Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › [REVIEW] Woo WA6 vs Schiit Valhalla vs ALO Pan Am. The hard sell.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[REVIEW] Woo WA6 vs Schiit Valhalla vs ALO Pan Am. The hard sell. - Page 2

post #16 of 32
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by noxway View Post

WA7 vs Pan Am driving the LCD-2: that would be a great fight! (with Mullard CV4010 on one hand and Electro Harmonix 6C45 one the other) rolleyes.gif

exactly what i plan to eventually do!

In the interim (depending on when an exact wait time is released) i may just get a little dot 3? first i need to find out exactly what the deal is with this wa7. Anyone got any specs/a geek sheet yet? I dont need to know anything other than if it has more power than the wa6. The house sound is nice enough for me, and with a little rolling im sure i can dial in the perfect bass. It would really upset me if it was gutless though- i dont want to be just buying a designer piece of furniture (which is lovely all the same).

post #17 of 32

WA7

 

 

Specifications:

o    Single-ended, class-A, transformers output

o    Linear external high-performance power supply

o    Two 6C45 driver/power tubes

   o    C-Media 6631 USB chip

   o    TI PCM5102 32-bit DAC chip

o    Headphones impedance : 8-600 Ohms

o    Input impedance: 100 Kilo-Ohms

o    Sampling rate: up to 32-Bit, 192kHz

o    Inputs: 1 Asynchronous USB2.0, 1 RCA

o    Outputs: 1 1/4" and 1 1/8" headphone outputs, 1 RCA (same connector as the input)

o    Max output: approx 1 watt @ 32 ohms

o    Frequency response: 11Hz to 27kHz, +/-0.5dB

o    Distortion: <0.03%

o    S/N: 95dB

o    Power consumption: 25W max

o    Mains supply: 100-120V, 220-240V, 50/60Hz, user selectable

o    Finish: Anodized aluminum

o    DC cord length: 4.25 ft or 1.3 m

o    Dimension: AMP: 4.8" L x 4.8" W x 5.1" H with glass
                            PSU: 7.5" L x 3.5" W x 2.2" H

o    Weight: AMP - 5.3 lbs / 2.4kg, Glass - 3.3 lbs / 1.5kg
         PSU - 2.8 lbs / 1.4kg

post #18 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbigsby View Post

exactly what i plan to eventually do!

In the interim (depending on when an exact wait time is released) i may just get a little dot 3? first i need to find out exactly what the deal is with this wa7. Anyone got any specs/a geek sheet yet? I dont need to know anything other than if it has more power than the wa6. The house sound is nice enough for me, and with a little rolling im sure i can dial in the perfect bass. It would really upset me if it was gutless though- i dont want to be just buying a designer piece of furniture (which is lovely all the same).

from Cnet:

"It’s warm and vibrant but not dark, and open with great detail and soundstage, transparent, and POWERFUL. 

Not Schitt or EF5/6 powerful, but at least 3x more power than my WA6 (maybe as much as the WA6 SE?)."

Actually with these specifications I don't know why i'm still hesitating with the Pan Am... Maybe because the tube rolling is gonna be poor with the WA7 unit and maybe because Pan Am + LCD2 = o2smile.gif

 

post #19 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keevs View Post

 I think if it had a 24/192 capable input and the Gateway and Pan Am for $599, then it would be a very good DAC/Amp for the money.

 

I managed to snag that combo for $569 + free shipping during their black friday sale.  Wouldnt have bought them at their full price of $750, but I saw a deal and jumped on it during a time when I was hunting for headfi gear.

 

Cant compare the Pan Am to anything else as its my first amp, but I'm glad its receiving praise from some people as that helps justify my choice going into this blind.

 

Now to find something that bests the 650.


Edited by max pl - 1/3/13 at 12:58pm
post #20 of 32
Thread Starter 

GREAT news thanks guys!

Quote:
Originally Posted by noxway View Post

from Cnet:

"It’s warm and vibrant but not dark, and open with great detail and soundstage, transparent, and POWERFUL. 

Not Schitt or EF5/6 powerful, but at least 3x more power than my WA6 (maybe as much as the WA6 SE?)."

