or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › The T50RP Paradox | reviews, discussion, & mini-tour impressions (index in second post)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The T50RP Paradox | reviews, discussion, & mini-tour impressions (index in second post) - Page 23

post #331 of 744

This may be a silly question, but has anyone tried experimenting with their Paradox by putting some of the new Mad Dog alpha pads on them? If not, would anyone be willing to try? tongue.gif I was just really impressed with the new mad dogs when I listened to them, particularly with regards to their soundstage. I think I'd still prefer the sound signature of the paradox overall though, hence why I'm asking about trying the alpha pads on them...

And with regard to my last post here -- I finally got to try out those LCD-3's I was craving in person, and they sounded... good... can't say they 'wow'-ed me though. Pretty clean, natural presentation, nicer treble than the LCD-2's, but lighter/more 'delicate' bass than the LCD-2's as well. Overall, I'd have to agree that I prefer the HD800's over them too. I actually found that I even preferred the HE-6's over them to some degree. But yeah, it's really nice not to have an itch for such an expensive item anymore tongue.gif

post #332 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by oblique63 View Post

This may be a silly question, but has anyone tried experimenting with their Paradox by putting some of the new Mad Dog alpha pads on them? If not, would anyone be willing to try? tongue.gif I was just really impressed with the new mad dogs when I listened to them, particularly with regards to their soundstage. I think I'd still prefer the sound signature of the paradox overall though, hence why I'm asking about trying the alpha pads on them...

The thing is, Luis tuned the sound of the Paradox with the HM5 pads. I'm not sure swapping the pads out would make for any sort of improvements. It looks like at the Austin meet we'll have the Paradox, the Alpha Dogs, and the Mad Dogs in one place though. (: Been looking forward to doing a side-by-side comparison.

post #333 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by HideousPride View Post

The thing is, Luis tuned the sound of the Paradox with the HM5 pads. I'm not sure swapping the pads out would make for any sort of improvements. It looks like at the Austin meet we'll have the Paradox, the Alpha Dogs, and the Mad Dogs in one place though. (: Been looking forward to doing a side-by-side comparison.

Oh, I'm aware of the elaborate tuning process that's involved with these, I was merely curious for experimentation's sake -- partially cause of the soundstage that it gave the mad dogs, and partially cause they're just so damn comfortable, lol.

 

Definitely come back with some detailed impressions if you get a chance to compare them! I know there was supposed to be a pair of paradox at the last meet I went to, but then they never showed up so I didn't get a chance to compare them myself frown.gif.

post #334 of 744

Hows this for strange. I was testing sine waves through my Paradox and the right driver can't do 5.62kHz. It also cuts out from 8.22kHz to 9.08kHz but comes back in at 9.19kHz. At 9.30kHz my left driver cuts out.

 

Thankfully it was just the software being strange. I retested with other headphones and got the same effect, albeit randomized through different frequencies with each different headphone.

 

I got an impression that some of the treble is grainy on the Paradox. I heard the graininess when practicing high note passages on my silent Yamaha piano (Chopin's 1st Ballade to be exact). It's probably the piano itself but I'll test this with other headphones to be sure. Has anyone had any experience with grainy treble with their Paradox?

post #335 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by temporaryname View Post

Hows this for strange. I was testing sine waves through my Paradox and the right driver can't do 5.62kHz. It also cuts out from 8.22kHz to 9.08kHz but comes back in at 9.19kHz. At 9.30kHz my left driver cuts out.

 

Thankfully it was just the software being strange. I retested with other headphones and got the same effect, albeit randomized through different frequencies with each different headphone.

 

I got an impression that some of the treble is grainy on the Paradox. I heard the graininess when practicing high note passages on my silent Yamaha piano (Chopin's 1st Ballade to be exact). It's probably the piano itself but I'll test this with other headphones to be sure. Has anyone had any experience with grainy treble with their Paradox?

