Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Review: NuForce DAC-80 - replacement for the DAC-100 (same sound, lower price)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Review: NuForce DAC-80 - replacement for the DAC-100 (same sound, lower price) - Page 2

post #16 of 55
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlyz View Post
 

Anyone have any idea how DAC-80/100 would sound compared to Asus Xonar one Muses edition? Im not sure which one to buy. I am a NuForce IA-7 owner and a Xonar STX owner, so i am a fan of both brands. Tough choice.

 

Reviewer at 6moons said that the Xonar One Muses wins the DAC-100 though.

 

 

For what it's worth, I like the DAC-80 more than the Essence STU with the Muses opamps. I found the STU with Muses to be roughly on par with the Essence One. 

post #17 of 55

Project86, do you have a preference between the Concero and the DAC-80?

post #18 of 55
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zebra View Post
 

Project86, do you have a preference between the Concero and the DAC-80?

 

Depends. Are we talking original Concero or Concero HD? DAC-80 has a more dynamic sound, very exciting. Concero is somewhat more relaxed, and Concero HD more detailed. Different sounds (and features) for different needs. 

post #19 of 55

I am interested in your thoughts on the 24-bit Concero and the DAC-80 used as a USB DAC.

post #20 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by project86 View Post
 

 

 

For what it's worth, I like the DAC-80 more than the Essence STU with the Muses opamps. I found the STU with Muses to be roughly on par with the Essence One. 

 

Now you just need to slap the Muses into the DAC-100/80 :cool:

post #21 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armaegis View Post
 

 

Now you just need to slap the Muses into the DAC-100/80 :cool:

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by project86 View Post
 

 

 

For what it's worth, I like the DAC-80 more than the Essence STU with the Muses opamps. I found the STU with Muses to be roughly on par with the Essence One. 

 

Thanks for the feedback guys. Its still tough decision to make due to the price of the DACs and my country's weak currency. I did ask around but so far and not many ppl have tested both DACs.

 

So i changed my approach and asked, how far improvement will i get if i buy either DAC vs my STX. Some say very much improvement due to the better power supply and away from the EMI/RFI interference. Some say, by a small margin but improvement is there.

 

What is your opinion on this? The answer will most likely make me pull the trigger to get the DAC-100, i wont be getting the newer DAC-80 because the new distributer in the country decided to mark up all NuForce products and DAC-80 is more expensive than the DAC-100. 

post #22 of 55
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zebra View Post
 

I am interested in your thoughts on the 24-bit Concero and the DAC-80 used as a USB DAC.

 

The original Concero is really great. So is the DAC-80, but if all you want is pure USB DAC functionality, no preamp and no SPDIF inputs, the Concero might be the better buy. It's more neutral overall versus the NuForce having that mild coloration tipped towards making everything sound good.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Armaegis View Post
 

 

Now you just need to slap the Muses into the DAC-100/80 :cool:

 

Not sure if I dare. Got the Muses01 and 02 here, and seem to like the 02 best. Maybe I'll try when I get a moment. The stock LM4562 is no slouch though.

post #23 of 55

so what dac chip is it? ;)

post #24 of 55
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by curiousmuffin View Post
 

so what dac chip is it? ;)

 

 

Says right at the beginning of the review - 32-bit AKM AK4390 DAC. 

post #25 of 55

my bad, only looked at the picture hah.

 

interesting the chip that garners so much attention for this popular dac is also one of the least popular for diy crowd for reasons unknown to me. 

 

thanks for the info :)


Edited by curiousmuffin - 9/15/13 at 11:41am
post #26 of 55

Probably because it takes more work than most DIY can handle?

post #27 of 55

i doubt that's the main reason.

 

there are chips that are harder to 'handle' than 4390 that are more popular.


Edited by curiousmuffin - 9/15/13 at 1:26pm
post #28 of 55

Who knows. Maybe they had a general architecture in mind and this one fit the best.

 

Or maybe they picked it precisely because it wasn't popular for DIY :p

post #29 of 55
Thread Starter 

I just figure it's not a well known DAC chip, so it isn't used often. AKM in general gets less use compared to Cirrus, TI, Wolfson, and ESS. AKM is roughly in the same place as Analog Devices - both make good DAC chips which for some reason are less commonly used than others. 

post #30 of 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by project86 View Post
 

I just figure it's not a well known DAC chip, so it isn't used often. AKM in general gets less use compared to Cirrus, TI, Wolfson, and ESS. AKM is roughly in the same place as Analog Devices - both make good DAC chips which for some reason are less commonly used than others. 

 

I love the Fostex HP-A3 which features the AKM4390.

I find it sound very clean and transparent but also very smooth and maybe sweet even.
It's very good at revealing ambience in the scene. Not the last word in terms of details, but the Fostex USB is quite outdated now (Tenor 7022L, which is fine but there's better nowadays).
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Review: NuForce DAC-80 - replacement for the DAC-100 (same sound, lower price)