I can foreseen the future on Head-fi when someone asking for suggestion on headphones, people just need to share the graphs and discuss about it, even people have not listen to the headphone are also welcomed, they just need to pass the basic requirement: know how to read the graph. That will be fun and interesting.
No, it is not gonna happen. I am just kidding. Let's relax & TGIF.
@Inks: The graphs are useful to me to learn more about the SM64. However, as you might know, in audio industry it is both objective and subject. I do not think we can separate it and just mention about the cold facts. The fact is without reading the graphs me and many members in this thread were not recognized the issue which so called "The earsonics are pretty terrible, missing entire mid frequencies". You can see how the graph can mislead a member who has not heard the SM64 yet. As the current owners of the SM64, we are fine even the graph is horrible but please be fair to the other members who have not own the SM64, they need both cold facts and real impressions.
Additionally, as the original owner of the SM64 which was measured by Rin Choi already stated that his SM64 is faulty. I do not think we can use it as reference. I could not see any notice/disclaimer about that is an defective earphone on Rin Choi blog so everyone who does not had a chance to read Shotgunshane's post will be mislead as that is a normal SM64 pair.