or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Non-audiophile reactions to high-end headphones Part II
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Non-audiophile reactions to high-end headphones Part II - Page 105

post #1561 of 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eternal Schism View Post

I very much doubt that blindfolded someone would not be able to pick out the differences between a HD800 and say a LCD2

 

Sorry for the meta post, where in the thread was this claimed? I'm having trouble finding it.

 

(Not trying to be rude or sarcastic)

 

Solved, two posts below. Thanks mate!


Edited by White Lotus - 3/3/14 at 3:28am
post #1562 of 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeGuyDude View Post
 

 

It's actually been done quite a few times, chiefly with A/V cables. There's never a difference in anything but durability. That's one thing I like about the V-MODA cable, it's kevlar so I know I won't snap it, but that's the only benefit. 

 

I mean, obviously all headphones have their own signature, but to my eyes it's like expensive televisions. They don't have the exact same picture, but if you sit everyone in front of a big wall of them, they won't all pick the same on that they think looks best. In addition, buying a 4K capable television (the equivalent of $2,000 planar magnetic headphones) in order to watch Netflix and broadcast television is pointless anyway.

 

Maybe those Audeze LCD-3's are capable of higher fidelity, clearer sound. They probably are. But unless you're listening to a completely lossless, PERFECTLY produced piece of audio with a flawless DAC/AMP combination, first of all you won't even be sending anything through those speakers that warrants all the hardware. Additionally, there's a limit to how much fidelity the ear can differentiate anyway. 

 

Like I said, I would love to do a blind test of a couple dozen headphone types of the same ilk (closed vs closed, open vs open) and see just how much of a difference one can hear if one isn't told that this one cost $300 and this one cost $3000.

 

I think it's the opposite.  Get your average Jane without hearing damage and get them to blind test the latest flagship from Beyerdynamic or whatever and their previous flagship.  I have reason to believe the average Jane will immediately notice the superiority of the latest generation flagships.  If average Jane picks it up...for aficionado's the difference is a big one.

 

Which worries me when some people claim, I'll give an example that occurs here often, that the T1 is no better than the former flagships.  Frankly I trust average Jane much more than experienced head-fier Joe.  The key here is overall articulation of the drivers, for me there is a clear divide in this specific area.  Not even measurements work here, and I find the only correlating factor for this divide is market pricing.

post #1563 of 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Lotus View Post
 

 

Sorry for the meta post, where in the thread was this claimed? I'm having trouble finding it.

 

(Not trying to be rude or sarcastic)

 

It wasn't, I was just using it as an example in response a comment I pasted below. Just at the point even in the same price bracket (open vs open) you can hear differences, let alone $300 vs $3000.

 

quote:

 

Like I said, I would love to do a blind test of a couple dozen headphone types of the same ilk (closed vs closed, open vs open) and see just how much of a difference one can hear if one isn't told that this one cost $300 and this one cost $3000.[/quote]


Edited by Eternal Schism - 3/3/14 at 3:26am
post #1564 of 4570

Ah! Thank you and sorry again. Updated my post.

post #1565 of 4570

Accidentally got a friend of mine into headphone stuff..

He keeps asking me what the best headphone in the world is. (x

post #1566 of 4570
Tell him it's either Stax sr 009, sennheiser Orpheus or perhaps Sony R10.
post #1567 of 4570

Thanks, maybe he'll stop asking me now! :p

Damn, those headphones are expensive. And I thought the LCD-2's were costly!

post #1568 of 4570

You could always confuse the everloving **** out of him and tell him it's something you can get at Best Buy like the Sol Republic or UE6000's but "no one is willing to admit that because they're considered too mainstream". 

post #1569 of 4570

Oh, you're a mean one. (x

...

That's not a bad idea:evil: 

post #1570 of 4570
Showed headphones to my friends cousin :3

His face:
http://m.memegenerator.net/instance/45038403

I just accepted the fact that he wouldnt care about anything but the bass so i showed him rah! By dj pyro

Hawaii bad boy was right about the bass in that song o.o
post #1571 of 4570
I think I'm gonna have a noob reaction when I buy me something more than the Sennheiser HD201's. But they are a good start because I lived on some really crap headphones (but not iPhone earbud things at least, either in-ears or on-the-ear ones biggrin.gif )
Edited by alenfromcroatia - 3/3/14 at 1:54pm
post #1572 of 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeGuyDude View Post
 

You could always confuse the everloving **** out of him and tell him it's something you can get at Best Buy like the Sol Republic or UE6000's but "no one is willing to admit that because they're considered too mainstream". 

Just imagine the look on a Best Buy employee's face if you asked them where the Audeze LCD-2's are.

post #1573 of 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeGuyDude View Post
 

You could always confuse the everloving **** out of him and tell him it's something you can get at Best Buy like the Sol Republic or UE6000's but "no one is willing to admit that because they're considered too mainstream". 


There's a subset of people here on Head-Fi who think the Martin Logan Mikros 90 is God's gift to the world, so you could make that claim and have a base to back it up. Their thread expands by about ten pages a day; it's actually one of the most active corners of this community.

post #1574 of 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssrock64 View Post
 


There's a subset of people here on Head-Fi who think the Martin Logan Mikros 90 is God's gift to the world, so you could make that claim and have a base to back it up. Their thread expands by about ten pages a day; it's actually one of the most active corners of this community.

 

I poked my head in there. Holy crap it's like the headphones hold them in their arms and rock them to sleep at night. 

post #1575 of 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssrock64 View Post
 


There's a subset of people here on Head-Fi who think the Martin Logan Mikros 90 is God's gift to the world, so you could make that claim and have a base to back it up. Their thread expands by about ten pages a day; it's actually one of the most active corners of this community.

 

Woah. I'd never looked into them until you just mentioned it..

 

They look nice!

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Non-audiophile reactions to high-end headphones Part II