New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Audeze LCD-X - Page 291

post #4351 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by songmic View Post
 

 

So I wasn't the only one who thought so...

 

By the way, being a fan of HE-6 as I know it, did you also pre-order the HE-560? I am currently using my LCD-X with Allnic HPA-3000, but Allnic's president personally recommended HE-500 with his amp. If the HE-560 turns out to be just as enjoyable, if not more favorable than the LCD-X in terms of midrange presentation, I may end up selling the LCD-X and keep the HE-560.

 

I did not pre order the 560.  I'll let the dust settle first to make sure HiFiMan doesn't have anymore changes.  I use aftermarket cables as well, but only for ergonomics and aesthetics. 

post #4352 of 6438
FWIW, I had the opportunity to audition the HE-560’s and, other than the weight, I found nothing exceptional about them. Huge disappointment.
post #4353 of 6438

WOW - That the first "Huge disappointment" I've seen about the 560s.

post #4354 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by leesure View Post

FWIW, I had the opportunity to audition the HE-560’s and, other than the weight, I found nothing exceptional about them. Huge disappointment.

 

That's how I felt about the PM-1s when I heard them the other day. 

post #4355 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by preproman View Post
 

I sure hope the LCD-3F doesn't have recessed mids.  I've heard for a few folks now that the LCD-X does and is now being called a V shaped headphone.  

IMO, those comments are WAY off bass. And the LCD-X measure flat from 2kHz down to 20Hz and the treble is hardly "spiked" or tilted in anyway.

post #4356 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacedonianHero View Post

IMO, those comments are WAY off bass. And the LCD-X measure flat from 2kHz down to 20Hz and the treble is hardly "spiked" or tilted in anyway.

I concur!
post #4357 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacedonianHero View Post

IMO, those comments are WAY off bass. And the LCD-X measure flat from 2kHz down to 20Hz and the treble is hardly "spiked" or tilted in anyway.

Agreed. I find the X to be amazingly balanced from top to bottom.
post #4358 of 6438

Measurements don't always tell the whole story about sound.  As I said earlier in the topic, the HE-400 also measures pretty flat from 20hz-2khz, but it's widely known as a u-shaped headphone.  The PM-1 is shown to have a little spike around 10khz in the IF measurements while the LCD-X is shown to have subdued treble, but in reality it's the opposite way around in subjective listening.  The Denon D2000 is shown to be supremely neutral in its IF measurements but is also known to be infamously u-shaped.   I could go on about objective measurement and subjective listening discrepancies.  

post #4359 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMRaven View Post
 

Measurements don't always tell the whole story about sound.  As I said earlier in the topic, the HE-400 also measures pretty flat from 20hz-2khz, but it's widely known as a u-shaped headphone.  The PM-1 is shown to have a little spike around 10khz in the IF measurements while the LCD-X is shown to have subdued treble, but in reality it's the opposite way around in subjective listening.  The Denon D2000 is shown to be supremely neutral in its IF measurements but is also known to be infamously u-shaped.   I could go on about objective measurement and subjective listening discrepancies.  

FWIW, I was going off BOTH measurements and my own first hand experiences (many months) driving the LCD-X in my main dynamic rig (GS-X Mk2 / BDA-2). The LCD-XC are more "U" shaped to my ears than the LCD-X, but I certainly wouldn't classify either headphone as U shaped. The D7000s, yes, but that's due to some bloated bass that lingers too long, mids that are a bit pushed back and treble that can be strident. Thankfully the LCD-X/XC don't suffer from this.


Edited by MacedonianHero - 6/13/14 at 7:26pm
post #4360 of 6438

Hopefully Audeze returns me a neutral sounding LCD-X, otherwise I just can't take it seriously. 

post #4361 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by preproman View Post
 

WOW - That the first "Huge disappointment" I've seen about the 560s.

 

Not for me - cant recall if the other comment was from the same Head-Fier though  :D

 

All this talk of the X as a V or U-shaped headphone brings me back to the HD800 - I believe this is my endgame headphone. When I want a 'fun' headphone, I reach for my Fidelio X1 - they're lighter and more comfortable than my Audeze cans and I just love the way Philips have voiced these cans.  The X is good for about an hour - from that point I have to make a decision re HD800 vs X1. 

post #4362 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMRaven View Post

Measurements don't always tell the whole story about sound.  As I said earlier in the topic, the HE-400 also measures pretty flat from 20hz-2khz, but it's widely known as a u-shaped headphone.  The PM-1 is shown to have a little spike around 10khz in the IF measurements while the LCD-X is shown to have subdued treble, but in reality it's the opposite way around in subjective listening.  The Denon D2000 is shown to be supremely neutral in its IF measurements but is also known to be infamously u-shaped.   I could go on about objective measurement and subjective listening discrepancies.  

Thing is the X doesn't sound remotely U shaped either.
post #4363 of 6438

I had pretty bad neck aches and top of the head pressure pain for the first couple months of using the X and XC all day at work and after.  Recently I don't get any of that anymore happy to say.  Think my neck must have strengthened up and the velour also seems to have helped across the top of my head.  no longer get those red pad marks on my head and around my ears.

post #4364 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by groovyd View Post
 

I had pretty bad neck aches and top of the head pressure pain for the first couple months of using the X and XC all day at work and after.  Recently I don't get any of that anymore happy to say.  Think my neck must have strengthened up and the velour also seems to have helped across the top of my head.  no longer get those red pad marks on my head and around my ears.

 

I just need to visit the workplace where you can wear large, open headphones all day at work - even IEMs were a bone of contention with one of my bosses as he couldnt easily get someone's attention without resorting to IM. I absolutely loathe the open office concept - partitions may have had their downsides but it was so much easier to just burrow into the task at hand (I was a code cutter for most of my working life) without any distractions - someone wearing a pair of LCD-X in an open office environment would (at the very least) be a visual distraction. Of course, if you're in a position where you can call the shots none of that matters - more power to you. 

post #4365 of 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by estreeter View Post

Not for me - cant recall if the other comment was from the same Head-Fier though  biggrin.gif

All this talk of the X as a V or U-shaped headphone brings me back to the HD800 - I believe this is my endgame headphone. When I want a 'fun' headphone, I reach for my Fidelio X1 - they're lighter and more comfortable than my Audeze cans and I just love the way Philips have voiced these cans.  The X is good for about an hour - from that point I have to make a decision re HD800 vs X1. 

Since this was my first comment regarding the 560's, I was clearly not the originator of your 'other' comment. I'm not sure what the implication of your comment was.

FWIW, I have no agenda and, in fact, own 3 of Fang's offerings...HE-4 (now THERE'S a V shaped Ortho), HE-400's and HE-6's. I was just disappointed by the sound and build quality of the 560's. The weight and comfort were nice tho. It's simply my opinion. If it's an unpopular one, so be it.
Edited by leesure - 6/13/14 at 10:12pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum