Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › December 2013 Mid-Level DAC Comparison
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

December 2013 Mid-Level DAC Comparison - Page 2  

post #16 of 1331

Gary,

 

That switch you linked will work just fine, i use the exact same one and always recommend it. I just forgot to mention it lol.

 

EDIT: Actually I use the 5 input one, it's just $1 more should i ever go crazy with Turntables, disc players, DACs etc. :tongue_smile: 


Edited by brunk - 11/10/13 at 9:03pm
post #17 of 1331
Thread Starter 

Okay, it didn't take long for me to find what I needed on the Chordette QuteHD.  If I can get it with any reasonable return policy it's in.  It apparently comes with a crappy switching power supply though, so I might have to find a better linear supply... or maybe even a battery!  Sounds like a job for Zilch!

 

So which of the 9018 units should drop out?

post #18 of 1331
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by brunk View Post
 

Gary,

 

That switch you linked will work just fine, i use the exact same one and always recommend it. I just forgot to mention it lol.

 

EDIT: Actually I use the 5 input one, it's just $1 more should i ever go crazy with Turntables, disc players, DACs etc. :tongue_smile: 


Yeah, I tried to think of how many of these things I would need to hook up before I lost track of what I was listening to.  4 seemed to be the max I would ever need, but 5 is a nice number too... I'll think about it!  But good thing they don't make one with 8 inputs... hey wait, they do! (head explodes)

post #19 of 1331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary in MD View Post
 


Excellent, I love unique stuff... I'll go hunt up some info on the Chordette.

 

This is the kind of input I'm looking for!

 

Watch out, Gary - everything Chord makes induces a lust of the eyes so strong your ears can be overwhelmed by synesthesia!

 

 

Mike

post #20 of 1331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary in MD View Post
 

Okay, it didn't take long for me to find what I needed on the Chordette QuteHD.  If I can get it with any reasonable return policy it's in.  It apparently comes with a crappy switching power supply though, so I might have to find a better linear supply... or maybe even a battery!  Sounds like a job for Zilch!

 

So which of the 9018 units should drop out?

The Anedio D2, Matrix X-Sabre, and Yulong DA8 have been compared quite extensively (IMO) by project86 in his reviews of these units (see http://www.head-fi.org/t/673033/review-yulong-audio-sabre-da8-reference-dac for a 3-way shootout), so maybe drop some of these to make room for others? Of course it's good for others to confirm the comparisons as well, so up to you.

post #21 of 1331
Thread Starter 

Good input.  The Anedio has a good audition program, and I already have a customer for the DA8 if I don't keep it, so I propose that the first off the list would be the Matrix X-Sabre, since it has more return risk for me. 

 

Any arguments against that logic?

post #22 of 1331

Gary,

 

In regards to "which ESS DAC to scratch off the list?" I am going to say this objectively as I can, and take into account your top priority of being trial/return friendly.

 

 I say the BMC PureDAC (followed by Concero) should be scratched off. The reasoning behind this is that if you don't have a balanced amp, or desire the built-in amp and preamp, it's money spent on features you don't need. The second choice of the Concero because spec-wise it's a lesser ESS model, and appears to be only USB-powered which is an unreliable method of power delivery.

post #23 of 1331
Thread Starter 

Good points.  Any rebuttals from the crowd (such as it is)? 

 

Here are my personal first responses.  Is there any indication that BMC has done a better job of implementing the 9018 than others have?  Or that the HP amp is any good?  I wouldn't mind having the PureDAC's built-in amp/pre-amp.  I currently only have my pre-historic Adcom pre-amp and it's HP out, and I would need something to drive hard-wired TRS connected cans if I ever get any... plus I could possibly use it to attenuate the input to the Cyclops and thus get more into the amp's power range.  Of course I could also get one of those fancy attenuators you guys have been building...