Actually with these specifications I don't know why i'm still hesitating with the Pan Am... Maybe because the tube rolling is gonna be poor with the WA7 unit and maybe because Pan Am + LCD2 = o2smile.gif

 

 

why do you say this noxway? is the tube family that limited? we have good access to tubes from around the world now with the magic of the internetbigsmile_face.gif Also that glass top is totally removable, apparently quite easily. 

While we're on the topic, im actually really excited for the glass top, it means if i put it up on a bench or sidebard or whatever i can leave the tubes warm and leave the room without worrying about the little one/s burning a hand. Not an issue for some of you, but if you have a 1-3 year old around you know what i mean... even the quietest ones touch EVERYTHING, especially shiny things!

post #21 of 32

awesome review!

post #22 of 32
Thread Starter 
Thanks a mil, your too kind!
post #23 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbigsby View Post

GREAT news thanks guys!

 

why do you say this noxway? is the tube family that limited? we have good access to tubes from around the world now with the magic of the internetbigsmile_face.gif Also that glass top is totally removable, apparently quite easily. 

While we're on the topic, im actually really excited for the glass top, it means if i put it up on a bench or sidebard or whatever i can leave the tubes warm and leave the room without worrying about the little one/s burning a hand. Not an issue for some of you, but if you have a 1-3 year old around you know what i mean... even the quietest ones touch EVERYTHING, especially shiny things!

 

AFAIK there are only Sovtek or Electro Harmonix 6C45 tubes available; that's why i'm saying the rolling will be poor...

post #24 of 32
Thread Starter 

what about 6S45P-E (reflektor) or WE437 (if you have a spare $500-$1000 to spend on the unobtanium of Western Electric) these wouldnt fit? i assumed they wouldconfused_face_2.gif

post #25 of 32

I suppose that's another factor to consider when doing straight cost comparisons with tube amps.

 

I'm not familiar with the WA7 tube family or even the Schiit Lyr, but I've quickly browsed through the Schiit tube rolling thread and noticed that people were buying $200+ tubes. 

 

I know, for at least the Pan Am, that you'll probably only need 3 sets of tubes to fully be happy (without having the urge to see what's better).

 

1) Russian Tubes - $9/pair (for clean powerful bass)

2) Siemens - $29/pair (for clean mids/trebles, larger soundstage)

 

Or don't get the above and just get the Mullard CV4010 for $20/pair which is supposed to be good at everything.

 

Tube rolling can get expensive with other amps.

post #26 of 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbigsby View Post

what about 6S45P-E (reflektor) or WE437 (if you have a spare $500-$1000 to spend on the unobtanium of Western Electric) these wouldnt fit? i assumed they wouldconfused_face_2.gif

You're right but the choice isn't this big: russian (20$) or electro harmonix (50$) or WE ($$$$$); The Pan Am compatible tubes are a lot more (and affordable too)

post #27 of 32
Thread Starter 

well theres the stock russians, the reflektors ($25), EH ($30-$60), WE(not really an option at that price), and other re-issues of the original russian tube with different suffixes (found two others on ebay). 

Reality is, in Australia with the way the pricing seems to work here, we would pay about the same fr both units (pan am and wa7). As it stand im waiting for the wa7. Sure you are slightly more limited- but then again there are only two tubes for the pan am worth rolling anyways- so they are not that different. For my money i feel i get much more with the wa7, from obvious design and build, to power, features and function. If they were at a different price point i would have gone with the pan am

post #28 of 32
I just ordered the Pan Am as I know it´s a great synergie with my LCD-2 + portable + tube rolling...
Anyway thank you bigsby for your review and discussion wink.gif
post #29 of 32
Thread Starter 

Congrats noxway! you made a great purchase. If i were in the US i prob would have done the same. Ive ordered a WA7 just waiting till they come out here now.

post #30 of 32

Great review. One thing I have noticed is the build quality difference between the three.  Personally having experience in fabrication and cnc machining, Woo Audio blows ALO out of the water. No doubt that ALO stuff sounds great, but I wish it was built with the kind of attention to detail as the Woo Audio stuff, or even the Apex Glacier.  

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › [REVIEW] Woo WA6 vs Schiit Valhalla vs ALO Pan Am. The hard sell.