The iBasso DX50 Thread - Latest firmware: 1.9.5 - June 30, 2016
Oct 14, 2013 at 3:12 AM Post #3,991 of 18,652
1.16 has better clarity and soundstage for me but it made almost deaf a few times so I can't go back
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 5:23 AM Post #3,993 of 18,652
A multitude of people have done exactly that and shared their findings in this very thread.



Has anyone managed to improve the SQ significantly of DX50 by bypassing its internal DAC/AMP with external DAC/AMP? Basically to make DX50 as a Transport.

Please share.


I have done few page back





Source : DX50 as transport
Dac / Amp : iBasso D 12 mod with HiFlight kits
Iem : Earsonic S EM6
Cable : Venture Craft Coax RCA to RCA , use JVC adapter RCA to mini

SQ : the improvement is excellent , like DX 50 born for D12 , D12 has the best synergy with DX 50 :D
More balance SQ , high more extended and detail .
Mid more clear and clean , bass more body and impact
Overall better pronounce , I hear piano more body

My IMO
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM Post #4,001 of 18,652
I hope they improve the SQ with the next firmware. Does anyone else think 1.20 sounds muddier than the earlier versions?
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 1:22 PM Post #4,004 of 18,652
Ha! You did indeed D...the T1 sounds insane with all three actually. When I put the T1 with the DX100 it raises the bar again. So...the 100 still rules the roost so to speak...

The order remains the same...

DX100
RWAK100
DX50

However, I am seriously considering selling the RWAK100 now and using the DX50/T1 combo for work. If I get one of those Meenova's the DX50 can hold just as much music as the RWAK100. The T1 brings the DX50 on par with the base DX100 and sounds better than the base RWAK100.

Steve from NYC


ah mate, congrats, so you a believer now like me? yes, T1 shocked me considering its very modest price, one of the best value for money gear purchases i made.

about DX50 bugs and freezes, i wonder if buyng DX50 you risk becoming to iBasso what guinea pigs are to scientists? reading through all reported problem pains especially when sound quality reportedly so good.
 
Oct 14, 2013 at 1:25 PM Post #4,005 of 18,652
Please any suggest or comparison between iBasso D12 vs Headstage Arrow 4G, for my DX50?




Source : IBasso DX 50 through line out with maxx volume
Dac / Amp : IBasso D12 HiFlight mod
Amp : Headstage Arrow 4 G
Iem : Earsonic. SEM 6

IBasso D12 win again Headstage Arrow 4 G pair with Earsonic SEM 6

High :
Arrow 4 G :
high : slightly breiter
Mid : more forward , clear and clean
Bass : very good bass impact , faster speed than D12
Separation : on par
Soundstage : D12 has wider soundstage than Arrow 4 G

D 12 with HiFligt mod
High : is enough and very good detail
Mid : more analog than 4 G , not as forward as my 4 G
Bass : very good bass impact , bass speed a bit slower , but is more natural
Separation : on par
Soundstage : D12 has wider soundstage than arrow 4 G

D12 is slightly warmer and analog SQ than arrow 4 G

This is my IMO
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top