or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

. - Page 2

post #16 of 18

Really? The reason I got the E-17 was because most reviews on them were positive.

post #17 of 18
Thread Starter 

 .


Edited by surrealdeal - 11/17/13 at 8:50am
post #18 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamorin View Post

Really? The reason I got the E-17 was because most reviews on them were positive.

Right. There is nothing wrong with the E17. It's definitely a good unit. However, depending on what headphones someone uses, how loud they listen to music, and the sound coming out of a laptop or computer, it may offer a very minimal upgrade in SQ (which may not even be noticeable) that may or may not be worth the cost to some people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by surrealdeal View Post

indeed, a few people on headfi say cards like an asus xonar are better sounding ( not suprising since the DAC surface area is greater; from an 'engineering' standpoint 'larger surface area' = quality, generally )

I don't know anything about surface area and DACs, but the Xonar STX is a better sounding DAC/headphone amp than the E17. That's generally very much agreed up on Head-Fi. Having owned both myself, I would say it's somewhat easy to hear a difference. Xonar DX/D1 would not be for most headphone use since it does not have a headphone amp.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home