Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › AKG new headphone K545?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AKG new headphone K545? - Page 34

post #496 of 1529

The K545 simply are to new to have lots of reviews. I am confident they will have a huge customer base over time. I like the last few posts, they all give good information, pay particular attention to shinbones comments about the Q701 being used straight from a portable player IT'S IMPORTANT!

post #497 of 1529
Thanks for the analogy of how the K545 compares to the Q701.
I find it worrying though that the glue becomes softer with time, so with excessive use would they stop working.
How long would these last because I don't plan on replacing them any time soon.
post #498 of 1529

I think you reading to much into his theory of driver burnin. While no one knows for sure how long this headphone will last in daily use (it's only a couple months old after all), I highly doubt it will fail easily. AKG has been making headphones for a long time and their products generally last for years and years.

post #499 of 1529

Lukalop, I didn't mean to suggest the glue may fail soon.

 

For one, "glue getting softer" is just my guess. It is a common theory with guitar amplifier speakers, and that is why I mentioned it. There are a tons of vintage speakers (both hi-fi and guitar amps) still in service. Like anything with moving parts, components wear and loosen / soften with use. It is nothing out of ordinary. Once guitar amp speakers settle (once the glue gets softer from its initial stiffness), they are good for years and years of use, often under less than ideal conditions (gigs on hot days, cold nights, high humidity, accidental beer spillage, storage in non-air conditioned places, etc., etc).

 

And two: there are a lot of people who do not believe speakers change sound as they are used. I am pretty sure some people who read my post would argue I am only imagining it. You'll have to see for yourself.

 

K545 is very solid. Its build quality is very good. The way the cups stay where you put them is very assuring -- a lot of headphones do not do this. I am pretty sure they are very durable and reliable.

 

I think the question you should ask yourself is where you are going to use the headphones, and with what source.


Edited by Shinnbone - 12/11/13 at 11:00am
post #500 of 1529
 

 

On a different note: I ordered a Sony MDR-7520. Would be interesting to see how it compares to the K545.

yeah let me know?!!?!?!? interested in that for real

post #501 of 1529
Same here
post #502 of 1529

I also would be interested in a 7520 and K545 comparison :)

post #503 of 1529
Quote:
Originally Posted by dweaver View Post
 

I also would be interested in a 7520 and K545 comparison :)

 

I listened to both last night and preferred the K545. It has more delicacy and refinement IMO.

post #504 of 1529

UPS tracking page keeps lying ... hopefully I'll get the Sony delivered tomorrow.



Beagle, I see you have some headphones I've been considering. How do the K545, NAD HP50, Soundmagic HP100, and Sony MDR-7520 compare?  I am specifically interested in on-the-go portable use.


Edited by Shinnbone - 12/11/13 at 4:12pm
post #505 of 1529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
 

 

I listened to both last night and preferred the K545. It has more delicacy and refinement IMO.


Thanks Beagle, I thought that might be the case. I owned the 7520 very briefly and from memory thought the K545 would be better in those areas but direct A/B comparison is much better than going by memory.

post #506 of 1529

Can anyone give some comparisons to the B&O H6?  I know the price difference but that doesn't concern me.

post #507 of 1529
Further back in the thread I gave a brief comparison. The H6 had a bit more of a V shaped signature and had a sharper upper midrange that caused S sounds to have a lot more ssssss to them than I liked. They were a decent headphone but I thought the K545 sounded better and were at least as good technically. I also felt the K545 was more sturdy. So considering the $150 additional cost for the H6 I felt the K545 was a significantly better bargain.
post #508 of 1529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
 

 

I listened to both last night and preferred the K545. It has more delicacy and refinement IMO.

Thats exactly what I was going to say but refrained since I don't have both. The 7520 has a lot going for it but the k545 had a softer smoother sound from what I remember.

post #509 of 1529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
 

 

I listened to both last night and preferred the K545. It has more delicacy and refinement IMO.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by grizzlybeast View Post
 

Thats exactly what I was going to say but refrained since I don't have both. The 7520 has a lot going for it but the k545 had a softer smoother sound from what I remember.

 

Interesting. I just got the 7520, and to my ears it sounds significantly more balanced, natural, and enjoyable than the K545 did right out of the box. K545 had almost no bass, and the highs sounded a little harsh. I am comparing the 2 freshly out of the box, and from my phone, though.
post #510 of 1529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinnbone View Post

 

 



Everything you said could be right. I just said smoother. I don't know if more refined is right or not but the 7520 is a sharp sounding headphone. Its not what you would call smooth or soft. It is very balanced and its bass has more detail than any hp I have ever heard(mayby not lcd2)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › AKG new headphone K545?