can't people here accept the fact that KFKI thinks that it's not worth it $500 more than the 535 and this is coming from someone who really wanted an excuse to buy it I even sold my heir 4.A and 8.A in search of the ultimate universal iem but to this this day I have not found a good excuse to get the 846 based on the reviews, by the way the 535 was my first high-end iem and sold it and may buy another one and wait until the next big thing in universals comes around.
Nobody has a problem with that. Hell, if he didn't think it was worth upgrading from the Brainwavz delta I still would not care. Again, please re-read what I and others have said. We are confused by the reported difference in sound signature, not his value evaluation.
If I said I don't think it's worth upgrading from the Sennheiser CX400 to the ER4P because the ER4P has less clarity then I think most people who had heard both would be confused.
If I said I don't think it's worth upgrading from the BA-200 to the ASG-2 because the ASG-2 doesn't have enough bass compared to the BA200 then I think people who heard both would be very confused as well.
Nobody here is accusing kfki of being dishonest, having misplaced priorities or bad judgement. I do not blame anyone who thinks they should not upgrade. However, when someone reports a very big discrepancy in sound which contradicts what everyone else has heard - as well as the frequency response chart - then yes, there is confusion and an interest in figuring out what is going on.
Edited by Zalithian - 11/9/13 at 8:24am