Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Fostex TH900 vs Senn HD800
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Fostex TH900 vs Senn HD800 - Page 2

post #16 of 76

If I had to choose I would keep the Fostexes.

post #17 of 76
I agree with rgs9200m I think the Fostex are more about musical enjoyment the HD800 are about fantastic engineering depends on what is more important to you.
post #18 of 76

My TH900s dig somewhat more texture and what I take to be insight and realistic character to vocals and some instruments, kind of like what

I heard in Sony R10s. The bass is looser and not as focused as the HD800s. The bass seems to come from everywhere on the TH900s and has less detail than

on the HD800s. It's a bigger bass area on the TH900s, while on the HD800s the bass seems to come from the center or sometimes even nicely linked to whatever

instrument is generating it.

But the midrange things seem to be less point sourced (though still well locatable), and are just plain bigger and more 3D where I can see into them

(I guess that's something I would call object transparency, or I would describe it as organic).

 

If you get the TH900s, down the line try to tweak your system so that bass is tight and controlled and you'll be fine, because this is the main thing they need

a little help in to sound awesome. I use both tube and solid state amps with great results.

 

I think that's a lot easier than trying to get more insight and sweetness and liquidity from the HD800s, which you can do, but it takes a lot more work

(tubes help a lot with the Senns).

 

And I when I listen to my TH900s, I do not feel like I want any more soundstaging in any dimension, just subjectively, I don't even think about it, they are fine in this area.

 

The HD800s focus a lot on the area around the musical objects, while the TH900s focus deeply on the objects themselves.

It's not at all that the Senns are opaque or anything, it's just that the Fostexes are better at looking into each object.

 

I've had the TH900s over a year now and They've really grown on me and I wouldn't be without them.

I think they came out of nowhere to be a classic.


Edited by rgs9200m - 6/27/13 at 6:42pm
post #19 of 76
My pick is hd800, particularly since the addition of my new (used) spdif converter, sonicweld diverter. Hd800, particularly with good live recording, is very live-like. But still I don't think I want to part with my th900.
post #20 of 76

HD800 > All imo

post #21 of 76
My humble opinion:

I have done a fun audio journey, from inexpensive Little Dot amplifiers to quite expensive gear like Woo Audio WA22. To me the equipment journey is half the fun - to tweak the sound - and the other half is to sit down and listen to some good music with a nice whisky. Therefore I have to own both HD800 and TH900 because, like some other people already has pointed out, they are just different... with different pros and cons. But if my main interest were to get a pair of headphones and then forget about equipment, then I would get TH900. They sound nice straight out of my iPhone and iPad. It is quite recently I started to really like my HD800 - when my WA22 got married with NAD M51 - and that is a lot more money than an iPhone. If I would have to just have one headphone I would keep HD800 - they sound better to me but need an expensive rig to sound really good.
post #22 of 76

hd 800 better, th-900 is very fun though if you love bass, but for just accuracy, detail, soundstage, etc. the hd 800.

post #23 of 76

The only genre I prefer the TH900 to the HD800 is bass-heavy electronic. And that's mainly due to not enough bass being mastered into the track to begin with.

post #24 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubstep Girl View Post

hd 800 better, th-900 is very fun though if you love bass, but for just accuracy, detail, soundstage, etc. the hd 800.

 

+1  HD800 if I could only have one of the two.

post #25 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by preproman View Post

 

+1  HD800 if I could only have one of the two.

+2 thank goodness you don't have to pick only one.  

post #26 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshin23 View Post

+2 thank goodness you don't have to pick only one.  

biggrin.gif  yes "thank goodness we dont" wink_face.gif

post #27 of 76
Had both but kept hd 800 because they came closer to my high-end speaker system sound. Also with 800 I can more easily forget I'm listening to headphones. The th-900 on the other hand imo had to much bass for hip hop and R&B and I found the treble too smooth and laid back.
post #28 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by cradon View Post

Had both but kept hd 800 because they came closer to my high-end speaker system sound. Also with 800 I can more easily forget I'm listening to headphones. The th-900 on the other hand imo had to much bass for hip hop and R&B and I found the treble too smooth and laid back.

agree on every account about the speakers and HD800 - just wrote it up on the HD800 forum but also love the TH900 because of the bass!  When I'm in the mood to just have that fun listening experience it hits gets that itch... 


Edited by jjshin23 - 7/1/13 at 1:28pm
post #29 of 76

Vote for TH 900 impressive bass and soundstage although it's closed

post #30 of 76

HD800 = bright with less bass

TH900 = bright with more bass

 

Pick your poison :P - I vote for neither

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Fostex TH900 vs Senn HD800