or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The (new) HD800 Impressions Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The (new) HD800 Impressions Thread - Page 238

post #3556 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by extrabigmehdi View Post


versus
 

 
versus
 

 


versus a guy that own different amp, and didn't hear much difference, but the post in lost in this long thread.

 

Eh, enough of the hype pressure to buy whatever amp.

I see no pressure, just opinions being expressed.  You have the choice to go as far as you want to.  No one is twisting your arm as far as I see, on this thread anyway...biggrin.gif

 

Enjoy the music. beerchug.gif

post #3557 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearFNF View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by extrabigmehdi View Post


versus
 

 
versus
 

 


versus a guy that own different amp, and didn't hear much difference, but the post in lost in this long thread.

 

Eh, enough of the hype pressure to buy whatever amp.

I see no pressure, just opinions being expressed.  You have the choice to go as far as you want to.  No one is twisting your arm as far as I see, on this thread anyway...biggrin.gif

 

Enjoy the music. beerchug.gif

+1...It is all good....gs1000.gif

post #3558 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by longbowbbs View Post

+1...It is all good....gs1000.gif

+2 !

post #3559 of 20002

verses

 

need to own a pair of HD800's to have an arm to twist........cool.gif

post #3560 of 20002

It's all about the law of diminishing returns and expendable income and passion for music and/or toys.

 

For me I have to decide if I am happy with a $1000 amp or do I want to spend $2000 for that extra percent of clarity/detail...or maybe that $500 amp is good enough and I'll get new shocks and springs for my Porsche, or maybe I don't need an amp at all and I'll buy a new regulator and dry suit that I've been putting off. Or...   biggrin.gif

 

We all draw the line in a different place.

post #3561 of 20002

I'm at that line for both my rigs in terms of amps and dacs. My Buffalo III and Mjolnir is good enough for me with the HD800. The GSX is definitely an improvement but diminishing gains come in hard at the cost of the GSX compared to the Mjolnir. As long as what you have lets you enjoy the music that's all you can ask for.

post #3562 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallan View Post

verses

 

need to own a pair of HD800's to have an arm to twist........cool.gif

 

BuhbuhbuhitsallTHESAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

-Daniel

post #3563 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacedonianHero View Post

Bingo. Yes, the HD800s can sound very good out of the Lyr (owned it and liked it). But as long as one is aware that they're leaving a lot of cards on the table. They continue to scale and scale. They got a big bump up when I picked up my WA2 and then again with the WA22 and LF. And now, holy smoke, they are simply breath taking on my GS-X MKII. 

 

I've seen a lot of people saying incredible stuff about this GS-X MKII, especially how it drives the HD800 so well despite being a solid-state amp (tube amps are generally preferred for the HD800). I own a ZDSE, which is undoubtedly the best amp I've heard with the HD800 along with Bakoon HPA-21, but I wonder if the GS-X MKII outperforms both of them by a huge margin. Of course I don't have the money to buy the GS-X MKII right now, but if it is indeed a significant improvement over my Zana Deux SE, then I may consider it in the future. Have you heard the ZDSE, and if so, do you think the GS-X is far superior to it in its ability to drive the HD800?

post #3564 of 20002
It looks like I'm settled on getting an HD 800. Was going to go for the LCD-3 but it's much more expensive and would have to be ordered from the US. From what I've read, my V200 should be nice with it, and I also have a Taboo MKIII coming soon, which I believe Frank said was a "revelation" with the HD 800. I'm very curious about how I'll feel about them, as I tend to like warm headphones. But I'm also really drawn to the idea of more detail and soundstage.
post #3565 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by songmic View Post

 

I've seen a lot of people saying incredible stuff about this GS-X MKII, especially how it drives the HD800 so well despite being a solid-state amp (tube amps are generally preferred for the HD800). I own a ZDSE, which is undoubtedly the best amp I've heard with the HD800 along with Bakoon HPA-21, but I wonder if the GS-X MKII outperforms both of them by a huge margin. Of course I don't have the money to buy the GS-X MKII right now, but if it is indeed a significant improvement over my Zana Deux SE, then I may consider it in the future. Have you heard the ZDSE, and if so, do you think the GS-X is far superior to it in its ability to drive the HD800?

blink.gif

 

None of these amp are "far superior" anyway.  Subtle difference.  

 

"For me."  Tubes bring a certain distortion in the mid rage that sacrifices clarity and detail.  It seems that folks are trying to get tube amps to sound like SS amps.  With saying like "This tube amp sounds more like a SS amp"  why not just get a SS amp?

 

Where's the poll that says tube amps are generally preferred?


Edited by preproman - 7/7/13 at 7:51am
post #3566 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kendoji View Post

It looks like I'm settled on getting an HD 800. Was going to go for the LCD-3 but it's much more expensive and would have to be ordered from the US. From what I've read, my V200 should be nice with it, and I also have a Taboo MKIII coming soon, which I believe Frank said was a "revelation" with the HD 800. I'm very curious about how I'll feel about them, as I tend to like warm headphones. But I'm also really drawn to the idea of more detail and soundstage.

I had the V200 for a while with the HD800. It was a nice pairing

post #3567 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by preproman View Post

blink.gif

 

Nonoe of these amp are "far superior" anyway.  Subtle difference.  

 

"For me."  Tubes bring a certain distortion in the mid rage that sacrifices clarity and detail.  It seems that folks are trying to get tube amps to sound like SS amps.  With saying like "This tube amp sounds more like a SS amp"  why not just get a SS amp?

 

Where's the poll that says tube amps are generally preferred?

 

Well said.

post #3568 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by preproman View Post

blink.gif

 

None of these amp are "far superior" anyway.  Subtle difference.  

 

"For me."  Tubes bring a certain distortion in the mid rage that sacrifices clarity and detail.  It seems that folks are trying to get tube amps to sound like SS amps.  With saying like "This tube amp sounds more like a SS amp"  why not just get a SS amp?

 

Where's the poll that says tube amps are generally preferred?

 

I like the sound tubes bring to the HD800. Agreed, it may reduce its accuracy, however I find the Lyr brings a certain "liquidity" into the mids, not to mention the extra weight in the low end. Not scientifically accurate, but enjoyable.

post #3569 of 20002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stalker81598 View Post

 

I like the sound tubes bring to the HD800. Agreed, it may reduce its accuracy, however I find the Lyr brings a certain "liquidity" into the mids, not to mention the extra weight in the low end. Not scientifically accurate, but enjoyable.

 

 

I can see that.  biggrin.gif

post #3570 of 20002

I own a v200 and Zana Deux.  Both good, Zana Deux clearer and more dynamic but the v200 is wonderful and gets a lot of time with the phones.  I don't always like to power up the tubes for short listens or if i am not really sitting down for a session.  Other amps i have liked with the HD800 are the B22(not sure of the exact configuration) and Luxman P1 but that was long ago.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The (new) HD800 Impressions Thread