p.s.: can I ask you: which one is the land of pork & taxes?
that wouldn't be somewhere in europe, would it?
That would be the kingdom of Denmark. :-)
For instance, when we buy a car we pay the price of the car, and then a mere 180% of the price of the car on top of that in taxes. At least we have bacon...
Cool beans, I get to keep my IC's and whatnot
DX90 (500usd) - DX50 (239usd) = 261usd worth of sound improvement....in other words, it is 112% improvement over the DX50
I will be losing sleep to fantasize about that.
by the way, I am just playing....
wow,u are an excellent mathematician
great logic there
sorry quite the contrary, I am lousy in Maths because I fail to consider the golden rule of "diminishing return".....It takes a great deal of engineering and cost to improve the SQ
Nah, it should be expressed as +3.26dB sound improvement.
Yeah, but i really have issues paying that kind of money for a device which doesnt even have a proper amp section or a line out. I own an AK100 and it is fine for IEMs, but not for full-sized cans.
I hope the X5 is better than the X3, cos the latter's poor interface makes it virtually useless.
Just stumbled on to this thread. As a happy DX100 owner and one who skipped on the DX50, my (short) wish list:
- 100% Reliable UI, which I do not feel iBasso has achieved yet. My iRiver H140 hasn't crashed or hung up in ten plus years. C'mon guys, you can do it!
- Optical out preferred over coax alone.
Looking forward to the release....