- 3,421 Posts. Joined 12/2010
- Location: West Coast
- Select All Posts By This User
Earsonics SM2 vs SM3
Is the SM3 bass really much tighter than SM2? if so I will probably look for something else...
Edited by Gilly87 - 6/21/13 at 2:18pm
Seriously? They are only $180 though, and Joker rates them higher than the UM3X, which I have at the moment, and like, but don't love like I loved the SM3. I don't mind the midbass boost on my SE215, which some call bloated, so maybe I won't mind.
What would you recommend instead?
ARRRGH There is no universal IEM for me, I give up. I will just get used to my SE215.
I really just want the damn SM3 without filters and not such a freaking weird soundstage and crappy build, but there is no such thing.
Edited by Gilly87 - 6/21/13 at 8:37pm
If I have to buy the SM64 to get what I want, I am going to ******* kill someone, because I won't do it.
I hate Earsonics. I really, REALLY do. I got addicted to the speed and tightness of unfiltered SM3s, it was positively ear-tickling, and now I can't find anything that will replace them, but I refuse to repurchase because of the durability vs cost and weird presentation.
I am truly screwed.
Edited by Gilly87 - 6/21/13 at 8:50pm