Very very interested in your comparison. The XC's are the only other closed can I'm interested in at the moment.
Fair enough, I probably should have stated that it's just my personal preference.
I don't think price really has anything to do with this until he reaches his conclusion about how they compare. Higher price does not automatically guarantee higher performance, though it does often imply it. Also, I don't see why not being in the same price range should disqualify the XC as a challenger to the AD. I assume he means that he's testing to see whether it technically outperforms the AD, regardless of price.
yep very intereste also in this comparaison since I need to buy a " NON Leaking " headphone to complement my TH-900. So... I will be VERY interested to know which one LEAK the less sound outside
Trying to find a good combo to drive the alpha dogs...
So far, I prefer the clas db+duet combo for its clarity, separation and overall presentation.
The Theorem is great option too.
Fostex HPP1 seems like need a bit more energy for the AD.
I only get bits and pieces of what they say over there. The writing style is somewhat...unusual. Semantics, sentence structure maybe.
Glad I am not the only one thinking this.
Maybe someone could try parsing it with SanjiWatsuki's method:
Check here --> http://www.head-fi.org/products/audeze-lcd-xc/reviews/10150
I swear that every time I read Srajen's reviews I have to blow up my mind, brain and try to read his words really carefully, read over and over again at least 4-5 times to truly understand what he meant. But I got him this time, in the end he liked LCD-XC more than Alpha Dog but not really mentioned that the LCD-XC triumph the Alpha Dog significantly so I guess just a small gap.