I have received A LOT of complaints about graininess. One notable complaint I get OVER AND OVER again is from "Don't Know Why" from the Norah Jones album "Come Away With Me". 

 

The answer is complicated and simple at the same time. The reason it sounds grainy on some stuff is because it is actually present on the recording itself. I can verify them on my mastering set-up and have plenty of times. The follow up is usually the following...

 

Q: "But LFF, I heard this same recording on X headphones and couldn't hear it. I even played it on Y and Z and couldn't hear it either!? Z is a $2000 headphone and Y is electromajig $10,000 set up! What gives? It's definitely the Paradox!"

 

A: Correct! If you or I could hear it on X, Y or Z headphones, the Paradox would NOT exist. The Paradox is brutal when it comes to revealing flaws if you have it on a revealing, neutral chain. That's why I use it to restore music. That's why I use it to master. I have HUNDREDS on examples of tiny little noises that bug the F out of me that I couldn't hear before on most headphones but that really stand out with the Paradox. These aren't bad recordings and in fact, most are audiophile demo recordings. This is a major reason why I tell my customers that the Paradox isn't for everyone. It's not meant to make your music sound nice. It's meant to be a reference and show you EXACTLY what is on the recording - warts and all.

 

Also...those Yamaha piano samples aren't all that great...as you heard yourself. wink_face.gif I usually use run a low-pass filter when those are involved.


Edited by LFF - 2/22/13 at 11:35am
post #336 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFF View Post

I have received A LOT of complaints about graininess. One notable complaint I get OVER AND OVER again is from "Don't Know Why" from the Norah Jones album "Come Away With Me". 

The answer is complicated and simple at the same time. The reason it sounds grainy on some stuff is because it is actually present on the recording itself. I can verify them on my mastering set-up and have plenty of times. The follow up is usually the following...

Q: "But LFF, I heard this same recording on X headphones and couldn't hear it. I even played it on Y and Z and couldn't hear it either!? Z is a $2000 headphone and Y is electromajig $10,000 set up! What gives? It's definitely the Paradox!"

A: Correct! If you or I could hear it on X, Y or Z headphones, the Paradox would NOT exist. The Paradox is brutal when it comes to revealing flaws if you have it on a revealing, neutral chain. That's why I use it to restore music. That's why I use it to master. I have HUNDREDS on examples of tiny little noises that bug the F out of me that I couldn't hear before on most headphones but that really stand out with the Paradox. These aren't bad recordings and in fact, most are audiophile demo recordings. This is a major reason why I tell my customers that the Paradox isn't for everyone. It's not meant to make your music sound nice. It's meant to be a reference and show you EXACTLY what is on the recording - warts and all.

Also...those Yamaha piano samples aren't all that great...as you heard yourself. wink_face.gif I usually use run a low-pass filter when those are involved.

I can't remember the exact year, but this piano is from the early 90's. It's an upright acoustic with an option to put an electric board between the hammer and the strings to synthesize notes and listen to them through headphones or midi out instead of a mute pedal. I would be surprised if its samples were hi-fi.
post #337 of 744
Thread Starter 

So.. this is pretty cool.. Tyll's got a Reddit Q&A going.. about halfway down the thread:

 

 

 

Nice job, Luis!  Don't go all "corporate" on us when you blow up tongue_smile.gif.

post #338 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlySweep View Post

So.. this is pretty cool.. Tyll's got a Reddit Q&A going.. about halfway down the thread:

 

 

 

Nice job, Luis!  Don't go all "corporate" on us when you blow up tongue_smile.gif.

Thanks!

 

I do enjoy seeing someone sit down at my station and smiling when they listen to some music. I love it when they tell me "I've never heard that before!".

 

That's why I do what I do. biggrin.gif

post #339 of 744
Thread Starter 

Headfonia has done a solid review of the Paradox.. with some snazzy photos, too.

post #340 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlySweep View Post

Headfonia has done a solid review of the Paradox.. with some snazzy photos, too.

