not so sure about the first link's buying advice
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by austonia
|
I just bought 'old' stock Li-Ion batteries for my six-year old (Nokia 6190) cellphone (one of the two original now six-year old Li-Ion batteries, package dated 1/1998, had given up the ghost). The replacement stock batteries were 'deep discounted' to 10% of their typical purchase price (package date coding of the replacement batteries is 8/1999).
My point being, the first link admonishes against ever buying 'old' stock, but, I'm finding this is one heck of a bargain, and the charge/recharge cycle is as good as you'd ever want and well within labelled specs (nb. they were 'partially' charged when I opened the package, which is the optimum storage mode according to the links). Maybe at some point I'll notice my five years on the shelf replacement batteries do not hold out for a further six years or so of active use, maybe not.
The articles also remark that the lifespan of even freshly manufactured Li-ion batteries is perhaps a couple of years. That seems awfully pessimistic from my limited experience of cellphone Li-Ion batteries. Hmm, I wonder if their theme about 'on-going' improvements in metal combinations leading to improved Li-Ion battery performance is valid -- it sounds reasonable, but, is it conjecture as the other points appear to have been, or based on research?
(a former chemist)