If there's no subbass at decent listening levels it's a dealbreaker.
- categoryIn Eartagged by System, 11/27/12
Related Forum Threads
- In ear headphone (earbuds) under 120$ Last post on 5/22/15 at 5:20pm in Introductions, Help and Recommendations
- Review: Cardas Ear Speakers EM5813 Model 1 Last post on 8/1/15 at 6:18am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Recommendations for IEMs for electronic music (mostly EDM) ~$200 Budget Last post on 5/13/15 at 6:57am in Introductions, Help and Recommendations
- Help please Last post on 2/4/15 at 8:21pm in Introductions, Help and Recommendations
- Any experience with Dynamic Ear company/Tympro music custom IEM ? - now with frequency graphs Last post on 4/2/15 at 12:09pm in Introductions, Help and Recommendations
Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And Information
Last edited: 6/22/16
- Basic Guide To In Ear CanalphonesLast edited: 3/22/12
I want to thank the MezeTeam over at Head Fi for allowing me the chance to review the 99 Classics as part of their Tour. You can purchase the 99 Classics in three colors right from their...
Disclaimer: I received this earphone for free from the manufacturers. I did my best not to let that color my opinion on the product, but my impressions may not be entirely without bias. Shozy...
Introduction: The Effect Audio is a Singapore brand that is known by some famous aftermarket cables. They offer Ares and Thor series headphone/IEM cables as well as Piccolino Ultimate and Eros...
Here is my review for the Brainwavz BLU-200 Bluetooth earphones. I must say that I really like and respect the Brainwavz brand and that they deserve attention with their high quality/budget...
Hello Fellow Headfiers, I own this DAC for atleast 7 months now and so I thought I would make a review cuz I'm planning to sell this :) (which I'll tell you why at the end of this review). I...
- Basic Guide To In Ear Canalphones
No Matter How Good an IEM Sounds, It is a Dealbreaker if it... - Page 2
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
...except if it is a TF10
WARNING LONG POST AHEAD!!!
IDK about back then when things weren't digitally stored, but in the digital age, it may be better to record at higher volumes rather than low. Let's go back and take a look at how a recording is done digitally today, going to the core basics. A little above 0s and 1s though. Given a constant time, we will measure the amplitude of a given wave at a given constant time. Essentially, we create a drawing of a wave this way. This wave can then be defined by some sort of function f(t) such that for a given time, the wave is at x frequency. For simplicity sake, let's assume we are always in positive integer system + 0.
Now, we can always reduce the wave with minimal loss of the actual structure of the wave itself. Let's say that f(20) = 25.4433. Now let's say that the recording company was using something that halved the volume (recorded at half volume). We'd get the reading f(20) = 12.72165 = 12.7266 (4 digit arithmetic). Note how we lost some precision in the lower volume. Now the error in both instances will always vary by +/- .00005. This we'll call absolute error. However, relative error is the more important factor here. Relative error = | actual - calculated | / actual where actual is the actual number it should be and calculated is what would be calculated. | actual - calculated | = absolute error. We know the absolute error for both instances, .00005 (differs by computer though). So we get | .00005 | = | -.00005 | = .00005 for absolute error. This means that the absolute error is the same in both instances. We can calculate the relative error now. We get the following relative errors: .00005 / 12.72165 and .00005 / 25.4433 or .000003930 and .000001965 respectively. Notice how the error in the smaller amplitude is twice that of the one recorded at the higher amplitude (that is twice as high in amplitude). Digitally speaking, it is more adventageous to record at higher SPL so long as we don't induce distortion or clipping.
I hope all of that made sense. We can generalize it like this. Assume we have two SPL levels: spl1 and spl2. Assume they aren't the same (one is higher than the other). spl1 > spl2. The absolute error for both is based upon machine precision (computers percision it can calculate to). It would be +/- u where u is the machine's precision. u / spl1 < u spl2 iff spl1 > spl2. The relative error of the higher volume will always be better than the lower volume mathematically speaking.
It's got nothing to do with recording. You ALWAYS record at the highest level available before digital distortion or tape saturation and it has nothing to do with how loud they're playing which is simply a personal reference and varies by music type. Way over thought guys and not much to do with the issue at hand.I find that both too loud and too quiet don't work as well on playback. I try to find a comfotable level where I get proper bandwidth and dynamics without having my ear/brain naturally compress things. There have been some studies that higher listening levels more excite emotional protions of your brain as well but I think there's a limit and once natural compression starts, the trade offs begin. For me they are as earlier stated. Peter Walker once said that there seems to be a proper volume for every song.
- No Matter How Good an IEM Sounds, It is a Dealbreaker if it...
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
- › Alclair RSM Quad Custom In-Ear Monitor Impressions Thread [ These... 2 minutes ago
- › The discovery thread.! DQSM D2 first look by Peter123. PG 2128. 4 minutes ago
- › Geek Pulse: Geek desktop DAC/AMP by Light Harmonics 8 minutes ago
- › Angie 2 For Sale by JH Audio 8 minutes ago
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide: (3/18/2016: MrSpeakers... 9 minutes ago
- › AUDIO over IP - REDNET 3 & 16 Review. AES67 Sets A New Standard... 11 minutes ago
- › Earbuds Round-Up (Update: April 17th, 2016) 12 minutes ago
- › FiiO X7 | DXD | DSD | 384K/64B | ESS9018+ Android + Amp Module... 12 minutes ago
- › AKG K7XX serial 9323 (all black) w/ original box + portable cable 14 minutes ago
- › Watches - another passion of ours, it seems...post your pics! 14 minutes ago
- › HiFiMAN RE-400 by achelgeson
- › Meze 99 Classics by Mshenay
- › SHOZY Zero IEM by C.C.S.
- › Effect Audio Leonidas by MikePortnoy
- › Brainwavz BLU-200 by DynamikeB
- › Marantz HD- DAC1High Definition USB DAC / Headphone Amp by Gamergtx260
- › Fidue A91 Sirius by flinkenick
- › Havi B3 Pro 1 by getclikinagas
- › Yulong U100 by Spork67
- › Schiit Audio Bifrost DAC by bosiemoncrieff
- › Flawless Album Suggestions
- › The Audiophile Scene in a Third World Country...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide:...
- › Chord Mojo FAQ
- › Head-Fi Logo Gear
- › All about iPod Touch 6G as digital transport
- › List of major HiFiMan HE1000 reviews,...
- › Can I change my user name? Can I delete my...