 

The last 2 lines has me really interested:

 

"And secondly, maybe LFF indeed does have something planned using a larger driver. ;) That’s all I can say at the moment…"

 

LFF, please elaborate on this!! I was just thinking about how the natural limitations of the T50RP driver prevent the Paradox from being truly incredible. It already sounds better than most headphones I've heard thanks to its tuning, but the T50RP will always have wooly bass to a degree...

post #341 of 744

removed


Edited by Cristello - 9/5/13 at 9:52am
post #342 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by temporaryname View Post

The last 2 lines has me really interested:

"And secondly, maybe LFF indeed does have something planned using a larger driver. icon_wink.gif That’s all I can say at the moment…"

LFF, please elaborate on this!! I was just thinking about how the natural limitations of the T50RP driver prevent the Paradox from being truly incredible. It already sounds better than most headphones I've heard thanks to its tuning, but the T50RP will always have wooly bass to a degree...

Of course this news had to come out the week after I finally decided to place an order for these... sigh.

Even if they come out to be more expensive and are still a few months away or so, If he's still aiming for the same goal of neutrality, I would've gladly waited a while longer... Oh well.

Anyways, considering LFF's Colonel Sanders approach to headphone modding, I doubt we're gonna get much more info on them until they're released tongue.gif
post #343 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by oblique63 View Post


Of course this news had to come out the week after I finally decided to place an order for these... sigh.

Even if they come out to be more expensive and are still a few months away or so, If he's still aiming for the same goal of neutrality, I would've gladly waited a while longer... Oh well.

Anyways, considering LFF's Colonel Sanders approach to headphone modding, I doubt we're gonna get much more info on them until they're released tongue.gif

 

Hey Luis, a few hints can lead to some very beneficial Paradox-awareness-raising hype. *nudge nudge*

post #344 of 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by temporaryname View Post

 

Hey Luis, a few hints can lead to some very beneficial Paradox-awareness-raising hype. *nudge nudge*

 

Paradox are remaining as is... blink.gif

 

No beta, zeta, pi versions....Paradox no. 1 is the same as the current one I am working on at the moment...over a year later.

 

I am working on completely different and NEW headphones that are COMPLIMENTARY to the Paradox. There are only three in existence at the moment. I have one proto-type, another head-fi member has one proto-type and the third one (first official one... (Secret Name) No. 1) is being modded to be sent to the guy who bought it and ordered it. Bigger driver with certain mods to make the soundsignature I like, Mini-XLR connectors, custom hand made housing...neutral sound with an open, airy sound signature that's ever so slightly on the bright side of things....That's all I'm saying at the moment....

post #345 of 744
Quote:

Originally Posted by LFF View Post
 

 

I am working on completely different and NEW headphones that are COMPLIMENTARY to the Paradox. There are only three in existence at the moment. I have one proto-type, another head-fi member has one proto-type and the third one (first official one... (Secret Name) No. 1) is being modded to be sent to the guy who bought it and ordered it. Bigger driver with certain mods to make the soundsignature I like, Mini-XLR connectors, custom hand made housing...neutral sound with an open, airy sound signature that's ever so slightly on the bright side of things....That's all I'm saying at the moment....

Hm, so something like a Paradox+HE-6+HD800 lovechild of sorts, maybe? Interesting...


P.S.: Totally unrelated, but while you're here -- what DAC would you recommend for under ~$800?  I've been looking into the resonessence concero or teac ud 501 recently, but I'm not sure about their neutrality/detail-retrieval; and I noticed you stick with a modest emu 0404 in your profile, so I was just curious, cause the I know the rme babyface is also a similarly good deal along those lines, but unsure as to where to go for a good dac in that price range...


Edited by oblique63 - 3/2/13 at 5:43pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › The T50RP Paradox | reviews, discussion, & mini-tour impressions (index in second post)