, I am seeking that last 5%.
The Ack! was the surprise for me. I felt that it ran evenly with the Wadia. Some recordings, mainly male vocals, seemed a little behind the Wadia, but there were other recordings which the Ack! fattened up and seemed to widen. The fact that it can even be considered in the same class as a Wadia is simply amazing. It has no business sounding so good. For me it was a tie between the Wadia and the Ack!, with the Meridian walking away from both.
The other surprise was the testing we did with digital cables and sources feeding the Ack!. I brought the worst looking, thinnest rca cable I could find in my junk cable box. I could not hear any difference between that and the nice digital interconnect which Ack! recommends. Even more surprising was the Ack!’s indifference to source. The Wadia and Meridian sounded exactly the same to me. To throw it a curve, we then fed it with an old Rotel Hirsch had. Ack! specifically named this player as a bad match for the Ack!, but it again was indistinguishable from the Meridian, or the Wadia. I donno?
The Meridian is worth the money. To me, it was a clear winner every time we switched to it in an a/b comparison. It had a unique combination of crystal clear clarity and blinding speed, which made the Wadia and Ack! seem wooly.
I thought that it was a substantial difference, and one worth the insane cost. It was the nicest source I have ever heard.
The Wadia was also a fine player, and if we had not listened to the Meridian, I would have given it a fantastic review. It is 95% of the Meridian, but really at this level of player, I am seeking that last 5%.
The Ack! was the surprise for me. I felt that it ran evenly with the Wadia. Some recordings, mainly male vocals, seemed a little behind the Wadia, but there were other recordings which the Ack! fattened up and seemed to widen. The fact that it can even be considered in the same class as a Wadia is simply amazing. It has no business sounding so good. For me it was a tie between the Wadia and the Ack!, with the Meridian walking away from both.
The other surprise was the testing we did with digital cables and sources feeding the Ack!. I brought the worst looking, thinnest rca cable I could find in my junk cable box. I could not hear any difference between that and the nice digital interconnect which Ack! recommends. Even more surprising was the Ack!’s indifference to source. The Wadia and Meridian sounded exactly the same to me. To throw it a curve, we then fed it with an old Rotel Hirsch had. Ack! specifically named this player as a bad match for the Ack!, but it again was indistinguishable from the Meridian, or the Wadia. I donno?











.
