Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Upcoming Hifiman IEM's: RE-400 and RE-600
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Upcoming Hifiman IEM's: RE-400 and RE-600 - Page 20

post #286 of 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleblanc343 View Post
For those curious ones cool.gif

 

http://www.erji.net/read.php?tid=1335045&fpage=9&toread=&page=1

 

This is an "interesting" read but one must read between the lines of Google's translation wink.gif

As I understand it the reviewer likes the RE600 more than the AKG 3003 and describes them as well balanced, smooth sounding with a warm tone and especially great for vocal. Other words used are clean, transparent and high resolution. Sounds very pomising...

He also compares them to "EM customs", anybody knows which ones he means ?

post #287 of 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachgraz View Post

 

This is an "interesting" read but one must read between the lines of Google's translation wink.gif

As I understand it the reviewer likes the RE600 more than the AKG 3003 and describes them as well balanced, smooth sounding with a warm tone and especially great for vocal. Other words used are clean, transparent and high resolution. Sounds very pomising...

He also compares them to "EM customs", anybody knows which ones he means ?

Perhaps Earsonic EM customs.

post #288 of 830

I was talking about the RE 400's......Are they similar to 252........in a different shell?

 

RE 600s would be in a totally different class.....surely

post #289 of 830

Well maybe no one has heard both.......Re400 & 252.  Reason im asking this is by reading up on some of the reviews it kinda reminds me of them...Just wanted to be sure.

post #290 of 830

You do not to start moaning at people because they are not agreeing with your speculation of the RE-400 and RE-252 being the same thing. The 252 have not been available for a while so it is hard to compare them.

post #291 of 830

I'm not moaning at all about any speculation .....maybe 2 different things entirely for all i know?  But that is what I wanted to know....

 

Yes I do realize that 252's have been gone for awhile.....also......Very hard to compare if no one has heard them. 

 

Just got frustrated with no responses.........I thought being Hifiman IEM ...Surely someone who loves these had to have?

+++++plus too many Bourbons the other night didn't help either ...so sorry for my hissy fit.......A thousand apologies......

 

Carry on as per normal.....biggrin.gif

post #292 of 830

alright mate ;)

post #293 of 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zalithian View Post

Perhaps Earsonic EM customs.
He means the Ear Monitors of Future Sonics, which is mg6pro (or mg5pro)
post #294 of 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by maguire View Post

I'm not moaning at all about any speculation .....maybe 2 different things entirely for all i know?  But that is what I wanted to know....

 

Yes I do realize that 252's have been gone for awhile.....also......Very hard to compare if no one has heard them. 

 

Just got frustrated with no responses.........I thought being Hifiman IEM ...Surely someone who loves these had to have?

+++++plus too many Bourbons the other night didn't help either ...so sorry for my hissy fit.......A thousand apologies......

 

Carry on as per normal.....biggrin.gif

ClieOS would know if any.

He has a review unit of the RE 400 and probably still has the old RE 252-

post #295 of 830

RE252 and RE400 are not the same thing - that much I know. There have two different drivers. RE400's drivers are much smaller than that on RE252. Of course, they don't sound anything alike as well.

 

On a side note, RE252 and RE-ZERO are using the same transducers, if any of you are interested to know. HifiMan retuned RE252 for balanced audio and the end result is RE-ZERO.

post #296 of 830

I remember RE252 has really thin nozzles making them very comfortable in the ear canal, how big is the one on Re400? Looks like the same size as the RE0, RE262/272.

post #297 of 830

Sinquito.....How stupid of me.......Cleos......

 

Finally....Thanks Cleos.....I should have known better and asked you straight off ....lol.

 

So Re-Zero is the one thats 252 orientated.

 

Re400 then is quite different...

But from what I gathered reading I thought it had a typical Hifiman sound ....perhaps not as mid centric as 262 and not as crisp as my favourite...the 272.  Hence I thought ...Hey they may have brought back the 252 in a different shell.....remembering how wierd the that was...

Well Now I know for sure there different. The Drivers being smaller is interesting also, as i didnt know this.

 

Thanks for this Cleos, and good thinking Sinquito......

post #298 of 830

This should be a first: the final version of both RE400 (left) and RE600 (right)

 

RE600-03.jpg

 

For those who want a quick impression: RE600 (ptototype) is very close to RE400, but richer in detail, more upfront and musical though not as open in soundstage. I would think RE400 is closer (though not totally) to stage monitor tuning in a neutral way, while RE600 is more emotionally involved in comparison.

 

[UPDATE] After talking with Fang, apparently the RE600 I received is part of the prototype. His worker in China sent it out to me for sampling but forgot to mention it in the package while Fang is far away in Las Vegas (CES). The final version is still in tuning (so it won't be the same as the RE600 prototype I have now) and won't arrive until April or May. RE400 I received earlier is however the final version and is on sale now.


Edited by ClieOS - 1/29/13 at 8:43pm
post #299 of 830
I can agree with the re400 being a neutral/monitor sound. Unfortunatley I found it too polite. That combined with the soft note and small soundstage (both in width and height) made for a boring experience to me. I was hoping to hear about some of Fang's Hifiman magic in the re600. I'm left feeling underwhelmed.
post #300 of 830

I can understand your point.

 

I think both new models mark a change from the more 'traditional' HifiMan sound (which is always trying to achieve a certain tuning goal. i.e. RE0 and RE272 for reference curve, RE262 for a more euphonic mid, etc) to a more universal sound. A sound that isn't necessary tailor to a particular strength but can be appreciated by more people regardless of preference. In a way it does make them less 'surprising', or even boring to an extent. But I also see them as in the same situation UM3X used to be in - boring to many who have listened to W3 before, but might ultimately earns the upper hand in the long run. They are kind of belongs to the more enduring of sound.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Upcoming Hifiman IEM's: RE-400 and RE-600