- 3,103 Posts. Joined 8/2012
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Select All Posts By This User
Recent Images In This Thread
Related Forum Threads
- IEM for Symphonic Metal, Rock, plus occasional Trance and Soundtrack Orchestral? Last post on 7/22/14 at 3:36pm in Introductions, Help and Recommendations
- KEF M200 vs RHA MA750 vs Yamaha EPH-100 Last post on 6/16/14 at 3:00am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- KEF M500 Last post on 4/9/14 at 12:03pm in Headphones for Sale / Trade
- KEF M500 or B&W P5 ? Last post on 4/7/14 at 9:14pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- *SOLD* KEF M500 (mint condition) Last post on 4/8/14 at 11:15pm in Headphones for Sale / Trade
Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 3
Last edited: 8/14/14
- Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 2Last edited: 7/3/14
- Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 2
KEF new headphones! - Page 13
Gear mentioned in this thread:
Ear positioning also changes the soundstage somewhat dramatically. Don't wear them on the front of your ears, wear them farther back and man it improves.
I don't think I've ever had a headphone that I haven't had a problem with the build, that is, except the m500.
Sound Comment: The Soundstage is veeery deep abd it has good height, especially for a closed on-ear headphone. It's not very wide though, but that was expected.
Edited by Trunks159 - 6/22/13 at 6:40am
The build is wonderful. You can tap your fingers on any part of the construction and it is solid and dead. Compare that to the various percussive noises you get when doing that to a Skullcandy Aviator.
M500 looks great, feels great, sounds great. The complete package.
Ok. First impressions:
Comfort-Wonderful for short listening, but they hurt for longer sessions, just be because they're on ear and they're brand new. Clamp is just right.
Isolation-Nice, no complaints
Build- Nice, wonderful actually.
Concerns- Only one problem, and this will suck for some people, is the microfonics. Rubbing the cord at lower volumes isn't a pleasant exp, and any touch on the headphones will produce some sound. The cord is a little thin.
Sound- I shouldn't write anything on the sound really, its too early. But I guess I could say something. The sound is pretty much neutral, though having a veeeery small bump in the upper bass/lower midrange area. The highs thankfully aren't recessed, and the bass is absolutely perfect quantity wise. Like beagle said, the quantity of bass depends entirely on the recording. Some are bass light, some bass heavy.
Quality wise, I won't give many impressions. I'll say they're very clear and airy sounding (compared to other portables in this price range). The soundstage is pretty damn good for an on ear too.
Only good things! Against the ws99, 1r, etc, well, that'll have to wait for another time.
Thanks for the review Looking forward to your comparison with the WS99's. Do let us know what you think
I would have to go with the M500 due to it's sonic honesty and comfort.
But the Martin Logan is a real hi-fi treat
I still may have that new toy effect, but after all the new toys I've gotten in the past, probably not.
Anyway, with every headphone, you have to give up something. I'd say this headphone's main weaknesses are:(not burned in really, only like 7 hours)
1- Lack of width in the soundstage. It's very noticeable.
2- Bass: I'd say the bass is about average. It does mud up the sound a little, and its more noticeable against my ath ws99, which had the absolute best bass ever! The width of the soundstage and the somewhat loose bass kind of compound each other, making these sound a lot more like headphones than my other cans.
The sound is very neutral, with slight emphasis in the bass to upper mid range area. The mid mids and upper mids, and highs rock though. These sound nice at most genres. The only genres it falls in are rock, metal, or soundtrack, genres that require solid, and fast bass.
These are pre burn in impressions though, so take this with a grain of salt.
If you wanna know which I prefer out of the ws99 and m500 right now, I'd say the ws99, but don't worry, these will probably improve.
Beagle, how do these improve with burn in?
Interesting. I have no problem with the bass (very balanced) and I find the M500 spacious from all angles, depending, of course, on the recording. But I am using them with a good amp..
You may not notice it because you haven't compared them to the ATH WS99, which is known for its unstoppable bass.
- KEF new headphones!
Gear mentioned in this thread:
- › After you buy a headphone what is most important to you? 1 second ago
- › Zero DAC/Amp (LM4562 and LT 1364 opamps) 5 seconds ago
- › NAD Viso HP50 : Another superb headphone from Paul Barton? 39 seconds ago
- › Noble Audio - the Wizard returns! 3 minutes ago
- › DENON DA-10 DSD - New portable DAC/Headphone AMP 5 minutes ago
- › TOPPING NX1 Portable Headphone Amplifier Impressions Thread 6 minutes ago
- › Havi B3 Pro-1 Impressions Thread 6 minutes ago
- › Just received my Denon DA300USB desktop DAC/amp 7 minutes ago
- › Sennheiser HD518 HD558 HD598 Support Thread 8 minutes ago
- › Hifiman he-400i Impressions and Discussion 9 minutes ago
- › Sennheiser Momentum by MacroPower
- › AKG K712 Pro by Rob80b
- › Grado Labs SR225e by yage
- › Tekfusion Twinwoofers by BillsonChang007
- › ATH-ESW10JPN by bluelines
- › Audio-Technica ATH-M40x Professional Headphones by krishtrinity1
- › Baldoor EarBell E100 by subwoof3r
- › Brainwavz S5 In Ear Headphones by lin0003
- › FiiO Kilimanjaro 2 (E11K) Portable Headphone Amplifier by twister6
- › Audio Technica Sonic Fuel ATH-CKX9iS In-ear Headphones with In-line... by TheAfterEffect
- › Audio Connections between components --...
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Introduction)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 3
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 3
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Gaming Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Exercise Headphones)