Does the RE400 produce changes over some time (Burn-in) ?
Recent Images In This Thread
Related Forum Threads
- Head-Direct RE0 Appreciation Thread Last post on 11/19/13 at 1:31am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Wanted Heir 8A Last post on 9/27/13 at 2:46pm in Headphones for Sale / Trade
- D5000 equivalent IEMs Last post on 11/7/12 at 5:17pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- B&W C5 Question and Recommended IEMS for Rock Last post on 11/8/12 at 4:22pm in High-end Audio Forum
- Need help choosing an IEM Last post on 10/29/12 at 5:35pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide (In-Ear Headphones)
Last edited: 12/4/13
- 2013 Head-Fi Summer Buying Guide (Ultra-High-End Headphones...Last edited: 8/2/13
- 2013 Head-Fi Summer Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones)Last edited: 11/23/13
- Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And InformationLast edited: 5/7/10
- Basic Guide To In Ear CanalphonesLast edited: 3/22/12
Coming from Tascam US-144 to Audio GD .. Here is the story. A few years ago I discovered the magic world of listening to headphones. The reason for that is the ease of computer hifi. I...
I will first start by declaring that I'm no audiophile, and that this is just a review coming from an average consumer. I know a lot of you will facepalm by my review, but I will post it...
The CAL! 2 is a big improvement over the first version. Creative brands this as a "premium headphone" on the box, but is it? First thing I noticed was the soundstage. It's MUCH better than...
As nicely explained by Victor in his review of the same CIEM, this is the previous flagship model from FitEar. In fact, unless you are married to the emphasised bass of the MH335DW, this would...
First of all, I am not a audiofile with several pairs of $1,000 headphones. I am more of a casual listener but I do like good sound. This is also my first review on head-fi so give me some feedback...
Hifiman IEM's: RE-400 and RE-600 - Page 28post #406 of 20642/16/13 at 6:05pm
Gear mentioned in this thread:post #407 of 20642/16/13 at 7:06pmpost #408 of 20642/16/13 at 10:16pmI do like the RE-400s. Word of caution though: they are very unforgiving with bad recordings.
I am currently using them with the ALO Continental V3, Cypher Labs Solo (not the newer -dB).
I will see if I can post a review soon.post #409 of 20642/17/13 at 1:39am
you mention gr-10 in your signature
can you do a small comparison between re-400 and gr-10 ?post #410 of 20642/17/13 at 5:12amQuote:
I didn't find this to be the case for me at all. They are so overly polite. Nothing sounded harsh or bad. Just boring, to me; similarly to how I found the Rockit R50. In fact I'd say these would be a good all rounder for any type of music, quality or bitrate.post #411 of 20642/17/13 at 9:04am
My purchase history goes as following:
apple in ear
fischer audio dba 02
audio technica ck10
Each purchase has gotten better from the previous. Can anyone compare them to the RE 400? It would be very helpful. My RE 400 should arrive by next week but I always like to compare notes with other, more skilled users.post #412 of 20642/18/13 at 9:14am
My review of the RE-400 has been posted at my site, Musical Musings.
Quick sum up:
"The result is a tonally neutral, linear presentation that is absolutely phenomenal. Yeah, I know this sounds like hyperbole but it isn’t. It has certain seductive qualities that belie its true abilities, luring you in with its completely inoffensive sound signature and allowing the detail to sink in rather than shoving it in your face the way the Rock-It Sounds R-50 does. The RE-400 doesn’t try to impress with aggressive detailing or a presentation that errs on one side of neutral or another or emphasize one frequency range (mids, treble, bass) at the expense of the others. But, oddly enough, it’s because the RE-400 doesn’t try to sound great that it actually does. This is one of the few IEMs in my collection I’d truly say sounds “effortless”. It doesn’t try to sound as good as it does, it just…does."post #413 of 20642/18/13 at 10:11ampost #414 of 20642/19/13 at 7:31amQuote:Originally Posted by audiobot
My purchase history goes as following:
apple in ear
fischer audio dba 02
audio technica ck10
Each purchase has gotten better from the previous. Can anyone compare them to the RE 400? It would be very helpful. My RE 400 should arrive by next week but I always like to compare notes with other, more skilled users.
