Originally Posted by genetic
In a «past life» I was the director of an indoor tennis center. So the concept of acceptable level of sound between tennis courts was a constant issue. The main excuse to behave like a barbarian after winning a point was: Hey I've paid good money to make this reservation so bug off. It's always the same debate around what are you entitle when you rent something. But in the Vikram case it was not about dog rights or even cricket rights....
All that saga was about protecting the privacy right of the individual. The relation in the building between Vik and the lady wasn't in the initial picture at all. Let me put it in other words: If I went in a drugstore and while standing in line to pay for some items I saw in front of me PinkFloyd bying 10,000 condoms do I have the right to make it public on the internet?
In all seriousness though, you're exactly right. This woman is a nut and a slanderous one at that. I just hope everything works our for Vikram...