 

The Concero has the advantage of being cheap, which gives me an opportunity to analyze the price/performance tradeoff, and keep the total up-front cost of the testing down a bit -- remember, I have to pay for all of these units up front, and then make sure I get timely refunds to avoid having a bit of a cash crunch.  Of course, the Emotiva is even cheaper, so I can use that as my bargain unit... and if I end up having to drop a unit (e.g., testing 9 instead of 10, or 8 instead of 9) to keep the costs reasonable, I'll do that as long as we have a good mix.  On second thought, who am I kidding... I'm not dropping the size of the group based on up-front cost... in for an inch, in for a mile. I'll only drop the number of contenders if we can't come up with 10 that have decent return risk.

post #24 of 1331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary in MD View Post
 

Good points.  Any rebuttals from the crowd (such as it is)? 

 

Here are my personal first responses.  Is there any indication that BMC has done a better job of implementing the 9018 than others have?  Or that the HP amp is any good?  I wouldn't mind having the PureDAC's built-in amp/pre-amp.  I currently only have my pre-historic Adcom pre-amp and it's HP out, and I would need something to drive hard-wired TRS connected cans if I ever get any... plus I could possibly use it to attenuate the input to the Cyclops and thus get more into the amp's power range.  Of course I could also get one of those fancy attenuators you guys have been building...

 

The Concero has the advantage of being cheap, which gives me an opportunity to analyze the price/performance tradeoff, and keep the total up-front cost of the testing down a bit -- remember, I have to pay for all of these units up front, and then make sure I get timely refunds to avoid having a bit of a cash crunch.  Of course, the Emotiva is even cheaper, so I can use that as my bargain unit... and if I end up having to drop a unit (e.g., testing 9 instead of 10, or 8 instead of 9) to keep the costs reasonable, I'll do that as long as we have a good mix.  On second thought, who am I kidding... I'm not dropping the size of the group based on up-front cost... in for an inch, in for a mile. I'll only drop the number of contenders if we can't come up with 10 that have decent return risk.

Based on your thoughts, I see all the more reason to drop the BMC because it overlaps too much with the DA8. Keep the Concero on your list for now...

post #25 of 1331
Quote:
Originally Posted by brunk View Post
 

Based on your thoughts, I see all the more reason to drop the BMC because it overlaps too much with the DA8. Keep the Concero on your list for now...

In addition, this means that you need to fill the gap with an all-in-one unit that is not ESS DAC based. I don't know off the top of my head what may fit your criteria though.

post #26 of 1331
Thread Starter 

The Emotiva is all in one, AD1955.

 

And I don't really need an all in one.  I could use the extra functionality, but I don't have it now, and I'm not suffering.  Much.  :biggrin:

post #27 of 1331

So which headphones and amps will you be using for this comparison? Someone should lend you a pair of hd800s :D

post #28 of 1331

Here's a list of DAC sites that might be useful at some point, to get specifications:

 

 

Wolfson:  http://www.wolfsonmicro.com/products/dacs/

 

ESS:  http://www.esstech.com/?p=products_DAC

 

Texas Instruments:  http://www.ti.com/lsds/ti/audio-ic/audio-dac-product.page

 

AKM:  http://www.akm.com/akm/en/product/detail/0021/

 

Analog Devices: http://www.analog.com/en/digital-to-analog-converters/audio-da-converters/products/index.html

 

Cirrus Logic:  http://www.cirrus.com/en/products/d-a_converters.html

 

Others?

 

 

Check this out:  The Complete D/A DAC Converter List (last updated May 29, 2012)

 

Mike

post #29 of 1331
If this is a community quest and Gary the master of ceremonies, then as a community, we should be offering up our gear so that the man isn't putting out so much of his money for our entertainment since he's putting in the time.

Gary, I will offer the Hilo for services. Though I will miss having my music over the holidays. Guess I'll rig up my old DAC since it is a good cause for the community. When and PM me your address. I'll pay there, you pay back?
post #30 of 1331

Gary,

 

I had already been considering this, so here goes... Count on me to send you my well-burned-in Resonessence Concero (ESS9023) - if you're interested after assembling your list of candidates.

 

I'll include the Apple remote and summary instructions on how to select the built-in filters.  Just send me a PM (if and) when you're ready.

 

Mike

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
This thread is locked  
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › December 2013 Mid-Level DAC Comparison