I can compare to DBA-02, which is the same as my Brainwavz B2, which I will mark as (A) vs Hifiman RE-400 (B).
Brainwavz B2/Fischer Audio DBA-02 Hifiman RE-400 Deep fit for best sound Shallow fit for best sound Bent nozzle means only one type of wear is comfortable (over-the-ear for me) Straight nozzle allows for comfortable wear over the ear and straight down Small shell Small shell Cable doesn't harden Cable might harden V-shaped with some focus on highs Neutral, balanced sound Has some midbass boost (3 dB, 200 Hz central, wide) (Maybe?) Has some low bass boost? Low end rolloff starts at 70 Hz, gentle (3 dB/oct) Low end rolloff starts maybe at 35 Hz, gentle (4 dB/oct?) Medium speed bass Fast bass Smoothened bass Neutral bass smoothness Medium-low bass impact High bass impact Midrange cut (800-2kHz, central 1 kHz, 5 dB) Neutral midrange Midrange sounds slightly recessed. Midrange sounds balanced Highs sound presence-boosted, shimmering. May exaggerate sibilance if present. Highs sound sometimes slightly crunchy. (a'la electric guitar) Highs boost in presence region, (5-10kHz central 6.5 kHz, 6+ dB)
No highs boost
No upper end shelf. Slight upper end shelf (2 dB?) Upper end rolloff starts at 15.5 kHz, steep No upper end rolloff. (19kHz+) Medium decay in bass Medium/fast decay in bass Fast decay in mids Medium decay in mids Fast decay in highs Medium/long decay in highs Sounds dampened (a'la highly foam dampened room) Sounds bit reverberated (a'la plate reverb/concrete walls) No bass bleed No bass bleed Somewhat flattened soundstage Correct soundstage depth Good soundstage height rendition Excellent soundstage height rendition Slightly wider soundstage than perfect Slightly narrower soundstage than perfect Small center hole in left/right soundstaging Perfect smoothness in left/right soundstaging Slightly inversely arced soundstage (edges further than center) "Linear" soundstage "Surround" effect causes front/back confusion if highs are present "Surround" effect only widens soundstage Gets cold sounding when loud (odd order harmonic distortion) Gets super-reverberant when loud (decay gets longer) Gets more neutral with high output impedance amps Output impedance does not affect sound
Medium-high sensitivity for IEMs
(110 dB/mW, 40 Ohm)
Medium-low sensitivity for IEMs
(102 dB/mW, 32 Ohm)
High isolation (~22 dB) Medium isolation (~15 dB)
Edited by AstralStorm - 2/19/13 at 4:14pmpost #415 of 20642/19/13 at 11:31ampost #416 of 20642/19/13 at 11:41ampost #417 of 20642/19/13 at 3:15pm
Just ordered the RE-400! Very curious! I found myself without a quality pair of iems; its been a while since getting into over ear headphones and trying to build a good portable set up. In the end of the day, a good iem is just so convenient when you're out and about. Everyone seems to be saying this is the bang for your buck iem now, so we'll see. I expect good things though!post #418 of 20642/19/13 at 4:09pm
Difference table of RE-ZERO vs RE-400:
Hifiman RE-ZERO Hifiman RE-400 Bit nasal tonality (5k bump), too forward mids Neutral tonality, mids neither forward nor recessed Shimmer cut (8.5k null) Neutral shimmer Much more pronounced highest end shelf
Very slight if any high end shelf Slow highest end rolloff
(17kHz; better than B2, similar to GR07)
No highest end roll off
(can hear up to 19.5k)
Somewhat gritty feel to the sound
Smooth sound with only a hint of extra crunch or midbass boost Very long mids reverberation Less reverberation in mids, more in highs Very solid bass impact Slightly softer bass impact, but felt more Definitely rolled-off subbass, a bit wide-band boosted bass (2 dB) No apparent subbass rolloff, perhaps even a neglible low bass boost Best performance only with aftermarket tips
(hard to get Fostex elliptic single flange for me)
