Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › New HD 800 very different than the old HD 800
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

New HD 800 very different than the old HD 800 - Page 11

post #151 of 297

I am certainly impressed with the bass response. It is solid and controlled. Best headphones I have ever had.

post #152 of 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by longbowbbs View Post

I am certainly impressed with the bass response. It is solid and controlled. Best headphones I have ever had.

+1 

 

I'm not missing my LCD2's at all... Feel bad about that. 

post #153 of 297
This new and old HD800 thread is rather misleading.
post #154 of 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by MomijiTMO View Post

This new and old HD800 thread is rather misleading.

How so?
post #155 of 297

Because I've measured six or seven of them with serial numbers ranging from the hundreds to twenty-thousands; and while there are production variances for each one, they are all pretty much are alike. I have not seen any other headphone measure so consistently. The notion that there are new and old HD800s seems unlikely.

 

The differences are more likely attributable to individual traits of each HD800 as a result of minor production variances, and differences in the playback system and recordings used when assessing the HD800s qualities, i.e. my new s/n HD800 has more bass (on my setup) than my friend's old s/n HD800 (on my friends setup), the new s/n HD800 in my home setup has less biting treble than the old s/n I heard at the Headroom table with their amps, etc.

post #156 of 297

In another thread I mentioned comparing 4 HD800's side by side which included one under 10k, mine in the 14k's, a 16k and a 19k or 20k. They all sounded the same if plugged to the same rig.

 

Also, I got to compare mine to 5 other back-to-back serials of HD800's in the 213xx's with Sennheiser Canada; and again, it was all mostly the same.

post #157 of 297

Hello.

 

Recently I've bought a new HD800 S/N 21xxx and - out of the same amp - at the same volume - with the same material and - without any modifications,

it just sounds like my old HD800 with S/N 003xx and my other pair, that I bought about two years ago (S/N 07xxx).

 

Otherwise, listening to my other good headphones like T1, K702, LCD3, HE5LE, SR009, HE90, etc. is in case of each of them always a different world.

There can simply be no doubt, they all sound different! This can be heard very easily even by untrained headphone listeners.

 

Not so with the three HD800s!

 

Again:

 

All my three HD800s from 'old' to brand new sound the same (under the same conditions).

 

I wonder why someone may hear HUGE differences here and even minor differences are probably hard to find out... for me, at all, there weren't any.

 

And if there are differences heard by others, maybe they are "wishful thinking" wink_face.gif or the result of a slightly different fit on the head, that probably could effect the sound also (I mean a different headband position, etc.).

 

I don't know.

 

Out of my perception, this equation makes really sense to me:

 

OLD HD800 = 'MIDDLE-AGED' HD800 = NEW HD800

 

beerchug.gif

 

PS: Maybe my ears are not good enough to point out slight/huge differences here. I feel a bit ashamed, but I really really can't hear the green grass growing on the fields of Austria, while others might hear it... even if they are standing on the Stephansplatz in Vienna... surrounded by 2,000,000 active people... and while the cathedral's bells are ringing loudly... wink_face.gif biggrin.gif


Edited by Der Germane - 4/28/13 at 6:11pm
post #158 of 297

I have a pr of the HD800s, one serial #17XX and newer pair #20xxx.  I way prefer the older ones.  The newer version is brighter - like these cans were not bright enough.  The older version is more musical with a better defined bass, more neutral sounding.

 

Of course I switched out the stock cable and have really good success with the Moon Black Dragon V2.  About to spring for the SAA Endorphines.  I plan on using the Moon on the newer and SAA on the older.

 

Seems like Dave Mahler had a similar experience in his awesome Head-Fi review, although he preferred the newer ones.

Battle Of The Flagships (57 Headphones Compared

"I own two pairs of the HD800: serial #297 and serial #10333. Serial #297 was made during the first production run while serial #10333 was manufactured approximately two years later. Initially, I purchased a second pair because the headband of my original pair encountered a recurring squeak issue. Despite several repair attempts, this problem has never been resolved to my full satisfaction.


However, what I've found is that the two HD800s have some very noticeable sonic differences. The earlier pair (#297) has a fuller tone and is slightly more laid-back in the highs. This is, in my opinion, not a result of burn-in; I've owned the later pair for nearly two years and I still maintain this view. While many people are of the belief that there will always be differences from model to model (a belief I most certainly don't disagree with), I have had the opportunity to hear several early models and several later models of the HD800; in my opinion, the earlier ones have a slightly fuller tone. I am not certain as to when the sonic transition took place or what may have caused it.

 

Despite the earlier model's fuller tone, if I had to pick which of the two pairs was my preference, I would choose the later. I feel that the later model (#10333) offers a greater degree of transparency and puts more air around the instruments. The noted differences are not so drastic, but I have done several blind tests and I always know which headphone is which."


Edited by rb2013 - 5/29/13 at 11:50am
post #159 of 297
I tried out 4 different stock HD800's recently and they all sounded the same when directly A/B'd through the same source. It's the second time I do this because these recent comments made me doubt myself.

There is absolutely no difference between HD800's unless the pads deteriorated (that largely affects sound, again, by test).

post #160 of 297

im pretty happy with my #8300

post #161 of 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by rb2013 View Post

I have a pr of the HD800s, one serial #17XX and newer pair #20xxx.  I way prefer the older ones.  The newer version is brighter - like these cans were not bright enough.  The older version is more musical with a better defined bass, more neutral sounding.

 

Ha! Interesting.....some have reported that the newer #20xxx have more bass. I'm like ph34r.gif

post #162 of 297

Maybe the dudes who are getting different results aren't checking to see that they're using the same cable on both headphones.

 

It's easy to forget.

post #163 of 297

 

flat as a very flat pancake around the 6k mark. Mids and bass are clearly more prominant and me good ole ears tell me this too!

post #164 of 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by LugBug1 View Post

 

flat as a very flat pancake around the 6k mark. Mids and bass are clearly more prominant and me good ole ears tell me this too!

 

This is how a HD800 freq graph really looks.

http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/SennheiserHD800.pdf

 

The spike at 6 kHz is pretty obvious when listening if you don't perform a mod.

post #165 of 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweden View Post

 

This is how a HD800 freq graph really looks.

http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/SennheiserHD800.pdf

 

The spike at 6 kHz is pretty obvious when listening if you don't perform a mod.

Yeah I've seen that graph, must be a bright one wink_face.gif And of course its not my headphone.  

 

Not being funny but the 6k spike is not obvious to my ears, and I do know what one sounds like as I've owned quite a few bright headphones :)  

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › New HD 800 very different than the old HD 800