Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The (new) HD800 Impressions Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The (new) HD800 Impressions Thread - Page 156

post #2326 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank I View Post

It sound better than the V200 amp I have

Do you prefer it to any of the woo amps like wa2? or is it too different?

post #2327 of 15399

Different strokes and i only listened to the WA2 very limited so not sure I can make a best impression there. It solid state so the sound is not warm it is neutral and balanced. More like a Soloist but better sounding with the hd800. 


Edited by Frank I - 5/1/13 at 7:22pm
post #2328 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank I View Post

Different strokes and i only listened to the WA2 very limited so not sur eI can make a best impression there. It solid state so the sound is not warm it is neutral and balanced. More like a Soloist but better sounding with the hd800. 

i dont know if ill ever be able to give up that warmth but who knows anything could happen

post #2329 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubstep Girl View Post

i don't think HD 800 will sound too good out of a denon receiver. not sure though, never tried them on a receiver.

I'll try them from my AVR-4311CI this weekend and get back to you all on that.

post #2330 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by longbowbbs View Post

I'll try them from my AVR-4311CI this weekend and get back to you all on that.

thanks!

beerchug.gif

post #2331 of 15399

The Denons with and past the 2112ci line are actually pretty decent networking receivers capable of two zones. 90 watts 7.1. I looked up all the DAC/ADC and stuff and it's 192k low distortion. Obviously you are limited with the chips in a big design like that but the graphs I saw all looked good from the chip maker. I like the sound out of it. It's not a ten thousand dollar amp but we have come a long way since the 90s. It has a lot of gruff. It can easily kill my DT1350s at 80 0hms and make the bass severely uncomfortable. I don't think that is going to be a problem really.

 

It does sound like they are the headphone for me, though, I am going to try and audition a pair I think.
 

post #2332 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by longbowbbs View Post

I'll try them from my AVR-4311CI this weekend and get back to you all on that.


Why would they not sound good on that receiver lol? Doesn't even make sense. That is top end quality stuff for what it does.

 

And anway I'm not severely picky as long as it's high-fi and the DLC/amplification does its job. Looking forward to what you think of this combo and thanks for trying it out!

post #2333 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitingCow View Post


Why would they not sound good on that receiver lol? Doesn't even make sense. That is top end quality stuff for what it does.

And anway I'm not severely picky as long as it's high-fi and the DLC/amplification does its job. Looking forward to what you think of this combo and thanks for trying it out!

New receivers tend to have cheap headphone sections and wonky output impedances.
post #2334 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorbidToaster View Post


New receivers tend to have cheap headphone sections and wonky output impedances.

This is why I stick with vintage Marantz, Pioneer, Sansui and Teac stuff. The same example can be said for modern day Marantz gear, it just doesn't compare with some of the vintage good stuff.

post #2335 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by OrbitingCow View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by longbowbbs View Post

I'll try them from my AVR-4311CI this weekend and get back to you all on that.


Why would they not sound good on that receiver lol? Doesn't even make sense. That is top end quality stuff for what it does.

 

And anway I'm not severely picky as long as it's high-fi and the DLC/amplification does its job. Looking forward to what you think of this combo and thanks for trying it out!

It will be an interesting exercise alongside the Taboo MK III. SS vs Tubes...round 1!

post #2336 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by MorbidToaster View Post


New receivers tend to have cheap headphone sections and wonky output impedances.

 

I don't know, I did extensive testing a month ago and discovered that out of all the major brands, only Pioneer has high quality low output impedance headphone stages built in.

 

I pitted my two Pioneer AVR's head-to-head against the Violectric V200 and they compared extremely well (I couldnt tell the difference).

 

My most recent acquisition is a VSX-1122 that I picked up refurbished for $200. Not only is it an outstanding headphone amp for my HD800, but it also has all the analog (X4) and digital inputs (opticalX2, coaxX2) I need to hook up my turntable, cassette deck, Squeezebox, and CD player - with plenty to spare (HDMIX7 & USBX2).

 

Oh yeah, it also powers my speakers with authority. smile.gif

post #2337 of 15399
Hey guys is the serial number or the build date written on the outer box?
post #2338 of 15399
Quote:
Originally Posted by technica18 View Post

Hey guys is the serial number or the build date written on the outer box?

Serial number is on top of the head band....

post #2339 of 15399

lol

post #2340 of 15399
L0L!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › The (new) HD800 Impressions Thread