Well, enjoy your $60 players... it's really pretty laughable when you think about how poor the quality of these things absolutely have to be for that price. In order to make a profit, the entirety of these players (from power supply to transport to laser assembly to amplification to digital readout to remote control and etc.) has to cost substantially less than $60 to make. I mean, there are some standalone remote controls that cost more than this. Since this is rock-bottom quality as a given, the fact that people are saying it's better than PC-based audio only shows ignorance and inability to set up a PC-based rig. Either that or it's the clique-y need to agree with the "PC audio suxxx" B.S. floating around this forum.
Before anyone tells me to run out and waste my money on one of these plastic "Made in China" players so I can subject my ears to something costing less than a low-end portable, I've already A/B'd between my Audiophile 24/96 and Toshiba SD-2109 DVD player (one of the earlier DVD players, and more solid than the crap being made these days)... the sound card won by light years in the SQ department. Far less grainy, far more detailed and realistic presentation.
Quote:
Originally posted by amol Quite true, I have lost my faith in PC Audio , since i heard a friend's discman sounding better than my Revo. His discman costed him 55$ and my Revo a ********* 100$ !! |
Something's obviously wrong with your setup... maybe all that modding only created an illusion in your mind that the Revo was sounding better. Either that, or you just like the sound of a cheap discman. Nothing wrong with that, but this whole "audiophilia" business is something of a joke considering how subjective it is -- in the end, it comes down to buying the most expensive gear you can afford that pleases your ears.