Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Questyle CMA800 Current Mode amp
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Questyle CMA800 Current Mode amp - Page 26

post #376 of 586
John, did you ever get to trying the Auralic Vega Dac with Questyle CMA800?
post #377 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vangelis View Post

John, did you ever get to trying the Auralic Vega Dac with Questyle CMA800?

 

 

No, most of my time with Vega has not been in my own system. I had one come through briefly but only had time to use it with the matching Taurus amp. I see no reason why it wouldn't make a great combo though - I go the other direction and use Questyle's CAS192 with the Taurus all the time, with excellent results. 

post #378 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by project86 View Post
 

 

 

No, most of my time with Vega has not been in my own system. I had one come through briefly but only had time to use it with the matching Taurus amp. I see no reason why it wouldn't make a great combo though - I go the other direction and use Questyle's CAS192 with the Taurus all the time, with excellent results. 


Makes sense, the Vega would probably work fine with the CMA800. The CAS192 is likely voiced similar to the the Vega (not too tipped up) or it wouldn't work so well with the sometimes aggressive HD800s.

post #379 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vangelis View Post
 


Makes sense, the Vega would probably work fine with the CMA800. The CAS192 is likely voiced similar to the the Vega (not too tipped up) or it wouldn't work so well with the sometimes aggressive HD800s.

 

Yep, CAS192 is very similar. Wish I had the Vega here longer for direct comparisons. 

post #380 of 586

Quite interested in hearing more comparisons between the CAS192 and CMA800R, especially when paired with a couple different higher end cans.

post #381 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by roguegeek View Post
 

Quite interested in hearing more comparisons between the CAS192 and CMA800R, especially when paired with a couple different higher end cans.

 

 

CAS192 is the DAC, and CMA800R is the amp, both from Questyle. Not sure what comparisons could be done. Did you mean Taurus versus CMA800R?

post #382 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by project86 View Post
 

 

 

CAS192 is the DAC, and CMA800R is the amp, both from Questyle. Not sure what comparisons could be done. Did you mean Taurus versus CMA800R?

Been gone for the last week and a half and my brain goes to mush. I mean the CMA800R vs the Q192.

post #383 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by project86 View Post
 

 

 

CAS192 is the DAC, and CMA800R is the amp, both from Questyle. Not sure what comparisons could be done. Did you mean Taurus versus CMA800R?

I sent you a PM regarding this question.. It would be fun if you shared in depth thoughts either by private or public message.

 

If not, I'll have to buy two CMA800R's AND a Taurus MKII :eek:

post #384 of 586

Add the Cambridge Audio 851D to the list of DACs with digital volume control and a pre-amp (and headphone amp) stage with balanced outputs.

post #385 of 586

I've been reading up on the CMA800R to pair with my LCD-X and soon to arrive Chord Hugo.  

 

I recently demo'd the GSX-MkII and Senn HDVA600 at the SoCal meet, and the Auralic Taurus MkII at Stereo Unlimited here in San Diego.

 

At $1,500, the CMA800R and the Senn amp are the cheapest of the bunch.  The Master 9 is in that $ ballpark as well.

 

With my LCD-X the GSX sounded amazing, very full, and is just a beauty.  It's very expensive, and the wait is just too long.  The Taurus had massive balls, bass galore, and very musical.  

 

I currently have the Senn amp at home, and it sounds quite good, musical, has great synergy with the LCD-X and of course Senn's HD800, but the Taurus has considerably more power and is able to punch with greater bass impact at equal volume.  The bass is very strong, hits hard, hits fast and then fades instantly.  It's worth the $500 premium to me, and so the Senn is likely going back.

 

I only listened to the Taurus in balanced mode, and regret not switching over to SE given what I've read about that output's distinct character.

 

I've been chatting with Mr. Alden Zhao of Questyle and he informed me today that the company will be exhibiting at the upcoming T.H.E. Show next month in Irvine, CA. 

 

Hopefully the CMA800R will have that musical essence / character I'm looking for, with decent power.  As Project86 cited in his review, one can always add another unit for greater dynamics.  I'm really hoping Questyle will have that mono-balanced setup at THE Show.

 

Ah, such problems to ponder.  Buy a single CMA800R now, and perhaps scale up in the future.  Or pay a bit more for the Taurus... 

post #386 of 586

Yes, it's a tough choice..... just yesterday I was using the Hugo alternating between Taurus mkII and CMA800R, driving LCD-XC, TH900, HD800, Alpha Dogs.... wow, both amps are extremely impressive. Honestly I think it's a win for the buyer no matter which way they go. 

post #387 of 586

I have a hd800 so was really looking seriously at the CMA800R, but I now have a LCD X coming in tomorrow.

 

Now wondering if CMA800R is still the best choice or the Taurus.

post #388 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by eantala View Post
 

I have a hd800 so was really looking seriously at the CMA800R, but I now have a LCD X coming in tomorrow.

 

Now wondering if CMA800R is still the best choice or the Taurus.

 

 

I suppose it depends on which headphone ends up being your favorite. If it's HD800 then I'd go CMA800R. If it's the Audeze, stick with Taurus. Not that each one will still perform at a very high level at all times..... So Questyle still does Audeze very well, and AURALiC still does marvelous with HD800.

post #389 of 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by project86 View Post
 

 

 

I suppose it depends on which headphone ends up being your favorite. If it's HD800 then I'd go CMA800R. If it's the Audeze, stick with Taurus. Not that each one will still perform at a very high level at all times..... So Questyle still does Audeze very well, and AURALiC still does marvelous with HD800.

The question is: in a score from 0 to 100...with Audezes, how much is better the Taurus than the CMA800R? With HD800, how much is better the CMA800R than the Taurus? That's the point if you have both Audezes and Senn.


Edited by kaesar94 - 4/2/14 at 5:52pm
post #390 of 586

Dang, tough question! If I say my Stax Omega II is perfection, then I'd arbitrarily call HD800 on the CMA800R a 95/100. Taurus makes it a solid 90. LCD-XC on the Taurus is also a 95, and on the CMA800R it is a 90. 

 

Of course these numbers are silly, because it really depends on a number of factors. For classical, I tend to choose the HD800 every time. For electronic music, the LCD-XC is a better choice. Poor recordings do better with the Audeze. Etc, etc. Plus there's the matter of source matching, which brings a whole new set of variables. 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Questyle CMA800 Current Mode amp