If there's no subbass at decent listening levels it's a dealbreaker.
- categoryIn Eartagged by System, 11/27/12
Related Forum Threads
- Would appreciate some suggestions for some in-ears around $30 with sound similar to KSC-75 Last post on 1/27/14 at 2:01pm in Introductions, Help and Recommendations
- How IEM characteristics are measured? Last post on 8/7/13 at 6:06am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Need help choosing the right IEM's for me Last post on 2/14/13 at 6:03pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Recommendations for IEMS around 50-90 dollars? Last post on 12/1/13 at 5:42pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- F*** reviews. where can i test IEMs myself? Last post on 5/11/13 at 1:39am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And Information
Last edited: 5/7/10
- Basic Guide To In Ear CanalphonesLast edited: 3/22/12
Thanks to Oppo Digital Japan for allowing us to borrow the PM-1 and HA-1. Oppo coming out with a pair of headphones was quite a surprised, especially a pair of planars. Likewise the HA-1,...
Brainwavs are at it again with their new 10mm dynamic driver based IEM named "S5". I must say I was intrigued to try the new sample and where they'd come from Brainwavs B2 I owned many months...
A decade ago; I had bought into the crappy Logitech Bluetooth devices which I swore NEVER to buy again deeming it a bad technology. Ten years later; I now needed an in wireless in-ear device for...
I was looking for a cheap and cheerful, fun sounding closed can for listening at my computer at work and some limited portable use. I typically listen to EDM in this setting and had been using the...
I built my first ever PC with this sound card, I had already brought a Asus board that has SupremeFX and well the ZxR dethroned the Asus immediately. I have not heard any of the Asus Xonar PCIe...
- Basic Guide To In Ear Canalphones
No Matter How Good an IEM Sounds, It is a Dealbreaker if it... - Page 2
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
...except if it is a TF10
WARNING LONG POST AHEAD!!!
IDK about back then when things weren't digitally stored, but in the digital age, it may be better to record at higher volumes rather than low. Let's go back and take a look at how a recording is done digitally today, going to the core basics. A little above 0s and 1s though. Given a constant time, we will measure the amplitude of a given wave at a given constant time. Essentially, we create a drawing of a wave this way. This wave can then be defined by some sort of function f(t) such that for a given time, the wave is at x frequency. For simplicity sake, let's assume we are always in positive integer system + 0.
Now, we can always reduce the wave with minimal loss of the actual structure of the wave itself. Let's say that f(20) = 25.4433. Now let's say that the recording company was using something that halved the volume (recorded at half volume). We'd get the reading f(20) = 12.72165 = 12.7266 (4 digit arithmetic). Note how we lost some precision in the lower volume. Now the error in both instances will always vary by +/- .00005. This we'll call absolute error. However, relative error is the more important factor here. Relative error = | actual - calculated | / actual where actual is the actual number it should be and calculated is what would be calculated. | actual - calculated | = absolute error. We know the absolute error for both instances, .00005 (differs by computer though). So we get | .00005 | = | -.00005 | = .00005 for absolute error. This means that the absolute error is the same in both instances. We can calculate the relative error now. We get the following relative errors: .00005 / 12.72165 and .00005 / 25.4433 or .000003930 and .000001965 respectively. Notice how the error in the smaller amplitude is twice that of the one recorded at the higher amplitude (that is twice as high in amplitude). Digitally speaking, it is more adventageous to record at higher SPL so long as we don't induce distortion or clipping.
I hope all of that made sense. We can generalize it like this. Assume we have two SPL levels: spl1 and spl2. Assume they aren't the same (one is higher than the other). spl1 > spl2. The absolute error for both is based upon machine precision (computers percision it can calculate to). It would be +/- u where u is the machine's precision. u / spl1 < u spl2 iff spl1 > spl2. The relative error of the higher volume will always be better than the lower volume mathematically speaking.
It's got nothing to do with recording. You ALWAYS record at the highest level available before digital distortion or tape saturation and it has nothing to do with how loud they're playing which is simply a personal reference and varies by music type. Way over thought guys and not much to do with the issue at hand.I find that both too loud and too quiet don't work as well on playback. I try to find a comfotable level where I get proper bandwidth and dynamics without having my ear/brain naturally compress things. There have been some studies that higher listening levels more excite emotional protions of your brain as well but I think there's a limit and once natural compression starts, the trade offs begin. For me they are as earlier stated. Peter Walker once said that there seems to be a proper volume for every song.
- No Matter How Good an IEM Sounds, It is a Dealbreaker if it...
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
- › The Fiio X3 Thread. 47 seconds ago
- › Beyerdynamic T90 :D 1 minute ago
- › Woo Audio Amp Owner Unite 1 minute ago
- › The Takstar, Technical Pro, Gemini Greathon Thread 3 minutes ago
- › 「Official」Asian Anime, Manga, and Music Lounge 4 minutes ago
- › The Android Headphones with Inline Volume Controls and... 4 minutes ago
- › 2359glenn | studio 5 minutes ago
- › Havi B3 Pro-1 Impressions Thread 5 minutes ago
- › Dark Voice 339 6 minutes ago
- › iDSD micro Crowd-Designed. A Teeny-Weeny Update! (page 104) 8 minutes ago
- › Oppo HA-1 Integrated Headphone DAC and Amplifier. by Currawong
- › Brainwavz S5 In Ear Headphones by H20Fidelity
- › JayBird BlueBuds X Sport Bluetooth Headphones - Midnight Black by wpfloridian
- › Yamaha PRO 500 by VanCitySound
- › Creative Sound Blaster Z Series ZXR (70SB151000000) Sound Card by Nada190
- › ASUS Essence STX II by raymond555
- › iFi Nano iDSD by elmura
- › AKG K267 by Blinxat
- › AKG K490 NC by MP3guy
- › Corsair Vengeance 2000 Wireless 7.1 Gaming Headset (CA-9011115-NA) by DallasDanielle
- › Audio Connections between components --...
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Introduction)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 3
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 3
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Gaming Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Exercise Headphones)