Head-Fi.org › Forums › Help and Getting Started › Introductions, Help and Recommendations › Budget Review: LG QuadBeat (SE) vs MH1 vs UE200
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Budget Review: LG QuadBeat (SE) vs MH1 vs UE200 - Page 2

Poll Results: If you have heard all three budget earphones, which one do you prefer?

 
  • 30% (7)
    LG QuadBeat /Special Edition
  • 52% (12)
    Sony MH1 /MH-1C
  • 17% (4)
    Logitech Ultimate Ears UE200 /200vi
23 Total Votes  
post #16 of 18
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleep Mode zZ View Post

The sound of MH1C is near perfect. Pity that they don't stay in my ears - damn the cable and the overall ergonomics!

 

It's such a shame Sony isn't using the MH1 to improve it further. How difficult could a "MH1 Premium" be? Different cables, a set of cheap accessories including their very own Sony hybrid tips and finally a leather pouch. I wouldn't care if it cost 3 times as much.

post #17 of 18

You have an accurate description on the LG Quadbeat. I got mine which comes free with the phone(LG Optimus G Pro). I initially thought it had piercing highs but I found out that it was phone's player fault and switch to Rocket Player which brought all of the IEM's real qualities.

post #18 of 18

I tried today a friends LG QuadBeat and I would agree with a previous post. I can not find absolutely any area that the LG perform better than the MH1.

 

On the MH1 it does not matter how you set the equalizer. The mids are a bit recessed but the sound as a whole is super crisp with excellent separation and no congested highs, only the bass is a tad on the high side for my liking but I am sure many people would love that. On the contrary it does affect a lot  the LG's (on flat setting they sound like cheap earphones IMHO).

 

I guess there is nothing even remotely close to the MH1 for their price.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Help and Getting Started › Introductions, Help and Recommendations › Budget Review: LG QuadBeat (SE) vs MH1 vs UE200