Head-Fi.org › Forums › Head-Fi Special Forums › Head-Fi Bloggers › Jason Stoddard › Schiit Happened: The Story of the World's Most Improbable Start-Up
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Schiit Happened: The Story of the World's Most Improbable Start-Up - Page 110

post #1636 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by madwolfa View Post
 

 

Amps ain't DACs.

And yet, tubes are tubes. 

post #1637 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioholik View Post
 

And yet, tubes are tubes. 

 

And not to start another flame war, but what's the point of tubes in DAC exactly?

post #1638 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by madwolfa View Post
 

 

And not to start another flame war, but what's the point of tubes in DAC exactly?

 

Might as well have them somewhere.

post #1639 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by madwolfa View Post
 

 

And not to start another flame war, but what's the point of tubes in DAC exactly?

And what's the point of having them in an amplifier? Strange question..

 

You might want to check out these reviews of Lampizator's Tube DSD DAC.

 

http://www.stereomojo.com/Lampizator%20DSD%20DAC%20Review/LampizatorDSDDACReview.htm

 

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue73/lampizator.htm

 

http://www.monoandstereo.com/2014/06/lampizator-dsd-dac-test-unit-arrived.html


Edited by audioholik - 7/12/14 at 8:33am
post #1640 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioholik View Post

And yet, tubes are tubes. 

Yes, and they serve a purpose in some things, like amps. But not in other things, like dacs...
post #1641 of 2471

There's nothing magic about tubes. Everybody knows that it's the transistors that have the magic smoke in them. Trust me on this, I've seen it come out of them a few times.

 

Cheers

post #1642 of 2471

She is hottie indeed! Jason do you not have insurance for situations like this?

post #1643 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioholik View Post
 

And what's the point of having them in an amplifier? Strange question..

 

Normally to raise the voltage (gain stage) and sometimes as the power devices in the output stage.

What would they do in DAC?

post #1644 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoupRKnowva View Post


Yes, and they serve a purpose in some things, like amps. But not in other things, like dacs...

 

So you're saying that companies like Lampizator, AMR, EAR, Valve Audio Devices to name a few, that are using tubes in their DACs, are doing it without purpose?

post #1645 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioholik View Post
 

 

So you're saying that companies like Lampizator, AMR, EAR, Valve Audio Devices to name a few, that are using tubes in their DACs, are doing it without purpose?

No, but that purpose is not a technical one.

 

Cheers

post #1646 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioholik View Post
 

So you're saying that companies like Lampizator, AMR, EAR, Valve Audio Devices to name a few, that are using tubes in their DACs, are doing it without purpose?

 

Sure, there's a purpose - catering to nutjobs with more money than common sense. Schiit told many times, this is not their target audience.


Edited by madwolfa - 7/12/14 at 8:47am
post #1647 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by ab initio View Post
 

No, but that purpose is not a technical one.

 

Cheers

Thanks for the knowledge. You're an audio engineer, right?

post #1648 of 2471

Tubes in DACs are generally used as amplifiers to create the line-level preamp output, which is why they affect the signal.  They can also be used as a buffer with 1:1 gain, which means their purpose is to send the signal through the filaments which again affects the output signal.

post #1649 of 2471

The Loki has a hard time selling because people don't like the idea of having to outsource the DSD decoding to another box when there are other solutions that can do it all in one box. It's not an "elegant" solution and for neurotic audiophiles that is an issue.

 

The audience that is interested in DSD are those who tend to be the most discerning and willing to spend money to satisfy those OCDs, this solution does not check off any of those audiophile OCD checkboxes. Audiophiles argue about cables and additional components to the "chain" that will impact quality, the Loki is a neurotic audiophile's worst nightmare, I'm not surprised it's not selling well. Also, it does not support balanced operation, which also is another of those audiophile OCDs. Are these OCDs substantiated? Probably not Most likely not Almost certainly not, but it comes with the territory.

 

 

I guess you could argue that the Loki is targeted towards the entry level DSD audiophile who has not yet developed these OCDs. The reason these people are not purchasing it is because they are looking for something affordable, probably came to the website to buy the Modi (which is a ridiculous deal btw at $99), and then saw that the Loki was an additional $149 and figured they'd just purchase the Modi in the meantime and hold off on buying the Loki until they find that they needed it. Well given that they don't have those audiophile OCDs (and remember, they were looking for something affordable), they never end up purchasing higher-priced DSD tracks and live the rest of their lives consuming redbook or possibly even just a streaming service. The Loki is forgotten.

 

I haven't heard the Loki myself, and doesn't work for me in terms of connectivity options (yes an audiophile OCD), but I'm sure it sounds great as there are people I trust who say it gets the job done, so I do find it unfortunate that it is having a hard time selling.

post #1650 of 2471
Quote:
Originally Posted by audioholik View Post
 

Thanks for the knowledge. You're an audio engineer, right?

Is that an implied ad hominem attack?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Jason Stoddard
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Head-Fi Special Forums › Head-Fi Bloggers › Jason Stoddard › Schiit Happened: The Story of the World's Most Improbable Start-Up