Best performance with stock large biflange (crunch & reverb) or Comply Ts400 (midbass, non-reverbed, analytic) Medium depth insertion (reference plane?), "just" achievable with single flanges Shallow insertion (-3 mm?); deeper cuts highs, upper mids and boosts midbass a tiny bit Somewhat uneven decay Very even, smooth decay Trapezoid soundstage (sides noticeably closer to head) with slight hole in the middle Linear soundstage, superbly coherent Decent soundstage height rendition Very good soundstage height rendition Uneven soundstage depth rendition - "in the face" vocals, bass sometimes in-head Very good soundstageome depth rendition Definitely hardened cable Probably the same cable at the top Flat wide minijack (not exactly Macbook friendly) Tapered minijack Balanced cable with adaptor Normal unbalanced wiring Does not work that well with Comply T400/Ts400 in any form
Reduced "nasal" feeling, grittiness, and reverberation, but also much reduced bass impact and subbass amount
Works extremely well w/ Comply Ts400 normally mounted - faster bass impact, notably less reverb (almost like B2 anechoic room), no extra crunch, wider soundstage, warmer?, superbly extended subbass
Generally way more analytic (not brighter!), but warmer
Not too sensitive wrt insertion depth, but picky about tips Not picky about tips, but instead about insertion depth Medium-high sensitivity for an IEM
(100 dB/mW, 16 Ohm)
Generally half (-3 dB) as loud (102 dB/mW, 32 Ohm)
Note: corrected sensitivity value, all actually were at dB/mW @ 1kHz.
Edited by AstralStorm - 2/19/13 at 4:51pmpost #419 of 20642/20/13 at 6:50pm
Hmmm.... Considering it..... I'm in the market for an IEM to 'downgrade' so to speak from my FXZ200s which I'll be posting in the FS Foprum shortly after I figure out which IEM wil replace them.
Does anyone have any comments between the RE-400 and the FXZ200? I know they're two diffferent beats and price range but SQ wise, what are the differences?Return HomeBack to Forum: Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Hifiman IEM's: RE-400 and RE-600
Gear mentioned in this thread:
- 2013 Head-Fi Summer Buying Guide (Ultra-High-End Headphones...
- › Senn CX 300 II or Soundmagic E10 or some other in this budget ? 34 seconds ago
- › New JH Audio flagship! "Siren Series Roxanne" 38 seconds ago
- › Creative ZxR with external amp or all-in-one system? 1 minute ago
- › The Beyerdynamic DT880 Appreciation / Discussion thread 1 minute ago
- › Android-fi! 1 minute ago
- › The (new) HD800 Appreciation Thread 2 minutes ago
- › New Headphone Stand 2 minutes ago
- › Best classical recordings...ever! 2 minutes ago
- › All-round Headphones for Indoor use <US$100 2 minutes ago
- › Is there a cheapere alternative to B&W MM-1 Speakers? 3 minutes ago
- › Audio-gd Master 9 Preamp & Headphone amp by staalf
- › Sennheiser Momentum by commodent
- › Creative Aurvana Live! 2 Headset with 40mm Drivers and In-Line Mic... by Quaresma
- › FitEar Private C435 Custom In-Ear Monitors by Kiats
- › Monster iSport LIVESTRONG® In-Ear Headphones by Bassbanger101
- › Sennheiser HD 560 Ovation by Beeferer
- › Philips S2BK/28 Fidelio In-Ear Headsets by Antilochos
- › VSONIC VSD1S by IEMagnet01
- › Bowers & Wilkins P7 by eightbitpotion
- › NuForce Icon uDAC-2 (Black) USB DAC (24bit/96kHz) and Headphone... by jshaffe
- › Headphone-to-Speaker-Amp Interface With... by robrob
- › Headphone Resistor Network Calculator by robrob
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide by jude
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide (Introduction) by jude
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide (Over-Ear... by skehoe
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide (In-Ear... by warrenpchi
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide (Desktop Amps... by warrenpchi
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide (Portable... by warrenpchi
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide... by joe
- › 2013 Head-Fi Winter Gift Guide (Desktop &... by warrenpchi