or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › AKG K812 HEADPHONES REVIEW Serial No 001106
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AKG K812 HEADPHONES REVIEW Serial No 001106 - Page 3

post #31 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by majkel View Post

I believe that the K812 become an outstanding headphone after some months or years, when the lessons learned from initial production get introduced. This actually happened to the T1 and the HD800 which is not only heard but measurable and visible in the construction.

 

That would be desirable, except that the firms don't usually announce their changes to production and we have to figure it out ourselves.

post #32 of 77
Thread Starter 

Thanks mate, great and to the point comparison.

 

Regarding AKG / Harman. I don't believe they will ever listen or pay any real attention to what we think or write, but that's their problem.

 

Cheers.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by majkel View Post

I compared the K812 to the PS1000 directly a couple of times. Once these were similar headphones with different imaging and slightly different tonal balance - the K812 were more even. Another time the PS1000 seemed to sound drier so I decided to mod them. This made them sound closer to the Sony R10 - more nuances on the midrange and softer treble. Overall, I prefer the PS1000 to the K812. This is actually intresting but I realised that the K812 have lowered tonality in the mid-section. When I put the HD800 and the T1 on my head, I heard the same midrange timbre and "height" compared to the PS1000. So, the K812 are a bit different which I don't mind actually.

Regarding comparison to the T1, these with a high serial number are far from the K812 sound. They have darker nature (not tonality, if you know what I mean), the highs have different hue, kind of gold against silver (neutral) in the AKG. Then comes the bass which plays a background role in the Beyers while being one of the strengths of the AKG. I have used an amp with very low output impdance, below 0.1 ohm which on the other hand is able to make the T1 clip on bass when adjusted very loud, so power and drive is enough. This is not an amp related issue as other powerful headphones sound clean at the same volume level,. i.e. HE-6. So, back to the topic, I assume both the K812 and the T1 were well amped and showed quite different natures. Actually, I found the K812 to be a mix of the T1 and the HD800 at the first contact but looking for a one and only similarity, the Grado PS1000 comes to mind and the differences are as follows:
- Grado have more weighty treble which doesn't mean louder.
- AKG have darker midrange but I partly blame their cable for this. I heard an alternative cable too short to confirm for sure.
- The AKG's bass is better balanced
- The Grado have better imaging of furthest soundstage layers while the AKG have better presence of the sounds and voices located in the front of the scene
- There is no smooth "halo" surrounding sound pictures on the PS1000 and no issues with tenor and mezzo-soprano voices (yet famous tizziness wink.gif )
- The AKG are susceptible to the source that you use with your amp which is strongly related to holography. Once you can hear them sound centric, another time most sounds locate outside your head and all of these using the same headphones (K812 of course), amp and IC's.
Finally, I find the K812 more tweaked and flavored than the T1 for instance. The latter sound more honest to me despite probably lesser technical abilities. The same applies to the HD800. I believe that the K812 become an outstanding headphone after some months or years, when the lessons learned from initial production get introduced. This actually happened to the T1 and the HD800 which is not only heard but measurable and visible in the construction. I prefer the new sound of the HD800 and T1 to the point that there was a time I thought the T90 were better than the T1, prior to hearing the new version of the T1.
post #33 of 77
New version (sound) of T1? HD-800?
(When did this happen?)
post #34 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mambosenior View Post

New version (sound) of T1? HD-800?
(When did this happen?)

Not that Sennheiser told anyone, but last year's HD800 and on has a little more of everything (all frequencies) and it sounds similar but they should have told us so you know what you're getting.
post #35 of 77
Is this difference measurable?
post #36 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mambosenior View Post

Is this difference measurable?

It would seem so. Here are the measurements close up:



Original thread: http://www.head-fi.org/t/646871/new-hd-800-very-different-than-the-old-hd-800.
Edited by Claritas - 3/19/14 at 4:23am
post #37 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claritas View Post


Yes, and I remember Headroom's actually having measurements for both. Don't know about the T1.

Edit: Here are the Headroom measurements.

 

 

post #38 of 77
Thread Starter 

Does it meant that blue measurements are better?

 

LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01

post #39 of 77
I've seen this much variation from a single pair of cans from measurement to measurement. The HD800 manufacturing process produces remarkably little variation between individual units. It's pretty amazing. Maxvla is spot on here.
post #40 of 77

The 10db dynamic range chart seems to be deliberately misleading given the standards set by other measurement sites. Anyone who's listened to multiple HD800s in the past would know that they've never had that much perceived production variance. The 10db chart serves no useful purpose because it doesn't reflect real listening standards.

post #41 of 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by applehead View Post

Anyone who's listened to multiple HD800s in the past would know that they've never had that much perceived production variance.

That's precisely what happened and I've heard it. These companies make changes all the time--supposedly improvements--and don't tell anyone; maybe they don't want to frighten the public. Who knows how many versions of K340 exist? I've even read about changes to HD600, but I never got to the bottom of that.
post #42 of 77

hey guys don't shadow blackmore's excellent review with your "who's right" discussions. 

post #43 of 77
Thread Starter 

Thanks mate:-)

 

For those who may interested, the pair I used for this review, HD800 I mean, have low serial number: 01694, think from the first run?

 

Keep it nice guys.

 

Cheers.

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by saktanbers View Post
 

hey guys don't shadow blackmore's excellent review with your "who's right" discussions.

post #44 of 77

Although there are small production variances, the HD800s have always been pretty much the same in how they measure (and subjectively sound like) from the very early serial numbers to now. I've measured almost a dozen or so now. The tricky part is getting consistent measurements because of the HD800's angled driver and cup. One needs to be super precise in cup placement, otherwise the measurements from the mid-treble up will vary.

 

@Blackmore: Good analysis between K812 and HD800.


Edited by purrin - 3/19/14 at 8:17am
post #45 of 77
Thread Starter 

This is good to know, thanks for the info and kind words.

 

Cheers

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by purrin View Post
 

Although there are small production variances, the HD800s have always been pretty much the same in how they measure (and subjectively sound like) from the very early serial numbers to now. I've measured almost a dozen or so now. The tricky part is getting consistent measurements because of the HD800's angled driver and cup. One needs to be super precise in cup placement, otherwise the measurements from the mid-treble up will vary.

 

@Blackmore: Good analysis between K812 and HD800.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › AKG K812 HEADPHONES REVIEW Serial No 001106