I recently purchased the Pro 900 and have about 100 or so hours. For having the title of a basshead can, this sure has been a disappointment. The sharp highs have become more subtle but the bass impact just isn't there for me. Using the silver pads made some improvement, but not much. Without an amp, I can't really listen to it. Paired with my E17 it's just OK. The Pro 900 connected to the E17 with bass set to 10 is about on the same level as my XB500 un-amped, in terms of bass quantity. Is this about right? The 900 definitely has better bass quality but simply lacks the quantity I was expecting after reading hours of reviews and threads. Now I am no audiophile but I am comparing these to the headphones I own: XB500, Sennheiser HD595, Monoprice $23 cans, Beats SoloHD, and B&W P5. Out of all these the 900 only beats out the HD595 in terms of bass quantity. At this point I'm more content with my $60 XB500 un-amped. Could I possibly have a defective unit?
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Ultrasone Pro 900... is mine defective?
Ultrasone Pro 900... is mine defective?
Gear mentioned in this thread:
post #2 of 7
1/17/13 at 1:07pm
post #4 of 7
1/17/13 at 1:37pm
post #6 of 7
1/17/13 at 5:30pm
post #7 of 7
2/3/13 at 1:24pm
Gear mentioned in this thread:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Ultrasone Pro 900... is mine defective?


















